Evaluation of silicone rubber-lead shield's effectiveness in protecting the breast during thoracic CT
Radiation of thoracic computed tomography (CT) involves the breast although it is not considered an organ of interest. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) No. 103, the breast is an organ with a high level of sensitivity when interacting with x-rays, increasing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biomedical physics & engineering express 2023-02, Vol.9 (2), p.25006 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 25006 |
container_title | Biomedical physics & engineering express |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Lestari, Yulianti M Anam, Choirul Sutanto, Heri Arifin, Zaenal Alkian, Ilham Suyudi, Imam Dougherty, Geoff |
description | Radiation of thoracic computed tomography (CT) involves the breast although it is not considered an organ of interest. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) No. 103, the breast is an organ with a high level of sensitivity when interacting with x-rays, increasing the potential risk of breast cancer. Therefore, the radiation dose must be optimized while maintaining image quality. The dose optimization can be accomplished using a radiation shield. This study aims to determine the effect of silicone rubber (SR)-lead (Pb) in various thicknesses as an alternative protective material limiting dose and preserving the image quality of the breast in thoracic CT. SR-Pb was made from SR and Pb by a simple method. The SR-Pb had thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm. The breast dose was measured using a CT dose profiler on the surface of the breast phantom. The CT number and the noise level of the resulting image were determined quantitatively. The dose without the radiation shield was 5.4 mGy. The doses measured using shielding with thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm were 5.2, 4.5, 4.3, and 3.3 mGy, respectively. Radiation shielding with a thickness of 12 mm reduced breast surface dose by up to 38%. The CT numbers and noise levels for the left and right breast phantom images were almost the same as those without radiation shields indicating there were only slight artifacts in the image. Therefore, SR-Pb is considered a good shielding material which can be pplied in a clinical setting by placing it directly on the breast surface for dose optimization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/2057-1976/acb551 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_36689768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769375203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-281ea400fbf18dba6ff782b67663d210b92bcc9af86d9475a91dee041ceb9ab73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMojqh7V5LduLCapNM0WcrgCwQ3ug553DiRTlOTdtB_b4equBBXCV_O_bg5CJ1QckGJEJeMVHVBZc0vtTVVRXfQwU-0--s-Q8c5vxJCKGecy2ofzUrOxfgiDhBcb3Qz6D7EFkePc2iCjS3gNBgDqWhAO5xXARo3zxi8B9uHDbSQMw4t7lLst0n7gvsVYJNA5x67IU1JTNoGi5dPR2jP6ybD8dd5iJ5vrp-Wd8XD4-398uqhsEyKvmCCgl4Q4o2nwhnNva8FM7zmvHSMEiOZsVZqL7iTi7rSkjoAsqAWjNSmLg_R2dQ7LvY2QO7VOmQLTaNbiENWrOayrCtGyhElE2pTzDmBV10Ka50-FCVq61dtBaqtQDX5HUdOv9oHswb3M_BtcwTOJyDETr3GIbXjZ__rm_-Bmw7elVRMEVYRwlXnfPkJJ7eS3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2769375203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of silicone rubber-lead shield's effectiveness in protecting the breast during thoracic CT</title><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Lestari, Yulianti M ; Anam, Choirul ; Sutanto, Heri ; Arifin, Zaenal ; Alkian, Ilham ; Suyudi, Imam ; Dougherty, Geoff</creator><creatorcontrib>Lestari, Yulianti M ; Anam, Choirul ; Sutanto, Heri ; Arifin, Zaenal ; Alkian, Ilham ; Suyudi, Imam ; Dougherty, Geoff</creatorcontrib><description>Radiation of thoracic computed tomography (CT) involves the breast although it is not considered an organ of interest. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) No. 103, the breast is an organ with a high level of sensitivity when interacting with x-rays, increasing the potential risk of breast cancer. Therefore, the radiation dose must be optimized while maintaining image quality. The dose optimization can be accomplished using a radiation shield. This study aims to determine the effect of silicone rubber (SR)-lead (Pb) in various thicknesses as an alternative protective material limiting dose and preserving the image quality of the breast in thoracic CT. SR-Pb was made from SR and Pb by a simple method. The SR-Pb had thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm. The breast dose was measured using a CT dose profiler on the surface of the breast phantom. The CT number and the noise level of the resulting image were determined quantitatively. The dose without the radiation shield was 5.4 mGy. The doses measured using shielding with thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm were 5.2, 4.5, 4.3, and 3.3 mGy, respectively. Radiation shielding with a thickness of 12 mm reduced breast surface dose by up to 38%. The CT numbers and