Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches

Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reprodu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiological measurement 2024-11, Vol.45 (11), p.115005
Hauptverfasser: Silva, Luiz E V, Gaudio, Hunter A, Widmann, Nicholas J, Forti, Rodrigo M, Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan, Senthil, Kumaran, Slovis, Julia C, Mavroudis, Constantine D, Lin, Yuxi, Shi, Lingyun, Baker, Wesley B, Morgan, Ryan W, Kilbaugh, Todd J, Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich), Ko, Tiffany S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 115005
container_title Physiological measurement
container_volume 45
creator Silva, Luiz E V
Gaudio, Hunter A
Widmann, Nicholas J
Forti, Rodrigo M
Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan
Senthil, Kumaran
Slovis, Julia C
Mavroudis, Constantine D
Lin, Yuxi
Shi, Lingyun
Baker, Wesley B
Morgan, Ryan W
Kilbaugh, Todd J
Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)
Ko, Tiffany S
description Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value. ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success. Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA ) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88, = 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59, = 0.81). Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_39536707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3128819135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-9a5e6034bf469b06adf6d9bd752308dca45a6cceb488418f2febae52225be79e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1r1zAUhoMo7uf03ivJpcK65aNJU-_GcDoYeDOvw2lysnU0TU1aYf71tuvclQiBAznP-4Y8hLzn7JQzY8641LzSqmnPwLdCyhfk8Hz1khxYq5tKSlkfkTel3DPGuRHqNTmSrZK6Yc2BPJzHaejnxSMtE7o5L5FCRqB9oR4nHD2OM00jne-Q4rARyUH2fbrNEGmE2_Ex_ZniLxgWmPuVTYH6PgTMW3ZMOcLQ_95XME05gbvD8pa8CjAUfPc0j8mPyy83F9-q6-9fry7OrysnlJyrFhRqJusu1LrtmAYftG873yghmfEOagXaOexqY2puggjYASohhOqwaVEek4977_rwzwXLbGNfHA4DjJiWYiUXxvCWS7WibEddTqVkDHbKfYT8YDmzm3C72bWbXbsLXyMfntqXLqJ_Dvw1vAInO9Cnyd6nJY_rZ__X9-kf-BQRbK0s5-tRjCk7-SD_AP5Mmq4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128819135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Silva, Luiz E V ; Gaudio, Hunter A ; Widmann, Nicholas J ; Forti, Rodrigo M ; Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan ; Senthil, Kumaran ; Slovis, Julia C ; Mavroudis, Constantine D ; Lin, Yuxi ; Shi, Lingyun ; Baker, Wesley B ; Morgan, Ryan W ; Kilbaugh, Todd J ; Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich) ; Ko, Tiffany S</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luiz E V ; Gaudio, Hunter A ; Widmann, Nicholas J ; Forti, Rodrigo M ; Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan ; Senthil, Kumaran ; Slovis, Julia C ; Mavroudis, Constantine D ; Lin, Yuxi ; Shi, Lingyun ; Baker, Wesley B ; Morgan, Ryan W ; Kilbaugh, Todd J ; Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich) ; Ko, Tiffany S</creatorcontrib><description>Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value. ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success. Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA ) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88, = 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59, = 0.81). Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-3334</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1361-6579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39536707</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMEAE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>AMSA ; Animals ; cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods ; defibrillation ; Electrocardiography ; pediatric ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Swine ; ventricular fibrillation ; Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><ispartof>Physiological measurement, 2024-11, Vol.45 (11), p.115005</ispartof><rights>2024 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-9a5e6034bf469b06adf6d9bd752308dca45a6cceb488418f2febae52225be79e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8978-2525 ; 0000-0003-0801-1209</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,53844,53891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39536707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luiz E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudio, Hunter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmann, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forti, Rodrigo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthil, Kumaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slovis, Julia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavroudis, Constantine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yuxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Wesley B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Ryan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilbaugh, Todd J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Tiffany S</creatorcontrib><title>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</title><title>Physiological measurement</title><addtitle>PM</addtitle><addtitle>Physiol. Meas</addtitle><description>Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value. ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success. Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA ) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88, = 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59, = 0.81). Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation.