Assessment of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study

We investigated whether use of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests lowers the number of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLE) contaminated with gut flora. In this single-centre before-and-after study, DLEs were ATP tested post-cleaning. During the control period participa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2022-03
Hauptverfasser: Rauwers, Arjan W., Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F., Buijs, Jolanda G., de Groot, Woutrinus, Erler, Nicole S., Vos, Margreet C., Bruno, Marco.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Gastrointestinal endoscopy
container_volume
creator Rauwers, Arjan W.
Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F.
Buijs, Jolanda G.
de Groot, Woutrinus
Erler, Nicole S.
Vos, Margreet C.
Bruno, Marco.J.
description We investigated whether use of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests lowers the number of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLE) contaminated with gut flora. In this single-centre before-and-after study, DLEs were ATP tested post-cleaning. During the control period participants were blinded for ATP results: ATP-positive DLEs were not recleaned. During the intervention period ATP-positive DLEs were recleaned. DLEs underwent microbiological sampling after High Level Disinfection (HLD) with participants blinded for culture results. Using fifteen endoscopes of five different DLE types, nine-hundred-nine procedures were included (52% duodenoscopes, 48% linear echoendoscopes). During the intervention period the absolute rate of contamination with gut flora was higher (16% vs 21%). Main analysis showed that contamination was less likely to occur in the intervention period (OR 0.32; 95%CI 0.12-0.85). Secondary analysis showed that this effect was based on one particular duodenoscope type (estimated probability 39%; 95%CI 18%-64% vs 9%; 95%CI 2%-21%), while no effect was seen in the other four DLE types. In detail, of the four duodenoscopes of this type two had lower contamination rates (69% vs 39% and 36% vs 10%). During the control period, both these duodenoscopes had multiple episodes with ongoing contamination with the same microorganism which ended weeks before the start of the intervention period, i.e. they were not terminated by ATP testing. Post-manual cleaning ATP tests do not reduce post-HLD gut flora contamination rates of DLE. Hence, post-cleaning ATP tests are not suited as a means for quality control of endoscope reprocessing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_35341715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510722002449</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0016510722002449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e755-1a752f6e5882d0c9c9bfa943f87ba834ee4a228529b90fc82e95fc21788475163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kctOAyEUhonRaL08gBvDC8zIZSiMrkytl8TETfeEwhlL04HJwJj4Lj6stOrqDzkfX07Oj9A1JTUldH67rT881IwwVhNelzhCM0paWc2lbI_RjBSoEpTIM3Se0pYQohinp-iMC95QScUMfT-kBCn1EDKOHR5iylVvwmR22O7ABB8-sHEQYvIBcB79sIlp2JhcHpBywjniYYTP_f-8ATwl2HtsDNn0PhTOYTfFg8HGARI2weFdkZkRg91ECO5vcncQPC5Xy8UKpzy5r0t00pldgqu_vECrp-Vq8VK9vT-_Lh7eKpBCVNRIwbo5CKWYI7a17bozbcM7JddG8QagMYwpwdp1SzqrGLSis4xKpRop6JxfoJtf7TCte3B6GH1vxi_9f6UC3P8CUJb49DDqZD0EC86PYLN20WtK9L4TvdWlE73vRBOuS_Af44qBtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rauwers, Arjan W. ; Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F. ; Buijs, Jolanda G. ; de Groot, Woutrinus ; Erler, Nicole S. ; Vos, Margreet C. ; Bruno, Marco.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rauwers, Arjan W. ; Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F. ; Buijs, Jolanda G. ; de Groot, Woutrinus ; Erler, Nicole S. ; Vos, Margreet C. ; Bruno, Marco.J.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated whether use of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests lowers the number of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLE) contaminated with gut flora. In this single-centre before-and-after study, DLEs were ATP tested post-cleaning. During the control period participants were blinded for ATP results: ATP-positive DLEs were not recleaned. During the intervention period ATP-positive DLEs were recleaned. DLEs underwent microbiological sampling after High Level Disinfection (HLD) with participants blinded for culture results. Using fifteen endoscopes of five different DLE types, nine-hundred-nine procedures were included (52% duodenoscopes, 