End-to-end donor screening and manufacturing controls: complementary quality-based strategies to minimize patient risk for donor-derived microbiome therapeutics

Advances in microbiome therapeutics have been motivated by a deeper understanding of the role that the gastrointestinal microbiome plays in human health and disease. The FDA approval of two stool-derived live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), REBYOTA® 150 mL enema (fecal microbiota, live-jslm; formerl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut microbes 2024-12, Vol.16 (1), p.2402550
Hauptverfasser: Goldsmith, Jason, Tomkovich, Sarah, Auniņš, John G., McGovern, Barbara H., Mahoney, Jennifer C., Hasson, Brooke R., McChalicher, Christopher W J, Ege, David S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2402550
container_title Gut microbes
container_volume 16
creator Goldsmith, Jason
Tomkovich, Sarah
Auniņš, John G.
McGovern, Barbara H.
Mahoney, Jennifer C.
Hasson, Brooke R.
McChalicher, Christopher W J
Ege, David S.
description Advances in microbiome therapeutics have been motivated by a deeper understanding of the role that the gastrointestinal microbiome plays in human health and disease. The FDA approval of two stool-derived live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), REBYOTA® 150 mL enema (fecal microbiota, live-jslm; formerly RBX2660) and VOWST® oral capsules (fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk; formerly SER-109), for the prevention of recurrent CDI in adults following antibiotic treatment for recurrent CDI provides promise and insights for the development of LBPs for other diseases associated with microbiome dysfunction. Donor-derived products carry risk of disease transmission that must be mitigated through a robust donor screening program and downstream manufacturing controls. Most published recommendations for donor screening practices are prescriptive and do not include a systematic, risk-based approach for donor stool-derived products. A general framework for an end-to-end donor screening program is needed using risk management strategies for donor-derived microbiome therapeutic using a matrixed approach, combining the elements of donor screening with manufacturing controls that are designed to minimize risk to patients. A donor screening paradigm that incorporates medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and donor sample inspection are only the first steps in reducing risk of transmission of infectious agents. Manufacturing controls are the cornerstone of risk mitigation when screening unwittingly fails. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can be used as a tool to assess for residual risk that requires further donor or manufacturing controls. Together, a well-reasoned donor program and manufacturing controls are complementary strategies that must be revisited and reexamined frequently with constant vigilance to mitigate risk to patients. In the spirit of full disclosure and informed consent, physicians should discuss any limitations in the donor screening and manufacturing processes with their patients prior to treatment with microbiome-based therapeutics.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19490976.2024.2402550
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_39292598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d50c2aaf0d6047ffbd335412cd5b848c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3106732004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-d5e89f0bd6d8183b21c5f1b43a38321f2319b4abd8769653bf628d4fe4570d573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuFDEQHCEQiUI-AeQjl1n8nPFwAkUBIkXiAmfLz8VhbE9sD2j5Gj4V7yN7xBe3SlVd3V1d9xrBDYIcvkMTneA0DhsMMd1gCjFj8Fl3ucd7OHH6_FyPw0V3XcoDbI_SEQ7kZXdBJjxhNvHL7u9tNH1NvY0GmBRTBkVna6OPWyAbFmRcndR1zXtEp1hzmsv7VoVltsHGKvMOPK5y9nXXK1msAaVmWe3W2wJqAsFHH_wfCxZZfeOD7MtP4JrTwa83NvtfTRW8zkn5FCyoP2yWi12r1-VV98LJudjr03_Vff90--3mS3__9fPdzcf7XhM21t4wyycHlRkMR5wojDRzSFEiCScYOUzQpKhUho_DNDCi3IC5oc5SNkLDRnLV3R37miQfxJJ9aIuJJL04AClvhcxtoNkKw6DGUjpoBkhH55QhhFGEtWGKU65br7fHXktOj6stVQRftJ1nGW1aiyAIDiPBLZBGZUdqW76UbN3ZGkGxz1o8ZS32WYtT1k335mSxqmDNWfWUbCN8OBJ8bLcO8nfKsxFV7uaUXZZR-8Mc__P4B-exvH8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106732004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>End-to-end donor screening and manufacturing controls: complementary quality-based strategies to minimize patient risk for donor-derived microbiome therapeutics</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Goldsmith, Jason ; Tomkovich, Sarah ; Auniņš, John G. ; McGovern, Barbara H. ; Mahoney, Jennifer C. ; Hasson, Brooke R. ; McChalicher, Christopher W J ; Ege, David S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Jason ; Tomkovich, Sarah ; Auniņš, John G. ; McGovern, Barbara H. ; Mahoney, Jennifer C. ; Hasson, Brooke R. ; McChalicher, Christopher W J ; Ege, David S.</creatorcontrib><description>Advances in microbiome therapeutics have been motivated by a deeper understanding of the role that the gastrointestinal microbiome plays in human health and disease. The FDA approval of two stool-derived live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), REBYOTA® 150 mL enema (fecal microbiota, live-jslm; formerly RBX2660) and VOWST® oral capsules (fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk; formerly SER-109), for the prevention of recurrent CDI in adults following antibiotic treatment for recurrent CDI provides promise and insights for the development of LBPs for other diseases associated with microbiome dysfunction. Donor-derived products carry risk of disease transmission that must be mitigated through a robust donor screening program and downstream manufacturing controls. Most published recommendations for donor screening practices are prescriptive and do not include a systematic, risk-based approach for donor stool-derived products. A general framework for an end-to-end donor screening program is needed using risk management strategies for donor-derived microbiome therapeutic using a matrixed approach, combining the elements of donor screening with manufacturing controls that are designed to minimize risk to patients. A donor screening paradigm that incorporates medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and donor sample inspection are only the first steps in reducing risk of transmission of infectious agents. Manufacturing controls are the cornerstone of risk mitigation when screening unwittingly fails. