What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?
Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score bas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Postgraduate medical journal 2023-05, Vol.99 (1169), p.214 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1169 |
container_start_page | 214 |
container_title | Postgraduate medical journal |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Chin, Carven Yee Shean Kwan, Tsun Yu Lim, Hse Juinn Li, Chun Hei |
description | Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_37222063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37222063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_372220633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjs0KgkAUhYcg-n-FuC8gqGNKqxZRBG2LlnIbbzqh43BnFHr7DGodHPjg8B04IzGLknQbhNkmnYq5c88wjGSWRBMxlVkcx2EqZ6K_VegBmcBXBLqxqLyD9gFMiowHVaEpyYE2cD2DagfRdVxqhTV4Rm20KQGtrYfG69bAENUxf7ZoCrDcOkvK655-mvFutxTjB9aOVl8uxPp4uOxPge3uDRW5Zd0gv_LfUflXeAOkD0qD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Chin, Carven Yee Shean ; Kwan, Tsun Yu ; Lim, Hse Juinn ; Li, Chun Hei</creator><creatorcontrib>Chin, Carven Yee Shean ; Kwan, Tsun Yu ; Lim, Hse Juinn ; Li, Chun Hei</creatorcontrib><description>Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37222063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures ; Humans ; Medical Staff, Hospital ; Medicine ; Self-Assessment ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Postgraduate medical journal, 2023-05, Vol.99 (1169), p.214</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Postgraduate Medical Journal. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1979-6080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37222063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Tsun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hse Juinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chun Hei</creatorcontrib><title>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</title><title>Postgraduate medical journal</title><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><description>Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS.</description><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1469-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjs0KgkAUhYcg-n-FuC8gqGNKqxZRBG2LlnIbbzqh43BnFHr7DGodHPjg8B04IzGLknQbhNkmnYq5c88wjGSWRBMxlVkcx2EqZ6K_VegBmcBXBLqxqLyD9gFMiowHVaEpyYE2cD2DagfRdVxqhTV4Rm20KQGtrYfG69bAENUxf7ZoCrDcOkvK655-mvFutxTjB9aOVl8uxPp4uOxPge3uDRW5Zd0gv_LfUflXeAOkD0qD</recordid><startdate>20230519</startdate><enddate>20230519</enddate><creator>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</creator><creator>Kwan, Tsun Yu</creator><creator>Lim, Hse Juinn</creator><creator>Li, Chun Hei</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-6080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230519</creationdate><title>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</title><author>Chin, Carven Yee Shean ; Kwan, Tsun Yu ; Lim, Hse Juinn ; Li, Chun Hei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_372220633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Tsun Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hse Juinn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Chun Hei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chin, Carven Yee Shean</au><au>Kwan, Tsun Yu</au><au>Lim, Hse Juinn</au><au>Li, Chun Hei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants?</atitle><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><date>2023-05-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>1169</issue><spage>214</spage><pages>214-</pages><eissn>1469-0756</eissn><abstract>Core Surgical Training (CST) is a 2-year UK training programme, designed to provide junior doctors interested in surgery with formal training and to introduce them to various surgical specialties. The selection process is divided into two stages. In the portfolio stage, applicants submit a score based on a published self-assessment guidance. Only candidates whose scores remain higher than the cut-off after verification will proceed to the interview stage. Finally, jobs are allocated according to the overall performance of both stages. Despite the rising number of applicants, the number of job vacancies remains largely similar. Hence, the intensity of competition has increased over the past few years. The competitive ratio increased from 2.8:1 in 2019 to 4.6:1 in 2021. Hence, several changes have been implemented in the CST application process, with the aim to combat this trend. The recurring changes in the CST application process have sparked considerable discussions among applicants. The effect of the changes on the current and prospective applicants is yet to be explored. This letter aims to highlight the changes and discuss the potential impacts. The CST application from 2020 to 2022 has been compared to identify the changes implemented throughout the years. Specific changes have been highlighted. The impact of changes in the CST application process on applicants has been divided into 'pros' and 'cons' sections. Recently, many specialties have shifted from portfolio-based assessment to Multiple Specialty Recruitment Assessments. In contrast, CST application preserves its emphasis on holistic assessment and academic excellence. However, the application process could be further refined for more impartial recruitment. This would ultimately help alleviate the challenging situation of staff shortage, increase the number of specialist doctors, reduce waiting time for elective surgeries and most importantly, provide better care for our patients in the NHS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>37222063</pmid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-6080</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1469-0756 |
ispartof | Postgraduate medical journal, 2023-05, Vol.99 (1169), p.214 |
issn | 1469-0756 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_37222063 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Elective Surgical Procedures Humans Medical Staff, Hospital Medicine Self-Assessment United Kingdom |
title | What are the impacts of recent changes in UK core surgical training application on current and prospective applicants? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A40%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20are%20the%20impacts%20of%20recent%20changes%20in%20UK%20core%20surgical%20training%20application%20on%20current%20and%20prospective%20applicants?&rft.jtitle=Postgraduate%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Chin,%20Carven%20Yee%20Shean&rft.date=2023-05-19&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=1169&rft.spage=214&rft.pages=214-&rft.eissn=1469-0756&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E37222063%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/37222063&rfr_iscdi=true |