Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)

Diverting ileostomy is a common procedure in rectal cancer surgery, but it is sometimes associated with a nonnegligible rate of complications. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of stoma-related complications for ileostomy creation after rectal cancer resection. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Techniques in coloproctology 2024-12, Vol.29 (1), p.16
Hauptverfasser: Ferrara, F, Rizzo, G, Bondurri, A, Forni, C, Anania, G, Anastasi, A, Baiocchi, G L, Boccia, L, Cassini, D, Catarci, M, Cestaro, G, Cillara, N, Cobellis, F, De Luca, R, De Nardi, P, Deidda, S, Delogu, D, Fedi, M, Giuffrida, M C, Grossi, U, Impellizzeri, H, Langone, A, Lauretta, A, Lo Celso, F, Maffioli, A, Manigrasso, M, Marafante, C, Marano, L, Marinello, P, Massucco, P, Merlini, D, Morelli, L, Mozzon, M, Pafundi, D P, Pata, F, Pellino, G, Peltrini, R, Petrina, A, Piazza, D, Rabuini, C, Resendiz, A, Salmaso, B, Santarelli, M, Sena, G, Siragusa, L, Tamini, N, Tondolo, V, Tutino, R, Vannelli, A, Veltri, M, Vincenti, L, Parini, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Techniques in coloproctology
container_volume 29
creator Ferrara, F
Rizzo, G
Bondurri, A
Forni, C
Anania, G
Anastasi, A
Baiocchi, G L
Boccia, L
Cassini, D
Catarci, M
Cestaro, G
Cillara, N
Cobellis, F
De Luca, R
De Nardi, P
Deidda, S
Delogu, D
Fedi, M
Giuffrida, M C
Grossi, U
Impellizzeri, H
Langone, A
Lauretta, A
Lo Celso, F
Maffioli, A
Manigrasso, M
Marafante, C
Marano, L
Marinello, P
Massucco, P
Merlini, D
Morelli, L
Mozzon, M
Pafundi, D P
Pata, F
Pellino, G
Peltrini, R
Petrina, A
Piazza, D
Rabuini, C
Resendiz, A
Salmaso, B
Santarelli, M
Sena, G
Siragusa, L
Tamini, N
Tondolo, V
Tutino, R
Vannelli, A
Veltri, M
Vincenti, L
Parini, D
description Diverting ileostomy is a common procedure in rectal cancer surgery, but it is sometimes associated with a nonnegligible rate of complications. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of stoma-related complications for ileostomy creation after rectal cancer resection. The secondary aims were to report the indications, the technical details, and the efficacy of stoma care provided by ostomy nurses. From 15 February to 31 December 2022, consecutive patients who underwent protective ileostomy after anterior rectal cancer resection were enrolled for prospective data collection at 45 Italian colorectal surgery centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors that influenced the occurrence of stoma-related complications. In all, 287 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The short- and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity rates were 33.8% and 29.62%, respectively. The most frequent complications were dehydration (17.77%), peristomal skin dermatitis (13.59%), mucocutaneous separation (8.36%), and stoma retraction (4.18%). At the end of follow-up (median time 9 months), the overall stoma closure rate was 83.97% (241 patients), with a median time to stoma closure of 146 days (range 9-483 days). On multivariate analysis, the presence of a stoma nurse was a significant protective factor against stoma-related complications. This study demonstrated that the creation of a protective ileostomy is associated to a nonnegligible rate of short-term and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity, higher than 25%. The most frequent complication is dehydration, and the presence of stoma-specialized nurses seems to be a protective factor for stoma-related complications. Moreover, more than 15% of protective stomas were not closed at the end of follow-up.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_39661237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39661237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_396612373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj09LAzEQxYMgtv75CjJHPRQ2XdtVbyKKPZQetgdvJc3OaiTJhExS2M_lFzRb9OzpPXi_eY85EVMp5_ez6m7xPhHnzF9VJZtmIc_EpH5YLuW8bqbie5OTJocM1IMlCmAsEidyA6g-YYSIOilbhIsx5KGnCFp5jfERniBE4jAmBwTaM8aDGqly4bJNRqMfS9irwJ-UgFPuBugjOViPeWdYm2CNV3GAVRkyykN7hD4i5XBca7cbpxhu1qu22NtLcdory3j1qxfi-vVl-_w2C3nvsNuFaFyp2_19Wf8L_AAJV2Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Ferrara, F ; Rizzo, G ; Bondurri, A ; Forni, C ; Anania, G ; Anastasi, A ; Baiocchi, G L ; Boccia, L ; Cassini, D ; Catarci, M ; Cestaro, G ; Cillara, N ; Cobellis, F ; De Luca, R ; De Nardi, P ; Deidda, S ; Delogu, D ; Fedi, M ; Giuffrida, M C ; Grossi, U ; Impellizzeri, H ; Langone, A ; Lauretta, A ; Lo Celso, F ; Maffioli, A ; Manigrasso, M ; Marafante, C ; Marano, L ; Marinello, P ; Massucco, P ; Merlini, D ; Morelli, L ; Mozzon, M ; Pafundi, D P ; Pata, F ; Pellino, G ; Peltrini, R ; Petrina, A ; Piazza, D ; Rabuini, C ; Resendiz, A ; Salmaso, B ; Santarelli, M ; Sena, G ; Siragusa, L ; Tamini, N ; Tondolo, V ; Tutino, R ; Vannelli, A ; Veltri, M ; Vincenti, L ; Parini, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, F ; Rizzo, G ; Bondurri, A ; Forni, C ; Anania, G ; Anastasi, A ; Baiocchi, G L ; Boccia, L ; Cassini, D ; Catarci, M ; Cestaro, G ; Cillara, N ; Cobellis, F ; De Luca, R ; De Nardi, P ; Deidda, S ; Delogu, D ; Fedi, M ; Giuffrida, M C ; Grossi, U ; Impellizzeri, H ; Langone, A ; Lauretta, A ; Lo Celso, F ; Maffioli, A ; Manigrasso, M ; Marafante, C ; Marano, L ; Marinello, P ; Massucco, P ; Merlini, D ; Morelli, L ; Mozzon, M ; Pafundi, D P ; Pata, F ; Pellino, G ; Peltrini, R ; Petrina, A ; Piazza, D ; Rabuini, C ; Resendiz, A ; Salmaso, B ; Santarelli, M ; Sena, G ; Siragusa, L ; Tamini, N ; Tondolo, V ; Tutino, R ; Vannelli, A ; Veltri, M ; Vincenti, L ; Parini, D ; MISSTO Snapshot Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>Diverting ileostomy is a common procedure in rectal cancer surgery, but it is sometimes associated with a nonnegligible rate of complications. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of stoma-related complications for ileostomy creation after rectal cancer resection. The secondary aims were to report the indications, the technical details, and the efficacy of stoma care provided by ostomy nurses. From 15 February to 31 December 2022, consecutive patients who underwent protective ileostomy after anterior rectal cancer resection were enrolled for prospective data collection at 45 Italian colorectal surgery centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors that influenced the occurrence of stoma-related complications. In all, 287 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The short- and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity rates were 33.8% and 29.62%, respectively. The most frequent complications were dehydration (17.77%), peristomal skin dermatitis (13.59%), mucocutaneous separation (8.36%), and stoma retraction (4.18%). At the end of follow-up (median time 9 months), the overall stoma closure rate was 83.97% (241 patients), with a median time to stoma closure of 146 days (range 9-483 days). On multivariate analysis, the presence of a stoma nurse was a significant protective factor against stoma-related complications. This study demonstrated that the creation of a protective ileostomy is associated to a nonnegligible rate of short-term and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity, higher than 25%. The most frequent complication is dehydration, and the presence of stoma-specialized nurses seems to be a protective factor for stoma-related complications. Moreover, more than 15% of protective stomas were not closed at the end of follow-up.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1128-045X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39661237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Ileostomy - adverse effects ; Ileostomy - methods ; Ileostomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Incidence ; Italy - epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Proctectomy - adverse effects ; Proctectomy - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgical Stomas - adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Techniques in coloproctology, 2024-12, Vol.29 (1), p.16</ispartof><rights>2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-6521-5876 ; 0000-0002-8208-1945</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39661237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondurri, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forni, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anania, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baiocchi, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccia, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catarci, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cestaro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cillara, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobellis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Luca, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Nardi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deidda, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delogu, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuffrida, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impellizzeri, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langone, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauretta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Celso, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maffioli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manigrasso, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marafante, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marano, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinello, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massucco, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozzon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pafundi, D P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pata, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellino, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltrini, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrina, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabuini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resendiz, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmaso, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santarelli, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sena, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siragusa, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamini, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tondolo, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tutino, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vannelli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veltri, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenti, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MISSTO Snapshot Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)</title><title>Techniques in coloproctology</title><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><description>Diverting ileostomy is a common procedure in rectal cancer surgery, but it is sometimes associated with a nonnegligible rate of complications. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of stoma-related complications for ileostomy creation after rectal cancer resection. The secondary aims were to report the indications, the technical details, and the efficacy of stoma care provided by ostomy nurses. From 15 February to 31 December 2022, consecutive patients who underwent protective ileostomy after anterior rectal cancer resection were enrolled for prospective data collection at 45 Italian colorectal surgery centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors that influenced the occurrence of stoma-related complications. In all, 287 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The short- and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity rates were 33.8% and 29.62%, respectively. The most frequent complications were dehydration (17.77%), peristomal skin dermatitis (13.59%), mucocutaneous separation (8.36%), and stoma retraction (4.18%). At the end of follow-up (median time 9 months), the overall stoma closure rate was 83.97% (241 patients), with a median time to stoma closure of 146 days (range 9-483 days). On multivariate analysis, the presence of a stoma nurse was a significant protective factor against stoma-related complications. This study demonstrated that the creation of a protective ileostomy is associated to a nonnegligible rate of short-term and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity, higher than 25%. The most frequent complication is dehydration, and the presence of stoma-specialized nurses seems to be a protective factor for stoma-related complications. Moreover, more than 15% of protective stomas were not closed at the end of follow-up.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ileostomy - methods</subject><subject>Ileostomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Italy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Proctectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proctectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Stomas - adverse effects</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1128-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj09LAzEQxYMgtv75CjJHPRQ2XdtVbyKKPZQetgdvJc3OaiTJhExS2M_lFzRb9OzpPXi_eY85EVMp5_ez6m7xPhHnzF9VJZtmIc_EpH5YLuW8bqbie5OTJocM1IMlCmAsEidyA6g-YYSIOilbhIsx5KGnCFp5jfERniBE4jAmBwTaM8aDGqly4bJNRqMfS9irwJ-UgFPuBugjOViPeWdYm2CNV3GAVRkyykN7hD4i5XBca7cbpxhu1qu22NtLcdory3j1qxfi-vVl-_w2C3nvsNuFaFyp2_19Wf8L_AAJV2Ig</recordid><startdate>20241211</startdate><enddate>20241211</enddate><creator>Ferrara, F</creator><creator>Rizzo, G</creator><creator>Bondurri, A</creator><creator>Forni, C</creator><creator>Anania, G</creator><creator>Anastasi, A</creator><creator>Baiocchi, G L</creator><creator>Boccia, L</creator><creator>Cassini, D</creator><creator>Catarci, M</creator><creator>Cestaro, G</creator><creator>Cillara, N</creator><creator>Cobellis, F</creator><creator>De Luca, R</creator><creator>De Nardi, P</creator><creator>Deidda, S</creator><creator>Delogu, D</creator><creator>Fedi, M</creator><creator>Giuffrida, M C</creator><creator>Grossi, U</creator><creator>Impellizzeri, H</creator><creator>Langone, A</creator><creator>Lauretta, A</creator><creator>Lo Celso, F</creator><creator>Maffioli, A</creator><creator>Manigrasso, M</creator><creator>Marafante, C</creator><creator>Marano, L</creator><creator>Marinello, P</creator><creator>Massucco, P</creator><creator>Merlini, D</creator><creator>Morelli, L</creator><creator>Mozzon, M</creator><creator>Pafundi, D P</creator><creator>Pata, F</creator><creator>Pellino, G</creator><creator>Peltrini, R</creator><creator>Petrina, A</creator><creator>Piazza, D</creator><creator>Rabuini, C</creator><creator>Resendiz, A</creator><creator>Salmaso, B</creator><creator>Santarelli, M</creator><creator>Sena, G</creator><creator>Siragusa, L</creator><creator>Tamini, N</creator><creator>Tondolo, V</creator><creator>Tutino, R</creator><creator>Vannelli, A</creator><creator>Veltri, M</creator><creator>Vincenti, L</creator><creator>Parini, D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-5876</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8208-1945</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241211</creationdate><title>Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)</title><author>Ferrara, F ; Rizzo, G ; Bondurri, A ; Forni, C ; Anania, G ; Anastasi, A ; Baiocchi, G L ; Boccia, L ; Cassini, D ; Catarci, M ; Cestaro, G ; Cillara, N ; Cobellis, F ; De Luca, R ; De Nardi, P ; Deidda, S ; Delogu, D ; Fedi, M ; Giuffrida, M C ; Grossi, U ; Impellizzeri, H ; Langone, A ; Lauretta, A ; Lo Celso, F ; Maffioli, A ; Manigrasso, M ; Marafante, C ; Marano, L ; Marinello, P ; Massucco, P ; Merlini, D ; Morelli, L ; Mozzon, M ; Pafundi, D P ; Pata, F ; Pellino, G ; Peltrini, R ; Petrina, A ; Piazza, D ; Rabuini, C ; Resendiz, A ; Salmaso, B ; Santarelli, M ; Sena, G ; Siragusa, L ; Tamini, N ; Tondolo, V ; Tutino, R ; Vannelli, A ; Veltri, M ; Vincenti, L ; Parini, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_396612373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ileostomy - methods</topic><topic>Ileostomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Italy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Proctectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proctectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Stomas - adverse effects</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzo, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bondurri, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forni, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anania, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastasi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baiocchi, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boccia, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catarci, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cestaro, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cillara, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobellis, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Luca, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Nardi, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deidda, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delogu, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuffrida, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impellizzeri, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langone, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauretta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Celso, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maffioli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manigrasso, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marafante, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marano, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinello, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massucco, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozzon, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pafundi, D