Effect of Phenylephrine Push Before Continuous Infusion Norepinephrine in Patients With Septic Shock

IV pushes of phenylephrine may be used for patients with septic shock with the intent of rapidly achieving mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of this approach are unclear. In patients with septic shock, is administration of a phenylephrine push before...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2021-05, Vol.159 (5), p.1875-1883
Hauptverfasser: Hawn, Jaclyn M., Bauer, Seth R., Yerke, Jason, Li, Manshi, Wang, Xiaofeng, Reddy, Anita J., Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo, Sacha, Gretchen L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1883
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1875
container_title Chest
container_volume 159
creator Hawn, Jaclyn M.
Bauer, Seth R.
Yerke, Jason
Li, Manshi
Wang, Xiaofeng
Reddy, Anita J.
Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo
Sacha, Gretchen L.
description IV pushes of phenylephrine may be used for patients with septic shock with the intent of rapidly achieving mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of this approach are unclear. In patients with septic shock, is administration of a phenylephrine push before norepinephrine initiation associated with a higher incidence of hemodynamic stability? This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult patients with septic shock initiated on norepinephrine. Propensity scores for initial phenylephrine push receipt were generated, and patients receiving an initial phenylephrine push were propensity score-matched 1:2 to those not receiving an initial phenylephrine push. The primary outcome was achievement of hemodynamic stability (defined as maintaining MAP of ≥ 65 mm Hg for at least 6 h without an increase in continuous infusion vasoactive agent dosage) within 3 and 12 h of norepinephrine initiation. Of 1,317 included patients, 181 received an initial phenylephrine push; 141 phenylephrine push patients were matched to 282 patients not receiving a phenylephrine push. More patients who received a phenylephrine push achieved hemodynamic stability at hour 3 than those who did not receive a phenylephrine push (28.4% vs 18.8%; risk difference, 10%; 95% CI, 0.9%-18%). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with hemodynamic stability within 3 h (adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09-2.97), but not at 12 h (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.16). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with higher ICU mortality (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.1-3.21). Phenylephrine pushes were associated with a higher incidence of early, but not sustained, hemodynamic stability and were associated independently with higher ICU mortality. Caution is warranted when clinicians are considering the use of phenylephrine pushes in patients with septic shock.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33316239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369220353538</els_id><sourcerecordid>2470280919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5683b5ce2ef8332f424af3a9f862da1bb74ff7943577618dcaed305e57f91f6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EosPAL0BCXiKhDH7ETrJgAVGBSlU7UkEsrcS5VjzM2CF2WvXfc8sMXSJWfp3Pvj6XkNecbTjj-v1uY0dIeSOYwB2-YYo_ISveSF5IVcqnZMUYF4XUjTgjL1LaMVzzRj8nZ1JKroVsVmQ4dw5sptHR7Qjhfg_TOPsAdLukkX4CF2egbQzZhyUuiV4EtyQfA73CgwnBE-4D3XbZQ8iJ_vB5pDcwZW_pzRjtz5fkmev2CV6dxjX5_vn8W_u1uLz-ctF-vCysVE0ulK5lrywIcLWUwpWi7JzsGldrMXS876vSuaoppaoqzevBdjBIpkBVruFOO7kmb4_3TnP8taAbc_DJwn7fBcDijSgrJmrWoKM1kUfUzjGlGZyZZn_o5nvDmXnQa3bmj17zoNdwblAvpt6cHlj6AwyPmb8-EaiPwB300SWLQiw8YtgAXZUci8dZqVqfUVkMbVxCxui7_48i_eFIA_q89TCbU2LwM_bTDNH_8ye_AY2Ariw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470280919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Phenylephrine Push Before Continuous Infusion Norepinephrine in Patients With Septic Shock</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hawn, Jaclyn M. ; Bauer, Seth R. ; Yerke, Jason ; Li, Manshi ; Wang, Xiaofeng ; Reddy, Anita J. ; Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo ; Sacha, Gretchen L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hawn, Jaclyn M. ; Bauer, Seth R. ; Yerke, Jason ; Li, Manshi ; Wang, Xiaofeng ; Reddy, Anita J. ; Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo ; Sacha, Gretchen L.</creatorcontrib><description>IV pushes of phenylephrine may be used for patients with septic shock with the intent of rapidly achieving mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of this approach are unclear. In patients with septic shock, is administration of a phenylephrine push before norepinephrine initiation associated with a higher incidence of hemodynamic stability? This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult patients with septic shock initiated on norepinephrine. Propensity scores for initial phenylephrine push receipt were generated, and patients receiving an initial phenylephrine push were propensity score-matched 1:2 to those not receiving an initial phenylephrine push. The primary outcome was achievement of hemodynamic stability (defined as maintaining MAP of ≥ 65 mm Hg for at least 6 h without an increase in continuous infusion vasoactive agent dosage) within 3 and 12 h of norepinephrine initiation. Of 1,317 included patients, 181 received an initial phenylephrine push; 141 phenylephrine push patients were matched to 282 patients not receiving a phenylephrine push. More patients who received a phenylephrine push achieved hemodynamic stability at hour 3 than those who did not receive a phenylephrine push (28.4% vs 18.8%; risk difference, 10%; 95% CI, 0.9%-18%). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with hemodynamic stability within 3 h (adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09-2.97), but not at 12 h (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.16). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with higher ICU mortality (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.1-3.21). Phenylephrine pushes were associated with a higher incidence of early, but not sustained, hemodynamic stability and were associated independently with higher ICU mortality. Caution is warranted when clinicians are considering the use of phenylephrine pushes in patients with septic shock.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33316239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>AMSTERDAM: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Critical Care Medicine ; General &amp; Internal Medicine ; hemodynamics ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Respiratory System ; Science &amp; Technology ; sepsis ; septic shock ; vasopressor</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2021-05, Vol.159 (5), p.1875-1883</ispartof><rights>2020 American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>10</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000674176100045</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5683b5ce2ef8332f424af3a9f862da1bb74ff7943577618dcaed305e57f91f6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5683b5ce2ef8332f424af3a9f862da1bb74ff7943577618dcaed305e57f91f6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4391-9645 ; 0000-0002-5992-7375</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934,39267</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hawn, Jaclyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Seth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerke, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Manshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Anita J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacha, Gretchen L.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Phenylephrine Push Before Continuous Infusion Norepinephrine in Patients With Septic Shock</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>CHEST</addtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>IV pushes of phenylephrine may be used for patients with septic shock with the intent of rapidly achieving mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of this approach are unclear. In patients with septic shock, is administration of a phenylephrine push before norepinephrine initiation associated with a higher incidence of hemodynamic stability? This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult patients with septic shock initiated on norepinephrine. Propensity scores for initial phenylephrine push receipt were generated, and patients receiving an initial phenylephrine push were propensity score-matched 1:2 to those not receiving an initial phenylephrine push. The primary outcome was achievement of hemodynamic stability (defined as maintaining MAP of ≥ 65 mm Hg for at least 6 h without an increase in continuous infusion vasoactive agent dosage) within 3 and 12 h of norepinephrine initiation. Of 1,317 included patients, 181 received an initial phenylephrine push; 141 phenylephrine push patients were matched to 282 patients not receiving a phenylephrine push. More patients who received a phenylephrine push achieved hemodynamic stability at hour 3 than those who did not receive a phenylephrine push (28.4% vs 18.8%; risk difference, 10%; 95% CI, 0.9%-18%). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with hemodynamic stability within 3 h (adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09-2.97), but not at 12 h (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.16). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with higher ICU mortality (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.1-3.21). Phenylephrine pushes were associated with a higher incidence of early, but not sustained, hemodynamic stability and were associated independently with higher ICU mortality. Caution is warranted when clinicians are considering the use of phenylephrine pushes in patients with septic shock.</description><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>General &amp; Internal Medicine</subject><subject>hemodynamics</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Respiratory System</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>sepsis</subject><subject>septic shock</subject><subject>vasopressor</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAURi0EosPAL0BCXiKhDH7ETrJgAVGBSlU7UkEsrcS5VjzM2CF2WvXfc8sMXSJWfp3Pvj6XkNecbTjj-v1uY0dIeSOYwB2-YYo_ISveSF5IVcqnZMUYF4XUjTgjL1LaMVzzRj8nZ1JKroVsVmQ4dw5sptHR7Qjhfg_TOPsAdLukkX4CF2egbQzZhyUuiV4EtyQfA73CgwnBE-4D3XbZQ8iJ_vB5pDcwZW_pzRjtz5fkmev2CV6dxjX5_vn8W_u1uLz-ctF-vCysVE0ulK5lrywIcLWUwpWi7JzsGldrMXS876vSuaoppaoqzevBdjBIpkBVruFOO7kmb4_3TnP8taAbc_DJwn7fBcDijSgrJmrWoKM1kUfUzjGlGZyZZn_o5nvDmXnQa3bmj17zoNdwblAvpt6cHlj6AwyPmb8-EaiPwB300SWLQiw8YtgAXZUci8dZqVqfUVkMbVxCxui7_48i_eFIA_q89TCbU2LwM_bTDNH_8ye_AY2Ariw</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Hawn, Jaclyn M.</creator><creator>Bauer, Seth R.