Topical Treatment of Second-Degree Burn Wounds with Lactobacillus plantarum Supernatant: Phase I Trial

A burn wound is sterile immediately after injury, but opportunistic bacteria colonize the wound within 48 to 72 hours after the burn, causing delayed or failed burn wound healing. In addition, the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens doubles the treatment problems. ( ) is a well-known ant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Iranian Journal of Pathology 2022-10, Vol.17 (4), p.460-468
Hauptverfasser: Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh, Momeni, Mahnoush, Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh, Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh, Boustanshenas, Mina, Afshar, Mastaneh, Roham, Maryam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 468
container_issue 4
container_start_page 460
container_title Iranian Journal of Pathology
container_volume 17
creator Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh
Momeni, Mahnoush
Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh
Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh
Boustanshenas, Mina
Afshar, Mastaneh
Roham, Maryam
description A burn wound is sterile immediately after injury, but opportunistic bacteria colonize the wound within 48 to 72 hours after the burn, causing delayed or failed burn wound healing. In addition, the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens doubles the treatment problems. ( ) is a well-known antibacterial and healing agent that could be used topically to treat burn wounds. This clinical trial study (Case Series) was performed on 20 patients with deep second-degree burns. Patients had bilateral wounds; the wound on one side of the body was considered as control (treated with silver sulfadiazine) and the other side of the body as treatment (treated with bacteria-free supernatants (BFS) of ). The wounds were evaluated by microbial assessments and assessments related to healing. , , and were isolated from 4 (22.2%), 0%, and 2 (11.1%) of wounds treated with on the fifth day of the treatment, respectively. Furthermore, 12 (66.7%) of wounds treated with were free from bacteria. The need for skin grafting was the same in both treatment and control groups, but graft rejection in the group treated with was (0%) ( =0.02). Regarding eliminating or reducing infection and wound healing, bacteria-free supernatants of can be considered a possible topical treatment option in the case of second-degree burn wounds.
doi_str_mv 10.30699/ijp.2022.551202.2863
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_36532643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36532643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2383-3146ae8dbf6d4d1b2a8dcca10daa2b5260152bc58ea93250832d385a0ff465a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobsz9BCV_oDXJabLMO51fg4LCJl6W0yR1Hf0iaRH_vZ1Tz83Lgfd5Lx5CLjmLganl8rrcd7FgQsRS8jFjoRWckKmAREagpDolU74AGUlgMCHzEPbscAumFnBOJmMFhEpgSopt25UGK7r1DvvaNT1tC7pxpm1sdO8-vHP0bvANfW-Hxgb6WfY7mqLp2xxNWVVDoF2FTY9-qOlm6JxvsB__G_q6w-DoehwusbogZwVWwc1_c0beHh-2q-cofXlar27TyAjQEAFPFDpt80LZxPJcoLbGIGcWUeRSKMalyI3UDpcgJNMgLGiJrCgSJVHDjMjjrvFtCN4VWefLGv1Xxln2oy4b1WUHddlRXXZQN3JXR64b8trZf-pPFHwDm51rQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topical Treatment of Second-Degree Burn Wounds with Lactobacillus plantarum Supernatant: Phase I Trial</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh ; Momeni, Mahnoush ; Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh ; Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh ; Boustanshenas, Mina ; Afshar, Mastaneh ; Roham, Maryam</creator><creatorcontrib>Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh ; Momeni, Mahnoush ; Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh ; Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh ; Boustanshenas, Mina ; Afshar, Mastaneh ; Roham, Maryam</creatorcontrib><description>A burn wound is sterile immediately after injury, but opportunistic bacteria colonize the wound within 48 to 72 hours after the burn, causing delayed or failed burn wound healing. In addition, the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens doubles the treatment problems. ( ) is a well-known antibacterial and healing agent that could be used topically to treat burn wounds. This clinical trial study (Case Series) was performed on 20 patients with deep second-degree burns. Patients had bilateral wounds; the wound on one side of the body was considered as control (treated with silver sulfadiazine) and the other side of the body as treatment (treated with bacteria-free supernatants (BFS) of ). The wounds were evaluated by microbial assessments and assessments related to healing. , , and were isolated from 4 (22.2%), 0%, and 2 (11.1%) of wounds treated with on the fifth day of the treatment, respectively. Furthermore, 12 (66.7%) of wounds treated with were free from bacteria. The need for skin grafting was the same in both treatment and control groups, but graft rejection in the group treated with was (0%) ( =0.02). Regarding eliminating or reducing infection and wound healing, bacteria-free supernatants of can be considered a possible topical treatment option in the case of second-degree burn wounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1735-5303</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2345-3656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2345-3656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30699/ijp.2022.551202.2863</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36532643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Iran</publisher><ispartof>Iranian Journal of Pathology, 2022-10, Vol.17 (4), p.460-468</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2383-3146ae8dbf6d4d1b2a8dcca10daa2b5260152bc58ea93250832d385a0ff465a83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36532643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Mahnoush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boustanshenas, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshar, Mastaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roham, Maryam</creatorcontrib><title>Topical Treatment of Second-Degree Burn Wounds with Lactobacillus plantarum Supernatant: Phase I