Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses
Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses. Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nuclear cardiology 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.1293 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1293 |
container_title | Journal of nuclear cardiology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Yin, Hongyan Mao, Wujian Tan, Hui Zhu, Na Wan, Quan Shi, Jing Qiu, Lin Xiu, Yan Luo, Rongkui Yu, Haojun Shi, Hongcheng |
description | Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of
F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses.
Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE.
F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219).
F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients.
PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33462788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33462788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_334627883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDU20jUzNTXkYOAqLs4yMDCwNLa0ZGfgMDY2MTMyt7DgZHAMys9JVchPUzC0UHDTdXNxVwhwDdF3DlHIzE1Mz8xLV8jMU0hOLErJTExWSMxLUShILcqE8HMUchOLi1OLeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5yba4izh25BaVJuakp8QRHQqKLKeJidxgQVAACnkTRS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yin, Hongyan ; Mao, Wujian ; Tan, Hui ; Zhu, Na ; Wan, Quan ; Shi, Jing ; Qiu, Lin ; Xiu, Yan ; Luo, Rongkui ; Yu, Haojun ; Shi, Hongcheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hongyan ; Mao, Wujian ; Tan, Hui ; Zhu, Na ; Wan, Quan ; Shi, Jing ; Qiu, Lin ; Xiu, Yan ; Luo, Rongkui ; Yu, Haojun ; Shi, Hongcheng</creatorcontrib><description>Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of
F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses.
Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE.
F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219).
F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients.
PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33462788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Heart ; Humans ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.1293</ispartof><rights>2021. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33462788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Wujian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Rongkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hongcheng</creatorcontrib><title>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</title><title>Journal of nuclear cardiology</title><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><description>Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of
F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses.
Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE.
F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219).
F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients.
PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.</description><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1532-6551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDU20jUzNTXkYOAqLs4yMDCwNLa0ZGfgMDY2MTMyt7DgZHAMys9JVchPUzC0UHDTdXNxVwhwDdF3DlHIzE1Mz8xLV8jMU0hOLErJTExWSMxLUShILcqE8HMUchOLi1OLeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5yba4izh25BaVJuakp8QRHQqKLKeJidxgQVAACnkTRS</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Yin, Hongyan</creator><creator>Mao, Wujian</creator><creator>Tan, Hui</creator><creator>Zhu, Na</creator><creator>Wan, Quan</creator><creator>Shi, Jing</creator><creator>Qiu, Lin</creator><creator>Xiu, Yan</creator><creator>Luo, Rongkui</creator><creator>Yu, Haojun</creator><creator>Shi, Hongcheng</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</title><author>Yin, Hongyan ; Mao, Wujian ; Tan, Hui ; Zhu, Na ; Wan, Quan ; Shi, Jing ; Qiu, Lin ; Xiu, Yan ; Luo, Rongkui ; Yu, Haojun ; Shi, Hongcheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_334627883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Hongyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Wujian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Na</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiu, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Rongkui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Haojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Hongcheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Hongyan</au><au>Mao, Wujian</au><au>Tan, Hui</au><au>Zhu, Na</au><au>Wan, Quan</au><au>Shi, Jing</au><au>Qiu, Lin</au><au>Xiu, Yan</au><au>Luo, Rongkui</au><au>Yu, Haojun</au><au>Shi, Hongcheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nuclear cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Cardiol</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1293</spage><pages>1293-</pages><eissn>1532-6551</eissn><abstract>Considering the few reported cardiac masses, PET/CT in the imaging workup of cardiac masses is not well established. This retrospective study analyzed the role of
F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac/pericardial masses.
Fifty-nine patients with newly diagnosed cardiac/pericardial masses who underwent PET/CT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited. Echocardiographic and PET/CT characteristics were evaluated for predictive value in differentiating malignant and non-malignant lesions using histologic confirmation as the gold standard. The McNemar test was used to test the differences in sensitivity between PET/CT and TTE.
F-FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity in determining the malignancy of cardiac/pericardial masses compared to TTE (sensitivity, 96.6% vs 72.4%, P = .039). However, when pericardial masses were excluded from the analysis, the difference in sensitivity between the two was not statistically significant (sensitivity, 95.6% vs 78.3%, P = .219).
F-FDG PET/CT identified two malignant pericardial masses missed on TTE, changed the diagnostic orientation of TTE in 15 patients, and found seven patients with extracardiac lesions in 29 malignant patients.
PET/CT was an effective additional image modality in patients with suspected malignant cardiac mass for further confirmation and to screen for potential metastasis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33462788</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1532-6551 |
ispartof | Journal of nuclear cardiology, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.1293 |
issn | 1532-6551 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_33462788 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Heart Humans Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods Positron-Emission Tomography Retrospective Studies |
title | Role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging in cardiac and pericardial masses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T08%3A38%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%2018%20F-FDG%20PET/CT%20imaging%20in%20cardiac%20and%20pericardial%20masses&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nuclear%20cardiology&rft.au=Yin,%20Hongyan&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1293&rft.pages=1293-&rft.eissn=1532-6551&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E33462788%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33462788&rfr_iscdi=true |