Experimental and histological evaluation of each clamp technique for pulmonary artery

The double-loop technique has been used in our clinical settings for pulmonary arterioplasty and/or injured artery repair during thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection. We evaluated the pressure resistance capacity and intimal load to determine the effectiveness and safety of the double-loop technique. The double-loop technique, DeBakey clamp, Fogarty clamp, endovascular clips, and vessel loop technique were evaluated. During an experimental study, a polyvinyl alcohol main pulmonary artery model, manometer, and in-deflation device were used to measure the burst pressure. The maximum clamp pressure was measured using a pressure-measuring film. Each measurement was performed 10 times. During the histological study, we measured the burst pressure and evaluated the intimal damage of the human pulmonary artery associated with the double-loop technique and DeBakey clamp. The experimental burst pressure (mmHg) and maximum clamp pressure (MPa) between the double-loop technique and DeBakey at the third notch were not significantly different (24.6 ± 2.8 and 21.8 ± 2.8, P = 0.094; 1.54 ± 0.12 and 1.49 ± 0.12, P = 0.954). During the histological study, the burst pressures of the double-loop technique and DeBakey at the third notch were also not significantly different (P = 0.754). Furthermore, the double-loop technique resulted in only intimal deformation in each five samples. The double-loop technique is feasible for thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection because it has similar pressure resistance capacity and intimal load as DeBakey at the third notch.