Trial</title><title>Iranian Journal of Pathology</title><addtitle>Iran J Pathol</addtitle><description>A burn wound is sterile immediately after injury, but opportunistic bacteria colonize the wound within 48 to 72 hours after the burn, causing delayed or failed burn wound healing. In addition, the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens doubles the treatment problems. ( ) is a well-known antibacterial and healing agent that could be used topically to treat burn wounds. This clinical trial study (Case Series) was performed on 20 patients with deep second-degree burns. Patients had bilateral wounds; the wound on one side of the body was considered as control (treated with silver sulfadiazine) and the other side of the body as treatment (treated with bacteria-free supernatants (BFS) of ). The wounds were evaluated by microbial assessments and assessments related to healing. , , and were isolated from 4 (22.2%), 0%, and 2 (11.1%) of wounds treated with on the fifth day of the treatment, respectively. Furthermore, 12 (66.7%) of wounds treated with were free from bacteria. The need for skin grafting was the same in both treatment and control groups, but graft rejection in the group treated with was (0%) ( =0.02). Regarding eliminating or reducing infection and wound healing, bacteria-free supernatants of can be considered a possible topical treatment option in the case of second-degree burn wounds.</description><issn>1735-5303</issn><issn>2345-3656</issn><issn>2345-3656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMobsz9BCV_oDXJabLMO51fg4LCJl6W0yR1Hf0iaRH_vZ1Tz83Lgfd5Lx5CLjmLganl8rrcd7FgQsRS8jFjoRWckKmAREagpDolU74AGUlgMCHzEPbscAumFnBOJmMFhEpgSopt25UGK7r1DvvaNT1tC7pxpm1sdO8-vHP0bvANfW-Hxgb6WfY7mqLp2xxNWVVDoF2FTY9-qOlm6JxvsB__G_q6w-DoehwusbogZwVWwc1_c0beHh-2q-cofXlar27TyAjQEAFPFDpt80LZxPJcoLbGIGcWUeRSKMalyI3UDpcgJNMgLGiJrCgSJVHDjMjjrvFtCN4VWefLGv1Xxln2oy4b1WUHddlRXXZQN3JXR64b8trZf-pPFHwDm51rQw</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh</creator><creator>Momeni, Mahnoush</creator><creator>Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh</creator><creator>Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh</creator><creator>Boustanshenas, Mina</creator><creator>Afshar, Mastaneh</creator><creator>Roham, Maryam</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Topical Treatment of Second-Degree Burn Wounds with Lactobacillus plantarum Supernatant: Phase I Trial</title><author>Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh ; Momeni, Mahnoush ; Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh ; Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh ; Boustanshenas, Mina ; Afshar, Mastaneh ; Roham, Maryam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2383-3146ae8dbf6d4d1b2a8dcca10daa2b5260152bc58ea93250832d385a0ff465a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momeni, Mahnoush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boustanshenas, Mina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Afshar, Mastaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roham, Maryam</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Iranian Journal of Pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh</au><au>Momeni, Mahnoush</au><au>Mazar Atabaki, Samaneh</au><au>Mousavi Shabestari, Tahereh</au><au>Boustanshenas, Mina</au><au>Afshar, Mastaneh</au><au>Roham, Maryam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topical Treatment of Second-Degree Burn Wounds with Lactobacillus plantarum Supernatant: Phase I Trial</atitle><jtitle>Iranian Journal of Pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Iran J Pathol</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>460</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>460-468</pages><issn>1735-5303</issn><issn>2345-3656</issn><eissn>2345-3656</eissn><abstract>A burn wound is sterile immediately after injury, but opportunistic bacteria colonize the wound within 48 to 72 hours after the burn, causing delayed or failed burn wound healing. In addition, the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens doubles the treatment problems. ( ) is a well-known antibacterial and healing agent that could be used topically to treat burn wounds. This clinical trial study (Case Series) was performed on 20 patients with deep second-degree burns. Patients had bilateral wounds; the wound on one side of the body was considered as control (treated with silver sulfadiazine) and the other side of the body as treatment (treated with bacteria-free supernatants (BFS) of ). The wounds were evaluated by microbial assessments and assessments related to healing. , , and were isolated from 4 (22.2%), 0%, and 2 (11.1%) of wounds treated with on the fifth day of the treatment, respectively. Furthermore, 12 (66.7%) of wounds treated with were free from bacteria. The need for skin grafting was the same in both treatment and control groups, but graft rejection in the group treated with was (0%) ( =0.02). Regarding eliminating or reducing infection and wound healing, bacteria-free supernatants of can be considered a possible topical treatment option in the case of second-degree burn wounds.</abstract><cop>Iran</cop><pmid>36532643</pmid><doi>10.30699/ijp.2022.551202.2863</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1735-5303
ispartof Iranian Journal of Pathology, 2022-10, Vol.17 (4), p.460-468
issn 1735-5303
2345-3656
2345-3656
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_36532643
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
title Topical Treatment of Second-Degree Burn Wounds with Lactobacillus plantarum Supernatant: Phase I Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T16%3A54%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topical%20Treatment%20of%20Second-Degree%20Burn%20Wounds%20with%20Lactobacillus%20plantarum%20Supernatant:%20Phase%20I%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Iranian%20Journal%20of%20Pathology&rft.au=Soleymanzadeh%20Moghadam,%20Somayeh&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=460-468&rft.issn=1735-5303&rft.eissn=2345-3656&rft_id=info:doi/10.30699/ijp.2022.551202.2863&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E36532643%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36532643&rfr_iscdi=true