Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)

Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which disc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cadernos de saúde pública 2022, Vol.38 (11), p.e00054722
Hauptverfasser: Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães, Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do, Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes, Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de, Massarani, Luisa, Carvalho, Marilia Sá
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e00054722
container_title Cadernos de saúde pública
container_volume 38
creator Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães
Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do
Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes
Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de
Massarani, Luisa
Carvalho, Marilia Sá
description Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles.
doi_str_mv 10.1590/0102-311XPT054722
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_36541963</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36541963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-111b2313a642bc79fae5df39b4a9d67e3fd15132c4caa630200f7f59e94ba1c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1UMlKA0EUbAQxMfoBXqSPemjt19ukvUlidCAQDzF4C6-XiaOZhVkC_r2DmkvVoRaoIuQK-B1oy-85cMEkwPvrmmuVCHFCxmCSKVPKqBE5b9tPzoUUUp-RkTRagTVyTA4b9D4vY0uxDLStfI57WsSQ4wNFGqLDLlJsqn5QD0drVdK0bDvcNVj85hboo6uqLxr6Ji93tPuIdLbapHMGltaDIxa5pzeCC84GgNsLcprhvo2X_zwhb4un9eyFLVfP6exxyWrg044BgBMSJBolnE9shlGHTFqn0AaTRJkF0CCFVx7RyKGeZ0mmbbTKIXghJ-T6r7fu3bBqWzd5gc339niA_AF-Vlly</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães ; Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do ; Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes ; Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de ; Massarani, Luisa ; Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creator><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães ; Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do ; Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes ; Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de ; Massarani, Luisa ; Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creatorcontrib><description>Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XPT054722</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36541963</identifier><language>eng ; por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Brazil - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Pandemics - prevention &amp; control ; Social Media ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Cadernos de saúde pública, 2022, Vol.38 (11), p.e00054722</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4566-0833 ; 0000-0002-5994-9494 ; 0000-0002-9566-0284 ; 0000-0003-4995-6612 ; 0000-0002-8588-3548 ; 0000-0002-5710-7242</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massarani, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creatorcontrib><title>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</title><title>Cadernos de saúde pública</title><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><description>Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles.</description><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pandemics - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1678-4464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1UMlKA0EUbAQxMfoBXqSPemjt19ukvUlidCAQDzF4C6-XiaOZhVkC_r2DmkvVoRaoIuQK-B1oy-85cMEkwPvrmmuVCHFCxmCSKVPKqBE5b9tPzoUUUp-RkTRagTVyTA4b9D4vY0uxDLStfI57WsSQ4wNFGqLDLlJsqn5QD0drVdK0bDvcNVj85hboo6uqLxr6Ji93tPuIdLbapHMGltaDIxa5pzeCC84GgNsLcprhvo2X_zwhb4un9eyFLVfP6exxyWrg044BgBMSJBolnE9shlGHTFqn0AaTRJkF0CCFVx7RyKGeZ0mmbbTKIXghJ-T6r7fu3bBqWzd5gc339niA_AF-Vlly</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</creator><creator>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</creator><creator>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</creator><creator>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</creator><creator>Massarani, Luisa</creator><creator>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-0833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-6612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-3548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-7242</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</title><author>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães ; Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do ; Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes ; Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de ; Massarani, Luisa ; Carvalho, Marilia Sá</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p108t-111b2313a642bc79fae5df39b4a9d67e3fd15132c4caa630200f7f59e94ba1c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; por</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pandemics - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massarani, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carvalho, Eleonora de Magalhães</au><au>Santos Junior, Marcelo Alves do</au><au>Neves, Luiz Felipe Fernandes</au><au>Oliveira, Thaiane Moreira de</au><au>Massarani, Luisa</au><au>Carvalho, Marilia Sá</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)</atitle><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e00054722</spage><pages>e00054722-</pages><eissn>1678-4464</eissn><abstract>Considering that the Internet and especially social media work as a locus for the circulation of information on COVID-19, this study aimed to assess the attention given to the vaccine theme on Instagram and Facebook in posts throughout two years of pandemic, identifying the temporality in which discussion about the different immunizing agents in social media and highlighting the actors who permeated the discussions on the subject. Data were collected using the CrowdTangle graphical interface, based on search terms in Portuguese related to vaccines approved for use in Brazil and it included posts from public Facebook pages and open Instagram profiles made from January 1st, 2020, to December 31st, 2021. The database included 3,876,408 posts (2,901,457 on Facebook and 974,952 on Instagram). The results showed an alternation of Pfizer, CoronaVac, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines as the focus of discussion, following the public debate established in the country around the dilemmas and advances related to the development, production, distribution, and application of immunizing agents. References to institutions involved in the acquisition and production of immunizing agents were also identified, such as the Brazilian Ministry of Health, the Butantan Institute, and the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, present among the thousand social actors that most generated comments from users in both networks. It was evidenced that the debate on immunizing agents, in the analyzed channels and period, was permeated by social media related to journalism and politicians and celebrities' pages and profiles.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>36541963</pmid><doi>10.1590/0102-311XPT054722</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-0833</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9566-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4995-6612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-3548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5710-7242</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1678-4464
ispartof Cadernos de saúde pública, 2022, Vol.38 (11), p.e00054722
issn 1678-4464
language eng ; por
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_36541963
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Brazil - epidemiology
COVID-19 - epidemiology
COVID-19 - prevention & control
Humans
Pandemics - prevention & control
Social Media
Vaccines
title Vaccines and social media: a debate around vaccines on Instagram and Facebook during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaccines%20and%20social%20media:%20a%20debate%20around%20vaccines%20on%20Instagram%20and%20Facebook%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic%20(2020-2021)&rft.jtitle=Cadernos%20de%20sa%C3%BAde%20p%C3%BAblica&rft.au=Carvalho,%20Eleonora%20de%20Magalh%C3%A3es&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e00054722&rft.pages=e00054722-&rft.eissn=1678-4464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0102-311XPT054722&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E36541963%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36541963&rfr_iscdi=true