Evaluation of female Aedes aegypti proteome via LC-ESI-MS/MS using two protein extraction methods

Background. Proteomic analyses have broadened the horizons of vector control measures by identifying proteins associated with different biological and physiological processes and give further insight into the mosquitoes' biology, mechanism of insecticide resistance and pathogens-mosquitoes inte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2021-03, Vol.9, p.e10863-e10863, Article 10863
Hauptverfasser: Shettima, Abubakar, Ishak, Intan H., Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul, Abu Hasan, Hadura, Othman, Nurulhasanah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e10863
container_issue
container_start_page e10863
container_title PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)
container_volume 9
creator Shettima, Abubakar
Ishak, Intan H.
Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul
Abu Hasan, Hadura
Othman, Nurulhasanah
description Background. Proteomic analyses have broadened the horizons of vector control measures by identifying proteins associated with different biological and physiological processes and give further insight into the mosquitoes' biology, mechanism of insecticide resistance and pathogens-mosquitoes interaction. Female Ae. aegypti ingests human blood to acquire the requisite nutrients to make eggs. During blood ingestion, female mosquitoes transmit different pathogens. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the best protein extraction method for mass spectrometry analysis which will allow a better proteome profiling for female mosquitoes. Methods. In this present study, two protein extractions methods were performed to analyze female Ae. aegyti proteome, via TCA acetone precipitation extraction method and a commercial protein extraction reagent CytoBuster (TM). Then, protein identification was performed by LC-ESI-MS/MS and followed by functional protein annotation analysis. Results. The CytoBuster (TM) reagent gave the highest protein yield with a mean of 475.90 its compared to TCA acetone precipitation extraction showed 283.15 mu g mean of protein. LC-ESI-MS/MS identified 1,290 and 890 proteins from the CytoBusterTM reagent and TCA acetone precipitation, respectively. When comparing the protein class categories in both methods, there were three additional categories for proteins identified using CytoBuster (TM) reagent. The proteins were related to scaffold/adaptor protein (PC00226), protein binding activity modulator (PC00095) and intercellular signal molecule (PC00207). In conclusion, the CytoBuster (TM) protein extraction reagent showed a better performance for the extraction of proteins in term of the protein yield, proteome coverage and extraction speed.
doi_str_mv 10.7717/peerj.10863
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33717682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A653633727</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7d4558a0b5b84c5484102add3ff3a743</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A653633727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1bc993502765e620b1cb284f2c61353cd9c756bea2af758afea8cbbf9cf060103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1r2zAYh83YWEvX0-7DMBiF4VQf1ocvgxCyLZCyQ7azkOVXiYJtZZadrv_95KRrk7HD7IOF_LwP0vv-kuQtRhMhsLjdAXTbCUaS0xfJJcFcZJKy4uXJ-iK5DmGL4iMJR5K-Ti4ojbVckstEz_e6HnTvfJt6m1podA3pFCoIqYb1w6536a7zPfgG0r3T6XKWzVeL7G51e7dKh-Daddrf-yPj2hR-9Z02B10D_cZX4U3yyuo6wPXj9yr58Xn-ffY1W377sphNl5lhgvYZLk1RUIaI4Aw4QSU2JZG5JYZjyqipCiMYL0ETbQWT2oKWpixtYSziCCN6lSyO3srrrdp1rtHdg_LaqcOG79ZKd70zNShR5SwqUMlKmRuWyxwjoquKWku1yGl0fTq6dkPZQGWgjbeqz6Tnf1q3UWu_V6KgPKqj4OZR0PmfA4ReNS4YqGvdgh-CIgzhXBSIj-j7v9CtH7o2tkqRvBAkHgfTZ2od56Nca_3Y51GqppxRHidKRKQm_6DiW0HjjG_Burh_VvDhpGADuu43wdfDOMBwDn48gqbzIXRgn5qBkRqTqA5JVIckRvrdaf-e2D-5i4A8AvdQehuMg9bAExajyuPdcS7H1NKZ6w8Bnfmh7Z9P8j-l9DfhUPfj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497243313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of female Aedes aegypti proteome via LC-ESI-MS/MS using two protein extraction methods</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shettima, Abubakar ; Ishak, Intan H. ; Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul ; Abu Hasan, Hadura ; Othman, Nurulhasanah</creator><creatorcontrib>Shettima, Abubakar ; Ishak, Intan H. ; Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul ; Abu Hasan, Hadura ; Othman, Nurulhasanah</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Proteomic analyses have broadened the horizons of vector control measures by identifying proteins associated with different biological and physiological processes and give further insight into the mosquitoes' biology, mechanism of insecticide resistance and pathogens-mosquitoes interaction. Female Ae. aegypti ingests human blood to acquire the requisite nutrients to make eggs. During blood ingestion, female mosquitoes transmit different pathogens. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the best protein extraction method for mass spectrometry analysis which will allow a better proteome profiling for female mosquitoes. Methods. In this present study, two protein extractions methods were performed to analyze female Ae. aegyti proteome, via TCA acetone precipitation extraction method and a commercial protein extraction reagent CytoBuster (TM). Then, protein identification was performed by LC-ESI-MS/MS and followed by functional protein annotation analysis. Results. The CytoBuster (TM) reagent gave the highest protein yield with a mean of 475.90 its compared to TCA acetone precipitation extraction showed 283.15 mu g mean of protein. LC-ESI-MS/MS identified 1,290 and 890 proteins from the CytoBusterTM reagent and TCA acetone precipitation, respectively. When comparing the protein class categories in both methods, there were three additional categories for proteins identified using CytoBuster (TM) reagent. The proteins were related to scaffold/adaptor protein (PC00226), protein binding activity modulator (PC00095) and intercellular