48% linear echoendoscopes). During the intervention period the absolute rate of contamination with gut flora was higher (16% vs 21%). Main analysis showed that contamination was less likely to occur in the intervention period (OR 0.32; 95%CI 0.12-0.85). Secondary analysis showed that this effect was based on one particular duodenoscope type (estimated probability 39%; 95%CI 18%-64% vs 9%; 95%CI 2%-21%), while no effect was seen in the other four DLE types. In detail, of the four duodenoscopes of this type two had lower contamination rates (69% vs 39% and 36% vs 10%). During the control period, both these duodenoscopes had multiple episodes with ongoing contamination with the same microorganism which ended weeks before the start of the intervention period, i.e. they were not terminated by ATP testing. Post-manual cleaning ATP tests do not reduce post-HLD gut flora contamination rates of DLE. Hence, post-cleaning ATP tests are not suited as a means for quality control of endoscope reprocessing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35341715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenosine triphosphate ; ATP ; disinfection ; duodenoscopes ; Endoscopes ; equipment contamination ; Gastrointestinal ; linear echoendoscopes ; reprocessing</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-03</ispartof><rights>2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35341715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rauwers, Arjan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buijs, Jolanda G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Woutrinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erler, Nicole S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Margreet C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Marco.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>We investigated whether use of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests lowers the number of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLE) contaminated with gut flora. In this single-centre before-and-after study, DLEs were ATP tested post-cleaning. During the control period participants were blinded for ATP results: ATP-positive DLEs were not recleaned. During the intervention period ATP-positive DLEs were recleaned. DLEs underwent microbiological sampling after High Level Disinfection (HLD) with participants blinded for culture results. Using fifteen endoscopes of five different DLE types, nine-hundred-nine procedures were included (52% duodenoscopes, 48% linear echoendoscopes). During the intervention period the absolute rate of contamination with gut flora was higher (16% vs 21%). Main analysis showed that contamination was less likely to occur in the intervention period (OR 0.32; 95%CI 0.12-0.85). Secondary analysis showed that this effect was based on one particular duodenoscope type (estimated probability 39%; 95%CI 18%-64% vs 9%; 95%CI 2%-21%), while no effect was seen in the other four DLE types. In detail, of the four duodenoscopes of this type two had lower contamination rates (69% vs 39% and 36% vs 10%). During the control period, both these duodenoscopes had multiple episodes with ongoing contamination with the same microorganism which ended weeks before the start of the intervention period, i.e. they were not terminated by ATP testing. Post-manual cleaning ATP tests do not reduce post-HLD gut flora contamination rates of DLE. Hence, post-cleaning ATP tests are not suited as a means for quality control of endoscope reprocessing.</description><subject>Adenosine triphosphate</subject><subject>ATP</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>duodenoscopes</subject><subject>Endoscopes</subject><subject>equipment contamination</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal</subject><subject>linear echoendoscopes</subject><subject>reprocessing</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kctOAyEUhonRaL08gBvDC8zIZSiMrkytl8TETfeEwhlL04HJwJj4Lj6stOrqDzkfX07Oj9A1JTUldH67rT881IwwVhNelzhCM0paWc2lbI_RjBSoEpTIM3Se0pYQohinp-iMC95QScUMfT-kBCn1EDKOHR5iylVvwmR22O7ABB8-sHEQYvIBcB79sIlp2JhcHpBywjniYYTP_f-8ATwl2HtsDNn0PhTOYTfFg8HGARI2weFdkZkRg91ECO5vcncQPC5Xy8UKpzy5r0t00pldgqu_vECrp-Vq8VK9vT-_Lh7eKpBCVNRIwbo5CKWYI7a17bozbcM7JddG8QagMYwpwdp1SzqrGLSis4xKpRop6JxfoJtf7TCte3B6GH1vxi_9f6UC3P8CUJb49DDqZD0EC86PYLN20WtK9L4TvdWlE73vRBOuS_Af44qBtQ</recordid><startdate>20220324</startdate><enddate>20220324</enddate><creator>Rauwers, Arjan W.</creator><creator>Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F.</creator><creator>Buijs, Jolanda G.