Kinetic information from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI enables prediction of residual cancer burden and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective study

This study aimed to evaluate the predictions of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), especially with residual disease (RD) after preoperative chemotherapy. This retrospective analysis included 74 TNBC patients who recei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2021-05, Vol.11 (1), p.10112-10112, Article 10112
Hauptverfasser: Yamaguchi, Ayane, Honda, Maya, Ishiguro, Hiroshi, Kataoka, Masako, Kataoka, Tatsuki R., Shimizu, Hanako, Torii, Masae, Mori, Yukiko, Kawaguchi-Sakita, Nobuko, Ueno, Kentaro, Kawashima, Masahiro, Takada, Masahiro, Suzuki, Eiji, Nakamoto, Yuji, Kawaguchi, Kosuke, Toi, Masakazu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to evaluate the predictions of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), especially with residual disease (RD) after preoperative chemotherapy. This retrospective analysis included 74 TNBC patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. DCE-MRI findings from three timepoints were examined: at diagnosis (MRI pre ), at midpoint (MRI mid ) and after chemotherapy (MRI post ). These findings included cancer lesion size, washout index (WI) as a kinetic parameter using the difference in signal intensity between early and delayed phases, and time-signal intensity curve types. Distant disease-free survival was analysed using the log-rank test to compare RD group with and without a fast-washout curve. The diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI findings, including positive predictive value (PPV) for pathological responses, was also calculated. RD without fast washout curve was a significantly better prognostic factor, both at MRI mid and MRI post (hazard ratio = 0.092, 0.098, p 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-89380-4