Anatomic, stage-based repair of secondary mitral valve disease

Intervention for repair of secondary mitral valve disease is frequently associated with recurrent regurgitation. We sought to determine if there was sufficient evidence to support inclusion of anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction in the management of secondary mitral valve disease. We performed a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2024-05, Vol.167 (5), p.1733-1744
Hauptverfasser: Drake, Daniel H., Zhang, Peng, Zimmerman, Karen G., Morrow, Cynthia D., Sidebotham, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1744
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1733
container_title The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume 167
creator Drake, Daniel H.
Zhang, Peng
Zimmerman, Karen G.
Morrow, Cynthia D.
Sidebotham, David A.
description Intervention for repair of secondary mitral valve disease is frequently associated with recurrent regurgitation. We sought to determine if there was sufficient evidence to support inclusion of anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction in the management of secondary mitral valve disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports comparing anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction with the complexity of valve repair and the outcome from intervention. Patients were stratified by the severity of leaflet dysfunction. A secondary analysis was performed comparing outcomes when procedural complexity was optimally matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and when intervention was not matched to dysfunction. We identified 6864 publications, of which 65 met inclusion criteria. An association between the severity of leaflet dysfunction and the procedural complexity was highly predictive of satisfactory freedom from recurrent regurgitation. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on stratification of leaflet dysfunction. Satisfactory results were achieved in 93.7% of patients in whom repair complexity was appropriately matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and in 68.8% in whom repair was not matched to dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.148; 95% confidence interval, 0.119-0.184; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.01.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_36775783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002252232300017X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2775951718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-93faeff1cc7f25a961ac91e6d4c53b0570a38cb026a2ba4cb86f1d8f40825ae03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo7-AkG6dGHrSzJN2oXCMPgFA24U3IU0fZGUdjomnYL_3owzunT1Nue-yz2EXFDIKFBx02TNYMaQMWA8A5oBiAMyoVDKVBT5-yGZADCW5ozxE3IaQgMAEmh5TE64kDKXBZ-Qu_lKD33nzHUSBv2BaaUD1onHtXY-6W0S0PSrWvuvpHOD120y6nbEpHYBI3lGjqxuA57v75S8Pdy_Lp7S5cvj82K-TA2npUhLbjVaS42RluW6FFSbkqKoZybnFeQSNC9MBUxoVumZqQphaV3YGRQRR-BTcrX7u_b95wbDoDoXDLatXmG_CYrFPWVOJS0iyneo8X0IHq1ae9fFAYqC2opTjfoRp7biFFAVxcXU5b5gU3VY_2V-TUXgdgdgnDk69CoYhyuDtfNoBlX37t-CbxrVf94</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775951718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anatomic, stage-based repair of secondary mitral valve disease</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Drake, Daniel H. ; Zhang, Peng ; Zimmerman, Karen G. ; Morrow, Cynthia D. ; Sidebotham, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Drake, Daniel H. ; Zhang, Peng ; Zimmerman, Karen G. ; Morrow, Cynthia D. ; Sidebotham, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Intervention for repair of secondary mitral valve disease is frequently associated with recurrent regurgitation. We sought to determine if there was sufficient evidence to support inclusion of anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction in the management of secondary mitral valve disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports comparing anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction with the complexity of valve repair and the outcome from intervention. Patients were stratified by the severity of leaflet dysfunction. A secondary analysis was performed comparing outcomes when procedural complexity was optimally matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and when intervention was not matched to dysfunction. We identified 6864 publications, of which 65 met inclusion criteria. An association between the severity of leaflet dysfunction and the procedural complexity was highly predictive of satisfactory freedom from recurrent regurgitation. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on stratification of leaflet dysfunction. Satisfactory results were achieved in 93.7% of patients in whom repair complexity was appropriately matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and in 68.8% in whom repair was not matched to dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.148; 95% confidence interval, 0.119-0.184; P &lt; .0001). For patients with secondary mitral valve disease, satisfactory outcome from valve repair improves when procedural complexity is matched to anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction. Anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction should be considered when planning interventions for secondary mitral regurgitation. Routine inclusion of anatomic indices in trial design and reporting should facilitate comparison of results and strengthen guidelines. There are sufficient data to support anatomic staging of secondary mitral valve disease. [Display omitted] [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.01.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36775783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>cardiac surgical procedures ; echocardiography ; heart valve diseases ; mitral valve ; mitral valve insufficiency ; secondary mitral valve disease ; transesophageal</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024-05, Vol.167 (5), p.1733-1744</ispartof><rights>2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-93faeff1cc7f25a961ac91e6d4c53b0570a38cb026a2ba4cb86f1d8f40825ae03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-93faeff1cc7f25a961ac91e6d4c53b0570a38cb026a2ba4cb86f1d8f40825ae03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002252232300017X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drake, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Karen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Cynthia D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidebotham, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Anatomic, stage-based repair of secondary mitral valve disease</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Intervention for repair of secondary mitral valve disease is frequently associated with recurrent regurgitation. We sought to determine if there was sufficient evidence to support inclusion of anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction in the management of secondary mitral valve disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports comparing anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction with the complexity of valve repair and the outcome from intervention. Patients were stratified by the severity of leaflet dysfunction. A secondary analysis was performed comparing outcomes when procedural complexity was optimally matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and when intervention was not matched to dysfunction. We identified 6864 publications, of which 65 met inclusion criteria. An association between the severity of leaflet dysfunction and the procedural complexity was highly predictive of satisfactory freedom from recurrent regurgitation. