Plasmons: untangling the classical, experimental, and quantum mechanical definitions
Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage. In a classical electrodynamics framework, a plasmon is de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials horizons 2022-01, Vol.9 (1), p.25-42 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Materials horizons |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Gieseking, Rebecca L. M |
description | Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage. In a classical electrodynamics framework, a plasmon is defined as a collective, coherent oscillation of the conduction electrons of the material. In recent years, it has been shown experimentally that noble metal nanoclusters as small as a few nm can support plasmons. This work has led to numerous attempts to identify plasmons from a quantum mechanical perspective, including many overlapping and sometimes conflicting criteria for plasmons. Here, we shed light on the definitions of plasmons. We start with a brief overview of the well-established classical electrodynamics definition of a plasmon. We then turn to the experimental features used to determine whether a particular system is plasmonic, connecting the experimental results to the corresponding features of the classical electrodynamics description. The core of this article explains the many quantum mechanical criteria for plasmons. We explore the common features that these criteria share and explain how these features relate to the classical electrodynamics and experimental definitions. This comparison shows where more work is needed to expand and refine the quantum mechanical definitions of plasmons.
Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d1mh01163d |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_34608479</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2616653257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f65d18f8fdbd8321eed775026e67af414be537f3eba024958ac845d991c9bb7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c1LwzAYBvAgipO5i3el4EXEadJ8Nd5kUydM9DDPJU3ebh1tujUt6H9v5uYET0l4fzwkTxA6I_iWYKruLKkWmBBB7QE6iTEnQ0E5P9zvmeyhgfdLjDGhjOMEH6MeZQInTKoTNHsvta9q5--jzrXazcvCzaN2AZEJA18YXd5E8LmCpqgggHDSzkbrTru2q6IKzEK7jYos5IUr2iJknaKjXJceBru1jz6eHmejyXD69vwyepgODaOqHeaCW5LkSW4zm9CYAFgpOY4FCKlzRlgGnMqcQqZxzBRPtEkYt0oRo7JMWtpHV9vcVVOvO_BtWhXeQFlqB3Xn05hLRaUSXAV6-Y8u665x4XZpLIgQnAYc1PVWmab2voE8XYV36-YrJTjd1J2Oyevkp-5xwBe7yC6rwO7pb7kBnG9B481--vdf9BsBBYQf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2616653257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plasmons: untangling the classical, experimental, and quantum mechanical definitions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gieseking, Rebecca L. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Gieseking, Rebecca L. M</creatorcontrib><description>Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage. In a classical electrodynamics framework, a plasmon is defined as a collective, coherent oscillation of the conduction electrons of the material. In recent years, it has been shown experimentally that noble metal nanoclusters as small as a few nm can support plasmons. This work has led to numerous attempts to identify plasmons from a quantum mechanical perspective, including many overlapping and sometimes conflicting criteria for plasmons. Here, we shed light on the definitions of plasmons. We start with a brief overview of the well-established classical electrodynamics definition of a plasmon. We then turn to the experimental features used to determine whether a particular system is plasmonic, connecting the experimental results to the corresponding features of the classical electrodynamics description. The core of this article explains the many quantum mechanical criteria for plasmons. We explore the common features that these criteria share and explain how these features relate to the classical electrodynamics and experimental definitions. This comparison shows where more work is needed to expand and refine the quantum mechanical definitions of plasmons.
Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-6347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-6355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d1mh01163d</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34608479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Conduction electrons ; Criteria ; Electric fields ; Electrodynamics ; Electrons ; Energy storage ; Metals ; Nanoclusters ; Noble metals ; Plasmons ; Quantum mechanics ; Quantum Theory ; Solar energy</subject><ispartof>Materials horizons, 2022-01, Vol.9 (1), p.25-42</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f65d18f8fdbd8321eed775026e67af414be537f3eba024958ac845d991c9bb7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f65d18f8fdbd8321eed775026e67af414be537f3eba024958ac845d991c9bb7d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7343-1253</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gieseking, Rebecca L. M</creatorcontrib><title>Plasmons: untangling the classical, experimental, and quantum mechanical definitions</title><title>Materials horizons</title><addtitle>Mater Horiz</addtitle><description>Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage. In a classical electrodynamics framework, a plasmon is defined as a collective, coherent oscillation of the conduction electrons of the material. In recent years, it has been shown experimentally that noble metal nanoclusters as small as a few nm can support plasmons. This work has led to numerous attempts to identify plasmons from a quantum mechanical perspective, including many overlapping and sometimes conflicting criteria for plasmons. Here, we shed light on the definitions of plasmons. We start with a brief overview of the well-established classical electrodynamics definition of a plasmon. We then turn to the experimental features used to determine whether a particular system is plasmonic, connecting the experimental results to the corresponding features of the classical electrodynamics description. The core of this article explains the many quantum mechanical criteria for plasmons. We explore the common features that these criteria share and explain how these features relate to the classical electrodynamics and experimental definitions. This comparison shows where more work is needed to expand and refine the quantum mechanical definitions of plasmons.
Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage.</description><subject>Conduction electrons</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electrodynamics</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Nanoclusters</subject><subject>Noble metals</subject><subject>Plasmons</subject><subject>Quantum mechanics</subject><subject>Quantum Theory</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><issn>2051-6347</issn><issn>2051-6355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c1LwzAYBvAgipO5i3el4EXEadJ8Nd5kUydM9DDPJU3ebh1tujUt6H9v5uYET0l4fzwkTxA6I_iWYKruLKkWmBBB7QE6iTEnQ0E5P9zvmeyhgfdLjDGhjOMEH6MeZQInTKoTNHsvta9q5--jzrXazcvCzaN2AZEJA18YXd5E8LmCpqgggHDSzkbrTru2q6IKzEK7jYos5IUr2iJknaKjXJceBru1jz6eHmejyXD69vwyepgODaOqHeaCW5LkSW4zm9CYAFgpOY4FCKlzRlgGnMqcQqZxzBRPtEkYt0oRo7JMWtpHV9vcVVOvO_BtWhXeQFlqB3Xn05hLRaUSXAV6-Y8u665x4XZpLIgQnAYc1PVWmab2voE8XYV36-YrJTjd1J2Oyevkp-5xwBe7yC6rwO7pb7kBnG9B481--vdf9BsBBYQf</recordid><startdate>20220104</startdate><enddate>20220104</enddate><creator>Gieseking, Rebecca L. M</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-1253</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220104</creationdate><title>Plasmons: untangling the classical, experimental, and quantum mechanical definitions</title><author>Gieseking, Rebecca L. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-f65d18f8fdbd8321eed775026e67af414be537f3eba024958ac845d991c9bb7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Conduction electrons</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electrodynamics</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Nanoclusters</topic><topic>Noble metals</topic><topic>Plasmons</topic><topic>Quantum mechanics</topic><topic>Quantum Theory</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gieseking, Rebecca L. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Materials horizons</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gieseking, Rebecca L. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plasmons: untangling the classical, experimental, and quantum mechanical definitions</atitle><jtitle>Materials horizons</jtitle><addtitle>Mater Horiz</addtitle><date>2022-01-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>25-42</pages><issn>2051-6347</issn><eissn>2051-6355</eissn><abstract>Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage. In a classical electrodynamics framework, a plasmon is defined as a collective, coherent oscillation of the conduction electrons of the material. In recent years, it has been shown experimentally that noble metal nanoclusters as small as a few nm can support plasmons. This work has led to numerous attempts to identify plasmons from a quantum mechanical perspective, including many overlapping and sometimes conflicting criteria for plasmons. Here, we shed light on the definitions of plasmons. We start with a brief overview of the well-established classical electrodynamics definition of a plasmon. We then turn to the experimental features used to determine whether a particular system is plasmonic, connecting the experimental results to the corresponding features of the classical electrodynamics description. The core of this article explains the many quantum mechanical criteria for plasmons. We explore the common features that these criteria share and explain how these features relate to the classical electrodynamics and experimental definitions. This comparison shows where more work is needed to expand and refine the quantum mechanical definitions of plasmons.
Plasmons have been widely studied over the past several decades because of their ability to strongly absorb light and localize its electric field on the nanoscale, leading to applications in spectroscopy, biosensing, and solar energy storage.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>34608479</pmid><doi>10.1039/d1mh01163d</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-1253</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2051-6347 |
ispartof | Materials horizons, 2022-01, Vol.9 (1), p.25-42 |
issn | 2051-6347 2051-6355 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_34608479 |
source | MEDLINE; Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Conduction electrons Criteria Electric fields Electrodynamics Electrons Energy storage Metals Nanoclusters Noble metals Plasmons Quantum mechanics Quantum Theory Solar energy |
title | Plasmons: untangling the classical, experimental, and quantum mechanical definitions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A45%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plasmons:%20untangling%20the%20classical,%20experimental,%20and%20quantum%20mechanical%20definitions&rft.jtitle=Materials%20horizons&rft.au=Gieseking,%20Rebecca%20L.%20M&rft.date=2022-01-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=25-42&rft.issn=2051-6347&rft.eissn=2051-6355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d1mh01163d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2616653257%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2616653257&rft_id=info:pmid/34608479&rfr_iscdi=true |