68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis
The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods, Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score. We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Scien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2024-01, Vol.170, p.111274 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111274 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 170 |
creator | Ren, Xiaolu Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur Zhang, Li Wang, Kehua |
description | The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods,
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score.
We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I
statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.
Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias.
After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_38147764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38147764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_381477643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj81Kw0AUhQdB2mp9BbkvMJiksRPdSak_C0Ek-3I7ubEjmUmYexPJo_l2plDdujqb8_Gdc6YWaWEybUxm5uqC-TNJktv8Lpup-apIc2PW-UJ9rwt4Qt3FlgWFgDuyrnYWPPl9xECAQdwHBZ2m8LYtbzYlDBS5Z_B9I67DiJ4kTsTr-wu4AHIgqEjIimsDtDV00XmMI_w5LAZL8R4egEcW8igTHWlw9DXZKjgQVlpafUywrT86xA00bRLUGLAZ2fFSndfYMF2d8lJdP27LzbPu-r2nanfS7n6_rv4t_ABQ6mJf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ren, Xiaolu ; Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad ; Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur ; Zhang, Li ; Wang, Kehua</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaolu ; Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad ; Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur ; Zhang, Li ; Wang, Kehua</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods,
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score.
We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I
statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.
Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias.
After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38147764</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland</publisher><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2024-01, Vol.170, p.111274</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38147764$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kehua</creatorcontrib><title>68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods,
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score.
We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I
statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.
Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias.
After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further.</description><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj81Kw0AUhQdB2mp9BbkvMJiksRPdSak_C0Ek-3I7ubEjmUmYexPJo_l2plDdujqb8_Gdc6YWaWEybUxm5uqC-TNJktv8Lpup-apIc2PW-UJ9rwt4Qt3FlgWFgDuyrnYWPPl9xECAQdwHBZ2m8LYtbzYlDBS5Z_B9I67DiJ4kTsTr-wu4AHIgqEjIimsDtDV00XmMI_w5LAZL8R4egEcW8igTHWlw9DXZKjgQVlpafUywrT86xA00bRLUGLAZ2fFSndfYMF2d8lJdP27LzbPu-r2nanfS7n6_rv4t_ABQ6mJf</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Ren, Xiaolu</creator><creator>Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad</creator><creator>Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur</creator><creator>Zhang, Li</creator><creator>Wang, Kehua</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis</title><author>Ren, Xiaolu ; Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad ; Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur ; Zhang, Li ; Wang, Kehua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_381477643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xiaolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kehua</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Xiaolu</au><au>Nur Salihin Yusoff, Muhammad</au><au>Hartini Mohd Taib, Nur</au><au>Zhang, Li</au><au>Wang, Kehua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>170</volume><spage>111274</spage><pages>111274-</pages><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods,
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score.
We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I
statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.
Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias.
After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pmid>38147764</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1872-7727 |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2024-01, Vol.170, p.111274 |
issn | 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_38147764 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
title | 68 Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T05%3A26%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=68%20Ga-prostate%20specific%20membrane%20antigen-11%20PET/CT%20versus%20multiparametric%20MRI%20in%20the%20detection%20of%20primary%20prostate%20cancer:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20head-to-head%20comparative%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Ren,%20Xiaolu&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=170&rft.spage=111274&rft.pages=111274-&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E38147764%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/38147764&rfr_iscdi=true |