The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human–carnivore coexistence

Conflict with humans is one of the major threats facing the world's remaining large carnivore populations, and understanding human attitudes is key to improving coexistence. We surveyed people living near Hwange National Park about their attitudes toward coexisting with lions. We used ordinal r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2021-08, Vol.35 (4), p.1233-1244
Hauptverfasser: Jacobsen, Kim S., Dickman, Amy J., Macdonald, David W., Mourato, Susana, Johnson, Paul, Sibanda, Lovemore, Loveridge, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1244
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1233
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 35
creator Jacobsen, Kim S.
Dickman, Amy J.
Macdonald, David W.
Mourato, Susana
Johnson, Paul
Sibanda, Lovemore
Loveridge, Andrew
description Conflict with humans is one of the major threats facing the world's remaining large carnivore populations, and understanding human attitudes is key to improving coexistence. We surveyed people living near Hwange National Park about their attitudes toward coexisting with lions. We used ordinal regression models with the results of the survey to investigate the importance of a range of tangible and intangible factors on attitudes. The variables investigated included the costs and benefits of wildlife presence, emotion, culture, religion, vulnerability, risk perception, notions of responsibility, and personal value orientations. This was for the purpose of effectively tailoring conservation efforts but also for ethical policy making. Intangible factors (e.g., fear and ecocentric values) were as important as, if not more important than, tangible factors (such as livestock losses) for understanding attitudes, based on the effect sizes of these variables. The degree to which participants’ fear of lions interfered with their daily activities was the most influential variable. The degree to which benefits accrue to households from the nearby protected area was also highly influential, as was number of livestock lost, number of dependents, ecocentric value orientation, and participation in conflict mitigation programs. Contrary to what is often assumed, metrics of livestock loss did not dominate attitudes to coexistence with lions. Furthermore, we found that socioeconomic variables may appear important when studied in isolation, but their effect may disappear when controlling for variables related to beliefs, perceptions, and past experiences. This raises questions about the widespread reliance on socioeconomic variables in the field of human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. To facilitate coexistence with large carnivores, we recommend measures that reduce fear (through education and through protective measures that reduce the need to be fearful), reduction of livestock losses, and ensuring local communities benefit from conservation. Ecocentric values also emerged as influential, highlighting the need to develop conservation initiatives tailored to local values. Importancia de los Factores Tangibles e Intangibles en la Coexistencia Humanos‐Carnívoros Resumen Los conflictos con humanos son una de las principales amenazas que enfrentan las poblaciones permanentes de grandes carnívoros del planeta y el entendimiento de las actitudes humanas es importante para mejor
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cobi.13678
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33294987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2468666481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-283ebb7fa2984b3681839136efc29cfc1d49fef0215599e93e44dbc26bed12fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1q3DAUhUVISaZpN32AYsgmtDi1JFuWlqnpz0AgEKZrIclXjYItTSU7TXZ5h7xhn6SaznQWXZQIhK7Edw_nHiH0BlfnOK8PJmh3jilr-QFa4IbQErdUHKJFxTkvORfkGL1M6baqKtHg-ggdU0pELXi7QNerGyjcuA5xUt5AEWyRi-9OD1Ao3xfO769WmSnElJ-Km3lU_tfjk1HRu7sQoTAB7l2aIGu8Qi-sGhK83p0n6NvnT6vua3l59WXZXVyWhgrKS8IpaN1aRQSvNWUccyryFGANEcYa3NfCgq0IbhohQFCo614bwjT0mFhDT9DZVncdw48Z0iRHlwwMg_IQ5iRJzThjrOY4o6f_oLdhjj67k6TJ8gy3rM3Uuy1lYkgpgpXr6EYVHySu5CZpuUla_kk6w293krMeod-jf6PNwPst8BN0sMm4TTZ7LP8FIyxvkqtq45A_n-7cpCYXfBdmP-VWvGt1Azz8x7Psrj4ut-5_A_arql0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555961767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human–carnivore coexistence</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Jacobsen, Kim S. ; Dickman, Amy J. ; Macdonald, David W. ; Mourato, Susana ; Johnson, Paul ; Sibanda, Lovemore ; Loveridge, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Kim S. ; Dickman, Amy J. ; Macdonald, David W. ; Mourato, Susana ; Johnson, Paul ; Sibanda, Lovemore ; Loveridge, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Conflict with humans is one of the major threats facing the world's remaining large carnivore populations, and understanding human attitudes is key to improving coexistence. We surveyed people living near Hwange National Park about their attitudes toward coexisting with lions. We used ordinal regression models with the results of the survey to investigate the importance of a range of tangible and intangible factors on attitudes. The variables investigated included the costs and benefits of wildlife presence, emotion, culture, religion, vulnerability, risk perception, notions of responsibility, and personal value orientations. This was for the purpose of effectively tailoring conservation efforts but also for ethical policy making. Intangible factors (e.g., fear and ecocentric values) were as important as, if not more important than, tangible factors (such as