Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?
It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal 2021-06, Vol.57 (6), p.598-609 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 609 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 598 |
container_title | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Leme, Ligiane Oliveira Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling Carvalho, José Oliveira Pivato, I. Franco, Maurício Machaim Dode, Margot Alves Nunes |
description | It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro
–
produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_34128156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555656167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2KFDEUhYM4OD_6Ai4k4EaQ0tykkqq4EWnHURjQxQjuQpJKNENX0iZVbffbT9qaGcGFmE3O4juXc89F6CmQV0BI97oACCoaQqEhhEvZ7B6gE-Atazoivj2smnTQUCHJMTot5ZrUJ0E8QsesBdoDFyfoy1XWsdgcNlMaHU4ev4cWh4i3YZvwblFTTtikbYgOu9HkfSpvcCh4-uGywzru8RC8rzpa9_YxOvJ6XdyT2_8Mff1wfrX62Fx-vvi0enfZWNbxqRl8P0jZWQ2Uea2JobY3EoyTBIwZnO-08VYwbqQbQPRC9gOjA-eGstYby87Qi2XuJqefsyuTGkOxbr3W0aW5KMpbYCDrohV9_hd6neYca7pKcS64ANFVii6UzamU7Lza5DDqvFdA1KFvtfStat_qd99qV03PbkfPZnTDveWu4Aq8XIBfziRfbDiUdI_VgwgBLZD-cJtD0v7_6VWY9BRSXKU5TtXKFmupePzu8p8l_5H_Bolvq9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555656167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira ; Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro ; Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes ; Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva ; Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling ; Carvalho, José Oliveira ; Pivato, I. ; Franco, Maurício Machaim ; Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creator><creatorcontrib>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira ; Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro ; Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes ; Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva ; Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling ; Carvalho, José Oliveira ; Pivato, I. ; Franco, Maurício Machaim ; Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creatorcontrib><description>It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro
–
produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-2690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-706X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34128156</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biopsy ; Blastocyst - metabolism ; Cattle ; Cell Biology ; Cell Culture ; Developmental Biology ; Developmental stages ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Embryo, Mammalian ; Embryonic Development - genetics ; Embryos ; Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics ; Epigenetics ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics ; Gene sequencing ; Genes ; Gestation ; Life Sciences ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Polymerase chain reaction ; RNA-Seq ; Science & Technology ; Sexing ; Stem Cells ; Transcription ; Transcriptome - genetics ; Transcriptomes ; Trophectoderm ; Trophoblasts ; Trophoblasts - metabolism ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2021-06, Vol.57 (6), p.598-609</ispartof><rights>The Society for In Vitro Biology 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Society for In Vitro Biology.</rights><rights>The Society for In Vitro Biology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000661410800002</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1096-0457 ; 0000-0003-4105-9079 ; 0000-0003-4818-1202</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,39263,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34128156$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, José Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivato, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Maurício Machaim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creatorcontrib><title>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</title><title>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</title><addtitle>In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal</addtitle><addtitle>IN VITRO CELL DEV-AN</addtitle><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><description>It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro
–
produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blastocyst - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cell Culture</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Developmental stages</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Embryo, Mammalian</subject><subject>Embryonic Development - genetics</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics</subject><subject>Epigenetics</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>RNA-Seq</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Sexing</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><subject>Transcription</subject><subject>Transcriptome - genetics</subject><subject>Transcriptomes</subject><subject>Trophectoderm</subject><subject>Trophoblasts</subject><subject>Trophoblasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1071-2690</issn><issn>1543-706X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2KFDEUhYM4OD_6Ai4k4EaQ0tykkqq4EWnHURjQxQjuQpJKNENX0iZVbffbT9qaGcGFmE3O4juXc89F6CmQV0BI97oACCoaQqEhhEvZ7B6gE-Atazoivj2smnTQUCHJMTot5ZrUJ0E8QsesBdoDFyfoy1XWsdgcNlMaHU4ev4cWh4i3YZvwblFTTtikbYgOu9HkfSpvcCh4-uGywzru8RC8rzpa9_YxOvJ6XdyT2_8Mff1wfrX62Fx-vvi0enfZWNbxqRl8P0jZWQ2Uea2JobY3EoyTBIwZnO-08VYwbqQbQPRC9gOjA-eGstYby87Qi2XuJqefsyuTGkOxbr3W0aW5KMpbYCDrohV9_hd6neYca7pKcS64ANFVii6UzamU7Lza5DDqvFdA1KFvtfStat_qd99qV03PbkfPZnTDveWu4Aq8XIBfziRfbDiUdI_VgwgBLZD-cJtD0v7_6VWY9BRSXKU5TtXKFmupePzu8p8l_5H_Bolvq9Q</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</creator><creator>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</creator><creator>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</creator><creator>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</creator><creator>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</creator><creator>Carvalho, José Oliveira</creator><creator>Pivato, I.