Extensive Tracking of Nomadic Waterbird Movements Reveals an Inland Flyway
ABSTRACT Waterbirds are highly mobile and have the ability to respond to environmental conditions opportunistically at multiple scales. Mobility is particularly crucial for aggregate‐nesting species dependent on breeding habitat in arid and semi‐arid wetlands, which can be ephemeral and unpredictabl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology and evolution 2024-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e70668-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e70668 |
container_title | Ecology and evolution |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | McGinness, Heather M. Jackson, Micha V. Lloyd‐Jones, Luke Robinson, Freya Langston, Art O'Neill, Louis G. Rapley, Shoshana Piper, Melissa Davies, Micah Hodgson, Jessica Martin, John M. Kingsford, Richard Brandis, Kate Doerr, Veronica Mac Nally, Ralph |
description | ABSTRACT
Waterbirds are highly mobile and have the ability to respond to environmental conditions opportunistically at multiple scales. Mobility is particularly crucial for aggregate‐nesting species dependent on breeding habitat in arid and semi‐arid wetlands, which can be ephemeral and unpredictable. We aimed to address knowledge gaps about movement routes for aggregate‐nesting nomadic waterbird species by tracking them in numbers sufficient to make robust assessment of their movement patterns. We hypothesised that analysis of long‐distance movements would identify common routes with consistent environmental features that would be useful as context for conservation management. We used GPS satellite telemetry to track the movements of 73 straw‐necked ibis (Threskiornis spinicollis) and 42 royal spoonbills (Platalea regia) over 7 years (2016‐2023). We used these data to identify long‐distance movements and to demarcate and characterise movement routes. We identified common routes used by both species, including a ‘flyway’ over 2000 km long, spanning Australia's Murray–Darling Basin from the south‐west to the north‐east. This flyway connects important breeding sites and is characterised by flat, open/unforested areas with low elevations of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ece3.70668 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_39650541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146605112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2118-f4fe13c5368a44883468b4fa9f3e9bcc69c4d5284135c7bcb5e76d2e8b0c25fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRrNRe_AGy4MVL6n5nc5TSaqUqSMVj2GwmkpqPmk1a8-9N2iriXGaYeRhe3hehC0rGlBB2Axb42CdK6SN0xoiQnu9LffxnHqCRcyvSlSJMEP8UDXigJJGCnqGH6VcNhUs3gJeVsR9p8Y7LBD-VuYlTi99MDVWUVjF-LDeQQ1E7_AIbMJnDpsDzIjNFjGdZuzXtOTpJuj2MDn2IXmfT5eTeWzzfzSe3C2_NKNVeIhKg3EqutBFCay6UjkRigoRDEFmrAitiybSgXFo_spEEX8UMdEQsk0nEh-h6_3ddlZ8NuDrMU2ch66RA2biQU6EUkZSyDr36h67Kpio6dT0VCNX70VGXB6qJcojDdZXmpmrDH5c6gO6BbZpB-3unJOwjCPsIwl0E4XQy5buJfwNHN3bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149462407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extensive Tracking of Nomadic Waterbird Movements Reveals an Inland Flyway</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>McGinness, Heather M. ; Jackson, Micha V. ; Lloyd‐Jones, Luke ; Robinson, Freya ; Langston, Art ; O'Neill, Louis G. ; Rapley, Shoshana ; Piper, Melissa ; Davies, Micah ; Hodgson, Jessica ; Martin, John M. ; Kingsford, Richard ; Brandis, Kate ; Doerr, Veronica ; Mac Nally, Ralph</creator><creatorcontrib>McGinness, Heather M. ; Jackson, Micha V. ; Lloyd‐Jones, Luke ; Robinson, Freya ; Langston, Art ; O'Neill, Louis G. ; Rapley, Shoshana ; Piper, Melissa ; Davies, Micah ; Hodgson, Jessica ; Martin, John M. ; Kingsford, Richard ; Brandis, Kate ; Doerr, Veronica ; Mac Nally, Ralph</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Waterbirds are highly mobile and have the ability to respond to environmental conditions opportunistically at multiple scales. Mobility is particularly crucial for aggregate‐nesting species dependent on breeding habitat in arid and semi‐arid wetlands, which can be ephemeral and unpredictable. We aimed to address knowledge gaps about movement routes for aggregate‐nesting nomadic waterbird species by tracking them in numbers sufficient to make robust assessment of their movement patterns. We hypothesised that analysis of long‐distance movements would identify common routes with consistent environmental features that would be useful as context for conservation management. We used GPS satellite telemetry to track the movements of 73 straw‐necked ibis (Threskiornis spinicollis) and 42 royal spoonbills (Platalea regia) over 7 years (2016‐2023). We used these data to identify long‐distance movements and to demarcate and characterise movement routes. We identified common routes used by both species, including a ‘flyway’ over 2000 km long, spanning Australia's Murray–Darling Basin from the south‐west to the north‐east. This flyway connects important breeding sites and is characterised by flat, open/unforested areas with low elevations of < 350 m and mid to high rainfall. The flyway corresponds to an area west of Australia's Great Dividing Range, which appears to act as a low‐permeability barrier to the movement of both species. Identification of an inland flyway for waterbirds in Australia provides important context for multi‐jurisdictional cooperation and strategic management. Where resources are limited, water and wetland management efforts (e.g., environmental watering) should be preferentially located within this route. Similarly, targeting threat mitigation within common movement routes may have disproportionate importance for long‐term population viability. Given the widespread distribution of similar species globally, there are likely to be other flyways worthy of scientific and conservation management attention that could be identified using our approach.