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can be used as a tool to assess for residual risk that requires further donor or manufacturing controls. Together, a well-reasoned donor program and manufacturing controls are complementary strategies that must be revisited and reexamined frequently with constant vigilance to mitigate risk to patients. In the spirit of full disclosure and informed consent, physicians should discuss any limitations in the donor screening and manufacturing processes with their patients prior to treatment with microbiome-based therapeutics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-0976</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1949-0984</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-0984</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2402550</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39292598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Donor Selection - organization &amp; administration ; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation - adverse effects ; fecal transplant ; Feces - microbiology ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; Humans ; live biotherapeutic products ; Microbiome ; microbiome therapeutics ; stool donors</subject><ispartof>Gut microbes, 2024-12, Vol.16 (1), p.2402550</ispartof><rights>2024 Seres Therapeutics. Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-d5e89f0bd6d8183b21c5f1b43a38321f2319b4abd8769653bf628d4fe4570d573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/19490976.2024.2402550$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19490976.2024.2402550$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,2096,27483,27905,27906,59122,59123</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39292598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomkovich, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auniņš, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Barbara H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasson, Brooke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McChalicher, Christopher W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ege, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>End-to-end donor screening and manufacturing controls: complementary quality-based strategies to minimize patient risk for donor-derived microbiome therapeutics</title><title>Gut microbes</title><addtitle>Gut Microbes</addtitle><description>Advances in microbiome therapeutics have been motivated by a deeper understanding of the role that the gastrointestinal microbiome plays in human health and disease. The FDA approval of two stool-derived live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), REBYOTA® 150 mL enema (fecal microbiota, live-jslm; formerly RBX2660) and VOWST® oral capsules (fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk; formerly SER-109), for the prevention of recurrent CDI in adults following antibiotic treatment for recurrent CDI provides promise and insights for the development of LBPs for other diseases associated with microbiome dysfunction. Donor-derived products carry risk of disease transmission that must be mitigated through a robust donor screening program and downstream manufacturing controls. Most published recommendations for donor screening practices are prescriptive and do not include a systematic, risk-based approach for donor stool-derived products. A general framework for an end-to-end donor screening program is needed using risk management strategies for donor-derived microbiome therapeutic using a matrixed approach, combining the elements of donor screening with manufacturing controls that are designed to minimize risk to patients. A donor screening paradigm that incorporates medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and donor sample inspection are only the first steps in reducing risk of transmission of infectious agents. Manufacturing controls are the cornerstone of risk mitigation when screening unwittingly fails. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can be used as a tool to assess for residual risk that requires further donor or manufacturing controls. Together, a well-reasoned donor program and manufacturing controls are complementary strategies that must be revisited and reexamined frequently with constant vigilance to mitigate risk to patients. In the spirit of full disclosure and informed consent, physicians should discuss any limitations in the donor screening and manufacturing processes with their patients prior to treatment with microbiome-based therapeutics.</description><subject>Donor Selection - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>fecal transplant</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>live biotherapeutic products</subject><subject>Microbiome</subject><subject>microbiome therapeutics</subject><subject>stool donors</subject><issn>1949-0976</issn><issn>1949-0984</issn><issn>1949-0984</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctuFDEQHCEQiUI-AeQjl1n8nPFwAkUBIkXiAmfLz8VhbE9sD2j5Gj4V7yN7xBe3SlVd3V1d9xrBDYIcvkMTneA0DhsMMd1gCjFj8Fl3ucd7OHH6_FyPw0V3XcoDbI_SEQ7kZXdBJjxhNvHL7u9tNH1NvY0GmBRTBkVna6OPWyAbFmRcndR1zXtEp1hzmsv7VoVltsHGKvMOPK5y9nXXK1msAaVmWe3W2wJqAsFHH_wfCxZZfeOD7MtP4JrTwa83NvtfTRW8zkn5FCyoP2yWi12r1-VV98LJudjr03_Vff90--3mS3__9fPdzcf7XhM21t4wyycHlRkMR5wojDRzSFEiCScYOUzQpKhUho_DNDCi3IC5oc5SNkLDRnLV3R37miQfxJJ9aIuJJL04AClvhcxtoNkKw6DGUjpoBkhH55QhhFGEtWGKU65br7fHXktOj6stVQRftJ1nGW1aiyAIDiPBLZBGZUdqW76UbN3ZGkGxz1o8ZS32WYtT1k335mSxqmDNWfWUbCN8OBJ8bLcO8nfKsxFV7uaUXZZR-8Mc__P4B-exvH8</recordid><startdate>20241231</startdate><enddate>20241231</enddate><creator>Goldsmith, Jason</creator><creator>Tomkovich, Sarah</creator><creator>Auniņš, John G.