P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pata, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellino, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peltrini, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrina, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piazza, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabuini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resendiz, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmaso, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santarelli, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sena, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siragusa, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamini, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tondolo, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tutino, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vannelli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veltri, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincenti, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parini, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MISSTO Snapshot Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrara, F</au><au>Rizzo, G</au><au>Bondurri, A</au><au>Forni, C</au><au>Anania, G</au><au>Anastasi, A</au><au>Baiocchi, G L</au><au>Boccia, L</au><au>Cassini, D</au><au>Catarci, M</au><au>Cestaro, G</au><au>Cillara, N</au><au>Cobellis, F</au><au>De Luca, R</au><au>De Nardi, P</au><au>Deidda, S</au><au>Delogu, D</au><au>Fedi, M</au><au>Giuffrida, M C</au><au>Grossi, U</au><au>Impellizzeri, H</au><au>Langone, A</au><au>Lauretta, A</au><au>Lo Celso, F</au><au>Maffioli, A</au><au>Manigrasso, M</au><au>Marafante, C</au><au>Marano, L</au><au>Marinello, P</au><au>Massucco, P</au><au>Merlini, D</au><au>Morelli, L</au><au>Mozzon, M</au><au>Pafundi, D P</au><au>Pata, F</au><au>Pellino, G</au><au>Peltrini, R</au><au>Petrina, A</au><au>Piazza, D</au><au>Rabuini, C</au><au>Resendiz, A</au><au>Salmaso, B</au><au>Santarelli, M</au><au>Sena, G</au><au>Siragusa, L</au><au>Tamini, N</au><au>Tondolo, V</au><au>Tutino, R</au><au>Vannelli, A</au><au>Veltri, M</au><au>Vincenti, L</au><au>Parini, D</au><aucorp>MISSTO Snapshot Study Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)</atitle><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><date>2024-12-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><pages>16-</pages><eissn>1128-045X</eissn><abstract>Diverting ileostomy is a common procedure in rectal cancer surgery, but it is sometimes associated with a nonnegligible rate of complications. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of stoma-related complications for ileostomy creation after rectal cancer resection. The secondary aims were to report the indications, the technical details, and the efficacy of stoma care provided by ostomy nurses. From 15 February to 31 December 2022, consecutive patients who underwent protective ileostomy after anterior rectal cancer resection were enrolled for prospective data collection at 45 Italian colorectal surgery centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors that influenced the occurrence of stoma-related complications. In all, 287 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The short- and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity rates were 33.8% and 29.62%, respectively. The most frequent complications were dehydration (17.77%), peristomal skin dermatitis (13.59%), mucocutaneous separation (8.36%), and stoma retraction (4.18%). At the end of follow-up (median time 9 months), the overall stoma closure rate was 83.97% (241 patients), with a median time to stoma closure of 146 days (range 9-483 days). On multivariate analysis, the presence of a stoma nurse was a significant protective factor against stoma-related complications. This study demonstrated that the creation of a protective ileostomy is associated to a nonnegligible rate of short-term and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity, higher than 25%. The most frequent complication is dehydration, and the presence of stoma-specialized nurses seems to be a protective factor for stoma-related complications. Moreover, more than 15% of protective stomas were not closed at the end of follow-up.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pmid>39661237</pmid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-5876</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8208-1945</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1128-045X
ispartof Techniques in coloproctology, 2024-12, Vol.29 (1), p.16
issn 1128-045X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_39661237
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Ileostomy - adverse effects
Ileostomy - methods
Ileostomy - statistics & numerical data
Incidence
Italy - epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Proctectomy - adverse effects
Proctectomy - methods
Prospective Studies
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Surgical Stomas - adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
title Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20loop%20ileostomy%20after%20rectal%20resection%20for%20cancer:%20A%20prospective%20observational%20multicenter%20snapshot%20study%20from%20Multidisciplinary%20Italian%20Study%20group%20for%20STOmas%20(MISSTO)&rft.jtitle=Techniques%20in%20coloproctology&rft.au=Ferrara,%20F&rft.aucorp=MISSTO%20Snapshot%20Study%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2024-12-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.pages=16-&rft.eissn=1128-045X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E39661237%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/39661237&rfr_iscdi=true