noise levels for the left and right breast phantom images were almost the same as those without radiation shields indicating there were only slight artifacts in the image. Therefore, SR-Pb is considered a good shielding material which can be pplied in a clinical setting by placing it directly on the breast surface for dose optimization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acb551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36689768</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NJOPFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Bismuth ; breast ; Lead ; Radiation Dosage ; shielding ; Silicone Elastomers ; silicone rubber ; thoracic CT ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2023-02, Vol.9 (2), p.25006</ispartof><rights>2023 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2023 IOP Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-281ea400fbf18dba6ff782b67663d210b92bcc9af86d9475a91dee041ceb9ab73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-281ea400fbf18dba6ff782b67663d210b92bcc9af86d9475a91dee041ceb9ab73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7119-9633 ; 0000-0002-2386-0252 ; 0000-0003-0156-6797</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2057-1976/acb551/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36689768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lestari, Yulianti M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anam, Choirul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutanto, Heri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arifin, Zaenal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkian, Ilham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suyudi, Imam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Geoff</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of silicone rubber-lead shield's effectiveness in protecting the breast during thoracic CT</title><title>Biomedical physics & engineering express</title><addtitle>BPEX</addtitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><description>Radiation of thoracic computed tomography (CT) involves the breast although it is not considered an organ of interest. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) No. 103, the breast is an organ with a high level of sensitivity when interacting with x-rays, increasing the potential risk of breast cancer. Therefore, the radiation dose must be optimized while maintaining image quality. The dose optimization can be accomplished using a radiation shield. This study aims to determine the effect of silicone rubber (SR)-lead (Pb) in various thicknesses as an alternative protective material limiting dose and preserving the image quality of the breast in thoracic CT. SR-Pb was made from SR and Pb by a simple method. The SR-Pb had thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm. The breast dose was measured using a CT dose profiler on the surface of the breast phantom. The CT number and the noise level of the resulting image were determined quantitatively. The dose without the radiation shield was 5.4 mGy. The doses measured using shielding with thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm were 5.2, 4.5, 4.3, and 3.3 mGy, respectively. Radiation shielding with a thickness of 12 mm reduced breast surface dose by up to 38%. The CT numbers and noise levels for the left and right breast phantom images were almost the same as those without radiation shields indicating there were only slight artifacts in the image. Therefore, SR-Pb is considered a good shielding material which can be pplied in a clinical setting by placing it directly on the breast surface for dose optimization.</description><subject>Bismuth</subject><subject>breast</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>shielding</subject><subject>Silicone Elastomers</subject><subject>silicone rubber</subject><subject>thoracic CT</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>2057-1976</issn><issn>2057-1976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMojqh7V5LduLCapNM0WcrgCwQ3ug553DiRTlOTdtB_b4equBBXCV_O_bg5CJ1QckGJEJeMVHVBZc0vtTVVRXfQwU-0--s-Q8c5vxJCKGecy2ofzUrOxfgiDhBcb3Qz6D7EFkePc2iCjS3gNBgDqWhAO5xXARo3zxi8B9uHDbSQMw4t7lLst0n7gvsVYJNA5x67IU1JTNoGi5dPR2jP6ybD8dd5iJ5vrp-Wd8XD4-398uqhsEyKvmCCgl4Q4o2nwhnNva8FM7zmvHSMEiOZsVZqL7iTi7rSkjoAsqAWjNSmLg_R2dQ7LvY2QO7VOmQLTaNbiENWrOayrCtGyhElE2pTzDmBV10Ka50-FCVq61dtBaqtQDX5HUdOv9oHswb3M_BtcwTOJyDETr3GIbXjZ__rm_-Bmw7elVRMEVYRwlXnfPkJJ7eS3w</recordid><startdate>20230203</startdate><enddate>20230203</enddate><creator>Lestari, Yulianti M</creator><creator>Anam, Choirul</creator><creator>Sutanto, Heri</creator><creator>Arifin, Zaenal</creator><creator>Alkian, Ilham</creator><creator>Suyudi, Imam</creator><creator>Dougherty, Geoff</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-9633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-0252</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0156-6797</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230203</creationdate><title>Evaluation