Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO 2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure
The best way to titrate the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome is still matter of debate. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive technique that could guide PEEP setting based on an optimized ventilation homogeneity....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in medicine 2021, Vol.8, p.720920 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 720920 |
container_title | Frontiers in medicine |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Gibot, Sébastien Conrad, Marie Courte, Guilhem Cravoisy, Aurélie |
description | The best way to titrate the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome is still matter of debate. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive technique that could guide PEEP setting based on an optimized ventilation homogeneity.
For this study, we enrolled the patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), who required mechanical ventilation and were admitted to the ICU in March 2021. Patients were monitored by an esophageal catheter and a 32-electrode EIT device. Within 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation, different levels of PEEP were applied based upon PEEP/FiO
tables, positive end-expiratory transpulmonary (P
)/ FiO2 table, and EIT. Respiratory mechanics variables were recorded.
Seventeen patients were enrolled. PEEP values derived from EIT (PEEP
) were different from those based upon other techniques and has poor in-between agreement. The PEEP
was associated with lower plateau pressure, mechanical power, transpulmonary pressures, and with a higher static compliance (Crs) and homogeneity of ventilation.
Personalized PEEP setting derived from EIT may help to achieve a more homogenous distribution of ventilation. Whether this approach may translate in outcome improvement remains to be investigated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fmed.2021.720920 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_35004712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35004712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_350047123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9OwkAYxDdGI0S5ezLfA9Cy3VJpvSmUyIkGGuONLO0Hrun-ye4W7fv5YGKihpunmcP8kpkh5CaiYRyn2WgnsQ4ZZVE4YTRj9Iz0GcvugjRJX85PfI8MnHujlEYxS8ZRfEl6cULpeBKxPvkstBNeHBByVQf5hxGWe207KCw611qENXov1B6EgunyeTELoixYYcM91vBQtR5hhe4Pmwnnv0lYd6q2WuI9TLU03AqnFTyif0dUkDdYeSsq3sBCGqy5qhBKLfXecvPaDaHI82I0F0tgUPJtg24IXNVQWq6caRupFT_peE0udrxxOPjRK3I7z8vpU2Da7fGkjbFCHvOb39nxv4EvK1NuUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO 2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Gibot, Sébastien ; Conrad, Marie ; Courte, Guilhem ; Cravoisy, Aurélie</creator><creatorcontrib>Gibot, Sébastien ; Conrad, Marie ; Courte, Guilhem ; Cravoisy, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><description>The best way to titrate the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome is still matter of debate. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive technique that could guide PEEP setting based on an optimized ventilation homogeneity.
For this study, we enrolled the patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), who required mechanical ventilation and were admitted to the ICU in March 2021. Patients were monitored by an esophageal catheter and a 32-electrode EIT device. Within 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation, different levels of PEEP were applied based upon PEEP/FiO
tables, positive end-expiratory transpulmonary (P
)/ FiO2 table, and EIT. Respiratory mechanics variables were recorded.
Seventeen patients were enrolled. PEEP values derived from EIT (PEEP
) were different from those based upon other techniques and has poor in-between agreement. The PEEP
was associated with lower plateau pressure, mechanical power, transpulmonary pressures, and with a higher static compliance (Crs) and homogeneity of ventilation.
Personalized PEEP setting derived from EIT may help to achieve a more homogenous distribution of ventilation. Whether this approach may translate in outcome improvement remains to be investigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2296-858X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2296-858X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.720920</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35004712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland</publisher><ispartof>Frontiers in medicine, 2021, Vol.8, p.720920</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Gibot, Conrad, Courte and Cravoisy.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gibot, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courte, Guilhem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cravoisy, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><title>Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO 2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure</title><title>Frontiers in medicine</title><addtitle>Front Med (Lausanne)</addtitle><description>The best way to titrate the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome is still matter of debate. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive technique that could guide PEEP setting based on an optimized ventilation homogeneity.
