Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)
Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which disc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cadernos de saúde pública 2022, Vol.38 (11), p.e00054722 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; por |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e00054722 |
container_title | Cadernos de saúde pública |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de Massarani, Luisa Carvalho, Marilia Sá |
description | Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/0102-311XPT054722 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_36541963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36541963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-111b2313a642bc79fae5df39b4a9d67e3fd15132c4caa630200f7f59e94ba1c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMlKA0EUbAQxMfoBXqSPemjt19ukvUlidCAQDzF4C6-XiaOZhVkC_r2DmkvVoRaoIuQK-B1oy-85cMEkwPvrmmuVCHFCxmCSKVPKqBE5b9tPzoUUUp-RkTRagTVyTA4b9D4vY0uxDLStfI57WsSQ4wNFGqLDLlJsqn5QD0drVdK0bDvcNVj85hboo6uqLxr6Ji93tPuIdLbapHMGltaDIxa5pzeCC84GgNsLcprhvo2X_zwhb4un9eyFLVfP6exxyWrg044BgBMSJBolnE9shlGHTFqn0AaTRJkF0CCFVx7RyKGeZ0mmbbTKIXghJ-T6r7fu3bBqWzd5gc339niA_AF-Vlly</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães ; Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do ; Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes ; Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de ; Massarani, Luisa ; Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creator><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães ; Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do ; Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes ; Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de ; Massarani, Luisa ; Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creatorcontrib><description>Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XPT054722</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36541963</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Brazil - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; Humans ; Pandemics - prevention & control ; Social Media ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Cadernos de saúde pública, 2022, Vol.38 (11), p.e00054722</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4566-0833 ; 0000-0002-5994-9494 ; 0000-0002-9566-0284 ; 0000-0003-4995-6612 ; 0000-0002-8588-3548 ; 0000-0002-5710-7242</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massarani, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creatorcontrib><title>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</title><title>Cadernos de saúde pública</title><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><description>Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles.</description><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pandemics - prevention & control</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1678-4464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UMlKA0EUbAQxMfoBXqSPemjt19ukvUlidCAQDzF4C6-XiaOZhVkC_r2DmkvVoRaoIuQK-B1oy-85cMEkwPvrmmuVCHFCxmCSKVPKqBE5b9tPzoUUUp-RkTRagTVyTA4b9D4vY0uxDLStfI57WsSQ4wNFGqLDLlJsqn5QD0drVdK0bDvcNVj85hboo6uqLxr6Ji93tPuIdLbapHMGltaDIxa5pzeCC84GgNsLcprhvo2X_zwhb4un9eyFLVfP6exxyWrg044BgBMSJBolnE9shlGHTFqn0AaTRJkF0CCFVx7RyKGeZ0mmbbTKIXghJ-T6r7fu3bBqWzd5gc339niA_AF-Vlly</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</creator><creator>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</creator><creator>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</creator><creator>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</creator><creator>Massarani, Luisa</creator><creator>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-0833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-6612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-3548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-7242</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</title><author>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães ; Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do ; Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes ; Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de ; Massarani, Luisa ; Carvalho, Marilia Sá</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-111b2313a642bc79fae5df39b4a9d67e3fd15132c4caa630200f7f59e94ba1c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pandemics - prevention & control</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massarani, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</au><au>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</au><au>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</au><au>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</au><au>Massarani, Luisa</au><au>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</atitle><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e00054722</spage><pages>e00054722-</pages><eissn>1678-4464</eissn><abstract>Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>36541963</pmid><doi>10.1590/0102-311XPT054722</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-0833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-6612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-3548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-7242</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1678-4464 |
ispartof | Cadernos de saúde pública, 2022, Vol.38 (11), p.e00054722 |
issn | 1678-4464 |
language | eng ; por |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_36541963 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Brazil - epidemiology COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control Humans Pandemics - prevention & control Social Media Vaccines |
title | Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaccines%20and%20social%20media:%20a%20debate%20around%20vaccines%20on%20Instagram%20and%20Facebook%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20(2020-2021)&rft.jtitle=Cadernos%20de%20sa%C3%BAde%20p%C3%BAblica&rft.au=Carvalho,%20Eleonora%20de%20Magalh%C3%A3es&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e00054722&rft.pages=e00054722-&rft.eissn=1678-4464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0102-311XPT054722&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E36541963%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36541963&rfr_iscdi=true |