</description><subject>AMSA</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>defibrillation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>pediatric</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>ventricular fibrillation</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><issn>0967-3334</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1r1zAUhoMo7uf03ivJpcK65aNJU-_GcDoYeDOvw2lysnU0TU1aYf71tuvclQiBAznP-4Y8hLzn7JQzY8641LzSqmnPwLdCyhfk8Hz1khxYq5tKSlkfkTel3DPGuRHqNTmSrZK6Yc2BPJzHaejnxSMtE7o5L5FCRqB9oR4nHD2OM00jne-Q4rARyUH2fbrNEGmE2_Ex_ZniLxgWmPuVTYH6PgTMW3ZMOcLQ_95XME05gbvD8pa8CjAUfPc0j8mPyy83F9-q6-9fry7OrysnlJyrFhRqJusu1LrtmAYftG873yghmfEOagXaOexqY2puggjYASohhOqwaVEek4977_rwzwXLbGNfHA4DjJiWYiUXxvCWS7WibEddTqVkDHbKfYT8YDmzm3C72bWbXbsLXyMfntqXLqJ_Dvw1vAInO9Cnyd6nJY_rZ__X9-kf-BQRbK0s5-tRjCk7-SD_AP5Mmq4</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Silva, Luiz E V</creator><creator>Gaudio, Hunter A</creator><creator>Widmann, Nicholas J</creator><creator>Forti, Rodrigo M</creator><creator>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</creator><creator>Senthil, Kumaran</creator><creator>Slovis, Julia C</creator><creator>Mavroudis, Constantine D</creator><creator>Lin, Yuxi</creator><creator>Shi, Lingyun</creator><creator>Baker, Wesley B</creator><creator>Morgan, Ryan W</creator><creator>Kilbaugh, Todd J</creator><creator>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</creator><creator>Ko, Tiffany S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-2525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-1209</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</title><author>Silva, Luiz E V ; Gaudio, Hunter A ; Widmann, Nicholas J ; Forti, Rodrigo M ; Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan ; Senthil, Kumaran ; Slovis, Julia C ; Mavroudis, Constantine D ; Lin, Yuxi ; Shi, Lingyun ; Baker, Wesley B ; Morgan, Ryan W ; Kilbaugh, Todd J ; Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich) ; Ko, Tiffany S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-9a5e6034bf469b06adf6d9bd752308dca45a6cceb488418f2febae52225be79e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>AMSA</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>defibrillation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>pediatric</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>ventricular fibrillation</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luiz E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudio, Hunter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmann, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forti, Rodrigo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthil, Kumaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slovis, Julia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavroudis, Constantine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yuxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Wesley B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Ryan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilbaugh, Todd J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Tiffany S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Luiz E V</au><au>Gaudio, Hunter A</au><au>Widmann, Nicholas J</au><au>Forti, Rodrigo M</au><au>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</au><au>Senthil, Kumaran</au><au>Slovis, Julia C</au><au>Mavroudis, Constantine D</au><au>Lin, Yuxi</au><au>Shi, Lingyun</au><au>Baker, Wesley B</au><au>Morgan, Ryan W</au><au>Kilbaugh, Todd J</au><au>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</au><au>Ko, Tiffany S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</atitle><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle><stitle>PM</stitle><addtitle>Physiol. Meas</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>115005</spage><pages>115005-</pages><issn>0967-3334</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><eissn>1361-6579</eissn><coden>PMEAE3</coden><abstract>Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value. ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success. Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA ) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88, = 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59, = 0.81). Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>39536707</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-2525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-1209</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-3334
ispartof Physiological measurement, 2024-11, Vol.45 (11), p.115005
issn 0967-3334
1361-6579
1361-6579
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_39536707
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects AMSA
Animals
cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods
defibrillation
Electrocardiography
pediatric
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Swine
ventricular fibrillation
Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology
Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy
title Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amplitude%20spectrum%20area%20is%20dependent%20on%20the%20electrocardiogram%20magnitude:%20evaluation%20of%20different%20normalization%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Physiological%20measurement&rft.au=Silva,%20Luiz%20E%20V&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=115005&rft.pages=115005-&rft.issn=0967-3334&rft.eissn=1361-6579&rft.coden=PMEAE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3128819135%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128819135&rft_id=info:pmid/39536707&rfr_iscdi=true