Removal of nickel from neutral mine drainage using peat-calcite, compost, and wood ash in column reactors
The effectiveness of compost, peat-calcite, and wood ash to remove Ni from a circum-neutral-contaminated mine water was tested in continuous flow experiments. Materials were compared in 4.8-L columns at hydraulic residence times (HRT) of ∼ 16.5 h over the course of 2.5–4 months. During this period,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2021-03, Vol.28 (12), p.14854-14866 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 14866 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 14854 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Richard, Dominique Neculita, Carmen Mihaela Zagury, Gérald J. |
| description | The effectiveness of compost, peat-calcite, and wood ash to remove Ni from a circum-neutral-contaminated mine water was tested in continuous flow experiments. Materials were compared in 4.8-L columns at hydraulic residence times (HRT) of ∼ 16.5 h over the course of 2.5–4 months. During this period, all columns successfully treated over 400 L of synthetic contaminated neutral drainage (4.05 mg/L Ni), mainly through sorption processes. Mid-column results (HRT ∼ 9 h) indicated that wood ash was the most effective material for Ni removal, and chemical extractions revealed that retained Ni was less mobile in this spent material. The pH-increasing properties of wood ash played a major role in this material’s performance, but a pH correction would be required in the initial stages of full-scale treatment to maintain the effluent within regulatory limits (6–9.5). Scaled to full-sized, mid-column results indicated that treatment cell sizes, designed for the 1-year treatment of a high discharge (10 m
3
/h)–contaminated effluent (4.05 mg/L Ni), would be the smallest with wood ash ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-020-11623-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33219931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501357980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-61f41e246d2818b4947adb1d5a042aed1c26535dee4c73024eeff0f516f43ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE2PFCEQhonRuOPqH_BgSDy6rcVH091HM_Er2cTE7J0wUIys3TAC7cZ_L2uv6814ogLPW0U9hDxn8JoBDG8KY6JXHXDoGFNcdPCA7JhishvkND0kO5ik7JiQ8ow8KeUaGjnx4TE5E4KzaRJsR8IXXNIPM9PkaQz2G87U57TQiGvN7XoJEanLJkRzRLqWEI_0hKZ21sw2VLygNi2nVOoFNdHRm5QcNeUrDbE9zOsSaUZja8rlKXnkzVzw2d15Tq7ev7vaf-wuP3_4tH972VnZq9op5iVDLpXjIxsPcpKDcQfmegOSG3TMctWL3iFKOwjgEtF78D1TXgrvxTl5ubU95fR9xVL1dVpzbBM176EJG6YRGsU3yuZUSkavTzksJv_UDPStXL3J1U2Z_i1X34Ze3LVeDwu6-8gfmw14tQE3eEi-2IDR4j0GAGoceuiHVgFv9Pj_9D5UU0OK-7TG2qJii5aGxyPmv0v-4_-_ALjRpaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2501357980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of nickel from neutral mine drainage using peat-calcite, compost, and wood ash in column reactors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Richard, Dominique ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Zagury, Gérald J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richard, Dominique ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Zagury, Gérald J.</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of compost, peat-calcite, and wood ash to remove Ni from a circum-neutral-contaminated mine water was tested in continuous flow experiments. Materials were compared in 4.8-L columns at hydraulic residence times (HRT) of ∼ 16.5 h over the course of 2.5–4 months. During this period, all columns successfully treated over 400 L of synthetic contaminated neutral drainage (4.05 mg/L Ni), mainly through sorption processes. Mid-column results (HRT ∼ 9 h) indicated that wood ash was the most effective material for Ni removal, and chemical extractions revealed that retained Ni was less mobile in this spent material. The pH-increasing properties of wood ash played a major role in this material’s performance, but a pH correction would be required in the initial stages of full-scale treatment to maintain the effluent within regulatory limits (6–9.5). Scaled to full-sized, mid-column results indicated that treatment cell sizes, designed for the 1-year treatment of a high discharge (10 m
3
/h)–contaminated effluent (4.05 mg/L Ni), would be the smallest with wood ash (< 500 m
3
), followed by compost (600 ± 140 m
3
) and peat-calcite (720 ± 50 m
3
).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11623-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33219931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Ashes ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Calcite ; Calcium Carbonate ; Carbon ; Composting ; Composts ; Contamination ; Continuous flow ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Effluents ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Hardwoods ; Hydraulics ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Metals ; Mine drainage ; Mine waters ; Mines ; Mining ; Mining engineering ; Mosses ; Nickel ; Peat ; pH effects ; Research Article ; Science & Technology ; Soil ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water pollution ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-03, Vol.28 (12), p.14854-14866</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>2</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000687505700002</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-61f41e246d2818b4947adb1d5a042aed1c26535dee4c73024eeff0f516f43ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-61f41e246d2818b4947adb1d5a042aed1c26535dee4c73024eeff0f516f43ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-020-11623-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-020-11623-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,39263,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33219931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagury, Gérald J.</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of nickel from neutral mine drainage using peat-calcite, compost, and wood ash in column reactors</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of compost, peat-calcite, and wood ash to remove Ni from a circum-neutral-contaminated mine water was tested in continuous flow experiments. Materials were compared in 4.8-L columns at hydraulic residence times (HRT) of ∼ 16.5 h over the course of 2.5–4 months. During this period, all columns successfully treated over 400 L of synthetic contaminated neutral drainage (4.05 mg/L Ni), mainly through sorption processes. Mid-column results (HRT ∼ 9 h) indicated that wood ash was the most effective material for Ni removal, and chemical extractions revealed that retained Ni was less mobile in this spent material. The pH-increasing properties of wood ash played a major role in this material’s performance, but a pH correction would be required in the initial stages of full-scale treatment to maintain the effluent within regulatory limits (6–9.5). Scaled to full-sized, mid-column results indicated that treatment cell sizes, designed for the 1-year treatment of a high discharge (10 m
