Ambulatory blood pressure using 60 rather than 20-min intervals may better reflect the resting blood pressure
Twenty-four hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recommended in several guidelines as the best method for diagnosing hypertension. In general, the prognostic value of ABPM is superior to single office blood pressure (BP) measurements. Unfortunately, some patients experience consid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood pressure 2021-11, Vol.30 (6), p.341-347 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 347 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 341 |
container_title | Blood pressure |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Dabrowski, Karol M. Nyvad, Jakob Thomsen, Martin B. Bertelsen, Jannik B. Christensen, Kent L. |
description | Twenty-four hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recommended in several guidelines as the best method for diagnosing hypertension. In general, the prognostic value of ABPM is superior to single office blood pressure (BP) measurements. Unfortunately, some patients experience considerable discomfort during frequently repeated forceful cuff inflations.
In this study we investigated the difference in mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) between low-frequency ABPM (LF-ABPM), measuring once every hour, and high-frequency ABPM (HF-ABPM), measuring three times an hour during daytime, and two times an hour during night-time.
Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis. All included patients had an HF-ABPM performed first and within a few weeks they underwent an LF-ABPM. The average day time difference in SBP between the two frequencies was 3.8 mmHg (p-value = 0.07) for mild, 8.2 mmHg (p-value < 0.01) for moderate and 15 mmHg (p-value < 0.001) for severe hypertension. A similar pattern was seen for night-time SBP. This study suggests that mean BP is similar between the two measuring frequencies for normotensive and mild hypertensive patients, while HF-ABPM results in a higher 24-h mean BP for moderate- and severe hypertensive patients.
LF-ABPM may more correctly reflect the resting blood pressure in patients with moderate and severe hypertension. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08037051.2021.1953372 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_34263666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_16d8de621f22410e9de6f9db7860a95a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2552055604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-f42d52629b02b6768a9b2436b48e3ccb66a7f256e9efe72301695963b0dee3953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhI4B85JJlbMeT-EZV8adSJS5wtuxk0qZK4sV2QPvtcdhtJS4cLHus33ujmcfYWwF7AS18KEc1oMVeghR7YbRSjXzGdgK1qIQx5jnbbUy1QRfsVUoPAEIpgJfsQtUSFSLu2Hw1-3VyOcQj91MIPT9ESmmNxNc0LnccgUeX7ynyfO8WLqGax4WPS6b4y02Jz64IKZeSRxom6nIBqbxT3uT_er5mL4Yiojfn-5L9-Pzp-_XX6vbbl5vrq9uqqxuTq6GWvZYojQfpscHWGS9rhb5uSXWdR3TNIDWSoYEaqUCg0QaVh55IlVVcspuTbx_cgz3EcXbxaIMb7d-PEO-si3nsJrIC-7YnlGKQshZAphSD6X3TIjijXfF6f_I6xPBzLWPZeUwdTZNbKKzJSq0laI1QF1Sf0C6GlMo6nloLsFtq9jE1u6Vmz6kV3btzi9XP1D-pHmMqwMcTMC5DiLP7HeLU2-yOU4hDdEs3Jqv-3-MPvj6mCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552055604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambulatory blood pressure using 60 rather than 20-min intervals may better reflect the resting blood pressure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Dabrowski, Karol M. ; Nyvad, Jakob ; Thomsen, Martin B. ; Bertelsen, Jannik B. ; Christensen, Kent L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, Karol M. ; Nyvad, Jakob ; Thomsen, Martin B. ; Bertelsen, Jannik B. ; Christensen, Kent L.</creatorcontrib><description>Twenty-four hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recommended in several guidelines as the best method for diagnosing hypertension. In general, the prognostic value of ABPM is superior to single office blood pressure (BP) measurements. Unfortunately, some patients experience considerable discomfort during frequently repeated forceful cuff inflations.
In this study we investigated the difference in mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) between low-frequency ABPM (LF-ABPM), measuring once every hour, and high-frequency ABPM (HF-ABPM), measuring three times an hour during daytime, and two times an hour during night-time.
Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis. All included patients had an HF-ABPM performed first and within a few weeks they underwent an LF-ABPM. The average day time difference in SBP between the two frequencies was 3.8 mmHg (p-value = 0.07) for mild, 8.2 mmHg (p-value < 0.01) for moderate and 15 mmHg (p-value < 0.001) for severe hypertension. A similar pattern was seen for night-time SBP. This study suggests that mean BP is similar between the two measuring frequencies for normotensive and mild hypertensive patients, while HF-ABPM results in a higher 24-h mean BP for moderate- and severe hypertensive patients.
LF-ABPM may more correctly reflect the resting blood pressure in patients with moderate and severe hypertension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0803-7051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-1999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08037051.2021.1953372</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34263666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Ambulatory blood pressure ; Blood Pressure ; Blood Pressure Determination ; blood pressure measurement ; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory ; Humans ; hypertension ; Hypertension - diagnosis ; resistant hypertension ; Systole</subject><ispartof>Blood pressure, 2021-11, Vol.30 (6), p.341-347</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-f42d52629b02b6768a9b2436b48e3ccb66a7f256e9efe72301695963b0dee3953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-f42d52629b02b6768a9b2436b48e3ccb66a7f256e9efe72301695963b0dee3953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34263666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, Karol M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyvad, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Martin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertelsen, Jannik B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kent L.</creatorcontrib><title>Ambulatory blood pressure using 60 rather than 20-min intervals may better reflect the resting blood pressure</title><title>Blood pressure</title><addtitle>Blood Press</addtitle><description>Twenty-four hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recommended in several guidelines as the best method for diagnosing hypertension. In general, the prognostic value of ABPM is superior to single office blood pressure (BP) measurements. Unfortunately, some patients experience considerable discomfort during frequently repeated forceful cuff inflations.
In this study we investigated the difference in mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) between low-frequency ABPM (LF-ABPM), measuring once every hour, and high-frequency ABPM (HF-ABPM), measuring three times an hour during daytime, and two times an hour during night-time.
Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis. All included patients had an HF-ABPM performed first and within a few weeks they underwent an LF-ABPM. The average day time difference in SBP between the two frequencies was 3.8 mmHg (p-value = 0.07) for mild, 8.2 mmHg (p-value < 0.01) for moderate and 15 mmHg (p-value < 0.001) for severe hypertension. A similar pattern was seen for night-time SBP. This study suggests that mean BP is similar between the two measuring frequencies for normotensive and mild hypertensive patients, while HF-ABPM results in a higher 24-h mean BP for moderate- and severe hypertensive patients.
LF-ABPM may more correctly reflect the resting blood pressure in patients with moderate and severe hypertension.</description><subject>Ambulatory blood pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Determination</subject><subject>blood pressure measurement</subject><subject>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>resistant hypertension</subject><subject>Systole</subject><issn>0803-7051</issn><issn>1651-1999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhI4B85JJlbMeT-EZV8adSJS5wtuxk0qZK4sV2QPvtcdhtJS4cLHus33ujmcfYWwF7AS18KEc1oMVeghR7YbRSjXzGdgK1qIQx5jnbbUy1QRfsVUoPAEIpgJfsQtUSFSLu2Hw1-3VyOcQj91MIPT9ESmmNxNc0LnccgUeX7ynyfO8WLqGax4WPS6b4y02Jz64IKZeSRxom6nIBqbxT3uT_er5mL4Yiojfn-5L9-Pzp-_XX6vbbl5vrq9uqqxuTq6GWvZYojQfpscHWGS9rhb5uSXWdR3TNIDWSoYEaqUCg0QaVh55IlVVcspuTbx_cgz3EcXbxaIMb7d-PEO-si3nsJrIC-7YnlGKQshZAphSD6X3TIjijXfF6f_I6xPBzLWPZeUwdTZNbKKzJSq0laI1QF1Sf0C6GlMo6nloLsFtq9jE1u6Vmz6kV3btzi9XP1D-pHmMqwMcTMC5DiLP7HeLU2-yOU4hDdEs3Jqv-3-MPvj6mCg</recordid><startdate>20211102</startdate><enddate>20211102</enddate><creator>Dabrowski, Karol M.</creator><creator>Nyvad, Jakob</creator><creator>Thomsen, Martin B.