Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework

Automation is revamping our preprocessing pipelines, and accelerating the delivery of personalized digital medicine. It improves efficiency, reduces costs, and allows clinicians to treat patients without significant delays. However, the influx of multimodal data highlights the need to protect sensit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomedical physics & engineering express 2024-10, Vol.10 (6), p.67001
Hauptverfasser: Ghani, Amna, Heinrich, Hartmut, Brown, Trevor, Schellhorn, Klaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 67001
container_title Biomedical physics & engineering express
container_volume 10
creator Ghani, Amna
Heinrich, Hartmut
Brown, Trevor
Schellhorn, Klaus
description Automation is revamping our preprocessing pipelines, and accelerating the delivery of personalized digital medicine. It improves efficiency, reduces costs, and allows clinicians to treat patients without significant delays. However, the influx of multimodal data highlights the need to protect sensitive information, such as clinical data, and safeguard data fidelity. One of the neuroimaging modalities that produces large amounts of time-series data is Electroencephalography (EEG). It captures the neural dynamics in a task or resting brain state with high temporal resolution. EEG electrodes placed on the scalp acquire electrical activity from the brain. These electrical potentials attenuate as they cross multiple layers of brain tissue and fluid yielding relatively weaker signals than noise-low signal-to-noise ratio. EEG signals are further distorted by internal physiological artifacts, such as eye movements (EOG) or heartbeat (ECG), and external noise, such as line noise (50 Hz). EOG artifacts, due to their proximity to the frontal brain regions, are particularly challenging to eliminate. Therefore, a widely used EOG rejection method, independent component analysis (ICA), demands manual inspection of the marked EOG components before they are rejected from the EEG data. We underscore the inaccuracy of automatized ICA rejection and provide an auxiliary algorithm-Second Layer Inspection for EOG (SLOG) in the clinical environment. SLOG based on spatial and temporal patterns of eye movements, re-examines the already marked EOG artifacts and confirms no EEG-related activity is mistakenly eliminated in this artifact rejection step. SLOG achieved a 99% precision rate on the simulated dataset while 85% precision on the real EEG dataset. One of the primary considerations for cloud-based applications is operational costs, including computing power. Algorithms like SLOG allow us to maintain data fidelity and precision without overloading the cloud platforms and maxing out our budgets.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2057-1976/ad7e2d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_39315479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3108764230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-331d90bc189bdd18efbdcb109e6c2c6d7b73d82a83d97fb21c2d9123c59cd2793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9PwyAAhYnRuGXu7slw9GAdP9ZSvJllTpMlHtQzoUAdsy0dtJr99zI3Fy-eeJDvvYQPgEuMbjHK8wlBKUswZ9lEamaIPgHD49PpnzwA4xDWCCGckSzj6TkYUE5xOmV8CMK8WclG2eYdzucLqGUn4aaXle22UDYatt4oG6xrYOk8VJXrdVLIYHTMtrFKVlC2bRVDF6FwF0vQfMqq_7lDV8JuZeDL8nkBSy9r8-X8xwU4K2UVzPhwjsDbw_x19phE6ml2v0wUwbxLKMWao0LhnBda49yUhVYFRtxkiqhMs4JRnROZU81ZWRCsiOaYUJVypQnjdASu97utd5vehE7UNihTVbIxrg-CRo0smxKKIor2qPIuBG9K0XpbS78VGImdbbHTKXY6xd52rFwd1vuiNvpY-HUbgZs9YF0r1q73Tfzs_3vfyPSKCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3108764230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><creator>Ghani, Amna ; Heinrich, Hartmut ; Brown, Trevor ; Schellhorn, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghani, Amna ; Heinrich, Hartmut ; Brown, Trevor ; Schellhorn, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Automation is revamping our preprocessing pipelines, and accelerating the delivery of personalized digital medicine. It improves efficiency, reduces costs, and allows clinicians to treat patients without significant delays. However, the influx of multimodal data highlights the need to protect sensitive information, such as clinical data, and safeguard data fidelity. One of the neuroimaging modalities that produces large amounts of time-series data is Electroencephalography (EEG). It captures the neural dynamics in a task or resting brain state with high temporal resolution. EEG electrodes placed on the scalp acquire electrical activity from the brain. These electrical potentials attenuate as they cross multiple layers of brain tissue and fluid yielding relatively weaker signals than noise-low signal-to-noise ratio. EEG signals are further distorted by internal physiological artifacts, such as eye movements (EOG) or heartbeat (ECG), and external noise, such as line noise (50 Hz). EOG artifacts, due to their proximity to the frontal brain regions, are particularly challenging to eliminate. Therefore, a widely used EOG rejection method, independent component analysis (ICA), demands manual inspection of the marked EOG components before they are rejected from