For this study, we enrolled the patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), who required mechanical ventilation and were admitted to the ICU in March 2021. Patients were monitored by an esophageal catheter and a 32-electrode EIT device. Within 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation, different levels of PEEP were applied based upon PEEP/FiO
tables, positive end-expiratory transpulmonary (P
)/ FiO2 table, and EIT. Respiratory mechanics variables were recorded.
Seventeen patients were enrolled. PEEP values derived from EIT (PEEP
) were different from those based upon other techniques and has poor in-between agreement. The PEEP
was associated with lower plateau pressure, mechanical power, transpulmonary pressures, and with a higher static compliance (Crs) and homogeneity of ventilation.
Personalized PEEP setting derived from EIT may help to achieve a more homogenous distribution of ventilation. Whether this approach may translate in outcome improvement remains to be investigated.</description><issn>2296-858X</issn><issn>2296-858X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9OwkAYxDdGI0S5ezLfA9Cy3VJpvSmUyIkGGuONLO0Hrun-ye4W7fv5YGKihpunmcP8kpkh5CaiYRyn2WgnsQ4ZZVE4YTRj9Iz0GcvugjRJX85PfI8MnHujlEYxS8ZRfEl6cULpeBKxPvkstBNeHBByVQf5hxGWe207KCw611qENXov1B6EgunyeTELoixYYcM91vBQtR5hhe4Pmwnnv0lYd6q2WuI9TLU03AqnFTyif0dUkDdYeSsq3sBCGqy5qhBKLfXecvPaDaHI82I0F0tgUPJtg24IXNVQWq6caRupFT_peE0udrxxOPjRK3I7z8vpU2Da7fGkjbFCHvOb39nxv4EvK1NuUA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Gibot, Sébastien</creator><creator>Conrad, Marie</creator><creator>Courte, Guilhem</creator><creator>Cravoisy, Aurélie</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO 2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure</title><author>Gibot, Sébastien ; Conrad, Marie ; Courte, Guilhem ; Cravoisy, Aurélie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_350047123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gibot, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conrad, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Courte, Guilhem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cravoisy, Aurélie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gibot, Sébastien</au><au>Conrad, Marie</au><au>Courte, Guilhem</au><au>Cravoisy, Aurélie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO 2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Front Med (Lausanne)</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>720920</spage><pages>720920-</pages><issn>2296-858X</issn><eissn>2296-858X</eissn><abstract>The best way to titrate the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome is still matter of debate. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive technique that could guide PEEP setting based on an optimized ventilation homogeneity.
For this study, we enrolled the patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), who required mechanical ventilation and were admitted to the ICU in March 2021. Patients were monitored by an esophageal catheter and a 32-electrode EIT device. Within 48 h after the start of mechanical ventilation, different levels of PEEP were applied based upon PEEP/FiO
tables, positive end-expiratory transpulmonary (P
)/ FiO2 table, and EIT. Respiratory mechanics variables were recorded.
Seventeen patients were enrolled. PEEP values derived from EIT (PEEP
) were different from those based upon other techniques and has poor in-between agreement. The PEEP
was associated with lower plateau pressure, mechanical power, transpulmonary pressures, and with a higher static compliance (Crs) and homogeneity of ventilation.
Personalized PEEP setting derived from EIT may help to achieve a more homogenous distribution of ventilation. Whether this approach may translate in outcome improvement remains to be investigated.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pmid>35004712</pmid><doi>10.3389/fmed.2021.720920</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2296-858X |
ispartof | Frontiers in medicine, 2021, Vol.8, p.720920 |
issn | 2296-858X 2296-858X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_35004712 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
title | Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Electrical Impedance Tomography, PEEP/FiO 2 Tables, and Transpulmonary Pressure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T06%3A26%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positive%20End-Expiratory%20Pressure%20Setting%20in%20COVID-19-Related%20Acute%20Respiratory%20Distress%20Syndrome:%20Comparison%20Between%20Electrical%20Impedance%20Tomography,%20PEEP/FiO%202%20Tables,%20and%20Transpulmonary%20Pressure&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Gibot,%20S%C3%A9bastien&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=720920&rft.pages=720920-&rft.issn=2296-858X&rft.eissn=2296-858X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fmed.2021.720920&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E35004712%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35004712&rfr_iscdi=true |