Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches
Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reprodu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiological measurement 2024-11, Vol.45 (11), p.115005 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 115005 |
container_title | Physiological measurement |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Silva, Luiz E V Gaudio, Hunter A Widmann, Nicholas J Forti, Rodrigo M Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan Senthil, Kumaran Slovis, Julia C Mavroudis, Constantine D Lin, Yuxi Shi, Lingyun Baker, Wesley B Morgan, Ryan W Kilbaugh, Todd J Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich) Ko, Tiffany S |
description | Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value.
ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success.
Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA
) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA
thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA
did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88,
= 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59,
= 0.81).
Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA
demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_39536707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3128819135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-9a5e6034bf469b06adf6d9bd752308dca45a6cceb488418f2febae52225be79e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1r1zAUhoMo7uf03ivJpcK65aNJU-_GcDoYeDOvw2lysnU0TU1aYf71tuvclQiBAznP-4Y8hLzn7JQzY8641LzSqmnPwLdCyhfk8Hz1khxYq5tKSlkfkTel3DPGuRHqNTmSrZK6Yc2BPJzHaejnxSMtE7o5L5FCRqB9oR4nHD2OM00jne-Q4rARyUH2fbrNEGmE2_Ex_ZniLxgWmPuVTYH6PgTMW3ZMOcLQ_95XME05gbvD8pa8CjAUfPc0j8mPyy83F9-q6-9fry7OrysnlJyrFhRqJusu1LrtmAYftG873yghmfEOagXaOexqY2puggjYASohhOqwaVEek4977_rwzwXLbGNfHA4DjJiWYiUXxvCWS7WibEddTqVkDHbKfYT8YDmzm3C72bWbXbsLXyMfntqXLqJ_Dvw1vAInO9Cnyd6nJY_rZ__X9-kf-BQRbK0s5-tRjCk7-SD_AP5Mmq4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128819135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Silva, Luiz E V ; Gaudio, Hunter A ; Widmann, Nicholas J ; Forti, Rodrigo M ; Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan ; Senthil, Kumaran ; Slovis, Julia C ; Mavroudis, Constantine D ; Lin, Yuxi ; Shi, Lingyun ; Baker, Wesley B ; Morgan, Ryan W ; Kilbaugh, Todd J ; Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich) ; Ko, Tiffany S</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luiz E V ; Gaudio, Hunter A ; Widmann, Nicholas J ; Forti, Rodrigo M ; Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan ; Senthil, Kumaran ; Slovis, Julia C ; Mavroudis, Constantine D ; Lin, Yuxi ; Shi, Lingyun ; Baker, Wesley B ; Morgan, Ryan W ; Kilbaugh, Todd J ; Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich) ; Ko, Tiffany S</creatorcontrib><description>Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value.
ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success.
Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA
) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA
thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA
did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88,
= 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59,
= 0.81).
Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA
demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-3334</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1361-6579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6579</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39536707</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMEAE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>AMSA ; Animals ; cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods ; defibrillation ; Electrocardiography ; pediatric ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Swine ; ventricular fibrillation ; Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><ispartof>Physiological measurement, 2024-11, Vol.45 (11), p.115005</ispartof><rights>2024 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-9a5e6034bf469b06adf6d9bd752308dca45a6cceb488418f2febae52225be79e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8978-2525 ; 0000-0003-0801-1209</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,53844,53891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39536707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luiz E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudio, Hunter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmann, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forti, Rodrigo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthil, Kumaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slovis, Julia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavroudis, Constantine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yuxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Wesley B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Ryan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilbaugh, Todd J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Tiffany S</creatorcontrib><title>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</title><title>Physiological measurement</title><addtitle>PM</addtitle><addtitle>Physiol. Meas</addtitle><description>Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value.
ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success.
Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA
) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA
thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA
did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88,
= 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59,
= 0.81).
Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA
demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation.</description><subject>AMSA</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>defibrillation</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>pediatric</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>ventricular fibrillation</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</subject><issn>0967-3334</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1r1zAUhoMo7uf03ivJpcK65aNJU-_GcDoYeDOvw2lysnU0TU1aYf71tuvclQiBAznP-4Y8hLzn7JQzY8641LzSqmnPwLdCyhfk8Hz1khxYq5tKSlkfkTel3DPGuRHqNTmSrZK6Yc2BPJzHaejnxSMtE7o5L5FCRqB9oR4nHD2OM00jne-Q4rARyUH2fbrNEGmE2_Ex_ZniLxgWmPuVTYH6PgTMW3ZMOcLQ_95XME05gbvD8pa8CjAUfPc0j8mPyy83F9-q6-9fry7OrysnlJyrFhRqJusu1LrtmAYftG873yghmfEOagXaOexqY2puggjYASohhOqwaVEek4977_rwzwXLbGNfHA4DjJiWYiUXxvCWS7WibEddTqVkDHbKfYT8YDmzm3C72bWbXbsLXyMfntqXLqJ_Dvw1vAInO9Cnyd6nJY_rZ__X9-kf-BQRbK0s5-tRjCk7-SD_AP5Mmq4</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Silva, Luiz E V</creator><creator>Gaudio, Hunter A</creator><creator>Widmann, Nicholas J</creator><creator>Forti, Rodrigo M</creator><creator>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</creator><creator>Senthil, Kumaran</creator><creator>Slovis, Julia C</creator><creator>Mavroudis, Constantine D</creator><creator>Lin, Yuxi</creator><creator>Shi, Lingyun</creator><creator>Baker, Wesley B</creator><creator>Morgan, Ryan W</creator><creator>Kilbaugh, Todd J</creator><creator>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</creator><creator>Ko, Tiffany S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-2525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-1209</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</title><author>Silva, Luiz E V ; Gaudio, Hunter A ; Widmann, Nicholas J ; Forti, Rodrigo M ; Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan ; Senthil, Kumaran ; Slovis, Julia C ; Mavroudis, Constantine D ; Lin, Yuxi ; Shi, Lingyun ; Baker, Wesley B ; Morgan, Ryan W ; Kilbaugh, Todd J ; Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich) ; Ko, Tiffany S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-9a5e6034bf469b06adf6d9bd752308dca45a6cceb488418f2febae52225be79e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>AMSA</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>defibrillation</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>pediatric</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>ventricular fibrillation</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Luiz E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudio, Hunter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widmann, Nicholas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forti, Rodrigo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senthil, Kumaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slovis, Julia C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavroudis, Constantine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yuxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Lingyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Wesley B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Ryan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilbaugh, Todd J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Tiffany S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Luiz E V</au><au>Gaudio, Hunter A</au><au>Widmann, Nicholas J</au><au>Forti, Rodrigo M</au><au>Padmanabhan, Viveknarayanan</au><au>Senthil, Kumaran</au><au>Slovis, Julia C</au><au>Mavroudis, Constantine D</au><au>Lin, Yuxi</au><au>Shi, Lingyun</au><au>Baker, Wesley B</au><au>Morgan, Ryan W</au><au>Kilbaugh, Todd J</au><au>Tsui, Fuchiang (Rich)</au><au>Ko, Tiffany S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches</atitle><jtitle>Physiological measurement</jtitle><stitle>PM</stitle><addtitle>Physiol. Meas</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>115005</spage><pages>115005-</pages><issn>0967-3334</issn><issn>1361-6579</issn><eissn>1361-6579</eissn><coden>PMEAE3</coden><abstract>Amplitude Spectrum Area (AMSA) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform during ventricular fibrillation (VF) has shown promise as a predictor of defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, AMSA relies on the magnitude of the ECG waveform, raising concerns about reproducibility across different settings that may introduce magnitude bias. This study aimed to evaluate different AMSA normalization approaches and their impact on removing bias while preserving predictive value.
ECG were recorded in 118 piglets (1-2 months old) during a model of asphyxia-associated VF cardiac arrest and CPR. An initial subset (91/118) was recorded using one device (Device 1), and the remaining piglets were recorded in the second device (Device 2). Raw AMSA and three ECG magnitude metrics were estimated to assess magnitude-related bias between devices. Five AMSA normalization approaches were assessed for their ability to remove detected bias and to classify defibrillation success.
Device 2 showed significantly lower ECG magnitude and raw AMSA compared to Device 1. CPR-based AMSA normalization approaches mitigated device-associated bias. Raw AMSA normalized by the average AMSA in the 1st minute of CPR (AMSA
) exhibited the best sensitivity and specificity for classification of successful and unsuccessful defibrillation. While the optimal AMSA
thresholds for balanced sensitivity and specificity were consistent across both devices, the optimal raw AMSA thresholds varied between the two devices. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for AMSA
did not significantly differ from raw AMSA for both devices (Device 1: 0.74 vs. 0.88,
= 0.14; Device 2: 0.56 vs. 0.59,
= 0.81).
Unlike raw AMSA, AMSA
demonstrated consistent results across different devices while maintaining predictive value for defibrillation success. This consistency has important implications for the widespread use of AMSA and the development of future guidelines on optimal AMSA thresholds for successful defibrillation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>39536707</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-2525</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-1209</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0967-3334 |
ispartof | Physiological measurement, 2024-11, Vol.45 (11), p.115005 |
issn | 0967-3334 1361-6579 1361-6579 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_39536707 |
source | MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | AMSA Animals cardiopulmonary resuscitation Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods defibrillation Electrocardiography pediatric Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Swine ventricular fibrillation Ventricular Fibrillation - physiopathology Ventricular Fibrillation - therapy |
title | Amplitude spectrum area is dependent on the electrocardiogram magnitude: evaluation of different normalization approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T01%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amplitude%20spectrum%20area%20is%20dependent%20on%20the%20electrocardiogram%20magnitude:%20evaluation%20of%20different%20normalization%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Physiological%20measurement&rft.au=Silva,%20Luiz%20E%20V&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=115005&rft.pages=115005-&rft.issn=0967-3334&rft.eissn=1361-6579&rft.coden=PMEAE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6579/ad9233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3128819135%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128819135&rft_id=info:pmid/39536707&rfr_iscdi=true |