Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in three randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party

Radiation myelopathy (RM) is an uncommon but serious late effect of thoracic radiotherapy (RT), which oncologists try to avoid by careful planning and dose selection. Five patients with RM are described from among 1048 with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with palliative RT in three ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 1996, Vol.8 (3), p.176
Hauptverfasser: Macbeth, F R, Wheldon, T E, Girling, D J, Stephens, R J, Machin, D, Bleehen, N M, Lamont, A, Radstone, D J, Reed, N S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 176
container_title Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
container_volume 8
creator Macbeth, F R
Wheldon, T E
Girling, D J
Stephens, R J
Machin, D
Bleehen, N M
Lamont, A
Radstone, D J
Reed, N S
description Radiation myelopathy (RM) is an uncommon but serious late effect of thoracic radiotherapy (RT), which oncologists try to avoid by careful planning and dose selection. Five patients with RM are described from among 1048 with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with palliative RT in three randomized trials conducted by the Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Seven RT regimens were used in these trials: 10 Gy in a single fraction on one day (10/1/1) (114 patients), 17/2/8 (524 patients), 27/6/11 (47 patients), 30/6/11 (36 patients), 30/10/12 (88 patients), 36/12/16 (86 patients) and 39/13/17 (153 patients). Of the five instances of RM, three occurred in the 524 patients treated with 17 Gy in two fractions, and two in the 153 treated with 39 Gy in 13 fractions. The estimated cumulative risks of RM by 2 years were 2.2% for the 17 Gy group, 2.5% for the 39 Gy group, and 0% for the remainder, but the annual risks had wide 95% confidence intervals, indicating that the distribution of episodes among the seven regimens could have been random. Nevertheless, calculation of cord doses in terms of the total doses that would have an equivalent biological effect if given in 2 Gy fractions (LQED2 values) from our data for different values of the ratio of the linear quadratic parameters of the cell survival curve (alpha/beta), suggest that the best estimate of alpha/beta is less than 3 Gy, and possibly close to 2 Gy. This emphasizes the sensitivity of human spinal cord to changes in fraction size. We recommend that, when the computed LQED2 for a schedule of treatment that includes the thoracic spinal cord (assuming alpha/beta = 2 for cord) exceeds 48 Gy, oncologists should consider reducing the dose to the cord.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_8814372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8814372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p532-2a8d3036dff83a23c08f6d113872c0fa3ff16612d24bf278c984c3b202d454b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhbMAlVI4AtJcIMixk9RlhyL-pCJQVYll5dhjYprYke0ihftxL5LSzYzmzTdvpHeWzMmKlWlZFMVFchnCFyGEcr6aJTPOs5wt6Tz53QhlRDTOQjdg63oRm-EOMETTiYgBnAZvwh6MhYzkHEbAoI1hEmLjEcELq1xnflBB9Ea0x5tetO3k-z3tlXGxQS_6AbTzYJ1NQzcCIHEs7cF-ghRWor-FbYPwispI0cIGAwovG6jcwUrTwnoiqyMJH87vzTi-Cx-Hq-Rcj4_x-tQXyfbxYVs9p-u3p5fqfp32BaMpFVwxwkqlNWeCMkm4LlWWMb6kkmjBtM7KMqOK5rWmSy5XPJespoSqvMjrgi2Sm3_b_lB3qHa9H0Pyw-6UJvsD5W5zeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in three randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Macbeth, F R ; Wheldon, T E ; Girling, D J ; Stephens, R J ; Machin, D ; Bleehen, N M ; Lamont, A ; Radstone, D J ; Reed, N S</creator><creatorcontrib>Macbeth, F R ; Wheldon, T E ; Girling, D J ; Stephens, R J ; Machin, D ; Bleehen, N M ; Lamont, A ; Radstone, D J ; Reed, N S</creatorcontrib><description>Radiation myelopathy (RM) is an uncommon but serious late effect of thoracic radiotherapy (RT), which oncologists try to avoid by careful planning and dose selection. Five patients with RM are described from among 1048 with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with palliative RT in three randomized trials conducted by the Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Seven RT regimens were used in these trials: 10 Gy in a single fraction on one day (10/1/1) (114 patients), 17/2/8 (524 patients), 27/6/11 (47 patients), 30/6/11 (36 patients), 30/10/12 (88 patients), 36/12/16 (86 patients) and 39/13/17 (153 patients). Of the five instances of RM, three occurred in the 524 patients treated with 17 Gy in two fractions, and two in the 153 treated with 39 Gy in 13 fractions. The estimated cumulative risks of RM by 2 years were 2.2% for the 17 Gy group, 2.5% for the 39 Gy group, and 0% for the remainder, but the annual risks had wide 95% confidence intervals, indicating that the distribution of episodes among the seven regimens could have been random. Nevertheless, calculation of cord doses in terms of the total doses that would have an equivalent biological effect if given in 2 Gy fractions (LQED2 values) from our data for different values of the ratio of the linear quadratic parameters of the cell survival curve (alpha/beta), suggest that the best estimate of alpha/beta is less than 3 Gy, and possibly close to 2 Gy. This emphasizes the sensitivity of human spinal cord to changes in fraction size. We recommend that, when the computed LQED2 for a schedule of treatment that includes the thoracic spinal cord (assuming alpha/beta = 2 for cord) exceeds 48 Gy, oncologists should consider reducing the dose to the cord.