</creator><creator>Franco, Maurício Machaim</creator><creator>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Society for In Vitro Biology</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-0457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4105-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-1202</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</title><author>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira ; Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro ; Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes ; Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva ; Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling ; Carvalho, José Oliveira ; Pivato, I. ; Franco, Maurício Machaim ; Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df8d997ca123faa0b2c8b91be901bbdef7abfc635b9ed168698d32d55b234fbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blastocyst - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cell Culture</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Developmental stages</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Embryo, Mammalian</topic><topic>Embryonic Development - genetics</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics</topic><topic>Epigenetics</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>RNA-Seq</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Sexing</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><topic>Transcription</topic><topic>Transcriptome - genetics</topic><topic>Transcriptomes</topic><topic>Trophectoderm</topic><topic>Trophoblasts</topic><topic>Trophoblasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, José Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivato, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Maurício Machaim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leme, Ligiane Oliveira</au><au>Machado, Grazieli Marinheiro</au><au>Fidelis, Andrei Antonioni Guedes</au><au>Guimarães, Ana Luiza Silva</au><au>Sprícigo, José Felipe Warmiling</au><au>Carvalho, José Oliveira</au><au>Pivato, I.</au><au>Franco, Maurício Machaim</au><au>Dode, Margot Alves Nunes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?</atitle><jtitle>In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal</jtitle><stitle>In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal</stitle><stitle>IN VITRO CELL DEV-AN</stitle><addtitle>In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>598-609</pages><issn>1071-2690</issn><eissn>1543-706X</eissn><abstract>It is well-established that in vitro culture affects quality, gene expression, and epigenetic processes in bovine embryos and that trophectoderm cells are the most susceptible to abnormalities. These changes have been reported as the main factors responsible for losses observed after transfer of in vitro
–
produced embryos. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of an in vitro system on bovine embryo transcriptional profiles on D14 of development. Two groups were used—one with embryos produced in vitro until D7 (day 7; VT group) and another with embryos produced in vivo by hormonal stimulation, with embryos collected on D7 (VV group). D7 embryos at similar developmental stages from both treatments were transferred to recipient uteri and recollected on D14. From D14 embryos of both treatments, trophoblast samples were removed by biopsy for sexing and transcriptome analyses. Embryos were sexed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and only males were used for RNA sequencing. In total, 29,005 transcripts were expressed, from which 900 were differentially expressed, but only 29 genes were significantly differentially expressed. In addition, 20 genes were found uniquely for VV and 27 for VT. These findings suggested that although the uterine environment minimized transcriptional differences, it was not able to make trophoblasts from the in vitro embryos similar to the in vivo ones. The few genes exhibiting differences are in control of important events that may be responsible for embryonic losses occurring during the first period of gestation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34128156</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-0457</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4105-9079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-1202</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1071-2690 |
ispartof | In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2021-06, Vol.57 (6), p.598-609 |
issn | 1071-2690 1543-706X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_34128156 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Abnormalities Animal Genetics and Genomics Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Biopsy Blastocyst - metabolism Cattle Cell Biology Cell Culture Developmental Biology Developmental stages Embryo Transfer - methods Embryo, Mammalian Embryonic Development - genetics Embryos Epigenesis, Genetic - genetics Epigenetics Gene expression Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental - genetics Gene sequencing Genes Gestation Life Sciences Life Sciences & Biomedicine Polymerase chain reaction RNA-Seq Science & Technology Sexing Stem Cells Transcription Transcriptome - genetics Transcriptomes Trophectoderm Trophoblasts Trophoblasts - metabolism Uterus |
title | Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A32%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcriptome%20of%20D14%20in%20vivo%20x%20in%20vitro%20bovine%20embryos:%20is%20there%20any%20difference?&rft.jtitle=In%20vitro%20cellular%20&%20developmental%20biology.%20Animal&rft.au=Leme,%20Ligiane%20Oliveira&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=598-609&rft.issn=1071-2690&rft.eissn=1543-706X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11626-021-00599-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2555656167%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555656167&rft_id=info:pmid/34128156&rfr_iscdi=true |