Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C -Mutated NSCLC Treated With Sotorasib

For patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC who are treated with sotorasib, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We therefore investigated the clinical utility of pretreatment and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and treatment-emergent alterations on disease progression. P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic oncology 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.995
Hauptverfasser: Ernst, Sophie M, van Marion, Ronald, Atmodimedjo, Peggy N, de Jonge, Evert, Mathijssen, Ron H J, Paats, Marthe S, de Bruijn, Peter, Koolen, Stijn L, von der Thüsen, Jan H, Aerts, Joachim G J V, van Schaik, Ron H N, Dubbink, Hendrikus J, Dingemans, Anne-Marie C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 995
container_title Journal of thoracic oncology
container_volume 19
creator Ernst, Sophie M
van Marion, Ronald
Atmodimedjo, Peggy N
de Jonge, Evert
Mathijssen, Ron H J
Paats, Marthe S
de Bruijn, Peter
Koolen, Stijn L
von der Thüsen, Jan H
Aerts, Joachim G J V
van Schaik, Ron H N
Dubbink, Hendrikus J
Dingemans, Anne-Marie C
description For patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC who are treated with sotorasib, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We therefore investigated the clinical utility of pretreatment and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and treatment-emergent alterations on disease progression. Patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC treated with sotorasib were prospectively enrolled in our biomarker study (NCT05221372). Plasma samples were collected before sotorasib treatment, at first-response evaluation and at disease progression. The TruSight Oncology 500 panel was used for ctDNA and variant allele frequency analysis. Tumor response and progression-free survival were assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Pretreatment KRAS ctDNA was detected in 50 of 66 patients (76%). Patients with detectable KRAS had inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-4.30], p = 0.031) and overall survival (HR 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.91], p = 0.017). At first-response evaluation (n = 40), 29 patients (73%) had a molecular response. Molecular nonresponders had inferior overall survival (HR 3.58 [95% CI: 1.65-7.74], p = 0.00059). The disease control rate was significantly higher in those with a molecular response (97% versus 64%, p = 0.015). KRAS amplifications were identified as recurrent treatment-emergent alterations. Our data suggest detectable pretreatment KRAS ctDNA as a marker for poor prognosis and on-treatment ctDNA clearance as a marker for treatment response. We identified KRAS amplifications as a potential recurring resistance mechanism to sotorasib. Identifying patients with superior prognosis could aid in optimizing time of treatment initiation, and identifying patients at risk of early progression could allow for earlier treatment decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.04.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_38615940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38615940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_386159403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjs1Kw0AUhQdBbK2-gAu5L5B4J3_GZRj_QFvERFyWaTK1N0xmysxE6Nsbiq6FA4fz8S0OY1ccY468uOnjPuxsnGCSxTgFb0_YnOd5EfG0xBk7975HzHLMyjM2S8uC53cZzpkXmgy1UsNHIE3hAHYLglw7ahnIfEEzDtbB_aoCMvA2MWWCh08KO6i6b2la1cHLe1XDE08ERMsxyDChVS1eBTROHddRr22wTnraXLDTrdReXf72gl0_PjTiOdqPm0F1672jQbrD-u9l-q_wA3R4TLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C -Mutated NSCLC Treated With Sotorasib</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ernst, Sophie M ; van Marion, Ronald ; Atmodimedjo, Peggy N ; de Jonge, Evert ; Mathijssen, Ron H J ; Paats, Marthe S ; de Bruijn, Peter ; Koolen, Stijn L ; von der Thüsen, Jan H ; Aerts, Joachim G J V ; van Schaik, Ron H N ; Dubbink, Hendrikus J ; Dingemans, Anne-Marie C</creator><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Sophie M ; van Marion, Ronald ; Atmodimedjo, Peggy N ; de Jonge, Evert ; Mathijssen, Ron H J ; Paats, Marthe S ; de Bruijn, Peter ; Koolen, Stijn L ; von der Thüsen, Jan H ; Aerts, Joachim G J V ; van Schaik, Ron H N ; Dubbink, Hendrikus J ; Dingemans, Anne-Marie C</creatorcontrib><description>For patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC who are treated with sotorasib, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We therefore investigated the clinical utility of pretreatment and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and treatment-emergent alterations on disease progression. Patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC treated with sotorasib were prospectively enrolled in our biomarker study (NCT05221372). Plasma samples were collected before sotorasib treatment, at first-response evaluation and at disease progression. The TruSight Oncology 500 panel was used for ctDNA and variant allele frequency analysis. Tumor response and progression-free survival were assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Pretreatment KRAS ctDNA was detected in 50 of 66 patients (76%). Patients with detectable KRAS had inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-4.30], p = 0.031) and overall survival (HR 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.91], p = 0.017). At first-response evaluation (n = 40), 29 patients (73%) had a molecular response. Molecular nonresponders had inferior overall survival (HR 3.58 [95% CI: 1.65-7.74], p = 0.00059). The disease control rate was significantly higher in those with a molecular response (97% versus 64%, p = 0.015). KRAS amplifications were identified as recurrent treatment-emergent alterations. Our data suggest detectable pretreatment KRAS ctDNA as a marker for poor prognosis and on-treatment ctDNA clearance as a marker for treatment response. We identified KRAS amplifications as a potential recurring resistance mechanism to sotorasib. Identifying patients with superior prognosis could aid in optimizing time of treatment initiation, and identifying patients at risk of early progression could allow for earlier treatment decisions.