of silicone rubber-lead shield's effectiveness in protecting the breast during thoracic CT</title><author>Lestari, Yulianti M ; Anam, Choirul ; Sutanto, Heri ; Arifin, Zaenal ; Alkian, Ilham ; Suyudi, Imam ; Dougherty, Geoff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-281ea400fbf18dba6ff782b67663d210b92bcc9af86d9475a91dee041ceb9ab73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bismuth</topic><topic>breast</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>shielding</topic><topic>Silicone Elastomers</topic><topic>silicone rubber</topic><topic>thoracic CT</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lestari, Yulianti M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anam, Choirul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutanto, Heri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arifin, Zaenal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkian, Ilham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suyudi, Imam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Geoff</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomedical physics & engineering express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lestari, Yulianti M</au><au>Anam, Choirul</au><au>Sutanto, Heri</au><au>Arifin, Zaenal</au><au>Alkian, Ilham</au><au>Suyudi, Imam</au><au>Dougherty, Geoff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of silicone rubber-lead shield's effectiveness in protecting the breast during thoracic CT</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical physics & engineering express</jtitle><stitle>BPEX</stitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><date>2023-02-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>25006</spage><pages>25006-</pages><issn>2057-1976</issn><eissn>2057-1976</eissn><coden>NJOPFM</coden><abstract>Radiation of thoracic computed tomography (CT) involves the breast although it is not considered an organ of interest. According to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) No. 103, the breast is an organ with a high level of sensitivity when interacting with x-rays, increasing the potential risk of breast cancer. Therefore, the radiation dose must be optimized while maintaining image quality. The dose optimization can be accomplished using a radiation shield. This study aims to determine the effect of silicone rubber (SR)-lead (Pb) in various thicknesses as an alternative protective material limiting dose and preserving the image quality of the breast in thoracic CT. SR-Pb was made from SR and Pb by a simple method. The SR-Pb had thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm. The breast dose was measured using a CT dose profiler on the surface of the breast phantom. The CT number and the noise level of the resulting image were determined quantitatively. The dose without the radiation shield was 5.4 mGy. The doses measured using shielding with thicknesses of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm were 5.2, 4.5, 4.3, and 3.3 mGy, respectively. Radiation shielding with a thickness of 12 mm reduced breast surface dose by up to 38%. The CT numbers and noise levels for the left and right breast phantom images were almost the same as those without radiation shields indicating there were only slight artifacts in the image. Therefore, SR-Pb is considered a good shielding material which can be pplied in a clinical setting by placing it directly on the breast surface for dose optimization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>36689768</pmid><doi>10.1088/2057-1976/acb551</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-9633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-0252</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0156-6797</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2057-1976 |
ispartof | Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2023-02, Vol.9 (2), p.25006 |
issn | 2057-1976 2057-1976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_36689768 |
source | Institute of Physics Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Bismuth breast Lead Radiation Dosage shielding Silicone Elastomers silicone rubber thoracic CT Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Evaluation of silicone rubber-lead shield's effectiveness in protecting the breast during thoracic CT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A19%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20silicone%20rubber-lead%20shield's%20effectiveness%20in%20protecting%20the%20breast%20during%20thoracic%20CT&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20physics%20&%20engineering%20express&rft.au=Lestari,%20Yulianti%20M&rft.date=2023-02-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=25006&rft.pages=25006-&rft.issn=2057-1976&rft.eissn=2057-1976&rft.coden=NJOPFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2057-1976/acb551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2769375203%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2769375203&rft_id=info:pmid/36689768&rfr_iscdi=true |