signal molecule (PC00207). In conclusion, the CytoBuster (TM) protein extraction reagent showed a better performance for the extraction of proteins in term of the protein yield, proteome coverage and extraction speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10863</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33717682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LONDON: Peerj Inc</publisher><subject>Acetone ; Aedes aegypti ; Analysis ; Biochemistry ; Culicidae ; Disease transmission ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Entomology ; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ; Female Aedes aegypti ; Functional analysis ; Insecticides ; LC-ESI-MS/MS ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Methods ; Mosquitoes ; Multidisciplinary Sciences ; Nutrients ; Pathogens ; Peptides ; Pesticide resistance ; Physiological aspects ; Physiology ; Protein binding ; Protein extraction methods ; Protein identification ; Proteins ; Proteomes ; Proteomics ; Reagents ; Science &amp; Technology ; Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics ; Scientific imaging ; Solvents</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2021-03, Vol.9, p.e10863-e10863, Article 10863</ispartof><rights>2021 Shettima et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 Shettima et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Shettima et al. 2021 Shettima et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>1</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000624914800003</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1bc993502765e620b1cb284f2c61353cd9c756bea2af758afea8cbbf9cf060103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1bc993502765e620b1cb284f2c61353cd9c756bea2af758afea8cbbf9cf060103</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6944-5046</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936558/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936558/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,2114,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33717682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shettima, Abubakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishak, Intan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu Hasan, Hadura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Nurulhasanah</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of female Aedes aegypti proteome via LC-ESI-MS/MS using two protein extraction methods</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PEERJ</addtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Background. Proteomic analyses have broadened the horizons of vector control measures by identifying proteins associated with different biological and physiological processes and give further insight into the mosquitoes' biology, mechanism of insecticide resistance and pathogens-mosquitoes interaction. Female Ae. aegypti ingests human blood to acquire the requisite nutrients to make eggs. During blood ingestion, female mosquitoes transmit different pathogens. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the best protein extraction method for mass spectrometry analysis which will allow a better proteome profiling for female mosquitoes. Methods. In this present study, two protein extractions methods were performed to analyze female Ae. aegyti proteome, via TCA acetone precipitation extraction method and a commercial protein extraction reagent CytoBuster (TM). Then, protein identification was performed by LC-ESI-MS/MS and followed by functional protein annotation analysis. Results. The CytoBuster (TM) reagent gave the highest protein yield with a mean of 475.90 its compared to TCA acetone precipitation extraction showed 283.15 mu g mean of protein. LC-ESI-MS/MS identified 1,290 and 890 proteins from the CytoBusterTM reagent and TCA acetone precipitation, respectively. When comparing the protein class categories in both methods, there were three additional categories for proteins identified using CytoBuster (TM) reagent. The proteins were related to scaffold/adaptor protein (PC00226), protein binding activity modulator (PC00095) and intercellular signal molecule (PC00207). In conclusion, the CytoBuster (TM) protein extraction reagent showed a better performance for the extraction of proteins in term of the protein yield, proteome coverage and extraction speed.</description><subject>Acetone</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Culicidae</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</subject><subject>Female Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Functional analysis</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>LC-ESI-MS/MS</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary Sciences</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Pesticide resistance</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Protein binding</subject><subject>Protein extraction methods</subject><subject>Protein identification</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Proteomes</subject><subject>Proteomics</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1r2zAYh83YWEvX0-7DMBiF4VQf1ocvgxCyLZCyQ7azkOVXiYJtZZadrv_95KRrk7HD7IOF_LwP0vv-kuQtRhMhsLjdAXTbCUaS0xfJJcFcZJKy4uXJ-iK5DmGL4iMJR5K-Ti4ojbVckstEz_e6HnTvfJt6m1podA3pFCoIqYb1w6536a7zPfgG0r3T6XKWzVeL7G51e7dKh-Daddrf-yPj2hR-9Z02B10D_cZX4U3yyuo6wPXj9yr58Xn-ffY1W377sphNl5lhgvYZLk1RUIaI4Aw4QSU2JZG5JYZjyqipCiMYL0ETbQWT2oKWpixtYSziCCN6lSyO3srrrdp1rtHdg_LaqcOG79ZKd70zNShR5SwqUMlKmRuWyxwjoquKWku1yGl0fTq6dkPZQGWgjbeqz6Tnf1q3UWu_V6KgPKqj4OZR0PmfA4ReNS4YqGvdgh-CIgzhXBSIj-j7v9CtH7o2tkqRvBAkHgfTZ2od56Nca_3Y51GqppxRHidKRKQm_6DiW0HjjG_Burh_VvDhpGADuu43wdfDOMBwDn48gqbzIXRgn5qBkRqTqA5JVIckRvrdaf-e2D-5i4A8AvdQehuMg9bAExajyuPdcS7H1NKZ6w8Bnfmh7Z9P8j-l9DfhUPfj</recordid><startdate>20210303</startdate><enddate>20210303</enddate><creator>Shettima, Abubakar</creator><creator>Ishak, Intan H.