Deterioration of direct restorative materials under erosive conditions with impact of abrasion and attrition in vitro
To compare the cumulative impact of sequential wear on mechanical properties and appearance of a composite resin (CR), Filtek Z250 ® , a glass ionomer GI, Fuji IX GP ® , and a glass hybrid (GH), Equia Forte ® . Six equally sized specimens of each material were subjected to wear tests, i.e., simulati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biomaterial investigations in dentistry 2023-12, Vol.10 (1), p.2202211-2202211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2202211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 2202211 |
container_title | Biomaterial investigations in dentistry |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Mulic, Aida Ruud, Amund Stenhagen, Ida R. Bruzell, Ellen Tulek, Amela |
description | To compare the cumulative impact of sequential wear on mechanical properties and appearance of a composite resin (CR), Filtek Z250
®
, a glass ionomer GI, Fuji IX GP
®
, and a glass hybrid (GH), Equia Forte
®
.
Six equally sized specimens of each material were subjected to wear tests, i.e., simulation of brushing, chewing and acidic liquid exposure, mimicking at least 6 months of clinical exposure. Surface roughness, hardness, substance loss and degree of shade lightness were determined.
Following wear tests, significant increase in surface roughness and decrease in hardness values were observed for all materials (p < .05). Significantly larger substance loss was found in Equia Forte
®
specimens compared to Filtek Z250
®
(p < .05), while that of Fuji IX
®
exceeded the measurement capacity of the instrument. Opposite to the two other materials, the shade of Filtek Z250
®
became darker.
Sequential wear exposure mimicking abrasion, erosion and attrition to products representing CR, GI and GH, caused weakening and change in appearance of the materials. The composite resin was the most mechanically resistant to the sequential wear. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/26415275.2023.2202211 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37313433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d8867c9455bd45fba3f88a6f4ce92cbd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2825811187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-891203be8fb97980b5a30db4cbd6c25e092cd7c986ff6f56d2beba19d02c1e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1uFDEQhVsIRKKQI4B6yWYm_mn3uFeAEiCRIrGBtVX-Sxx120PZM1Fuw1k4Ge6ZSZRs2NjWq_e-suxqmveULCmR5Iz1HRVsJZaMML5kdWWUvmqOZ30xF14_Ox81pznfEUJYzVDav22O-IpT3nF-3GwvXHEYEkIJKbbJtzagM6VFl8tO3bp2gtkDY2430TpsHaY86yZFG-Zcbu9DuW3DtIYarRDQCHkGQrQtlII7Wxvi3z_bUDC9a974ynOnh_2k-fXt68_zy8X1j-9X51-uF4ZLQhdyoIxw7aTXw2qQRAvgxOrOaNsbJhwZmLErM8je-96L3jLtNNDBEmao6yQ_aa72XJvgTq0xTIAPKkFQOyHhjQIswYxOWSn7iuqE0LYTXgP3UkLvO-NqF20r69Oetd7oyVnjYkEYX0BfVmK4VTdpqyhhYmCDqISPBwKm35v6wGoK2bhxhOjSJismmZCUUrmqVrG3mvrWGZ1_6kOJmmdAPc6AmmdAHWag5j48v-RT6vHHq-Hz3hCiTzjBfcLRqgIPY0KPEE3Iiv-_xz8kIcUb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2825811187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deterioration of direct restorative materials under erosive conditions with impact of abrasion and attrition in vitro</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mulic, Aida ; Ruud, Amund ; Stenhagen, Ida R. ; Bruzell, Ellen ; Tulek, Amela</creator><creatorcontrib>Mulic, Aida ; Ruud, Amund ; Stenhagen, Ida R. ; Bruzell, Ellen ; Tulek, Amela</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the cumulative impact of sequential wear on mechanical properties and appearance of a composite resin (CR), Filtek Z250
®
, a glass ionomer GI, Fuji IX GP
®
, and a glass hybrid (GH), Equia Forte
®
.