</creator><creator>Bertelsen, Jannik B.</creator><creator>Christensen, Kent L.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211102</creationdate><title>Ambulatory blood pressure using 60 rather than 20-min intervals may better reflect the resting blood pressure</title><author>Dabrowski, Karol M. ; Nyvad, Jakob ; Thomsen, Martin B. ; Bertelsen, Jannik B. ; Christensen, Kent L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-f42d52629b02b6768a9b2436b48e3ccb66a7f256e9efe72301695963b0dee3953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory blood pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Determination</topic><topic>blood pressure measurement</topic><topic>Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>resistant hypertension</topic><topic>Systole</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dabrowski, Karol M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyvad, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Martin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertelsen, Jannik B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kent L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Blood pressure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dabrowski, Karol M.</au><au>Nyvad, Jakob</au><au>Thomsen, Martin B.</au><au>Bertelsen, Jannik B.</au><au>Christensen, Kent L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambulatory blood pressure using 60 rather than 20-min intervals may better reflect the resting blood pressure</atitle><jtitle>Blood pressure</jtitle><addtitle>Blood Press</addtitle><date>2021-11-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>341-347</pages><issn>0803-7051</issn><eissn>1651-1999</eissn><abstract>Twenty-four hours of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is recommended in several guidelines as the best method for diagnosing hypertension. In general, the prognostic value of ABPM is superior to single office blood pressure (BP) measurements. Unfortunately, some patients experience considerable discomfort during frequently repeated forceful cuff inflations.
In this study we investigated the difference in mean daytime systolic BP (SBP) between low-frequency ABPM (LF-ABPM), measuring once every hour, and high-frequency ABPM (HF-ABPM), measuring three times an hour during daytime, and two times an hour during night-time.
Seventy-one patients were included in the analysis. All included patients had an HF-ABPM performed first and within a few weeks they underwent an LF-ABPM. The average day time difference in SBP between the two frequencies was 3.8 mmHg (p-value = 0.07) for mild, 8.2 mmHg (p-value < 0.01) for moderate and 15 mmHg (p-value < 0.001) for severe hypertension. A similar pattern was seen for night-time SBP. This study suggests that mean BP is similar between the two measuring frequencies for normotensive and mild hypertensive patients, while HF-ABPM results in a higher 24-h mean BP for moderate- and severe hypertensive patients.
LF-ABPM may more correctly reflect the resting blood pressure in patients with moderate and severe hypertension.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>34263666</pmid><doi>10.1080/08037051.2021.1953372</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0803-7051 |
ispartof | Blood pressure, 2021-11, Vol.30 (6), p.341-347 |
issn | 0803-7051 1651-1999 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_34263666 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Ambulatory blood pressure Blood Pressure Blood Pressure Determination blood pressure measurement Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory Humans hypertension Hypertension - diagnosis resistant hypertension Systole |
title | Ambulatory blood pressure using 60 rather than 20-min intervals may better reflect the resting blood pressure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A07%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambulatory%20blood%20pressure%20using%2060%20rather%20than%2020-min%20intervals%20may%20better%20reflect%20the%20resting%20blood%20pressure&rft.jtitle=Blood%20pressure&rft.au=Dabrowski,%20Karol%20M.&rft.date=2021-11-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=341-347&rft.issn=0803-7051&rft.eissn=1651-1999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08037051.2021.1953372&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2552055604%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552055604&rft_id=info:pmid/34263666&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_16d8de621f22410e9de6f9db7860a95a&rfr_iscdi=true |