</creator><creator>Yerke, Jason</creator><creator>Li, Manshi</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaofeng</creator><creator>Reddy, Anita J.</creator><creator>Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo</creator><creator>Sacha, Gretchen L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>95M</scope><scope>AFTVD</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-9645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-7375</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Effect of Phenylephrine Push Before Continuous Infusion Norepinephrine in Patients With Septic Shock</title><author>Hawn, Jaclyn M. ; Bauer, Seth R. ; Yerke, Jason ; Li, Manshi ; Wang, Xiaofeng ; Reddy, Anita J. ; Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo ; Sacha, Gretchen L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5683b5ce2ef8332f424af3a9f862da1bb74ff7943577618dcaed305e57f91f6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>General &amp; Internal Medicine</topic><topic>hemodynamics</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Respiratory System</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>sepsis</topic><topic>septic shock</topic><topic>vasopressor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hawn, Jaclyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Seth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yerke, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Manshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Anita J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacha, Gretchen L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)</collection><collection>Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S) 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hawn, Jaclyn M.</au><au>Bauer, Seth R.</au><au>Yerke, Jason</au><au>Li, Manshi</au><au>Wang, Xiaofeng</au><au>Reddy, Anita J.</au><au>Mireles-Cabodevila, Eduardo</au><au>Sacha, Gretchen L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Phenylephrine Push Before Continuous Infusion Norepinephrine in Patients With Septic Shock</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><stitle>CHEST</stitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1875</spage><epage>1883</epage><pages>1875-1883</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>IV pushes of phenylephrine may be used for patients with septic shock with the intent of rapidly achieving mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of this approach are unclear. In patients with septic shock, is administration of a phenylephrine push before norepinephrine initiation associated with a higher incidence of hemodynamic stability? This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included adult patients with septic shock initiated on norepinephrine. Propensity scores for initial phenylephrine push receipt were generated, and patients receiving an initial phenylephrine push were propensity score-matched 1:2 to those not receiving an initial phenylephrine push. The primary outcome was achievement of hemodynamic stability (defined as maintaining MAP of ≥ 65 mm Hg for at least 6 h without an increase in continuous infusion vasoactive agent dosage) within 3 and 12 h of norepinephrine initiation. Of 1,317 included patients, 181 received an initial phenylephrine push; 141 phenylephrine push patients were matched to 282 patients not receiving a phenylephrine push. More patients who received a phenylephrine push achieved hemodynamic stability at hour 3 than those who did not receive a phenylephrine push (28.4% vs 18.8%; risk difference, 10%; 95% CI, 0.9%-18%). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with hemodynamic stability within 3 h (adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09-2.97), but not at 12 h (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.16). Phenylephrine push receipt was associated independently with higher ICU mortality (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.1-3.21). Phenylephrine pushes were associated with a higher incidence of early, but not sustained, hemodynamic stability and were associated independently with higher ICU mortality. Caution is warranted when clinicians are considering the use of phenylephrine pushes in patients with septic shock.</abstract><cop>AMSTERDAM</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33316239</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.051</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4391-9645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-7375</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 2021-05, Vol.159 (5), p.1875-1883
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_33316239
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
hemodynamics
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Respiratory System
Science & Technology
sepsis
septic shock
vasopressor
title Effect of Phenylephrine Push Before Continuous Infusion Norepinephrine in Patients With Septic Shock
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-28T23%3A30%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Phenylephrine%20Push%20Before%20Continuous%20Infusion%20Norepinephrine%20in%20Patients%20With%20Septic%20Shock&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Hawn,%20Jaclyn%20M.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1875&rft.epage=1883&rft.pages=1875-1883&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2470280919%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470280919&rft_id=info:pmid/33316239&rft_els_id=S0012369220353538&rfr_iscdi=true