Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response

T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were classified as different cell types...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 1983-11, Vol.50 (5), p.1197-1219
Hauptverfasser: Berger, T. W, Rinaldi, P. C, Weisz, D. J, Thompson, R. F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1219
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1197
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 50
creator Berger, T. W
Rinaldi, P. C
Weisz, D. J
Thompson, R. F
description T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation (i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation. Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus. Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells. theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition, two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells. Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_6644367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13748091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ef514fd3c86483f0128d2bd34bdb11e7159ac88376dd0c473baeccbd28ac80bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtv3CAYRFWjdLPtD-ihEoeqOXkDxhh8rKK-pEg9ND0jnrusbHABK9pLfnuxdpUeewLNzDffYwB4j9EOY9reHcMOD5zsKNrRigzsFdhUvG0wHfhrsEGo_gli7A24yfmIEGIUtdfguu-7jvRsA55_-bAfbbMEX6AMcjxln2F00HjnbLKhwIOf56jlNMsRajuOsJxmm6FZUi2FepQ5e71yMRhffAwrXB2SVKqaBq-LL7Ks6GQnlWSwMNk8x5DtW3Dl5Jjtu8u7Bb-_fnm8_948_Pz24_7zQ6MJ56WxjuLOGaJ533HiEG65aZUhnTIKY8vqulJzTlhvDNIdI0parZVpeYWRUmQLPp195xT_LDYXMfm8LlOHiUsWvN6I9oT9V4gJ6zgacBXis1CnmHOyTszJTzKdBEZiDUccg1jDERQJKtZwas2Hi_miJmteKi5pVP7jhZe5XtTVU2mfX2QDGdq2Om7B7Vl28PvDk09WzIcaWxzj_rR2_dfwLzOWqQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13748091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berger, T. W ; Rinaldi, P. C ; Weisz, D. J ; Thompson, R. F</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, T. W ; Rinaldi, P. C ; Weisz, D. J ; Thompson, R. F</creatorcontrib><description>T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation (i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation. Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus. Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells. theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition, two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells. Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the noncollidable neurons represent a subpopulation of pyramidal cells that do not project an axon via the fornix but project, instead, to other limbic cortical regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6644367</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JONEA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning, Classical - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hippocampus - cytology ; Hippocampus - physiology ; Learning. Memory ; Neurons - physiology ; Nictitating Membrane - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Rabbits</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 1983-11, Vol.50 (5), p.1197-1219</ispartof><rights>1984 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ef514fd3c86483f0128d2bd34bdb11e7159ac88376dd0c473baeccbd28ac80bb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=9392298$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6644367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, P. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisz, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. F</creatorcontrib><title>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation (i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation. Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus. Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells. theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition, two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells. Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the noncollidable neurons represent a subpopulation of pyramidal cells that do not project an axon via the fornix but project, instead, to other limbic cortical regions.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hippocampus - cytology</subject><subject>Hippocampus - physiology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Nictitating Membrane - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUUtv3CAYRFWjdLPtD-ihEoeqOXkDxhh8rKK-pEg9ND0jnrusbHABK9pLfnuxdpUeewLNzDffYwB4j9EOY9reHcMOD5zsKNrRigzsFdhUvG0wHfhrsEGo_gli7A24yfmIEGIUtdfguu-7jvRsA55_-bAfbbMEX6AMcjxln2F00HjnbLKhwIOf56jlNMsRajuOsJxmm6FZUi2FepQ5e71yMRhffAwrXB2SVKqaBq-LL7Ks6GQnlWSwMNk8x5DtW3Dl5Jjtu8u7Bb-_fnm8_948_Pz24_7zQ6MJ56WxjuLOGaJ533HiEG65aZUhnTIKY8vqulJzTlhvDNIdI0parZVpeYWRUmQLPp195xT_LDYXMfm8LlOHiUsWvN6I9oT9V4gJ6zgacBXis1CnmHOyTszJTzKdBEZiDUccg1jDERQJKtZwas2Hi_miJmteKi5pVP7jhZe5XtTVU2mfX2QDGdq2Om7B7Vl28PvDk09WzIcaWxzj_rR2_dfwLzOWqQw</recordid><startdate>198311</startdate><enddate>198311</enddate><creator>Berger, T. W</creator><creator>Rinaldi, P. C</creator><creator>Weisz, D. J</creator><creator>Thompson, R. F</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198311</creationdate><title>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</title><author>Berger, T. W ; Rinaldi, P. C ; Weisz, D. J ; Thompson, R. F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ef514fd3c86483f0128d2bd34bdb11e7159ac88376dd0c473baeccbd28ac80bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hippocampus - cytology</topic><topic>Hippocampus - physiology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Nictitating Membrane - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, P. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisz, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, T. W</au><au>Rinaldi, P. C</au><au>Weisz, D. J</au><au>Thompson, R. F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>1983-11</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1197</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1197-1219</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><coden>JONEA4</coden><abstract>T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation (i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation. Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus. Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells. theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition, two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells. Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the noncollidable neurons represent a subpopulation of pyramidal cells that do not project an axon via the fornix but project, instead, to other limbic cortical regions.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>6644367</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 1983-11, Vol.50 (5), p.1197-1219
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_6644367
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Conditioning, Classical - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hippocampus - cytology
Hippocampus - physiology
Learning. Memory
Neurons - physiology
Nictitating Membrane - physiology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Rabbits
title Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-unit%20analysis%20of%20different%20hippocampal%20cell%20types%20during%20classical%20conditioning%20of%20rabbit%20nictitating%20membrane%20response&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Berger,%20T.%20W&rft.date=1983-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1197&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1197-1219&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.coden=JONEA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E13748091%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13748091&rft_id=info:pmid/6644367&rfr_iscdi=true