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on stratification of leaflet dysfunction. Satisfactory results were achieved in 93.7% of patients in whom repair complexity was appropriately matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and in 68.8% in whom repair was not matched to dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.148; 95% confidence interval, 0.119-0.184; P &lt; .0001). For patients with secondary mitral valve disease, satisfactory outcome from valve repair improves when procedural complexity is matched to anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction. Anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction should be considered when planning interventions for secondary mitral regurgitation. Routine inclusion of anatomic indices in trial design and reporting should facilitate comparison of results and strengthen guidelines. There are sufficient data to support anatomic staging of secondary mitral valve disease. [Display omitted] [Display omitted]</description><subject>cardiac surgical procedures</subject><subject>echocardiography</subject><subject>heart valve diseases</subject><subject>mitral valve</subject><subject>mitral valve insufficiency</subject><subject>secondary mitral valve disease</subject><subject>transesophageal</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOo7-AkG6dGHrSzJN2oXCMPgFA24U3IU0fZGUdjomnYL_3owzunT1Nue-yz2EXFDIKFBx02TNYMaQMWA8A5oBiAMyoVDKVBT5-yGZADCW5ozxE3IaQgMAEmh5TE64kDKXBZ-Qu_lKD33nzHUSBv2BaaUD1onHtXY-6W0S0PSrWvuvpHOD120y6nbEpHYBI3lGjqxuA57v75S8Pdy_Lp7S5cvj82K-TA2npUhLbjVaS42RluW6FFSbkqKoZybnFeQSNC9MBUxoVumZqQphaV3YGRQRR-BTcrX7u_b95wbDoDoXDLatXmG_CYrFPWVOJS0iyneo8X0IHq1ae9fFAYqC2opTjfoRp7biFFAVxcXU5b5gU3VY_2V-TUXgdgdgnDk69CoYhyuDtfNoBlX37t-CbxrVf94</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Drake, Daniel H.</creator><creator>Zhang, Peng</creator><creator>Zimmerman, Karen G.</creator><creator>Morrow, Cynthia D.</creator><creator>Sidebotham, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Anatomic, stage-based repair of secondary mitral valve disease</title><author>Drake, Daniel H. ; Zhang, Peng ; Zimmerman, Karen G. ; Morrow, Cynthia D. ; Sidebotham, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-93faeff1cc7f25a961ac91e6d4c53b0570a38cb026a2ba4cb86f1d8f40825ae03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cardiac surgical procedures</topic><topic>echocardiography</topic><topic>heart valve diseases</topic><topic>mitral valve</topic><topic>mitral valve insufficiency</topic><topic>secondary mitral valve disease</topic><topic>transesophageal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drake, Daniel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, Karen G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrow, Cynthia D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidebotham, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drake, Daniel H.</au><au>Zhang, Peng</au><au>Zimmerman, Karen G.</au><au>Morrow, Cynthia D.</au><au>Sidebotham, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anatomic, stage-based repair of secondary mitral valve disease</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>167</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1733</spage><epage>1744</epage><pages>1733-1744</pages><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><eissn>1097-685X</eissn><abstract>Intervention for repair of secondary mitral valve disease is frequently associated with recurrent regurgitation. We sought to determine if there was sufficient evidence to support inclusion of anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction in the management of secondary mitral valve disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports comparing anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction with the complexity of valve repair and the outcome from intervention. Patients were stratified by the severity of leaflet dysfunction. A secondary analysis was performed comparing outcomes when procedural complexity was optimally matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and when intervention was not matched to dysfunction. We identified 6864 publications, of which 65 met inclusion criteria. An association between the severity of leaflet dysfunction and the procedural complexity was highly predictive of satisfactory freedom from recurrent regurgitation. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on stratification of leaflet dysfunction. Satisfactory results were achieved in 93.7% of patients in whom repair complexity was appropriately matched to severity of leaflet dysfunction and in 68.8% in whom repair was not matched to dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.148; 95% confidence interval, 0.119-0.184; P &lt; .0001). For patients with secondary mitral valve disease, satisfactory outcome from valve repair improves when procedural complexity is matched to anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction. Anatomic indices of leaflet dysfunction should be considered when planning interventions for secondary mitral regurgitation. Routine inclusion of anatomic indices in trial design and reporting should facilitate comparison of results and strengthen guidelines. There are sufficient data to support anatomic staging of secondary mitral valve disease. [Display omitted] [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36775783</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.01.006</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5223
ispartof The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024-05, Vol.167 (5), p.1733-1744
issn 0022-5223
1097-685X
1097-685X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_36775783
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects cardiac surgical procedures
echocardiography
heart valve diseases
mitral valve
mitral valve insufficiency
secondary mitral valve disease
transesophageal
title Anatomic, stage-based repair of secondary mitral valve disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A10%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomic,%20stage-based%20repair%20of%20secondary%20mitral%20valve%20disease&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Drake,%20Daniel%20H.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=167&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1733&rft.epage=1744&rft.pages=1733-1744&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft.eissn=1097-685X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.01.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2775951718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775951718&rft_id=info:pmid/36775783&rft_els_id=S002252232300017X&rfr_iscdi=true