Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study

Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics 2023-12, Vol.19 (3), p.2272539
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Qing, Dai, Peixi, Jia, Mengmeng, Jiang, Mingyue, Li, Juan, Yang, Weizhong, Feng, Luzhao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2272539
container_title Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics
container_volume 19
creator Wang, Qing
Dai, Peixi
Jia, Mengmeng
Jiang, Mingyue
Li, Juan
Yang, Weizhong
Feng, Luzhao
description Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37905961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4fae4b9cfada498ca4265b9b8c975a3b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2884675086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-fcbfbf70ec09e56f169f0cbd2f28605adeee5941f3a126030222232bd20878e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsFuEzEQXSEQrUo_AeQjl6S21_Z6uUAVKFSqxAUkbtas105cvHawvUX5exySRvSCL7Zn3ryZ0XtN85rgJcESX1EiGOeELymm7ZLSjvK2f9ac7-MLztmP56c34WfNZc73uJ4OUybEy-as7XrMe0HOm3kVQy5p1sXFgKJFEJALo9NQYkI2wWR-x_QT2fp7AK1dMDWv_Zz3eBfQdh6802hjwJcN2qa4rjX5HbpGH43fbtzChJLidocmUzZxRLnM4-5V88KCz-byeF80328-fVt9Wdx9_Xy7ur5baCbbsrB6sIPtsNG4N1xYInqL9TBSS6XAHEZjDO8ZsS0QKnCLaT0trQAsO2lYe9HcHnjHCPdqm9wEaaciOPU3ENNaQSpOe6OYBcOGXlsYgfVSA6OCD_0gdd9xaIfK9f7AVTeezKj3e4F_Qvo0E9xGreODIrirs0laGd4eGVL8NZtc1OSyNt5DMHHOikrJRMexFBXKD1CdYs7J2FMfgtXeAurRAmpvAXW0QK178--Qp6pHwSvgwwHgQpV0giquH1WBnY-pqh20y6r9f48_-q3Dfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884675086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, Qing ; Dai, Peixi ; Jia, Mengmeng ; Jiang, Mingyue ; Li, Juan ; Yang, Weizhong ; Feng, Luzhao</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing ; Dai, Peixi ; Jia, Mengmeng ; Jiang, Mingyue ; Li, Juan ; Yang, Weizhong ; Feng, Luzhao</creatorcontrib><description>Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-5515</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2164-554X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-554X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37905961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>behavioral and social drivers ; China ; Entropy ; Expanded program on immunization ; Immunization Programs ; Public Health ; public health program ; routine immunization program ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Human vaccines &amp; immunotherapeutics, 2023-12, Vol.19 (3), p.2272539</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC. 2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-fcbfbf70ec09e56f169f0cbd2f28605adeee5941f3a126030222232bd20878e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6096-3886 ; 0000-0002-6563-6283 ; 0009-0000-3176-6066 ; 0000-0001-5555-8026 ; 0000-0002-5206-5995 ; 0000-0002-6599-825X ; 0000-0002-9855-4348 ; 0000-0002-8175-7181</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10760382/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10760382/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27502,27924,27925,53791,53793,59143,59144</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37905961$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Peixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Mengmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Weizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Luzhao</creatorcontrib><title>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</title><title>Human vaccines &amp; immunotherapeutics</title><addtitle>Hum Vaccin Immunother</addtitle><description>Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines.</description><subject>behavioral and social drivers</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Expanded program on immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Programs</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>public health program</subject><subject>routine immunization program</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>2164-5515</issn><issn>2164-554X</issn><issn>2164-554X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsFuEzEQXSEQrUo_AeQjl6S21_Z6uUAVKFSqxAUkbtas105cvHawvUX5exySRvSCL7Zn3ryZ0XtN85rgJcESX1EiGOeELymm7ZLSjvK2f9ac7-MLztmP56c34WfNZc73uJ4OUybEy-as7XrMe0HOm3kVQy5p1sXFgKJFEJALo9NQYkI2wWR-x_QT2fp7AK1dMDWv_Zz3eBfQdh6802hjwJcN2qa4rjX5HbpGH43fbtzChJLidocmUzZxRLnM4-5V88KCz-byeF80328-fVt9Wdx9_Xy7ur5baCbbsrB6sIPtsNG4N1xYInqL9TBSS6XAHEZjDO8ZsS0QKnCLaT0trQAsO2lYe9HcHnjHCPdqm9wEaaciOPU3ENNaQSpOe6OYBcOGXlsYgfVSA6OCD_0gdd9xaIfK9f7AVTeezKj3e4F_Qvo0E9xGreODIrirs0laGd4eGVL8NZtc1OSyNt5DMHHOikrJRMexFBXKD1CdYs7J2FMfgtXeAurRAmpvAXW0QK178--Qp6pHwSvgwwHgQpV0giquH1WBnY-pqh20y6r9f48_-q3Dfg</recordid><startdate>20231215</startdate><enddate>20231215</enddate><creator>Wang, Qing</creator><creator>Dai, Peixi</creator><creator>Jia, Mengmeng</creator><creator>Jiang, Mingyue</creator><creator>Li, Juan</creator><creator>Yang, Weizhong</creator><creator>Feng, Luzhao</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-3886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-6283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3176-6066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-8026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-4348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-7181</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231215</creationdate><title>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</title><author>Wang, Qing ; Dai, Peixi ; Jia, Mengmeng ; Jiang, Mingyue ; Li, Juan ; Yang, Weizhong ; Feng, Luzhao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-fcbfbf70ec09e56f169f0cbd2f28605adeee5941f3a126030222232bd20878e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>behavioral and social drivers</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Expanded program on immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Programs</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>public health program</topic><topic>routine immunization program</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Peixi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Mengmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Mingyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Weizhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Luzhao</creatorcontrib><collection>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Human vaccines &amp; immunotherapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Qing</au><au>Dai, Peixi</au><au>Jia, Mengmeng</au><au>Jiang, Mingyue</au><au>Li, Juan</au><au>Yang, Weizhong</au><au>Feng, Luzhao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study</atitle><jtitle>Human vaccines &amp; immunotherapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Vaccin Immunother</addtitle><date>2023-12-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2272539</spage><pages>2272539-</pages><issn>2164-5515</issn><issn>2164-554X</issn><eissn>2164-554X</eissn><abstract>Governments must decide which vaccine priority to include in their public health programs. Using the modified Delphi and entropy method, we developed an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels, each containing three dimensions. In total, 4 primary indicators, 17 secondary indicators, and 45 tertiary indicators were selected, covering vaccine-preventable diseases, candidate vaccines, and social drivers of the supply and demand sides. From a subjective perspective, there was no significant weighting difference in the primary and secondary indicators at all administrative levels. "Vaccine-preventable diseases" as a primary indicator had the greatest weight in the peer group, of which "Health burden" had the highest weight among the secondary indicators. From the objective perspective, the social drivers on the supply and demand sides of the primary indicators accounted for 65% and higher. Among the secondary indicators, "the characteristics of the candidate vaccine" and "vaccine-related policies on the supply side" held 8% of weights or more at both national and provincial levels. "Demographic characteristics" held the highest weight at the municipal (13.50) and district/county (15.45) level. This study indicates that China needs different considerations when using WHO-recommended vaccines at the national, provincial, municipal, and district/county levels. In addition, this study highlights that behavioral and social drivers are important indicators that need to be considered for decision-making. This framework provides a tool for policymakers to determine the inclusion priority of candidate vaccines.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>37905961</pmid><doi>10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-3886</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-6283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3176-6066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-8026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-5995</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-825X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-4348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8175-7181</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2164-5515
ispartof Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023-12, Vol.19 (3), p.2272539
issn 2164-5515
2164-554X
2164-554X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_37905961
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects behavioral and social drivers
China
Entropy
Expanded program on immunization
Immunization Programs
Public Health
public health program
routine immunization program
Vaccines
title Construction of an indicator framework for vaccine inclusion in public health programs: A Delphi-entropy method study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A12%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construction%20of%20an%20indicator%20framework%20for%20vaccine%20inclusion%20in%20public%20health%20programs:%20A%20Delphi-entropy%20method%20study&rft.jtitle=Human%20vaccines%20&%20immunotherapeutics&rft.au=Wang,%20Qing&rft.date=2023-12-15&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2272539&rft.pages=2272539-&rft.issn=2164-5515&rft.eissn=2164-554X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21645515.2023.2272539&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2884675086%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884675086&rft_id=info:pmid/37905961&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4fae4b9cfada498ca4265b9b8c975a3b&rfr_iscdi=true