Comparison of Radiological Measurement and Actual Size of Ureteral Calculi
100 ureteral calculi were measured on X-ray films and directly on the stone after passage or removal. The largest diameters were compared. The size of the stone was radiologically overestimated for 59 stones, correct for 26 and underestimated for 15. 73 of the stones were radiologically measured wit...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology 1978, Vol.12 (2), p.155-156 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 156 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 155 |
| container_title | Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Otnes, B. Sandnes, H. |
| description | 100 ureteral calculi were measured on X-ray films and directly on the stone after passage or removal. The largest diameters were compared. The size of the stone was radiologically overestimated for 59 stones, correct for 26 and underestimated for 15. 73 of the stones were radiologically measured within ±25% of the actual size. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3109/00365597809179984 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_694440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>74188584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-1db2459f41c1f67fc3868a38040f10e50027211641eac5b7dd5fcf97fb13b3603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYP4Gh8_QHDRlbvqvdMkbdDNMPhEEdRZlzRNNJI2Y9Ii-uvtMIMgoqsL53zncDmEHCAcZwjiBCDjjIm8AIG5EAVdIyPkDNMxcLZORgs_HQCxTXZifAWAMUe-RTa5oJTCiNxMfTOXwUbfJt4kD7K23vlnq6RL7rSMfdCNbrtEtnUyUV0_yI_2Uy_YWdCdDoMwlU71zu6RDSNd1Puru0tmF-dP06v09v7yejq5TRUF6FKsqzFlwlBUaHhuVFbwQmYFUDAImg0v5mNETlFLxaq8rplRRuSmwqzKOGS75GjZOw_-rdexKxsblXZOttr3scwpFgUr6ADiElTBxxi0KefBNjJ8lAjlYr7y13xD5nBV3leNrr8Ty70G-2xp29b40Mh3H1xddvLD-WCCbJWNi-a_209_xF-0dN2LkkGXr74P7TDbP799ASEAjvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>74188584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Radiological Measurement and Actual Size of Ureteral Calculi</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Otnes, B. ; Sandnes, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Otnes, B. ; Sandnes, H.</creatorcontrib><description>100 ureteral calculi were measured on X-ray films and directly on the stone after passage or removal. The largest diameters were compared. The size of the stone was radiologically overestimated for 59 stones, correct for 26 and underestimated for 15. 73 of the stones were radiologically measured within ±25% of the actual size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-5599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2065</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/00365597809179984</identifier><identifier>PMID: 694440</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging ; Urography - standards</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 1978, Vol.12 (2), p.155-156</ispartof><rights>1978 Informa UK Ltd 1978</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-1db2459f41c1f67fc3868a38040f10e50027211641eac5b7dd5fcf97fb13b3603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00365597809179984$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/00365597809179984$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904,59624,59730,60413,60519,61198,61233,61379,61414</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/694440$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Otnes, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandnes, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Radiological Measurement and Actual Size of Ureteral Calculi</title><title>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Scand J Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>100 ureteral calculi were measured on X-ray films and directly on the stone after passage or removal. The largest diameters were compared. The size of the stone was radiologically overestimated for 59 stones, correct for 26 and underestimated for 15. 73 of the stones were radiologically measured within ±25% of the actual size.</description><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Urography - standards</subject><issn>0036-5599</issn><issn>1651-2065</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYP4Gh8_QHDRlbvqvdMkbdDNMPhEEdRZlzRNNJI2Y9Ii-uvtMIMgoqsL53zncDmEHCAcZwjiBCDjjIm8AIG5EAVdIyPkDNMxcLZORgs_HQCxTXZifAWAMUe-RTa5oJTCiNxMfTOXwUbfJt4kD7K23vlnq6RL7rSMfdCNbrtEtnUyUV0_yI_2Uy_YWdCdDoMwlU71zu6RDSNd1Puru0tmF-dP06v09v7yejq5TRUF6FKsqzFlwlBUaHhuVFbwQmYFUDAImg0v5mNETlFLxaq8rplRRuSmwqzKOGS75GjZOw_-rdexKxsblXZOttr3scwpFgUr6ADiElTBxxi0KefBNjJ8lAjlYr7y13xD5nBV3leNrr8Ty70G-2xp29b40Mh3H1xddvLD-WCCbJWNi-a_209_xF-0dN2LkkGXr74P7TDbP799ASEAjvg</recordid><startdate>1978</startdate><enddate>1978</enddate><creator>Otnes, B.</creator><creator>Sandnes, H.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1978</creationdate><title>Comparison of Radiological Measurement and Actual Size of Ureteral Calculi</title><author>Otnes, B. ; Sandnes, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-1db2459f41c1f67fc3868a38040f10e50027211641eac5b7dd5fcf97fb13b3603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Urography - standards</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Otnes, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandnes, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Otnes, B.</au><au>Sandnes, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Radiological Measurement and Actual Size of Ureteral Calculi</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Urol Nephrol</addtitle><date>1978</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>155-156</pages><issn>0036-5599</issn><eissn>1651-2065</eissn><abstract>100 ureteral calculi were measured on X-ray films and directly on the stone after passage or removal. The largest diameters were compared. The size of the stone was radiologically overestimated for 59 stones, correct for 26 and underestimated for 15. 73 of the stones were radiologically measured within ±25% of the actual size.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>694440</pmid><doi>10.3109/00365597809179984</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0036-5599 |
| ispartof | Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology, 1978, Vol.12 (2), p.155-156 |
| issn | 0036-5599 1651-2065 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_694440 |
| source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN |
| subjects | Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging Urography - standards |
| title | Comparison of Radiological Measurement and Actual Size of Ureteral Calculi |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Radiological%20Measurement%20and%20Actual%20Size%20of%20Ureteral%20Calculi&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=Otnes,%20B.&rft.date=1978&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=155-156&rft.issn=0036-5599&rft.eissn=1651-2065&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/00365597809179984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E74188584%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=74188584&rft_id=info:pmid/694440&rfr_iscdi=true |