livestock losses) for understanding attitudes, based on the effect sizes of these variables. The degree to which participants’ fear of lions interfered with their daily activities was the most influential variable. The degree to which benefits accrue to households from the nearby protected area was also highly influential, as was number of livestock lost, number of dependents, ecocentric value orientation, and participation in conflict mitigation programs. Contrary to what is often assumed, metrics of livestock loss did not dominate attitudes to coexistence with lions. Furthermore, we found that socioeconomic variables may appear important when studied in isolation, but their effect may disappear when controlling for variables related to beliefs, perceptions, and past experiences. This raises questions about the widespread reliance on socioeconomic variables in the field of human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. To facilitate coexistence with large carnivores, we recommend measures that reduce fear (through education and through protective measures that reduce the need to be fearful), reduction of livestock losses, and ensuring local communities benefit from conservation. Ecocentric values also emerged as influential, highlighting the need to develop conservation initiatives tailored to local values. Importancia de los Factores Tangibles e Intangibles en la Coexistencia Humanos‐Carnívoros Resumen Los conflictos con humanos son una de las principales amenazas que enfrentan las poblaciones permanentes de grandes carnívoros del planeta y el entendimiento de las actitudes humanas es importante para mejorar la coexistencia. Preguntamos a las personas que viven cerca del Parque Nacional Hwange sobre su postura hacia la coexistencia con leones. Usamos modelos de regresión ordinal en los resultados del cuestionario para investigar la importancia de una gama de factores tangibles e intangibles para estas posturas. Las variables investigadas incluyeron el costo y beneficio de la presencia de fauna, emociones, cultura, religión, vulnerabilidad, percepción de riesgos, nociones de la responsabilidad y orientaciones de valor personal. Realizamos esto con el propósito de diseñar efectivamente los esfuerzos de conservación pero también para la generación de políticas éticas. Los factores intangibles (p. ej.: el miedo y los valores ecocéntricos) fueron tan importantes, si no es que más importantes, como los factores tangibles (como la pérdida de cabezas de ganado) para el entendimiento de las actitudes, con base en los tamaños del efecto de estas variables. El grado al que el miedo que los participantes sienten por los leones interfiere con sus actividades diarias fue la variable con mayor influencia. El grado al que los hogares del área protegida cercana devengan beneficios también tuvo una influencia alta, como lo tuvo el número de cabezas de ganado perdidas, el número de dependientes, la orientación de los valores ecocéntricos y la participación en programas de mitigación del conflicto. Contrario a lo que frecuentemente se asume, las medidas de la pérdida de cabezas de ganado no dominó sobre las actitudes por la coexistencia con leones. Más allá, encontramos que las variables socioeconómicas pueden parecer importantes cuando se estudian de manera aislada pero su efecto puede desaparecer cuando se controlan las variables relacionadas con las creencias, percepciones y experiencias pasadas. Esto genera preguntas sobre la dependencia hacia las variables socioeconómicas en el área de estudios de conflictos y coexistencia entre humanos y fauna. Para facilitar la coexistencia con carnívoros mayores recomendamos tomar medidas que reduzcan el miedo (por medio de la educación y medidas de protección que reduzcan la necesidad de vivir con miedo), la disminución de la pérdida de cabezas de ganado y garantizarles a las comunidades locales los beneficios que proporciona la conservación. Los valores ecocéntricos también surgieron como influyentes, lo que resalta la necesidad de desarrollar iniciativas de conservación adaptadas a los valores locales. Article impact statement: Intangible factors are more important than tangible factors in shaping tolerance for lions, and this is crucial for successful policies</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13678</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33294987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>actitudes de los actores ; African lions ; Attitudes ; Biodiversity &amp; Conservation ; Carnivores ; Coexistence ; conflicto humano‐fauna ; Conservation ; conservation project evaluation ; Cost benefit analysis ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; evaluación de proyectos de conservación ; Fauna ; Fear ; Households ; Human-environment relationship ; Human-wildlife relations ; human–wildlife conflict ; leones africanos ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Livestock ; Local communities ; Mitigation ; modelos de actitud ordinal ; National parks ; ordinal attitude models ; Panthera leo ; Protected areas ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Risk perception ; Science &amp; Technology ; Social factors ; Socioeconomics ; stakeholder attitudes ; Surveying ; Variables ; Vulnerability ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2021-08, Vol.35 (4), p.1233-1244</ispartof><rights>2020 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2020 Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2021, Society for