What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?

Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Postgraduate medical journal 2023-05, Vol.99 (1169), p.214
Hauptverfasser: Chin, Carven Yee Shean, Kwan, Tsun Yu, Lim, Hse Juinn, Li, Chun Hei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1169
container_start_page 214
container_title Postgraduate medical journal
container_volume 99
creator Chin, Carven Yee Shean
Kwan, Tsun Yu
Lim, Hse Juinn
Li, Chun Hei
description Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37222063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37222063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_372220633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjs0KgkAUhYcg-n-FuC8gqGNKqxZRBG2LlnIbbzqh43BnFHr7DGodHPjg8B04IzGLknQbhNkmnYq5c88wjGSWRBMxlVkcx2EqZ6K_VegBmcBXBLqxqLyD9gFMiowHVaEpyYE2cD2DagfRdVxqhTV4Rm20KQGtrYfG69bAENUxf7ZoCrDcOkvK655-mvFutxTjB9aOVl8uxPp4uOxPge3uDRW5Zd0gv_LfUflXeAOkD0qD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Chin, Carven Yee Shean ; Kwan, Tsun Yu ; Lim, Hse Juinn ; Li, Chun Hei</creator><creatorcontrib>Chin, Carven Yee Shean ; Kwan, Tsun Yu ; Lim, Hse Juinn ; Li, Chun Hei</creatorcontrib><description>Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37222063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Medical Staff, Hospital ; Medicine ; Self-Assessment ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Postgraduate medical journal, 2023-05, Vol.99 (1169), p.214</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Postgraduate Medical Journal. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1979-6080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37222063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Tsun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hse Juinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chun Hei</creatorcontrib><title>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</title><title>Postgraduate medical journal</title><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><description>Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS.</description><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1469-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjs0KgkAUhYcg-n-FuC8gqGNKqxZRBG2LlnIbbzqh43BnFHr7DGodHPjg8B04IzGLknQbhNkmnYq5c88wjGSWRBMxlVkcx2EqZ6K_VegBmcBXBLqxqLyD9gFMiowHVaEpyYE2cD2DagfRdVxqhTV4Rm20KQGtrYfG69bAENUxf7ZoCrDcOkvK655-mvFutxTjB9aOVl8uxPp4uOxPge3uDRW5Zd0gv_LfUflXeAOkD0qD</recordid><startdate>20230519</startdate><enddate>20230519</enddate><creator>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</creator><creator>Kwan, Tsun Yu</creator><creator>Lim, Hse Juinn</creator><creator>Li, Chun Hei</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-6080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230519</creationdate><title>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</title><author>Chin, Carven Yee Shean ; Kwan, Tsun Yu ; Lim, Hse Juinn ; Li, Chun Hei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_372220633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Tsun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hse Juinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chun Hei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</au><au>Kwan, Tsun Yu</au><au>Lim, Hse Juinn</au><au>Li, Chun Hei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</atitle><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><date>2023-05-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>1169</issue><spage>214</spage><pages>214-</pages><eissn>1469-0756</eissn><abstract>Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>37222063</pmid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-6080</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1469-0756
ispartof Postgraduate medical journal, 2023-05, Vol.99 (1169), p.214
issn 1469-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_37222063
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Elective Surgical Procedures
Humans
Medical Staff, Hospital
Medicine
Self-Assessment
United Kingdom
title What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A40%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20are%20the%20impacts%20of%20recent%20changes%20in%20UK%20core%20surgical%20training%20application%20on%20current%20and%20prospective%20applicants?&rft.jtitle=Postgraduate%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Chin,%20Carven%20Yee%20Shean&rft.date=2023-05-19&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=1169&rft.spage=214&rft.pages=214-&rft.eissn=1469-0756&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E37222063%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/37222063&rfr_iscdi=true