Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?

It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal 2021-06, Vol.57 (6), p.598-609
Hauptverfasser: Leme, Ligiane Oliveira, Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro, Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes, Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva, Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling, Carvalho, José Oliveira, Pivato, I., Franco, Maurício Machaim, Dode, Margot Alves Nunes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 609
container_issue 6
container_start_page 598
container_title In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal
container_volume 57
creator Leme, Ligiane Oliveira
Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro
Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes
Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva
Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling
Carvalho, José Oliveira
Pivato, I.
Franco, Maurício Machaim
Dode, Margot Alves Nunes
description It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro – produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_34128156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555656167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2KFDEUhYM4OD_6Ai4k4EaQ0tykkqq4EWnHURjQxQjuQpJKNENX0iZVbffbT9qaGcGFmE3O4juXc89F6CmQV0BI97oACCoaQqEhhEvZ7B6gE-Atazoivj2smnTQUCHJMTot5ZrUJ0E8QsesBdoDFyfoy1XWsdgcNlMaHU4ev4cWh4i3YZvwblFTTtikbYgOu9HkfSpvcCh4-uGywzru8RC8rzpa9_YxOvJ6XdyT2_8Mff1wfrX62Fx-vvi0enfZWNbxqRl8P0jZWQ2Uea2JobY3EoyTBIwZnO-08VYwbqQbQPRC9gOjA-eGstYby87Qi2XuJqefsyuTGkOxbr3W0aW5KMpbYCDrohV9_hd6neYca7pKcS64ANFVii6UzamU7Lza5DDqvFdA1KFvtfStat_qd99qV03PbkfPZnTDveWu4Aq8XIBfziRfbDiUdI_VgwgBLZD-cJtD0v7_6VWY9BRSXKU5TtXKFmupePzu8p8l_5H_Bolvq9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555656167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira ; Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro ; Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes ; Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva ; Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling ; Carvalho, José Oliveira ; Pivato, I. ; Franco, Maurício Machaim ; Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creator><creatorcontrib>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira ; Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro ; Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes ; Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva ; Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling ; Carvalho, José Oliveira ; Pivato, I. ; Franco, Maurício Machaim ; Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creatorcontrib><description>It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro – produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-2690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-706X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34128156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biopsy ; Blastocyst - metabolism ; Cattle ; Cell Biology ; Cell Culture ; Developmental Biology ; Developmental stages ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo, Mammalian ; Embryonic Development - genetics ; Embryos ; Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics ; Epigenetics ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics ; Gene sequencing ; Genes ; Gestation ; Life Sciences ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Polymerase chain reaction ; RNA-Seq ; Science &amp; Technology ; Sexing ; Stem Cells ; Transcription ; Transcriptome - genetics ; Transcriptomes ; Trophectoderm ; Trophoblasts ; Trophoblasts - metabolism ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>In vitro cellular &amp; developmental biology. Animal, 2021-06, Vol.57 (6), p.598-609</ispartof><rights>The Society for In Vitro Biology 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Society for In Vitro Biology.</rights><rights>The Society for In Vitro Biology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000661410800002</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1096-0457 ; 0000-0003-4105-9079 ; 0000-0003-4818-1202</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,39263,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, José Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivato, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Maurício Machaim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creatorcontrib><title>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</title><title>In vitro cellular &amp; developmental biology. Animal</title><addtitle>In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal</addtitle><addtitle>IN VITRO CELL DEV-AN</addtitle><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><description>It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro – produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blastocyst - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Culture</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - genetics</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics</subject><subject>Epigenetics</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>RNA-Seq</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Sexing</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><subject>Transcription</subject><subject>Transcriptome - genetics</subject><subject>Transcriptomes</subject><subject>Trophectoderm</subject><subject>Trophoblasts</subject><subject>Trophoblasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1071-2690</issn><issn>1543-706X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2KFDEUhYM4OD_6Ai4k4EaQ0tykkqq4EWnHURjQxQjuQpJKNENX0iZVbffbT9qaGcGFmE3O4juXc89F6CmQV0BI97oACCoaQqEhhEvZ7B6gE-Atazoivj2smnTQUCHJMTot5ZrUJ0E8QsesBdoDFyfoy1XWsdgcNlMaHU4ev4cWh4i3YZvwblFTTtikbYgOu9HkfSpvcCh4-uGywzru8RC8rzpa9_YxOvJ6XdyT2_8Mff1wfrX62Fx-vvi0enfZWNbxqRl8P0jZWQ2Uea2JobY3EoyTBIwZnO-08VYwbqQbQPRC9gOjA-eGstYby87Qi2XuJqefsyuTGkOxbr3W0aW5KMpbYCDrohV9_hd6neYca7pKcS64ANFVii6UzamU7Lza5DDqvFdA1KFvtfStat_qd99qV03PbkfPZnTDveWu4Aq8XIBfziRfbDiUdI_VgwgBLZD-cJtD0v7_6VWY9BRSXKU5TtXKFmupePzu8p8l_5H_Bolvq9Q</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</creator><creator>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</creator><creator>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</creator><creator>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</creator><creator>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</creator><creator>Carvalho, José Oliveira</creator><creator>Pivato, I.</creator><creator>Franco, Maurício Machaim</creator><creator>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Society for In Vitro Biology</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-0457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4105-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-1202</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</title><author>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira ; Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro ; Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes ; Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva ; Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling ; Carvalho, José Oliveira ; Pivato, I. ; Franco, Maurício Machaim ; Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blastocyst - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Culture</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - genetics</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics</topic><topic>Epigenetics</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>RNA-Seq</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Sexing</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><topic>Transcription</topic><topic>Transcriptome - genetics</topic><topic>Transcriptomes</topic><topic>Trophectoderm</topic><topic>Trophoblasts</topic><topic>Trophoblasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, José Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivato, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Maurício Machaim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>In vitro cellular &amp; developmental biology. Animal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</au><au>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</au><au>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</au><au>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</au><au>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</au><au>Carvalho, José Oliveira</au><au>Pivato, I.</au><au>Franco, Maurício Machaim</au><au>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</atitle><jtitle>In vitro cellular &amp; developmental biology. Animal</jtitle><stitle>In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal</stitle><stitle>IN VITRO CELL DEV-AN</stitle><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>598-609</pages><issn>1071-2690</issn><eissn>1543-706X</eissn><abstract>It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro – produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34128156</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-0457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4105-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-1202</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-2690
ispartof In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2021-06, Vol.57 (6), p.598-609
issn 1071-2690
1543-706X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_34128156
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Abnormalities
Animal Genetics and Genomics
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biopsy
Blastocyst - metabolism
Cattle
Cell Biology
Cell Culture
Developmental Biology
Developmental stages
Embryo Transfer - methods
Embryo, Mammalian
Embryonic Development - genetics
Embryos
Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics
Epigenetics
Gene expression
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics
Gene sequencing
Genes
Gestation
Life Sciences
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Polymerase chain reaction
RNA-Seq
Science & Technology
Sexing
Stem Cells
Transcription
Transcriptome - genetics
Transcriptomes
Trophectoderm
Trophoblasts
Trophoblasts - metabolism
Uterus
title Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A32%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcriptome%20of%20D14%20in%20vivo%20x%20in%20vitro%20bovine%20embryos:%20is%20there%20any%20difference?&rft.jtitle=In%20vitro%20cellular%20&%20developmental%20biology.%20Animal&rft.au=Leme,%20Ligiane%20Oliveira&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=598-609&rft.issn=1071-2690&rft.eissn=1543-706X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2555656167%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555656167&rft_id=info:pmid/34128156&rfr_iscdi=true