We used GPS satellite telemetry to track the movements of 73 straw‐necked ibis (Threskiornis spinicollis) and 42 royal spoonbills (Platalea regia) over 7 years. We identified common routes used by both species, including an ‘inland flyway’ spanning Australia's Murray–Darling Basin from the south‐west to the north‐east. This flyway connects important breeding sites and is characterised by flat, open/unforested areas with low elevations of < 350 m and mid to high rainfall. The flyway also aligns with the area west of Australia's Great Dividing Range, which appears to act as a low‐permeability barrier to the movement of both species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70668</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39650541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic birds ; Aridity ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding sites ; Conservation ; Context ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental management ; environmental water ; Floods ; Geographical distribution ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Movement ; movement ecology ; Murray–Darling basin ; Nesting ; Nomads ; Population viability ; Rainfall ; royal spoonbill ; Satellite navigation systems ; satellite telemetry ; Satellite tracking ; Species ; straw‐necked ibis ; Telemetry ; Transmitters ; Water shortages ; Waterfowl ; Wetland management ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2024-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e70668-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0380-4982 ; 0000-0001-6565-4134 ; 0000-0002-8598-2466</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fece3.70668$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fece3.70668$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39650541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGinness, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Micha V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd‐Jones, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Freya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langston, Art</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Louis G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapley, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsford, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandis, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Nally, Ralph</creatorcontrib><title>Extensive Tracking of Nomadic Waterbird Movements Reveals an Inland Flyway</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Waterbirds are highly mobile and have the ability to respond to environmental conditions opportunistically at multiple scales. Mobility is particularly crucial for aggregate‐nesting species dependent on breeding habitat in arid and semi‐arid wetlands, which can be ephemeral and unpredictable. We aimed to address knowledge gaps about movement routes for aggregate‐nesting nomadic waterbird species by tracking them in numbers sufficient to make robust assessment of their movement patterns. We hypothesised that analysis of long‐distance movements would identify common routes with consistent environmental features that would be useful as context for conservation management. We used GPS satellite telemetry to track the movements of 73 straw‐necked ibis (Threskiornis spinicollis) and 42 royal spoonbills (Platalea regia) over 7 years (2016‐2023). We used these data to identify long‐distance movements and to demarcate and characterise movement routes. We identified common routes used by both species, including a ‘flyway’ over 2000 km long, spanning Australia's Murray–Darling Basin from the south‐west to the north‐east. This flyway connects important breeding sites and is characterised by flat, open/unforested areas with low elevations of < 350 m and mid to high rainfall. The flyway corresponds to an area west of Australia's Great Dividing Range, which appears to act as a low‐permeability barrier to the movement of both species. Identification of an inland flyway for waterbirds in Australia provides important context for multi‐jurisdictional cooperation and strategic management. Where resources are limited, water and wetland management efforts (e.g., environmental watering) should be preferentially located within this route. Similarly, targeting threat mitigation within common movement routes may have disproportionate importance for long‐term population viability. Given the widespread distribution of similar species globally, there are likely to be other flyways worthy of scientific and conservation management attention that could be identified using our approach.
