Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses

Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nuclear cardiology 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.1293
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Hongyan, Mao, Wujian, Tan, Hui, Zhu, Na, Wan, Quan, Shi, Jing, Qiu, Lin, Xiu, Yan, Luo, Rongkui, Yu, Haojun, Shi, Hongcheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1293
container_title Journal of nuclear cardiology
container_volume 29
creator Yin, Hongyan
Mao, Wujian
Tan, Hui
Zhu, Na
Wan, Quan
Shi, Jing
Qiu, Lin
Xiu, Yan
Luo, Rongkui
Yu, Haojun
Shi, Hongcheng
description Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients. PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33462788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33462788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_334627883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDU20jUzNTXkYOAqLs4yMDCwNLa0ZGfgMDY2MTMyt7DgZHAMys9JVchPUzC0UHDTdXNxVwhwDdF3DlHIzE1Mz8xLV8jMU0hOLErJTExWSMxLUShILcqE8HMUchOLi1OLeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5yba4izh25BaVJuakp8QRHQqKLKeJidxgQVAACnkTRS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yin, Hongyan ; Mao, Wujian ; Tan, Hui ; Zhu, Na ; Wan, Quan ; Shi, Jing ; Qiu, Lin ; Xiu, Yan ; Luo, Rongkui ; Yu, Haojun ; Shi, Hongcheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hongyan ; Mao, Wujian ; Tan, Hui ; Zhu, Na ; Wan, Quan ; Shi, Jing ; Qiu, Lin ; Xiu, Yan ; Luo, Rongkui ; Yu, Haojun ; Shi, Hongcheng</creatorcontrib><description>Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients. PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33462788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Heart ; Humans ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.1293</ispartof><rights>2021. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33462788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Wujian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Rongkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hongcheng</creatorcontrib><title>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</title><title>Journal of nuclear cardiology</title><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><description>Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients. PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.</description><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1532-6551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDU20jUzNTXkYOAqLs4yMDCwNLa0ZGfgMDY2MTMyt7DgZHAMys9JVchPUzC0UHDTdXNxVwhwDdF3DlHIzE1Mz8xLV8jMU0hOLErJTExWSMxLUShILcqE8HMUchOLi1OLeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5yba4izh25BaVJuakp8QRHQqKLKeJidxgQVAACnkTRS</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Yin, Hongyan</creator><creator>Mao, Wujian</creator><creator>Tan, Hui</creator><creator>Zhu, Na</creator><creator>Wan, Quan</creator><creator>Shi, Jing</creator><creator>Qiu, Lin</creator><creator>Xiu, Yan</creator><creator>Luo, Rongkui</creator><creator>Yu, Haojun</creator><creator>Shi, Hongcheng</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</title><author>Yin, Hongyan ; Mao, Wujian ; Tan, Hui ; Zhu, Na ; Wan, Quan ; Shi, Jing ; Qiu, Lin ; Xiu, Yan ; Luo, Rongkui ; Yu, Haojun ; Shi, Hongcheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_334627883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Wujian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Rongkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hongcheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Hongyan</au><au>Mao, Wujian</au><au>Tan, Hui</au><au>Zhu, Na</au><au>Wan, Quan</au><au>Shi, Jing</au><au>Qiu, Lin</au><au>Xiu, Yan</au><au>Luo, Rongkui</au><au>Yu, Haojun</au><au>Shi, Hongcheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1293</spage><pages>1293-</pages><eissn>1532-6551</eissn><abstract>Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE. F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219). F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients. PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33462788</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1532-6551
ispartof Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.1293
issn 1532-6551
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_33462788
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Heart
Humans
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Positron-Emission Tomography
Retrospective Studies
title Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A38%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%2018%20F-FDG%20PET/CT%20imaging%20in%20cardiac%20and%20pericardial%20masses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20cardiology&rft.au=Yin,%20Hongyan&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1293&rft.pages=1293-&rft.eissn=1532-6551&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E33462788%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33462788&rfr_iscdi=true