Emergency medical services protocols for traumatic brain injury in the United States: A call for standardization

•There is broad variation in recommended prehospital care for patients with traumatic brain injury in statewide EMS protocols in the United States.•Prehospital management is a universal component of traumatic brain injury care, and efforts should be made to standardize evidence-based care.•Neurosurg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2021-05, Vol.52 (5), p.1145-1150
Hauptverfasser: Chuck, Carlin C., Martin, Thomas J., Kalagara, Roshini, Shaaya, Elias, Kheirbek, Tareq, Cielo, Deus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•There is broad variation in recommended prehospital care for patients with traumatic brain injury in statewide EMS protocols in the United States.•Prehospital management is a universal component of traumatic brain injury care, and efforts should be made to standardize evidence-based care.•Neurosurgical and neurocritical care clinicians should collaborate in the development of local EMS protocols within their catchment area. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) with acute elevation in intracranial pressure (ICP) is a neurologic emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In addition to indicated trauma resuscitation, emergency department (ED) management includes empiric administration of hyperosmolar agents, rapid diagnostic imaging, anticoagulation reversal, and early neurosurgical consultation. Despite optimization of in-hospital care, patient outcomes may be worsened by variation in prehospital management. In this study, we evaluate geographic variation between emergency medical services (EMS) protocols for patients with suspected TBI. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of statewide EMS protocols in the United States in December 2020 and included all complete protocols published on government websites. Outcome measures were defined to include protocols or orders for the following interventions, given TBI: (1) hyperventilation and end-tidal capnography (EtCO2) goals, (2) administration of hyperosmolar agents, (3) tranexamic acid (TXA) administration for isolated head injury, (4) non-invasive management including head-of-bed elevation, and (5) hemodynamic goals. We identified 32 statewide protocols including Washington, D.C., 4 of which did not include specific guidance for TBI. Of 28 states providing ventilatory guidance, 22/28 (78.6%) recommend hyperventilation, with 17/22 (77.3%) restricting hyperventilation to signs of acute herniation. The remaining 6 states prohibited hyperventilation. Regarding EtCO2 goals among states permitting hyperventilation, 17/22 (77.3%) targeted an EtCO2 of < 35 mmHg, while 5/22 (22.7%) provided no guide EtCO2 for hyperventilation. Rhode Island was the only state identified that included hypertonic saline (3%), and Delaware was the only state that allowed TXA in the setting of isolated TBI with GCS ≤ 12. Only 15/32 (46.9%) identified states recommend head-of-bed elevation. For blood pressure goals, 12/28 (42.9%) of states set minimum systolic blood pressure at 90 mmHg, while 10/28 (35.7%) set other SBP goals
ISSN:0020-1383
1879-0267
DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.008