Conservation Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>23</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000626062200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-283ebb7fa2984b3681839136efc29cfc1d49fef0215599e93e44dbc26bed12fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-283ebb7fa2984b3681839136efc29cfc1d49fef0215599e93e44dbc26bed12fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6160-9045 ; 0000-0001-5651-3460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcobi.13678$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcobi.13678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,39265,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33294987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Kim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourato, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Lovemore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveridge, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human–carnivore coexistence</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>CONSERV BIOL</addtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Conflict with humans is one of the major threats facing the world's remaining large carnivore populations, and understanding human attitudes is key to improving coexistence. We surveyed people living near Hwange National Park about their attitudes toward coexisting with lions. We used ordinal regression models with the results of the survey to investigate the importance of a range of tangible and intangible factors on attitudes. The variables investigated included the costs and benefits of wildlife presence, emotion, culture, religion, vulnerability, risk perception, notions of responsibility, and personal value orientations. This was for the purpose of effectively tailoring conservation efforts but also for ethical policy making. Intangible factors (e.g., fear and ecocentric values) were as important as, if not more important than, tangible factors (such as livestock losses) for understanding attitudes, based on the effect sizes of these variables. The degree to which participants’ fear of lions interfered with their daily activities was the most influential variable. The degree to which benefits accrue to households from the nearby protected area was also highly influential, as was number of livestock lost, number of dependents, ecocentric value orientation, and participation in conflict mitigation programs. Contrary to what is often assumed, metrics of livestock loss did not dominate attitudes to coexistence with lions. Furthermore, we found that socioeconomic variables may appear important when studied in isolation, but their effect may disappear when controlling for variables related to beliefs, perceptions, and past experiences. This raises questions about the widespread reliance on socioeconomic variables in the field of human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. To facilitate coexistence with large carnivores, we recommend measures that reduce fear (through education and through protective measures that reduce the need to be fearful), reduction of livestock losses, and ensuring local communities benefit from conservation. Ecocentric values also emerged as influential, highlighting the need to develop conservation initiatives tailored to local values. Importancia de los Factores Tangibles e Intangibles en la Coexistencia Humanos‐Carnívoros Resumen Los conflictos con humanos son una de las principales amenazas que enfrentan las poblaciones permanentes de grandes carnívoros del planeta y el entendimiento de las actitudes humanas es importante para mejorar la coexistencia. Preguntamos a las personas que viven cerca del Parque Nacional Hwange sobre su postura hacia la coexistencia con leones. Usamos modelos de regresión ordinal en los resultados del cuestionario para investigar la importancia de una gama de factores tangibles e intangibles para estas posturas. Las variables investigadas incluyeron el costo y beneficio de la presencia de fauna, emociones, cultura, religión, vulnerabilidad, percepción de riesgos, nociones de la responsabilidad y orientaciones de valor personal. Realizamos esto con el propósito de diseñar efectivamente los esfuerzos de conservación pero también para la generación de políticas éticas. Los factores intangibles (p. ej.: el miedo y los valores ecocéntricos) fueron tan importantes, si no es que más importantes, como los factores tangibles (como la pérdida de cabezas de ganado) para el entendimiento de las actitudes, con base en los tamaños del efecto de estas variables. El grado al que el miedo que los participantes sienten por los leones interfiere con sus actividades diarias fue la variable con mayor influencia. El grado al que los hogares del área protegida cercana devengan beneficios también tuvo una influencia alta, como lo tuvo el número de cabezas de ganado perdidas, el número de dependientes, la orientación de los valores ecocéntricos y la participación en programas de mitigación del conflicto. Contrario a lo que frecuentemente se asume, las medidas de la pérdida de cabezas de ganado no dominó sobre las actitudes por la coexistencia con leones. Más allá, encontramos que las variables socioeconómicas pueden parecer importantes cuando se estudian de manera aislada pero su efecto puede desaparecer cuando se controlan las variables relacionadas con las creencias, percepciones y experiencias pasadas. Esto genera preguntas sobre la dependencia hacia las variables socioeconómicas en el área de estudios de conflictos y coexistencia entre humanos y fauna. Para facilitar la coexistencia con carnívoros mayores recomendamos tomar medidas que reduzcan el miedo (por medio de la educación y medidas de protección que reduzcan la necesidad de vivir con miedo), la disminución de la pérdida de cabezas de ganado