</creator><creator>Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul</creator><creator>Abu Hasan, Hadura</creator><creator>Othman, Nurulhasanah</creator><general>Peerj Inc</general><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6944-5046</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210303</creationdate><title>Evaluation of female Aedes aegypti proteome via LC-ESI-MS/MS using two protein extraction methods</title><author>Shettima, Abubakar ; Ishak, Intan H. ; Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul ; Abu Hasan, Hadura ; Othman, Nurulhasanah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-1bc993502765e620b1cb284f2c61353cd9c756bea2af758afea8cbbf9cf060103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acetone</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Culicidae</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</topic><topic>Female Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Functional analysis</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>LC-ESI-MS/MS</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary Sciences</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Pesticide resistance</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Protein binding</topic><topic>Protein extraction methods</topic><topic>Protein identification</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Proteomes</topic><topic>Proteomics</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shettima, Abubakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishak, Intan H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu Hasan, Hadura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Nurulhasanah</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shettima, Abubakar</au><au>Ishak, Intan H.</au><au>Rais, Syahirah Hanisah Abdul</au><au>Abu Hasan, Hadura</au><au>Othman, Nurulhasanah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of female Aedes aegypti proteome via LC-ESI-MS/MS using two protein extraction methods</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><stitle>PEERJ</stitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2021-03-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>e10863</spage><epage>e10863</epage><pages>e10863-e10863</pages><artnum>10863</artnum><artnum>e10863</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Background. Proteomic analyses have broadened the horizons of vector control measures by identifying proteins associated with different biological and physiological processes and give further insight into the mosquitoes' biology, mechanism of insecticide resistance and pathogens-mosquitoes interaction. Female Ae. aegypti ingests human blood to acquire the requisite nutrients to make eggs. During blood ingestion, female mosquitoes transmit different pathogens. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the best protein extraction method for mass spectrometry analysis which will allow a better proteome profiling for female mosquitoes. Methods. In this present study, two protein extractions methods were performed to analyze female Ae. aegyti proteome, via TCA acetone precipitation extraction method and a commercial protein extraction reagent CytoBuster (TM). Then, protein identification was performed by LC-ESI-MS/MS and followed by functional protein annotation analysis. Results. The CytoBuster (TM) reagent gave the highest protein yield with a mean of 475.90 its compared to TCA acetone precipitation extraction showed 283.15 mu g mean of protein. LC-ESI-MS/MS identified 1,290 and 890 proteins from the CytoBusterTM reagent and TCA acetone precipitation, respectively. When comparing the protein class categories in both methods, there were three additional categories for proteins identified using CytoBuster (TM) reagent. The proteins were related to scaffold/adaptor protein (PC00226), protein binding activity modulator (PC00095) and intercellular signal molecule (PC00207). In conclusion, the CytoBuster (TM) protein extraction reagent showed a better performance for the extraction of proteins in term of the protein yield, proteome coverage and extraction speed.</abstract><cop>LONDON</cop><pub>Peerj Inc</pub><pmid>33717682</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.10863</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6944-5046</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2167-8359
ispartof PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2021-03, Vol.9, p.e10863-e10863, Article 10863
issn 2167-8359
2167-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_33717682
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Acetone
Aedes aegypti
Analysis
Biochemistry
Culicidae
Disease transmission
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Entomology
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Female Aedes aegypti
Functional analysis
Insecticides
LC-ESI-MS/MS
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy
Methods
Mosquitoes
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Nutrients
Pathogens
Peptides
Pesticide resistance
Physiological aspects
Physiology
Protein binding
Protein extraction methods
Protein identification
Proteins
Proteomes
Proteomics
Reagents
Science & Technology
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Scientific imaging
Solvents
title Evaluation of female Aedes aegypti proteome via LC-ESI-MS/MS using two protein extraction methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T06%3A09%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20female%20Aedes%20aegypti%20proteome%20via%20LC-ESI-MS/MS%20using%20two%20protein%20extraction%20methods&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Shettima,%20Abubakar&rft.date=2021-03-03&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=e10863&rft.epage=e10863&rft.pages=e10863-e10863&rft.artnum=10863&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.10863&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA653633727%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497243313&rft_id=info:pmid/33717682&rft_galeid=A653633727&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_7d4558a0b5b84c5484102add3ff3a743&rfr_iscdi=true