Six equally sized specimens of each material were subjected to wear tests, i.e., simulation of brushing, chewing and acidic liquid exposure, mimicking at least 6 months of clinical exposure. Surface roughness, hardness, substance loss and degree of shade lightness were determined.
Following wear tests, significant increase in surface roughness and decrease in hardness values were observed for all materials (p < .05). Significantly larger substance loss was found in Equia Forte
®
specimens compared to Filtek Z250
®
(p < .05), while that of Fuji IX
®
exceeded the measurement capacity of the instrument. Opposite to the two other materials, the shade of Filtek Z250
®
became darker.
Sequential wear exposure mimicking abrasion, erosion and attrition to products representing CR, GI and GH, caused weakening and change in appearance of the materials. The composite resin was the most mechanically resistant to the sequential wear.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2641-5275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2641-5275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/26415275.2023.2202211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37313433</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>hardness ; Original ; profilometry ; substance loss ; Surface roughness</subject><ispartof>Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2023-12, Vol.10 (1), p.2202211-2202211</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-891203be8fb97980b5a30db4cbd6c25e092cd7c986ff6f56d2beba19d02c1e483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-891203be8fb97980b5a30db4cbd6c25e092cd7c986ff6f56d2beba19d02c1e483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259295/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259295/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2100,27501,27923,27924,53790,53792,59142,59143</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313433$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mulic, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruud, Amund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenhagen, Ida R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruzell, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulek, Amela</creatorcontrib><title>Deterioration of direct restorative materials under erosive conditions with impact of abrasion and attrition in vitro</title><title>Biomaterial investigations in dentistry</title><addtitle>Biomater Investig Dent</addtitle><description>To compare the cumulative impact of sequential wear on mechanical properties and appearance of a composite resin (CR), Filtek Z250
®
, a glass ionomer GI, Fuji IX GP
®
, and a glass hybrid (GH), Equia Forte
®
.
Six equally sized specimens of each material were subjected to wear tests, i.e., simulation of brushing, chewing and acidic liquid exposure, mimicking at least 6 months of clinical exposure. Surface roughness, hardness, substance loss and degree of shade lightness were determined.
Following wear tests, significant increase in surface roughness and decrease in hardness values were observed for all materials (p < .05). Significantly larger substance loss was found in Equia Forte
®
specimens compared to Filtek Z250
®
(p < .05), while that of Fuji IX
®
exceeded the measurement capacity of the instrument. Opposite to the two other materials, the shade of Filtek Z250
®
became darker.
Sequential wear exposure mimicking abrasion, erosion and attrition to products representing CR, GI and GH, caused weakening and change in appearance of the materials. The composite resin was the most mechanically resistant to the sequential wear.</description><subject>hardness</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>profilometry</subject><subject>substance loss</subject><subject>Surface roughness</subject><issn>2641-5275</issn><issn>2641-5275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1uFDEQhVsIRKKQI4B6yWYm_mn3uFeAEiCRIrGBtVX-Sxx120PZM1Fuw1k4Ge6ZSZRs2NjWq_e-suxqmveULCmR5Iz1HRVsJZaMML5kdWWUvmqOZ30xF14_Ox81pznfEUJYzVDav22O-IpT3nF-3GwvXHEYEkIJKbbJtzagM6VFl8tO3bp2gtkDY2430TpsHaY86yZFG-Zcbu9DuW3DtIYarRDQCHkGQrQtlII7Wxvi3z_bUDC9a974ynOnh_2k-fXt68_zy8X1j-9X51-uF4ZLQhdyoIxw7aTXw2qQRAvgxOrOaNsbJhwZmLErM8je-96L3jLtNNDBEmao6yQ_aa72XJvgTq0xTIAPKkFQOyHhjQIswYxOWSn7iuqE0LYTXgP3UkLvO-NqF20r69Oetd7oyVnjYkEYX0BfVmK4VTdpqyhhYmCDqISPBwKm35v6wGoK2bhxhOjSJismmZCUUrmqVrG3mvrWGZ1_6kOJmmdAPc6AmmdAHWag5j48v-RT6vHHq-Hz3hCiTzjBfcLRqgIPY0KPEE3Iiv-_xz8kIcUb</recordid><startdate>20231231</startdate><enddate>20231231</enddate><creator>Mulic, Aida</creator><creator>Ruud, Amund</creator><creator>Stenhagen, Ida R.