We used GPS satellite telemetry to track the movements of 73 straw‐necked ibis (Threskiornis spinicollis) and 42 royal spoonbills (Platalea regia) over 7 years. We identified common routes used by both species, including an ‘inland flyway’ spanning Australia's Murray–Darling Basin from the south‐west to the north‐east. This flyway connects important breeding sites and is characterised by flat, open/unforested areas with low elevations of < 350 m and mid to high rainfall. The flyway also aligns with the area west of Australia's Great Dividing Range, which appears to act as a low‐permeability barrier to the movement of both species.</description><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Aridity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>environmental water</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>movement ecology</subject><subject>Murray–Darling basin</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nomads</subject><subject>Population viability</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>royal spoonbill</subject><subject>Satellite navigation systems</subject><subject>satellite telemetry</subject><subject>Satellite tracking</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>straw‐necked ibis</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><subject>Transmitters</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wetland management</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1Lw0AQhhdRrNRe_AGy4MVL6n5nc5TSaqUqSMVj2GwmkpqPmk1a8-9N2iriXGaYeRhe3hehC0rGlBB2Axb42CdK6SN0xoiQnu9LffxnHqCRcyvSlSJMEP8UDXigJJGCnqGH6VcNhUs3gJeVsR9p8Y7LBD-VuYlTi99MDVWUVjF-LDeQQ1E7_AIbMJnDpsDzIjNFjGdZuzXtOTpJuj2MDn2IXmfT5eTeWzzfzSe3C2_NKNVeIhKg3EqutBFCay6UjkRigoRDEFmrAitiybSgXFo_spEEX8UMdEQsk0nEh-h6_3ddlZ8NuDrMU2ch66RA2biQU6EUkZSyDr36h67Kpio6dT0VCNX70VGXB6qJcojDdZXmpmrDH5c6gO6BbZpB-3unJOwjCPsIwl0E4XQy5buJfwNHN3bg</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>McGinness, Heather M.</creator><creator>Jackson, Micha V.</creator><creator>Lloyd‐Jones, Luke</creator><creator>Robinson, Freya</creator><creator>Langston, Art</creator><creator>O'Neill, Louis G.</creator><creator>Rapley, Shoshana</creator><creator>Piper, Melissa</creator><creator>Davies, Micah</creator><creator>Hodgson, Jessica</creator><creator>Martin, John M.</creator><creator>Kingsford, Richard</creator><creator>Brandis, Kate</creator><creator>Doerr, Veronica</creator><creator>Mac Nally, Ralph</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-4982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6565-4134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-2466</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Extensive Tracking of Nomadic Waterbird Movements Reveals an Inland Flyway</title><author>McGinness, Heather M. ; Jackson, Micha V. ; Lloyd‐Jones, Luke ; Robinson, Freya ; Langston, Art ; O'Neill, Louis G. ; Rapley, Shoshana ; Piper, Melissa ; Davies, Micah ; Hodgson, Jessica ; Martin, John M. ; Kingsford, Richard ; Brandis, Kate ; Doerr, Veronica ; Mac Nally, Ralph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2118-f4fe13c5368a44883468b4fa9f3e9bcc69c4d5284135c7bcb5e76d2e8b0c25fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Aridity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>environmental water</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>movement ecology</topic><topic>Murray–Darling basin</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nomads</topic><topic>Population viability</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>royal spoonbill</topic><topic>Satellite navigation systems</topic><topic>satellite telemetry</topic><topic>Satellite tracking</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>straw‐necked ibis</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><topic>Transmitters</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wetland management</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGinness, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Micha V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd‐Jones, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Freya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langston, Art</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Louis G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapley, Shoshana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Micah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsford, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandis, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Nally, Ralph</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGinness, Heather M.</au><au>Jackson, Micha V.</au><au>Lloyd‐Jones, Luke</au><au>Robinson, Freya</au><au>Langston, Art</au><au>O'Neill, Louis G.</au><au>Rapley, Shoshana</au><au>Piper, Melissa</au><au>Davies, Micah</au><au>Hodgson, Jessica</au><au>Martin, John M.