3
/h)–contaminated effluent (4.05 mg/L Ni), would be the smallest with wood ash (< 500 m
3
), followed by compost (600 ± 140 m
3
) and peat-calcite (720 ± 50 m
3
).</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Ashes</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Calcium Carbonate</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Continuous flow</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Mine drainage</subject><subject>Mine waters</subject><subject>Mines</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Mining engineering</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE2PFCEQhonRuOPqH_BgSDy6rcVH091HM_Er2cTE7J0wUIys3TAC7cZ_L2uv6814ogLPW0U9hDxn8JoBDG8KY6JXHXDoGFNcdPCA7JhishvkND0kO5ik7JiQ8ow8KeUaGjnx4TE5E4KzaRJsR8IXXNIPM9PkaQz2G87U57TQiGvN7XoJEanLJkRzRLqWEI_0hKZ21sw2VLygNi2nVOoFNdHRm5QcNeUrDbE9zOsSaUZja8rlKXnkzVzw2d15Tq7ev7vaf-wuP3_4tH972VnZq9op5iVDLpXjIxsPcpKDcQfmegOSG3TMctWL3iFKOwjgEtF78D1TXgrvxTl5ubU95fR9xVL1dVpzbBM176EJG6YRGsU3yuZUSkavTzksJv_UDPStXL3J1U2Z_i1X34Ze3LVeDwu6-8gfmw14tQE3eEi-2IDR4j0GAGoceuiHVgFv9Pj_9D5UU0OK-7TG2qJii5aGxyPmv0v-4_-_ALjRpaY</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Richard, Dominique</creator><creator>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creator><creator>Zagury, Gérald J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Removal of nickel from neutral mine drainage using peat-calcite, compost, and wood ash in column reactors</title><author>Richard, Dominique ; Neculita, Carmen Mihaela ; Zagury, Gérald J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-61f41e246d2818b4947adb1d5a042aed1c26535dee4c73024eeff0f516f43ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Ashes</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Calcium Carbonate</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Continuous flow</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences & Ecology</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Mine drainage</topic><topic>Mine waters</topic><topic>Mines</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Mining engineering</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richard, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagury, Gérald J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richard, Dominique</au><au>Neculita, Carmen Mihaela</au><au>Zagury, Gérald J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of nickel from neutral mine drainage using peat-calcite, compost, and wood ash in column reactors</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><stitle>ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>14854</spage><epage>14866</epage><pages>14854-14866</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of compost, peat-calcite, and wood ash to remove Ni from a circum-neutral-contaminated mine water was tested in continuous flow experiments. Materials were compared in 4.8-L columns at hydraulic residence times (HRT) of ∼ 16.5 h over the course of 2.5–4 months. During this period, all columns successfully treated over 400 L of synthetic contaminated neutral drainage (4.05 mg/L Ni), mainly through sorption processes. Mid-column results (HRT ∼ 9 h) indicated that wood ash was the most effective material for Ni removal, and chemical extractions revealed that retained Ni was less mobile in this spent material. The pH-increasing properties of wood ash played a major role in this material’s performance, but a pH correction would be required in the initial stages of full-scale treatment to maintain the effluent within regulatory limits (6–9.5). Scaled to full-sized, mid-column results indicated that treatment cell sizes, designed for the 1-year treatment of a high discharge (10 m
3
/h)–contaminated effluent (4.05 mg/L Ni), would be the smallest with wood ash (< 500 m
3
), followed by compost (600 ± 140 m
3
) and peat-calcite (720 ± 50 m
3
).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33219931</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-020-11623-0</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021-03, Vol.28 (12), p.14854-14866 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_33219931 |
| source | MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; SpringerLink |
| subjects | Aquatic Pollution Ashes Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Calcite Calcium Carbonate Carbon Composting Composts Contamination Continuous flow Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Effluents Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Environmental Sciences Environmental Sciences & Ecology Hardwoods Hydraulics Life Sciences & Biomedicine Metals Mine drainage Mine waters Mines Mining Mining engineering Mosses Nickel Peat pH effects Research Article Science & Technology Soil Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water pollution Water Pollution Control |
| title | Removal of nickel from neutral mine drainage using peat-calcite, compost, and wood ash in column reactors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-10T15%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20nickel%20from%20neutral%20mine%20drainage%20using%20peat-calcite,%20compost,%20and%20wood%20ash%20in%20column%20reactors&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Richard,%20Dominique&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=14854&rft.epage=14866&rft.pages=14854-14866&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-020-11623-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2501357980%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2501357980&rft_id=info:pmid/33219931&rfr_iscdi=true |