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1556-1380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38615940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Circulating Tumor DNA - blood ; Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - blood ; Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Lung Neoplasms - genetics ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Piperazines ; Prospective Studies ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) - genetics ; Pyridines - therapeutic use ; Pyrimidines</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic oncology, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.995</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38615940$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Sophie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Marion, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmodimedjo, Peggy N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Evert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathijssen, Ron H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paats, Marthe S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koolen, Stijn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von der Thüsen, Jan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerts, Joachim G J V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Ron H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubbink, Hendrikus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dingemans, Anne-Marie C</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C -Mutated NSCLC Treated With Sotorasib</title><title>Journal of thoracic oncology</title><addtitle>J Thorac Oncol</addtitle><description>For patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC who are treated with sotorasib, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We therefore investigated the clinical utility of pretreatment and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and treatment-emergent alterations on disease progression. Patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC treated with sotorasib were prospectively enrolled in our biomarker study (NCT05221372). Plasma samples were collected before sotorasib treatment, at first-response evaluation and at disease progression. The TruSight Oncology 500 panel was used for ctDNA and variant allele frequency analysis. Tumor response and progression-free survival were assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Pretreatment KRAS ctDNA was detected in 50 of 66 patients (76%). Patients with detectable KRAS had inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-4.30], p = 0.031) and overall survival (HR 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.91], p = 0.017). At first-response evaluation (n = 40), 29 patients (73%) had a molecular response. Molecular nonresponders had inferior overall survival (HR 3.58 [95% CI: 1.65-7.74], p = 0.00059). The disease control rate was significantly higher in those with a molecular response (97% versus 64%, p = 0.015). KRAS amplifications were identified as recurrent treatment-emergent alterations. Our data suggest detectable pretreatment KRAS ctDNA as a marker for poor prognosis and on-treatment ctDNA clearance as a marker for treatment response. We identified KRAS amplifications as a potential recurring resistance mechanism to sotorasib. Identifying patients with superior prognosis could aid in optimizing time of treatment initiation, and identifying patients at risk of early progression could allow for earlier treatment decisions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Circulating Tumor DNA - blood</subject><subject>Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Piperazines</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) - genetics</subject><subject>Pyridines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pyrimidines</subject><issn>1556-1380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjs1Kw0AUhQdBbK2-gAu5L5B4J3_GZRj_QFvERFyWaTK1N0xmysxE6Nsbiq6FA4fz8S0OY1ccY468uOnjPuxsnGCSxTgFb0_YnOd5EfG0xBk7975HzHLMyjM2S8uC53cZzpkXmgy1UsNHIE3hAHYLglw7ahnIfEEzDtbB_aoCMvA2MWWCh08KO6i6b2la1cHLe1XDE08ERMsxyDChVS1eBTROHddRr22wTnraXLDTrdReXf72gl0_PjTiOdqPm0F1672jQbrD-u9l-q_wA3R4TLA</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Ernst, Sophie M</creator><creator>van Marion, Ronald</creator><creator>Atmodimedjo, Peggy N</creator><creator>de Jonge, Evert</creator><creator>Mathijssen, Ron H J</creator><creator>Paats, Marthe S</creator><creator>de Bruijn, Peter</creator><creator>Koolen, Stijn L</creator><creator>von der Thüsen, Jan H</creator><creator>Aerts, Joachim G J V</creator><creator>van Schaik, Ron H N</creator><creator>Dubbink, Hendrikus J</creator><creator>Dingemans, Anne-Marie