Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response
T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3 regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were classified as different cell types...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 1983-11, Vol.50 (5), p.1197-1219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1197 |
container_title | Journal of neurophysiology |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Berger, T. W Rinaldi, P. C Weisz, D. J Thompson, R. F |
description | T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson
Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3
regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical
conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were
classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation
(i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing
characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal
neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually
over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal
cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within
conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates
strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In
contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given
unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS
and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation.
Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described
what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which
correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus.
Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses
during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells.
theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic
bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition,
two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of
theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while
displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing
frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In
addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded
in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type
was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant
latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of
such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action
potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing
characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells.
Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same
learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_6644367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>13748091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ef514fd3c86483f0128d2bd34bdb11e7159ac88376dd0c473baeccbd28ac80bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtv3CAYRFWjdLPtD-ihEoeqOXkDxhh8rKK-pEg9ND0jnrusbHABK9pLfnuxdpUeewLNzDffYwB4j9EOY9reHcMOD5zsKNrRigzsFdhUvG0wHfhrsEGo_gli7A24yfmIEGIUtdfguu-7jvRsA55_-bAfbbMEX6AMcjxln2F00HjnbLKhwIOf56jlNMsRajuOsJxmm6FZUi2FepQ5e71yMRhffAwrXB2SVKqaBq-LL7Ks6GQnlWSwMNk8x5DtW3Dl5Jjtu8u7Bb-_fnm8_948_Pz24_7zQ6MJ56WxjuLOGaJ533HiEG65aZUhnTIKY8vqulJzTlhvDNIdI0parZVpeYWRUmQLPp195xT_LDYXMfm8LlOHiUsWvN6I9oT9V4gJ6zgacBXis1CnmHOyTszJTzKdBEZiDUccg1jDERQJKtZwas2Hi_miJmteKi5pVP7jhZe5XtTVU2mfX2QDGdq2Om7B7Vl28PvDk09WzIcaWxzj_rR2_dfwLzOWqQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13748091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berger, T. W ; Rinaldi, P. C ; Weisz, D. J ; Thompson, R. F</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, T. W ; Rinaldi, P. C ; Weisz, D. J ; Thompson, R. F</creatorcontrib><description>T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson
Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3
regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical
conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were
classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation
(i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing
characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal
neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually
over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal
cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within
conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates
strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In
contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given
unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS
and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation.
Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described
what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which
correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus.
Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses
during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells.
theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic
bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition,
two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of
theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while
displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing
frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In
addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded
in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type
was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant
latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of
such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action
potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing
characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells.
Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same
learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the
noncollidable neurons represent a subpopulation of pyramidal cells that do
not project an axon via the fornix but project, instead, to other limbic
cortical regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 6644367</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JONEA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Am Phys Soc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conditioning, Classical - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hippocampus - cytology ; Hippocampus - physiology ; Learning. Memory ; Neurons - physiology ; Nictitating Membrane - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Rabbits</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 1983-11, Vol.50 (5), p.1197-1219</ispartof><rights>1984 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ef514fd3c86483f0128d2bd34bdb11e7159ac88376dd0c473baeccbd28ac80bb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9392298$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6644367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, P. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisz, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. F</creatorcontrib><title>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson
Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3
regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical
conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were
classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation
(i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing
characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal
neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually
over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal
cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within
conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates
strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In
contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given
unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS
and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation.
Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described
what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which
correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus.
Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses
during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells.
theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic
bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition,
two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of
theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while
displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing
frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In
addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded
in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type
was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant
latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of
such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action
potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing
characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells.
Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same
learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the
noncollidable neurons represent a subpopulation of pyramidal cells that do
not project an axon via the fornix but project, instead, to other limbic
cortical regions.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hippocampus - cytology</subject><subject>Hippocampus - physiology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Neurons - physiology</subject><subject>Nictitating Membrane - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUUtv3CAYRFWjdLPtD-ihEoeqOXkDxhh8rKK-pEg9ND0jnrusbHABK9pLfnuxdpUeewLNzDffYwB4j9EOY9reHcMOD5zsKNrRigzsFdhUvG0wHfhrsEGo_gli7A24yfmIEGIUtdfguu-7jvRsA55_-bAfbbMEX6AMcjxln2F00HjnbLKhwIOf56jlNMsRajuOsJxmm6FZUi2FepQ5e71yMRhffAwrXB2SVKqaBq-LL7Ks6GQnlWSwMNk8x5DtW3Dl5Jjtu8u7Bb-_fnm8_948_Pz24_7zQ6MJ56WxjuLOGaJ533HiEG65aZUhnTIKY8vqulJzTlhvDNIdI0parZVpeYWRUmQLPp195xT_LDYXMfm8LlOHiUsWvN6I9oT9V4gJ6zgacBXis1CnmHOyTszJTzKdBEZiDUccg1jDERQJKtZwas2Hi_miJmteKi5pVP7jhZe5XtTVU2mfX2QDGdq2Om7B7Vl28PvDk09WzIcaWxzj_rR2_dfwLzOWqQw</recordid><startdate>198311</startdate><enddate>198311</enddate><creator>Berger, T. W</creator><creator>Rinaldi, P. C</creator><creator>Weisz, D. J</creator><creator>Thompson, R. F</creator><general>Am Phys Soc</general><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198311</creationdate><title>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</title><author>Berger, T. W ; Rinaldi, P. C ; Weisz, D. J ; Thompson, R. F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-ef514fd3c86483f0128d2bd34bdb11e7159ac88376dd0c473baeccbd28ac80bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hippocampus - cytology</topic><topic>Hippocampus - physiology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Neurons - physiology</topic><topic>Nictitating Membrane - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, T. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, P. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisz, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, T. W</au><au>Rinaldi, P. C</au><au>Weisz, D. J</au><au>Thompson, R. F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>1983-11</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1197</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1197-1219</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><coden>JONEA4</coden><abstract>T. W. Berger, P. C. Rinaldi, D. J. Weisz and R. F. Thompson
Extracellular single-unit recordings from neurons in the CA1 and CA3
regions of the dorsal hippocampus were monitored during classical
conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response. Neurons were
classified as different cell types using response to fornix stimulation
(i.e., antidromic or orthodromic activation) and spontaneous firing
characteristics as criteria. Results showed that hippocampal pyramidal
neurons exhibit learning-related neural plasticity that develops gradually
over the course of classical conditioning. The learning-dependent pyramidal
cell response is characterized by an increase in frequency of firing within
conditioning trials and a within-trial pattern of discharge that correlates
strongly with amplitude-time course of the behavioral response. In
contrast, pyramidal cell activity recorded from control animals given
unpaired presentations of the conditioned and unconditioned stimulus (CS
and UCS) does not show enhanced discharge rates with repeated stimulation.
Previous studies of hippocampal cellular electrophysiology have described
what has been termed a theta-cell (19-21, 45), the activity of which
correlates with slow-wave theta rhythm generated in the hippocampus.
Neurons classified as theta-cells in the present study exhibit responses
during conditioning that are distinctly different than pyramidal cells.
theta-Cells respond during paired conditioning trials with a rhythmic
bursting; the between-burst interval occurs at or near 8 Hz. In addition,
two different types of theta-cells were distinguishable. One type of
theta-cell increases firing frequency above pretrial levels while
displaying the theta bursting pattern. The other type decreases firing
frequency below pretrial rates while showing a theta-locked discharge. In
addition to pyramidal and theta-neurons, several other cell types recorded
in or near the pyramidal cell layer could be distinguished. One cell type
was distinctive in that it could be activated with a short, invariant
latency following fornix stimulation, but spontaneous action potentials of
such neurons could not be collided with fornix shock-induced action
potentials. These neurons exhibit a different profile of spontaneous firing
characteristics than those of antidromically identified pyramidal cells.
Nevertheless, neurons in this noncollidable category display the same
learning-dependent response as pyramidal cells. It is suggested that the
noncollidable neurons represent a subpopulation of pyramidal cells that do
not project an axon via the fornix but project, instead, to other limbic
cortical regions.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Am Phys Soc</pub><pmid>6644367</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3077 |
ispartof | Journal of neurophysiology, 1983-11, Vol.50 (5), p.1197-1219 |
issn | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_6644367 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Conditioning, Classical - physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hippocampus - cytology Hippocampus - physiology Learning. Memory Neurons - physiology Nictitating Membrane - physiology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Rabbits |
title | Single-unit analysis of different hippocampal cell types during classical conditioning of rabbit nictitating membrane response |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T15%3A18%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-unit%20analysis%20of%20different%20hippocampal%20cell%20types%20during%20classical%20conditioning%20of%20rabbit%20nictitating%20membrane%20response&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Berger,%20T.%20W&rft.date=1983-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1197&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1197-1219&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft.coden=JONEA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.1983.50.5.1197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E13748091%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13748091&rft_id=info:pmid/6644367&rfr_iscdi=true |