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6555</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8814372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy ; Cell Survival ; Clinical Protocols ; Confidence Intervals ; Female ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Palliative Care ; Patient Care Planning ; Radiation Injuries - etiology ; Radiation Tolerance ; Radiotherapy - adverse effects ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Relative Biological Effectiveness ; Risk Factors ; Spinal Cord - radiation effects ; Spinal Cord Diseases - etiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 1996, Vol.8 (3), p.176</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8814372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macbeth, F R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheldon, T E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girling, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machin, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleehen, N M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radstone, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, N S</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in three randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party</title><title>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</title><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><description>Radiation myelopathy (RM) is an uncommon but serious late effect of thoracic radiotherapy (RT), which oncologists try to avoid by careful planning and dose selection. Five patients with RM are described from among 1048 with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with palliative RT in three randomized trials conducted by the Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Seven RT regimens were used in these trials: 10 Gy in a single fraction on one day (10/1/1) (114 patients), 17/2/8 (524 patients), 27/6/11 (47 patients), 30/6/11 (36 patients), 30/10/12 (88 patients), 36/12/16 (86 patients) and 39/13/17 (153 patients). Of the five instances of RM, three occurred in the 524 patients treated with 17 Gy in two fractions, and two in the 153 treated with 39 Gy in 13 fractions. The estimated cumulative risks of RM by 2 years were 2.2% for the 17 Gy group, 2.5% for the 39 Gy group, and 0% for the remainder, but the annual risks had wide 95% confidence intervals, indicating that the distribution of episodes among the seven regimens could have been random. Nevertheless, calculation of cord doses in terms of the total doses that would have an equivalent biological effect if given in 2 Gy fractions (LQED2 values) from our data for different values of the ratio of the linear quadratic parameters of the cell survival curve (alpha/beta), suggest that the best estimate of alpha/beta is less than 3 Gy, and possibly close to 2 Gy. This emphasizes the sensitivity of human spinal cord to changes in fraction size. We recommend that, when the computed LQED2 for a schedule of treatment that includes the thoracic spinal cord (assuming alpha/beta = 2 for cord) exceeds 48 Gy, oncologists should consider reducing the dose to the cord.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Radiation Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Radiation Tolerance</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Relative Biological Effectiveness</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - radiation effects</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Diseases - etiology</subject><issn>0936-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1OwzAQhbMAlVI4AtJcIMixk9RlhyL-pCJQVYll5dhjYprYke0ihftxL5LSzYzmzTdvpHeWzMmKlWlZFMVFchnCFyGEcr6aJTPOs5wt6Tz53QhlRDTOQjdg63oRm-EOMETTiYgBnAZvwh6MhYzkHEbAoI1hEmLjEcELq1xnflBB9Ea0x5tetO3k-z3tlXGxQS_6AbTzYJ1NQzcCIHEs7cF-ghRWor-FbYPwispI0cIGAwovG6jcwUrTwnoiqyMJH87vzTi-Cx-Hq-Rcj4_x-tQXyfbxYVs9p-u3p5fqfp32BaMpFVwxwkqlNWeCMkm4LlWWMb6kkmjBtM7KMqOK5rWmSy5XPJespoSqvMjrgi2Sm3_b_lB3qHa9H0Pyw-6UJvsD5W5zeg</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>Macbeth, F R</creator><creator>Wheldon, T E</creator><creator>Girling, D J</creator><creator>Stephens, R J</creator><creator>Machin, D</creator><creator>Bleehen, N M</creator><creator>Lamont, A</creator><creator>Radstone, D J</creator><creator>Reed, N S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in three randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party</title><author>Macbeth, F R ; Wheldon, T E ; Girling, D J ; Stephens, R J ; Machin, D ; Bleehen, N M ; Lamont, A ; Radstone, D J ; Reed, N S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p532-2a8d3036dff83a23c08f6d113872c0fa3ff16612d24bf278c984c3b202d454b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Radiation Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Radiation Tolerance</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Relative Biological Effectiveness</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - radiation effects</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Diseases - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macbeth, F R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheldon, T E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girling, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machin, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleehen, N M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamont, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radstone, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, N S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macbeth, F R</au><au>Wheldon, T E</au><au>Girling, D J</au><au>Stephens, R J</au><au>Machin, D</au><au>Bleehen, N M</au><au>Lamont, A</au><au>Radstone, D J</au><au>Reed, N S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in three randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>176</spage><pages>176-</pages><issn>0936-6555</issn><abstract>Radiation myelopathy (RM) is an uncommon but serious late effect of thoracic radiotherapy (RT), which oncologists try to avoid by careful planning and dose selection. Five patients with RM are described from among 1048 with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated with palliative RT in three randomized trials conducted by the Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Seven RT regimens were used in these trials: 10 Gy in a single fraction on one day (10/1/1) (114 patients), 17/2/8 (524 patients), 27/6/11 (47 patients), 30/6/11 (36 patients), 30/10/12 (88 patients), 36/12/16 (86 patients) and 39/13/17 (153 patients). Of the five instances of RM, three occurred in the 524 patients treated with 17 Gy in two fractions, and two in the 153 treated with 39 Gy in 13 fractions. The estimated cumulative risks of RM by 2 years were 2.2% for the 17 Gy group, 2.5% for the 39 Gy group, and 0% for the remainder, but the annual risks had wide 95% confidence intervals, indicating that the distribution of episodes among the seven regimens could have been random. Nevertheless, calculation of cord doses in terms of the total doses that would have an equivalent biological effect if given in 2 Gy fractions (LQED2 values) from our data for different values of the ratio of the linear quadratic parameters of the cell survival curve (alpha/beta), suggest that the best estimate of alpha/beta is less than 3 Gy, and possibly close to 2 Gy. This emphasizes the sensitivity of human spinal cord to changes in fraction size. We recommend that, when the computed LQED2 for a schedule of treatment that includes the thoracic spinal cord (assuming alpha/beta = 2 for cord) exceeds 48 Gy, oncologists should consider reducing the dose to the cord.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>8814372</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6555
ispartof Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 1996, Vol.8 (3), p.176
issn 0936-6555
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_8814372
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy
Cell Survival
Clinical Protocols
Confidence Intervals
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Male
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Palliative Care
Patient Care Planning
Radiation Injuries - etiology
Radiation Tolerance
Radiotherapy - adverse effects
Radiotherapy Dosage
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Relative Biological Effectiveness
Risk Factors
Spinal Cord - radiation effects
Spinal Cord Diseases - etiology
title Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in three randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A51%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20myelopathy:%20estimates%20of%20risk%20in%201048%20patients%20in%20three%20randomized%20trials%20of%20palliative%20radiotherapy%20for%20non-small%20cell%20lung%20cancer.%20The%20Medical%20Research%20Council%20Lung%20Cancer%20Working%20Party&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oncology%20(Royal%20College%20of%20Radiologists%20(Great%20Britain))&rft.au=Macbeth,%20F%20R&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=176&rft.pages=176-&rft.issn=0936-6555&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E8814372%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8814372&rfr_iscdi=true