</creator><creator>McGovern, Barbara H.</creator><creator>Mahoney, Jennifer C.</creator><creator>Hasson, Brooke R.</creator><creator>McChalicher, Christopher W J</creator><creator>Ege, David S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241231</creationdate><title>End-to-end donor screening and manufacturing controls: complementary quality-based strategies to minimize patient risk for donor-derived microbiome therapeutics</title><author>Goldsmith, Jason ; Tomkovich, Sarah ; Auniņš, John G. ; McGovern, Barbara H. ; Mahoney, Jennifer C. ; Hasson, Brooke R. ; McChalicher, Christopher W J ; Ege, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-d5e89f0bd6d8183b21c5f1b43a38321f2319b4abd8769653bf628d4fe4570d573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Donor Selection - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Fecal Microbiota Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>fecal transplant</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>live biotherapeutic products</topic><topic>Microbiome</topic><topic>microbiome therapeutics</topic><topic>stool donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomkovich, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auniņš, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Barbara H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahoney, Jennifer C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasson, Brooke R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McChalicher, Christopher W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ege, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Gut microbes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldsmith, Jason</au><au>Tomkovich, Sarah</au><au>Auniņš, John G.</au><au>McGovern, Barbara H.</au><au>Mahoney, Jennifer C.</au><au>Hasson, Brooke R.</au><au>McChalicher, Christopher W J</au><au>Ege, David S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>End-to-end donor screening and manufacturing controls: complementary quality-based strategies to minimize patient risk for donor-derived microbiome therapeutics</atitle><jtitle>Gut microbes</jtitle><addtitle>Gut Microbes</addtitle><date>2024-12-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2402550</spage><pages>2402550-</pages><issn>1949-0976</issn><issn>1949-0984</issn><eissn>1949-0984</eissn><abstract>Advances in microbiome therapeutics have been motivated by a deeper understanding of the role that the gastrointestinal microbiome plays in human health and disease. The FDA approval of two stool-derived live biotherapeutic products (LBPs), REBYOTA® 150 mL enema (fecal microbiota, live-jslm; formerly RBX2660) and VOWST® oral capsules (fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk; formerly SER-109), for the prevention of recurrent CDI in adults following antibiotic treatment for recurrent CDI provides promise and insights for the development of LBPs for other diseases associated with microbiome dysfunction. Donor-derived products carry risk of disease transmission that must be mitigated through a robust donor screening program and downstream manufacturing controls. Most published recommendations for donor screening practices are prescriptive and do not include a systematic, risk-based approach for donor stool-derived products. A general framework for an end-to-end donor screening program is needed using risk management strategies for donor-derived microbiome therapeutic using a matrixed approach, combining the elements of donor screening with manufacturing controls that are designed to minimize risk to patients. A donor screening paradigm that incorporates medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and donor sample inspection are only the first steps in reducing risk of transmission of infectious agents. Manufacturing controls are the cornerstone of risk mitigation when screening unwittingly fails. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can be used as a tool to assess for residual risk that requires further donor or manufacturing controls. Together, a well-reasoned donor program and manufacturing controls are complementary strategies that must be revisited and reexamined frequently with constant vigilance to mitigate risk to patients. In the spirit of full disclosure and informed consent, physicians should discuss any limitations in the donor screening and manufacturing processes with their patients prior to treatment with microbiome-based therapeutics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>39292598</pmid><doi>10.1080/19490976.2024.2402550</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1949-0976
ispartof Gut microbes, 2024-12, Vol.16 (1), p.2402550
issn 1949-0976
1949-0984
1949-0984
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_39292598
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Donor Selection - organization & administration
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation - adverse effects
fecal transplant
Feces - microbiology
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Humans
live biotherapeutic products
Microbiome
microbiome therapeutics
stool donors
title End-to-end donor screening and manufacturing controls: complementary quality-based strategies to minimize patient risk for donor-derived microbiome therapeutics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A49%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=End-to-end%20donor%20screening%20and%20manufacturing%20controls:%20complementary%20quality-based%20strategies%20to%20minimize%20patient%20risk%20for%20donor-derived%20microbiome%20therapeutics&rft.jtitle=Gut%20microbes&rft.au=Goldsmith,%20Jason&rft.date=2024-12-31&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2402550&rft.pages=2402550-&rft.issn=1949-0976&rft.eissn=1949-0984&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19490976.2024.2402550&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3106732004%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106732004&rft_id=info:pmid/39292598&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d50c2aaf0d6047ffbd335412cd5b848c&rfr_iscdi=true