C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C -Mutated NSCLC Treated With Sotorasib</title><author>Ernst, Sophie M ; van Marion, Ronald ; Atmodimedjo, Peggy N ; de Jonge, Evert ; Mathijssen, Ron H J ; Paats, Marthe S ; de Bruijn, Peter ; Koolen, Stijn L ; von der Thüsen, Jan H ; Aerts, Joachim G J V ; van Schaik, Ron H N ; Dubbink, Hendrikus J ; Dingemans, Anne-Marie C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_386159403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Circulating Tumor DNA - blood</topic><topic>Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Piperazines</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) - genetics</topic><topic>Pyridines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pyrimidines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Sophie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Marion, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmodimedjo, Peggy N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jonge, Evert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathijssen, Ron H J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paats, Marthe S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koolen, Stijn L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von der Thüsen, Jan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aerts, Joachim G J V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schaik, Ron H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubbink, Hendrikus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dingemans, Anne-Marie C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ernst, Sophie M</au><au>van Marion, Ronald</au><au>Atmodimedjo, Peggy N</au><au>de Jonge, Evert</au><au>Mathijssen, Ron H J</au><au>Paats, Marthe S</au><au>de Bruijn, Peter</au><au>Koolen, Stijn L</au><au>von der Thüsen, Jan H</au><au>Aerts, Joachim G J V</au><au>van Schaik, Ron H N</au><au>Dubbink, Hendrikus J</au><au>Dingemans, Anne-Marie C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C -Mutated NSCLC Treated With Sotorasib</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>995</spage><pages>995-</pages><eissn>1556-1380</eissn><abstract>For patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC who are treated with sotorasib, there is a lack of biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We therefore investigated the clinical utility of pretreatment and on-treatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and treatment-emergent alterations on disease progression. Patients with KRAS -mutated NSCLC treated with sotorasib were prospectively enrolled in our biomarker study (NCT05221372). Plasma samples were collected before sotorasib treatment, at first-response evaluation and at disease progression. The TruSight Oncology 500 panel was used for ctDNA and variant allele frequency analysis. Tumor response and progression-free survival were assessed per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Pretreatment KRAS ctDNA was detected in 50 of 66 patients (76%). Patients with detectable KRAS had inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-4.30], p = 0.031) and overall survival (HR 2.61 [95% CI: 1.16-5.91], p = 0.017). At first-response evaluation (n = 40), 29 patients (73%) had a molecular response. Molecular nonresponders had inferior overall survival (HR 3.58 [95% CI: 1.65-7.74], p = 0.00059). The disease control rate was significantly higher in those with a molecular response (97% versus 64%, p = 0.015). KRAS amplifications were identified as recurrent treatment-emergent alterations. Our data suggest detectable pretreatment KRAS ctDNA as a marker for poor prognosis and on-treatment ctDNA clearance as a marker for treatment response. We identified KRAS amplifications as a potential recurring resistance mechanism to sotorasib. Identifying patients with superior prognosis could aid in optimizing time of treatment initiation, and identifying patients at risk of early progression could allow for earlier treatment decisions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38615940</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtho.2024.04.007</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1556-1380
ispartof Journal of thoracic oncology, 2024-07, Vol.19 (7), p.995
issn 1556-1380
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_38615940
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor - blood
Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Circulating Tumor DNA - blood
Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms - blood
Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms - genetics
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Mutation
Piperazines
Prospective Studies
Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) - genetics
Pyridines - therapeutic use
Pyrimidines
title Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C -Mutated NSCLC Treated With Sotorasib
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A48%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Utility%20of%20Circulating%20Tumor%20DNA%20in%20Patients%20With%20Advanced%20KRAS%20G12C%20-Mutated%20NSCLC%20Treated%20With%20Sotorasib&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20oncology&rft.au=Ernst,%20Sophie%20M&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=995&rft.pages=995-&rft.eissn=1556-1380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E38615940%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/38615940&rfr_iscdi=true