</creator><creator>Bruzell, Ellen</creator><creator>Tulek, Amela</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Medical Journals Sweden</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231231</creationdate><title>Deterioration of direct restorative materials under erosive conditions with impact of abrasion and attrition in vitro</title><author>Mulic, Aida ; Ruud, Amund ; Stenhagen, Ida R. ; Bruzell, Ellen ; Tulek, Amela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3801-891203be8fb97980b5a30db4cbd6c25e092cd7c986ff6f56d2beba19d02c1e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>hardness</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>profilometry</topic><topic>substance loss</topic><topic>Surface roughness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mulic, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruud, Amund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenhagen, Ida R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruzell, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulek, Amela</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Biomaterial investigations in dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mulic, Aida</au><au>Ruud, Amund</au><au>Stenhagen, Ida R.</au><au>Bruzell, Ellen</au><au>Tulek, Amela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deterioration of direct restorative materials under erosive conditions with impact of abrasion and attrition in vitro</atitle><jtitle>Biomaterial investigations in dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Biomater Investig Dent</addtitle><date>2023-12-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2202211</spage><epage>2202211</epage><pages>2202211-2202211</pages><issn>2641-5275</issn><eissn>2641-5275</eissn><abstract>To compare the cumulative impact of sequential wear on mechanical properties and appearance of a composite resin (CR), Filtek Z250
®
, a glass ionomer GI, Fuji IX GP
®
, and a glass hybrid (GH), Equia Forte
®
.
Six equally sized specimens of each material were subjected to wear tests, i.e., simulation of brushing, chewing and acidic liquid exposure, mimicking at least 6 months of clinical exposure. Surface roughness, hardness, substance loss and degree of shade lightness were determined.
Following wear tests, significant increase in surface roughness and decrease in hardness values were observed for all materials (p < .05). Significantly larger substance loss was found in Equia Forte
®
specimens compared to Filtek Z250
®
(p < .05), while that of Fuji IX
®
exceeded the measurement capacity of the instrument. Opposite to the two other materials, the shade of Filtek Z250
®
became darker.
Sequential wear exposure mimicking abrasion, erosion and attrition to products representing CR, GI and GH, caused weakening and change in appearance of the materials. The composite resin was the most mechanically resistant to the sequential wear.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>37313433</pmid><doi>10.1080/26415275.2023.2202211</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2641-5275 |
ispartof | Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2023-12, Vol.10 (1), p.2202211-2202211 |
issn | 2641-5275 2641-5275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_37313433 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | hardness Original profilometry substance loss Surface roughness |
title | Deterioration of direct restorative materials under erosive conditions with impact of abrasion and attrition in vitro |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A30%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deterioration%20of%20direct%20restorative%20materials%20under%20erosive%20conditions%20with%20impact%20of%20abrasion%20and%20attrition%20in%C2%A0vitro&rft.jtitle=Biomaterial%20investigations%20in%20dentistry&rft.au=Mulic,%20Aida&rft.date=2023-12-31&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2202211&rft.epage=2202211&rft.pages=2202211-2202211&rft.issn=2641-5275&rft.eissn=2641-5275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/26415275.2023.2202211&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2825811187%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2825811187&rft_id=info:pmid/37313433&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_d8867c9455bd45fba3f88a6f4ce92cbd&rfr_iscdi=true |