y garantizarles a las comunidades locales los beneficios que proporciona la conservación. Los valores ecocéntricos también surgieron como influyentes, lo que resalta la necesidad de desarrollar iniciativas de conservación adaptadas a los valores locales. Article impact statement: Intangible factors are more important than tangible factors in shaping tolerance for lions, and this is crucial for successful policies</description><subject>actitudes de los actores</subject><subject>African lions</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biodiversity &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>conflicto humano‐fauna</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation project evaluation</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>evaluación de proyectos de conservación</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human-environment relationship</subject><subject>Human-wildlife relations</subject><subject>human–wildlife conflict</subject><subject>leones africanos</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>modelos de actitud ordinal</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>ordinal attitude models</subject><subject>Panthera leo</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>stakeholder attitudes</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1q3DAUhUVISaZpN32AYsgmtDi1JFuWlqnpz0AgEKZrIclXjYItTSU7TXZ5h7xhn6SaznQWXZQIhK7Edw_nHiH0BlfnOK8PJmh3jilr-QFa4IbQErdUHKJFxTkvORfkGL1M6baqKtHg-ggdU0pELXi7QNerGyjcuA5xUt5AEWyRi-9OD1Ao3xfO769WmSnElJ-Km3lU_tfjk1HRu7sQoTAB7l2aIGu8Qi-sGhK83p0n6NvnT6vua3l59WXZXVyWhgrKS8IpaN1aRQSvNWUccyryFGANEcYa3NfCgq0IbhohQFCo614bwjT0mFhDT9DZVncdw48Z0iRHlwwMg_IQ5iRJzThjrOY4o6f_oLdhjj67k6TJ8gy3rM3Uuy1lYkgpgpXr6EYVHySu5CZpuUla_kk6w293krMeod-jf6PNwPst8BN0sMm4TTZ7LP8FIyxvkqtq45A_n-7cpCYXfBdmP-VWvGt1Azz8x7Psrj4ut-5_A_arql0</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Jacobsen, Kim S.</creator><creator>Dickman, Amy J.</creator><creator>Macdonald, David W.</creator><creator>Mourato, Susana</creator><creator>Johnson, Paul</creator><creator>Sibanda, Lovemore</creator><creator>Loveridge, Andrew</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6160-9045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-3460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human–carnivore coexistence</title><author>Jacobsen, Kim S. ; Dickman, Amy J. ; Macdonald, David W. ; Mourato, Susana ; Johnson, Paul ; Sibanda, Lovemore ; Loveridge, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-283ebb7fa2984b3681839136efc29cfc1d49fef0215599e93e44dbc26bed12fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>actitudes de los actores</topic><topic>African lions</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biodiversity &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>conflicto humano‐fauna</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation project evaluation</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>evaluación de proyectos de conservación</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human-environment relationship</topic><topic>Human-wildlife relations</topic><topic>human–wildlife conflict</topic><topic>leones africanos</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>modelos de actitud ordinal</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>ordinal attitude models</topic><topic>Panthera leo</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>stakeholder attitudes</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Kim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Amy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourato, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibanda, Lovemore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loveridge, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobsen, Kim S.</au><au>Dickman, Amy J.</au><au>Macdonald, David W.</au><au>Mourato, Susana</au><au>Johnson, Paul</au><au>Sibanda, Lovemore</au><au>Loveridge, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human–carnivore coexistence</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><stitle>CONSERV BIOL</stitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1233</spage><epage>1244</epage><pages>1233-1244</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Conflict with humans is one of the major threats facing the world's remaining large carnivore populations, and understanding human attitudes is key to improving coexistence. We surveyed people living near Hwange National Park about their attitudes toward coexisting with lions. We used ordinal regression models with the results of the survey to investigate the importance of a range of tangible and intangible factors on attitudes. The variables investigated included the costs and benefits of wildlife presence, emotion, culture, religion, vulnerability, risk perception, notions of responsibility, and personal value orientations. This was for the purpose of effectively tailoring conservation efforts but also for ethical policy making. Intangible factors (e.g., fear and ecocentric values) were as important as, if not more important than, tangible factors (such as livestock losses) for understanding attitudes, based on the effect sizes of these variables. The degree to which participants’ fear of lions interfered with their daily activities was the most influential variable. The degree to which benefits accrue to households from the nearby protected area was also highly influential, as was number of livestock lost, number of dependents, ecocentric value orientation, and participation in conflict mitigation programs. Contrary to what is often assumed, metrics of livestock loss did not