</creator><creator>de Groot, Woutrinus</creator><creator>Erler, Nicole S.</creator><creator>Vos, Margreet C.</creator><creator>Bruno, Marco.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220324</creationdate><title>Assessment of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study</title><author>Rauwers, Arjan W. ; Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F. ; Buijs, Jolanda G. ; de Groot, Woutrinus ; Erler, Nicole S. ; Vos, Margreet C. ; Bruno, Marco.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e755-1a752f6e5882d0c9c9bfa943f87ba834ee4a228529b90fc82e95fc21788475163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adenosine triphosphate</topic><topic>ATP</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>duodenoscopes</topic><topic>Endoscopes</topic><topic>equipment contamination</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal</topic><topic>linear echoendoscopes</topic><topic>reprocessing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rauwers, Arjan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buijs, Jolanda G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Groot, Woutrinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erler, Nicole S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vos, Margreet C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruno, Marco.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rauwers, Arjan W.</au><au>Voor in ‘t holt, Anne F.</au><au>Buijs, Jolanda G.</au><au>de Groot, Woutrinus</au><au>Erler, Nicole S.</au><au>Vos, Margreet C.</au><au>Bruno, Marco.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-03-24</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><abstract>We investigated whether use of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests lowers the number of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLE) contaminated with gut flora. In this single-centre before-and-after study, DLEs were ATP tested post-cleaning. During the control period participants were blinded for ATP results: ATP-positive DLEs were not recleaned. During the intervention period ATP-positive DLEs were recleaned. DLEs underwent microbiological sampling after High Level Disinfection (HLD) with participants blinded for culture results. Using fifteen endoscopes of five different DLE types, nine-hundred-nine procedures were included (52% duodenoscopes, 48% linear echoendoscopes). During the intervention period the absolute rate of contamination with gut flora was higher (16% vs 21%). Main analysis showed that contamination was less likely to occur in the intervention period (OR 0.32; 95%CI 0.12-0.85). Secondary analysis showed that this effect was based on one particular duodenoscope type (estimated probability 39%; 95%CI 18%-64% vs 9%; 95%CI 2%-21%), while no effect was seen in the other four DLE types. In detail, of the four duodenoscopes of this type two had lower contamination rates (69% vs 39% and 36% vs 10%). During the control period, both these duodenoscopes had multiple episodes with ongoing contamination with the same microorganism which ended weeks before the start of the intervention period, i.e. they were not terminated by ATP testing. Post-manual cleaning ATP tests do not reduce post-HLD gut flora contamination rates of DLE. Hence, post-cleaning ATP tests are not suited as a means for quality control of endoscope reprocessing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35341715</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.022</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5107
ispartof Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022-03
issn 0016-5107
1097-6779
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_35341715
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adenosine triphosphate
ATP
disinfection
duodenoscopes
Endoscopes
equipment contamination
Gastrointestinal
linear echoendoscopes
reprocessing
title Assessment of post-manual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T17%3A14%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20post-manual%20cleaning%20adenosine%20triphosphate%20tests%20to%20prevent%20the%20use%20of%20contaminated%20duodenoscopes%20and%20linear%20echoendoscopes:%20the%20DETECT%20study&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Rauwers,%20Arjan%20W.&rft.date=2022-03-24&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.022&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES0016510722002449%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35341715&rft_els_id=S0016510722002449&rfr_iscdi=true