</au><au>Kingsford, Richard</au><au>Brandis, Kate</au><au>Doerr, Veronica</au><au>Mac Nally, Ralph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extensive Tracking of Nomadic Waterbird Movements Reveals an Inland Flyway</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e70668</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e70668-n/a</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Waterbirds are highly mobile and have the ability to respond to environmental conditions opportunistically at multiple scales. Mobility is particularly crucial for aggregate‐nesting species dependent on breeding habitat in arid and semi‐arid wetlands, which can be ephemeral and unpredictable. We aimed to address knowledge gaps about movement routes for aggregate‐nesting nomadic waterbird species by tracking them in numbers sufficient to make robust assessment of their movement patterns. We hypothesised that analysis of long‐distance movements would identify common routes with consistent environmental features that would be useful as context for conservation management. We used GPS satellite telemetry to track the movements of 73 straw‐necked ibis (Threskiornis spinicollis) and 42 royal spoonbills (Platalea regia) over 7 years (2016‐2023). We used these data to identify long‐distance movements and to demarcate and characterise movement routes. We identified common routes used by both species, including a ‘flyway’ over 2000 km long, spanning Australia's Murray–Darling Basin from the south‐west to the north‐east. This flyway connects important breeding sites and is characterised by flat, open/unforested areas with low elevations of < 350 m and mid to high rainfall. The flyway corresponds to an area west of Australia's Great Dividing Range, which appears to act as a low‐permeability barrier to the movement of both species. Identification of an inland flyway for waterbirds in Australia provides important context for multi‐jurisdictional cooperation and strategic management. Where resources are limited, water and wetland management efforts (e.g., environmental watering) should be preferentially located within this route. Similarly, targeting threat mitigation within common movement routes may have disproportionate importance for long‐term population viability. Given the widespread distribution of similar species globally, there are likely to be other flyways worthy of scientific and conservation management attention that could be identified using our approach.
We used GPS satellite telemetry to track the movements of 73 straw‐necked ibis (Threskiornis spinicollis) and 42 royal spoonbills (Platalea regia) over 7 years. We identified common routes used by both species, including an ‘inland flyway’ spanning Australia's Murray–Darling Basin from the south‐west to the north‐east. This flyway connects important breeding sites and is characterised by flat, open/unforested areas with low elevations of < 350 m and mid to high rainfall. The flyway also aligns with the area west of Australia's Great Dividing Range, which appears to act as a low‐permeability barrier to the movement of both species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39650541</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.70668</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-4982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6565-4134</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8598-2466</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7758 |
ispartof | Ecology and evolution, 2024-12, Vol.14 (12), p.e70668-n/a |
issn | 2045-7758 2045-7758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_39650541 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Aquatic birds Aridity Birds Breeding Breeding sites Conservation Context Environmental conditions Environmental management environmental water Floods Geographical distribution Global positioning systems GPS Movement movement ecology Murray–Darling basin Nesting Nomads Population viability Rainfall royal spoonbill Satellite navigation systems satellite telemetry Satellite tracking Species straw‐necked ibis Telemetry Transmitters Water shortages Waterfowl Wetland management Wetlands |
title | Extensive Tracking of Nomadic Waterbird Movements Reveals an Inland Flyway |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A39%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extensive%20Tracking%20of%20Nomadic%20Waterbird%20Movements%20Reveals%20an%20Inland%20Flyway&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=McGinness,%20Heather%20M.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e70668&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e70668-n/a&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.70668&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3146605112%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149462407&rft_id=info:pmid/39650541&rfr_iscdi=true |