dominate attitudes to coexistence with lions. Furthermore, we found that socioeconomic variables may appear important when studied in isolation, but their effect may disappear when controlling for variables related to beliefs, perceptions, and past experiences. This raises questions about the widespread reliance on socioeconomic variables in the field of human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. To facilitate coexistence with large carnivores, we recommend measures that reduce fear (through education and through protective measures that reduce the need to be fearful), reduction of livestock losses, and ensuring local communities benefit from conservation. Ecocentric values also emerged as influential, highlighting the need to develop conservation initiatives tailored to local values. Importancia de los Factores Tangibles e Intangibles en la Coexistencia Humanos‐Carnívoros Resumen Los conflictos con humanos son una de las principales amenazas que enfrentan las poblaciones permanentes de grandes carnívoros del planeta y el entendimiento de las actitudes humanas es importante para mejorar la coexistencia. Preguntamos a las personas que viven cerca del Parque Nacional Hwange sobre su postura hacia la coexistencia con leones. Usamos modelos de regresión ordinal en los resultados del cuestionario para investigar la importancia de una gama de factores tangibles e intangibles para estas posturas. Las variables investigadas incluyeron el costo y beneficio de la presencia de fauna, emociones, cultura, religión, vulnerabilidad, percepción de riesgos, nociones de la responsabilidad y orientaciones de valor personal. Realizamos esto con el propósito de diseñar efectivamente los esfuerzos de conservación pero también para la generación de políticas éticas. Los factores intangibles (p. ej.: el miedo y los valores ecocéntricos) fueron tan importantes, si no es que más importantes, como los factores tangibles (como la pérdida de cabezas de ganado) para el entendimiento de las actitudes, con base en los tamaños del efecto de estas variables. El grado al que el miedo que los participantes sienten por los leones interfiere con sus actividades diarias fue la variable con mayor influencia. El grado al que los hogares del área protegida cercana devengan beneficios también tuvo una influencia alta, como lo tuvo el número de cabezas de ganado perdidas, el número de dependientes, la orientación de los valores ecocéntricos y la participación en programas de mitigación del conflicto. Contrario a lo que frecuentemente se asume, las medidas de la pérdida de cabezas de ganado no dominó sobre las actitudes por la coexistencia con leones. Más allá, encontramos que las variables socioeconómicas pueden parecer importantes cuando se estudian de manera aislada pero su efecto puede desaparecer cuando se controlan las variables relacionadas con las creencias, percepciones y experiencias pasadas. Esto genera preguntas sobre la dependencia hacia las variables socioeconómicas en el área de estudios de conflictos y coexistencia entre humanos y fauna. Para facilitar la coexistencia con carnívoros mayores recomendamos tomar medidas que reduzcan el miedo (por medio de la educación y medidas de protección que reduzcan la necesidad de vivir con miedo), la disminución de la pérdida de cabezas de ganado y garantizarles a las comunidades locales los beneficios que proporciona la conservación. Los valores ecocéntricos también surgieron como influyentes, lo que resalta la necesidad de desarrollar iniciativas de conservación adaptadas a los valores locales. Article impact statement: Intangible factors are more important than tangible factors in shaping tolerance for lions, and this is crucial for successful policies</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>33294987</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.13678</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6160-9045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-3460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2021-08, Vol.35 (4), p.1233-1244
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_33294987
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects actitudes de los actores
African lions
Attitudes
Biodiversity & Conservation
Carnivores
Coexistence
conflicto humano‐fauna
Conservation
conservation project evaluation
Cost benefit analysis
Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
evaluación de proyectos de conservación
Fauna
Fear
Households
Human-environment relationship
Human-wildlife relations
human–wildlife conflict
leones africanos
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Livestock
Local communities
Mitigation
modelos de actitud ordinal
National parks
ordinal attitude models
Panthera leo
Protected areas
Regression analysis
Regression models
Risk perception
Science & Technology
Social factors
Socioeconomics
stakeholder attitudes
Surveying
Variables
Vulnerability
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
title The importance of tangible and intangible factors in human–carnivore coexistence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T23%3A27%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20importance%20of%20tangible%20and%20intangible%20factors%20in%20human%E2%80%93carnivore%20coexistence&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Jacobsen,%20Kim%20S.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1233&rft.epage=1244&rft.pages=1233-1244&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.13678&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2468666481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555961767&rft_id=info:pmid/33294987&rfr_iscdi=true