Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study
Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics 2023-12, Vol.19 (3), p.2272539 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2272539 |
container_title | Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Wang, Qing Dai, Peixi Jia, Mengmeng Jiang, Mingyue Li, Juan Yang, Weizhong Feng, Luzhao |
description | Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37905961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4fae4b9cfada498ca4265b9b8c975a3b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2884675086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-fcbfbf70ec09e56f169f0cbd2f28605adeee5941f3a126030222232bd20878e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsFuEzEQXSEQrUo_AeQjl6S21_Z6uUAVKFSqxAUkbtas105cvHawvUX5exySRvSCL7Zn3ryZ0XtN85rgJcESX1EiGOeELymm7ZLSjvK2f9ac7-MLztmP56c34WfNZc73uJ4OUybEy-as7XrMe0HOm3kVQy5p1sXFgKJFEJALo9NQYkI2wWR-x_QT2fp7AK1dMDWv_Zz3eBfQdh6802hjwJcN2qa4rjX5HbpGH43fbtzChJLidocmUzZxRLnM4-5V88KCz-byeF80328-fVt9Wdx9_Xy7ur5baCbbsrB6sIPtsNG4N1xYInqL9TBSS6XAHEZjDO8ZsS0QKnCLaT0trQAsO2lYe9HcHnjHCPdqm9wEaaciOPU3ENNaQSpOe6OYBcOGXlsYgfVSA6OCD_0gdd9xaIfK9f7AVTeezKj3e4F_Qvo0E9xGreODIrirs0laGd4eGVL8NZtc1OSyNt5DMHHOikrJRMexFBXKD1CdYs7J2FMfgtXeAurRAmpvAXW0QK178--Qp6pHwSvgwwHgQpV0giquH1WBnY-pqh20y6r9f48_-q3Dfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884675086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, Qing ; Dai, Peixi ; Jia, Mengmeng ; Jiang, Mingyue ; Li, Juan ; Yang, Weizhong ; Feng, Luzhao</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing ; Dai, Peixi ; Jia, Mengmeng ; Jiang, Mingyue ; Li, Juan ; Yang, Weizhong ; Feng, Luzhao</creatorcontrib><description>Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-5515</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2164-554X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-554X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37905961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>behavioral and social drivers ; China ; Entropy ; Expanded program on immunization ; Immunization Programs ; Public Health ; public health program ; routine immunization program ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023-12, Vol.19 (3), p.2272539</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-fcbfbf70ec09e56f169f0cbd2f28605adeee5941f3a126030222232bd20878e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6096-3886 ; 0000-0002-6563-6283 ; 0009-0000-3176-6066 ; 0000-0001-5555-8026 ; 0000-0002-5206-5995 ; 0000-0002-6599-825X ; 0000-0002-9855-4348 ; 0000-0002-8175-7181</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10760382/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10760382/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27502,27924,27925,53791,53793,59143,59144</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37905961$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Peixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Mengmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Weizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Luzhao</creatorcontrib><title>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</title><title>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics</title><addtitle>Hum Vaccin Immunother</addtitle><description>Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines.</description><subject>behavioral and social drivers</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Expanded program on immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Programs</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>public health program</subject><subject>routine immunization program</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>2164-5515</issn><issn>2164-554X</issn><issn>2164-554X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsFuEzEQXSEQrUo_AeQjl6S21_Z6uUAVKFSqxAUkbtas105cvHawvUX5exySRvSCL7Zn3ryZ0XtN85rgJcESX1EiGOeELymm7ZLSjvK2f9ac7-MLztmP56c34WfNZc73uJ4OUybEy-as7XrMe0HOm3kVQy5p1sXFgKJFEJALo9NQYkI2wWR-x_QT2fp7AK1dMDWv_Zz3eBfQdh6802hjwJcN2qa4rjX5HbpGH43fbtzChJLidocmUzZxRLnM4-5V88KCz-byeF80328-fVt9Wdx9_Xy7ur5baCbbsrB6sIPtsNG4N1xYInqL9TBSS6XAHEZjDO8ZsS0QKnCLaT0trQAsO2lYe9HcHnjHCPdqm9wEaaciOPU3ENNaQSpOe6OYBcOGXlsYgfVSA6OCD_0gdd9xaIfK9f7AVTeezKj3e4F_Qvo0E9xGreODIrirs0laGd4eGVL8NZtc1OSyNt5DMHHOikrJRMexFBXKD1CdYs7J2FMfgtXeAurRAmpvAXW0QK178--Qp6pHwSvgwwHgQpV0giquH1WBnY-pqh20y6r9f48_-q3Dfg</recordid><startdate>20231215</startdate><enddate>20231215</enddate><creator>Wang, Qing</creator><creator>Dai, Peixi</creator><creator>Jia, Mengmeng</creator><creator>Jiang, Mingyue</creator><creator>Li, Juan</creator><creator>Yang, Weizhong</creator><creator>Feng, Luzhao</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-3886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-6283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3176-6066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-8026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-4348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-7181</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231215</creationdate><title>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</title><author>Wang, Qing ; Dai, Peixi ; Jia, Mengmeng ; Jiang, Mingyue ; Li, Juan ; Yang, Weizhong ; Feng, Luzhao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-fcbfbf70ec09e56f169f0cbd2f28605adeee5941f3a126030222232bd20878e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>behavioral and social drivers</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Expanded program on immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Programs</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>public health program</topic><topic>routine immunization program</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Peixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Mengmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Weizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Luzhao</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Qing</au><au>Dai, Peixi</au><au>Jia, Mengmeng</au><au>Jiang, Mingyue</au><au>Li, Juan</au><au>Yang, Weizhong</au><au>Feng, Luzhao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</atitle><jtitle>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Vaccin Immunother</addtitle><date>2023-12-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2272539</spage><pages>2272539-</pages><issn>2164-5515</issn><issn>2164-554X</issn><eissn>2164-554X</eissn><abstract>Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>37905961</pmid><doi>10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-3886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-6283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3176-6066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-8026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-4348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-7181</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2164-5515 |
ispartof | Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023-12, Vol.19 (3), p.2272539 |
issn | 2164-5515 2164-554X 2164-554X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_37905961 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | behavioral and social drivers China Entropy Expanded program on immunization Immunization Programs Public Health public health program routine immunization program Vaccines |
title | Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A12%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20of%20an%20indicator%20framework%20for%20vaccine%20inclusion%20in%20public%20health%20programs:%20A%20Delphi-entropy%20method%20study&rft.jtitle=Human%20vaccines%20&%20immunotherapeutics&rft.au=Wang,%20Qing&rft.date=2023-12-15&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2272539&rft.pages=2272539-&rft.issn=2164-5515&rft.eissn=2164-554X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2884675086%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884675086&rft_id=info:pmid/37905961&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4fae4b9cfada498ca4265b9b8c975a3b&rfr_iscdi=true |