Dynamic axial fixation. A rational alternative for the external fixation of fractures

Conventional external fixation systems neither inhibit motion at the fracture site sufficiently to permit primary bone healing, nor do they allow sufficient motion to encourage adequate external callus formation. Healing with such systems is therefore prolonged. These methods are usually reserved fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 1986, Vol.10 (2), p.95
Hauptverfasser: De Bastiani, G, Aldegheri, R, Renzi Brivio, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 95
container_title International orthopaedics
container_volume 10
creator De Bastiani, G
Aldegheri, R
Renzi Brivio, L
description Conventional external fixation systems neither inhibit motion at the fracture site sufficiently to permit primary bone healing, nor do they allow sufficient motion to encourage adequate external callus formation. Healing with such systems is therefore prolonged. These methods are usually reserved for the most severe fractures when internal fixation may be contraindicated. A unilateral, dynamic axial fixation system (Orthofix - registered trademark) is described which allows for simple conversion from a rigid to a dynamic mode, and so can be readily adapted to the changing physiological patterns of fracture repair. In 288 fresh fractures a success rate of 94% was achieved, with an average time to healing of 4.4 months. The incidence of pin-track infection was only 0.6%. The contribution which the mechanical and design features of the apparatus make to the results obtained is discussed. It is suggested that the system is capable of extending the range of indications for an externally mounted system to include many cases which would formerly have been treated by internal fixation, plaster cast or traction.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_3744639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3744639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_37446393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDYx1DUyszTlYOAqLs4yMDA0N7MwZGdgNzY3MTEztuRkCHWpzEvMzUxWSKzITMxRSMusSCzJzM_TU3BUKAKzgIKJOSWpRXlAXlmqQlp-kUJJRqpCagVYDKFDIT9NIa0oMbmktCi1mIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i6uYY4e-gWlCblpqbEFxRl5iYWVcZDnWFMSB4Aijc99A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic axial fixation. A rational alternative for the external fixation of fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>De Bastiani, G ; Aldegheri, R ; Renzi Brivio, L</creator><creatorcontrib>De Bastiani, G ; Aldegheri, R ; Renzi Brivio, L</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional external fixation systems neither inhibit motion at the fracture site sufficiently to permit primary bone healing, nor do they allow sufficient motion to encourage adequate external callus formation. Healing with such systems is therefore prolonged. These methods are usually reserved for the most severe fractures when internal fixation may be contraindicated. A unilateral, dynamic axial fixation system (Orthofix - registered trademark) is described which allows for simple conversion from a rigid to a dynamic mode, and so can be readily adapted to the changing physiological patterns of fracture repair. In 288 fresh fractures a success rate of 94% was achieved, with an average time to healing of 4.4 months. The incidence of pin-track infection was only 0.6%. The contribution which the mechanical and design features of the apparatus make to the results obtained is discussed. It is suggested that the system is capable of extending the range of indications for an externally mounted system to include many cases which would formerly have been treated by internal fixation, plaster cast or traction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-2695</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3744639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Femoral Fractures - surgery ; Fracture Fixation - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation - methods ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; Fractures, Closed - surgery ; Fractures, Open - surgery ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Bones - injuries ; Tibial Fractures - surgery ; Time Factors ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>International orthopaedics, 1986, Vol.10 (2), p.95</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3744639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Bastiani, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldegheri, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renzi Brivio, L</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic axial fixation. A rational alternative for the external fixation of fractures</title><title>International orthopaedics</title><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><description>Conventional external fixation systems neither inhibit motion at the fracture site sufficiently to permit primary bone healing, nor do they allow sufficient motion to encourage adequate external callus formation. Healing with such systems is therefore prolonged. These methods are usually reserved for the most severe fractures when internal fixation may be contraindicated. A unilateral, dynamic axial fixation system (Orthofix - registered trademark) is described which allows for simple conversion from a rigid to a dynamic mode, and so can be readily adapted to the changing physiological patterns of fracture repair. In 288 fresh fractures a success rate of 94% was achieved, with an average time to healing of 4.4 months. The incidence of pin-track infection was only 0.6%. The contribution which the mechanical and design features of the apparatus make to the results obtained is discussed. It is suggested that the system is capable of extending the range of indications for an externally mounted system to include many cases which would formerly have been treated by internal fixation, plaster cast or traction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation - methods</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Fractures, Closed - surgery</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pelvic Bones - injuries</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0341-2695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDYx1DUyszTlYOAqLs4yMDA0N7MwZGdgNzY3MTEztuRkCHWpzEvMzUxWSKzITMxRSMusSCzJzM_TU3BUKAKzgIKJOSWpRXlAXlmqQlp-kUJJRqpCagVYDKFDIT9NIa0oMbmktCi1mIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i6uYY4e-gWlCblpqbEFxRl5iYWVcZDnWFMSB4Aijc99A</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>De Bastiani, G</creator><creator>Aldegheri, R</creator><creator>Renzi Brivio, L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Dynamic axial fixation. A rational alternative for the external fixation of fractures</title><author>De Bastiani, G ; Aldegheri, R ; Renzi Brivio, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_37446393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation - methods</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Fractures, Closed - surgery</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pelvic Bones - injuries</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Bastiani, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldegheri, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renzi Brivio, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Bastiani, G</au><au>Aldegheri, R</au><au>Renzi Brivio, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic axial fixation. A rational alternative for the external fixation of fractures</atitle><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><pages>95-</pages><issn>0341-2695</issn><abstract>Conventional external fixation systems neither inhibit motion at the fracture site sufficiently to permit primary bone healing, nor do they allow sufficient motion to encourage adequate external callus formation. Healing with such systems is therefore prolonged. These methods are usually reserved for the most severe fractures when internal fixation may be contraindicated. A unilateral, dynamic axial fixation system (Orthofix - registered trademark) is described which allows for simple conversion from a rigid to a dynamic mode, and so can be readily adapted to the changing physiological patterns of fracture repair. In 288 fresh fractures a success rate of 94% was achieved, with an average time to healing of 4.4 months. The incidence of pin-track infection was only 0.6%. The contribution which the mechanical and design features of the apparatus make to the results obtained is discussed. It is suggested that the system is capable of extending the range of indications for an externally mounted system to include many cases which would formerly have been treated by internal fixation, plaster cast or traction.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>3744639</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0341-2695
ispartof International orthopaedics, 1986, Vol.10 (2), p.95
issn 0341-2695
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_3744639
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Female
Femoral Fractures - surgery
Fracture Fixation - instrumentation
Fracture Fixation - methods
Fractures, Bone - surgery
Fractures, Closed - surgery
Fractures, Open - surgery
Humans
Humeral Fractures - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Pelvic Bones - injuries
Tibial Fractures - surgery
Time Factors
Wound Healing
title Dynamic axial fixation. A rational alternative for the external fixation of fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20axial%20fixation.%20A%20rational%20alternative%20for%20the%20external%20fixation%20of%20fractures&rft.jtitle=International%20orthopaedics&rft.au=De%20Bastiani,%20G&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.pages=95-&rft.issn=0341-2695&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E3744639%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/3744639&rfr_iscdi=true