the EEG data. We underscore the inaccuracy of automatized ICA rejection and provide an auxiliary algorithm-Second Layer Inspection for EOG (SLOG) in the clinical environment. SLOG based on spatial and temporal patterns of eye movements, re-examines the already marked EOG artifacts and confirms no EEG-related activity is mistakenly eliminated in this artifact rejection step. SLOG achieved a 99% precision rate on the simulated dataset while 85% precision on the real EEG dataset. One of the primary considerations for cloud-based applications is operational costs, including computing power. Algorithms like SLOG allow us to maintain data fidelity and precision without overloading the cloud platforms and maxing out our budgets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad7e2d</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39315479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; Cloud Computing ; Data Accuracy ; digital medicine ; EEG artifact rejection ; EEG data fidelity ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Electrooculography - methods ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Humans ; independent component analysis ICA ; signal processing ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><ispartof>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express, 2024-10, Vol.10 (6), p.67001</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Creative Commons Attribution license.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-331d90bc189bdd18efbdcb109e6c2c6d7b73d82a83d97fb21c2d9123c59cd2793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8665-689X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2057-1976/ad7e2d/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53846,53893</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39315479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghani, Amna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhorn, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework</title><title>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express</title><addtitle>BPEX</addtitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><description>Automation is revamping our preprocessing pipelines, and accelerating the delivery of personalized digital medicine. It improves efficiency, reduces costs, and allows clinicians to treat patients without significant delays. However, the influx of multimodal data highlights the need to protect sensitive information, such as clinical data, and safeguard data fidelity. One of the neuroimaging modalities that produces large amounts of time-series data is Electroencephalography (EEG). It captures the neural dynamics in a task or resting brain state with high temporal resolution. EEG electrodes placed on the scalp acquire electrical activity from the brain. These electrical potentials attenuate as they cross multiple layers of brain tissue and fluid yielding relatively weaker signals than noise-low signal-to-noise ratio. EEG signals are further distorted by internal physiological artifacts, such as eye movements (EOG) or heartbeat (ECG), and external noise, such as line noise (50 Hz). EOG artifacts, due to their proximity to the frontal brain regions, are particularly challenging to eliminate. Therefore, a widely used EOG rejection method, independent component analysis (ICA), demands manual inspection of the marked EOG components before they are rejected from the EEG data. We underscore the inaccuracy of automatized ICA rejection and provide an auxiliary algorithm-Second Layer Inspection for EOG (SLOG) in the clinical environment. SLOG based on spatial and temporal patterns of eye movements, re-examines the already marked EOG artifacts and confirms no EEG-related activity is mistakenly eliminated in this artifact rejection step. SLOG achieved a 99% precision rate on the simulated dataset while 85% precision on the real EEG dataset. One of the primary considerations for cloud-based applications is operational costs, including computing power. Algorithms like SLOG allow us to maintain data fidelity and precision without overloading the cloud platforms and maxing out our budgets.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Cloud Computing</subject><subject>Data Accuracy</subject><subject>digital medicine</subject><subject>EEG artifact rejection</subject><subject>EEG data fidelity</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Electrooculography - methods</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>independent component analysis ICA</subject><subject>signal processing</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><issn>2057-1976</issn><issn>2057-1976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9PwyAAhYnRuGXu7slw9GAdP9ZSvJllTpMlHtQzoUAdsy0dtJr99zI3Fy-eeJDvvYQPgEuMbjHK8wlBKUswZ9lEamaIPgHD49PpnzwA4xDWCCGckSzj6TkYUE5xOmV8CMK8WclG2eYdzucLqGUn4aaXle22UDYatt4oG6xrYOk8VJXrdVLIYHTMtrFKVlC2bRVDF6FwF0vQfMqq_7lDV8JuZeDL8nkBSy9r8-X8xwU4K2UVzPhwjsDbw_x19phE6ml2v0wUwbxLKMWao0LhnBda49yUhVYFRtxkiqhMs4JRnROZU81ZWRCsiOaYUJVypQnjdASu97utd5vehE7UNihTVbIxrg-CRo0smxKKIor2qPIuBG9K0XpbS78VGImdbbHTKXY6xd52rFwd1vuiNvpY-HUbgZs9YF0r1q73Tfzs_3vfyPSKCg</recordid><startdate>20241004</startdate><enddate>20241004</enddate><creator>Ghani, Amna</creator><creator>Heinrich, Hartmut</creator><creator>Brown, Trevor</creator><creator>Schellhorn, Klaus</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8665-689X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241004</creationdate><title>Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework</title><author>Ghani, Amna ; Heinrich, Hartmut ; Brown, Trevor ; Schellhorn, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c219t-331d90bc189bdd18efbdcb109e6c2c6d7b73d82a83d97fb21c2d9123c59cd2793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Cloud Computing</topic><topic>Data Accuracy</topic><topic>digital medicine</topic><topic>EEG artifact rejection</topic><topic>EEG data fidelity</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Electrooculography - methods</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>independent component analysis ICA</topic><topic>signal processing</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghani, Amna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schellhorn, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghani, Amna</au><au>Heinrich, Hartmut</au><au>Brown, Trevor</au><au>Schellhorn, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express</jtitle><stitle>BPEX</stitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><date>2024-10-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>67001</spage><pages>67001-</pages><issn>2057-1976</issn><eissn>2057-1976</eissn><abstract>Automation is revamping our preprocessing pipelines, and accelerating the delivery of personalized digital medicine. It improves efficiency, reduces costs, and allows clinicians to treat patients without significant delays. However, the influx of multimodal data highlights the need to protect sensitive information, such as clinical data, and safeguard data fidelity. One of the neuroimaging modalities that produces large amounts of time-series data is Electroencephalography (EEG). It captures the neural dynamics in a task or resting brain state with high temporal resolution. EEG electrodes placed on the scalp acquire electrical activity from the brain. These electrical potentials attenuate as they cross multiple layers of brain tissue and fluid yielding relatively weaker signals than noise-low signal-to-noise ratio. EEG signals are further distorted by internal physiological artifacts, such as eye movements (EOG) or heartbeat (ECG), and external noise, such as line noise (50 Hz). EOG artifacts, due to their proximity to the frontal brain regions, are particularly challenging to eliminate. Therefore, a widely used EOG rejection method, independent component analysis (ICA), demands manual inspection of the marked EOG components before they are rejected from the EEG data. We underscore the inaccuracy of automatized ICA rejection and provide an auxiliary algorithm-Second Layer Inspection for EOG (SLOG) in the clinical environment. SLOG based on spatial and temporal patterns of eye movements, re-examines the already marked EOG artifacts and confirms no EEG-related activity is mistakenly eliminated in this artifact rejection step. SLOG achieved a 99% precision rate on the simulated dataset while 85% precision on the real EEG dataset. One of the primary considerations for cloud-based applications is operational costs, including computing power. Algorithms like SLOG allow us to maintain data fidelity and precision without overloading the cloud platforms and maxing out our budgets.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>39315479</pmid><doi>10.1088/2057-1976/ad7e2d</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8665-689X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2057-1976
ispartof Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2024-10, Vol.10 (6), p.67001
issn 2057-1976
2057-1976
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_39315479
source MEDLINE; Institute of Physics Journals
subjects Algorithms
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - physiology
Cloud Computing
Data Accuracy
digital medicine
EEG artifact rejection
EEG data fidelity
Electroencephalography - methods
Electrooculography - methods
Eye Movements - physiology
Humans
independent component analysis ICA
signal processing
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
title Enhancing EEG data quality and precision for cloud-based clinical applications: an evaluation of the SLOG framework
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A55%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20EEG%20data%20quality%20and%20precision%20for%20cloud-based%20clinical%20applications:%20an%20evaluation%20of%20the%20SLOG%20framework&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20physics%20&%20engineering%20express&rft.au=Ghani,%20Amna&rft.date=2024-10-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=67001&rft.pages=67001-&rft.issn=2057-1976&rft.eissn=2057-1976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2057-1976/ad7e2d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3108764230%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3108764230&rft_id=info:pmid/39315479&rfr_iscdi=true