Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode

The photocatalytic activity of TiO anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO phase, while rutile was slightly pres...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2021-03, Vol.267, p.128925
Hauptverfasser: García-Ramírez, Patricia, Ramírez-Morales, Erik, Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos, Sirés, Ignasi, Silva-Martínez, Susana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 128925
container_title Chemosphere (Oxford)
container_volume 267
creator García-Ramírez, Patricia
Ramírez-Morales, Erik
Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos
Sirés, Ignasi
Silva-Martínez, Susana
description The photocatalytic activity of TiO anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO , whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E (PP) was much higher than that attained at E (SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33213874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33213874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_332138743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01OwzAUhC0k1BbKFdDjAAm2Q2myRiBYdVPYVo7zUrty_CL_VMpBuC9BwJrVSKOZTzOM3QleCi4e70-lNjhQHA0GLCWXsy_rRm4u2ErU26YQsqmX7CrGE-dzYdMs2LKqpKjq7cOKfb753mX0GoF6CDkZ9DYP0NFo_RHIw_tHAcp3cLbRtg4LZ48mwWgoETrUKZBWSbkpWQ2aHAUI856zctAHmkETQiSXkyUfIcdvqoK93YEErzyl3CKoENT0w5ytDtfsslcu4s2vXrPbl-f902sx5nbA7jAGO6gwHf5-VP8GvgADY1-u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>García-Ramírez, Patricia ; Ramírez-Morales, Erik ; Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos ; Sirés, Ignasi ; Silva-Martínez, Susana</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Ramírez, Patricia ; Ramírez-Morales, Erik ; Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos ; Sirés, Ignasi ; Silva-Martínez, Susana</creatorcontrib><description>The photocatalytic activity of TiO anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO , whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E (PP) was much higher than that attained at E (SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33213874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Catalysis ; Doping in Sports ; Light ; Nanotubes ; Ruthenium ; Titanium ; Ultraviolet Rays</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2021-03, Vol.267, p.128925</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Ramírez, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirés, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Martínez, Susana</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>The photocatalytic activity of TiO anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO , whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E (PP) was much higher than that attained at E (SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum.</description><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Doping in Sports</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Nanotubes</subject><subject>Ruthenium</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj01OwzAUhC0k1BbKFdDjAAm2Q2myRiBYdVPYVo7zUrty_CL_VMpBuC9BwJrVSKOZTzOM3QleCi4e70-lNjhQHA0GLCWXsy_rRm4u2ErU26YQsqmX7CrGE-dzYdMs2LKqpKjq7cOKfb753mX0GoF6CDkZ9DYP0NFo_RHIw_tHAcp3cLbRtg4LZ48mwWgoETrUKZBWSbkpWQ2aHAUI856zctAHmkETQiSXkyUfIcdvqoK93YEErzyl3CKoENT0w5ytDtfsslcu4s2vXrPbl-f902sx5nbA7jAGO6gwHf5-VP8GvgADY1-u</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>García-Ramírez, Patricia</creator><creator>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</creator><creator>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Sirés, Ignasi</creator><creator>Silva-Martínez, Susana</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</title><author>García-Ramírez, Patricia ; Ramírez-Morales, Erik ; Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos ; Sirés, Ignasi ; Silva-Martínez, Susana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_332138743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Doping in Sports</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Nanotubes</topic><topic>Ruthenium</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Ramírez, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirés, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Martínez, Susana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Ramírez, Patricia</au><au>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</au><au>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</au><au>Sirés, Ignasi</au><au>Silva-Martínez, Susana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>267</volume><spage>128925</spage><pages>128925-</pages><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><abstract>The photocatalytic activity of TiO anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO , whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E (PP) was much higher than that attained at E (SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33213874</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1879-1298
ispartof Chemosphere (Oxford), 2021-03, Vol.267, p.128925
issn 1879-1298
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_33213874
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Catalysis
Doping in Sports
Light
Nanotubes
Ruthenium
Titanium
Ultraviolet Rays
title Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20ruthenium%20doping%20on%20UV-%20and%20visible-light%20photoelectrocatalytic%20color%20removal%20from%20dye%20solutions%20using%20a%20TiO%202%20nanotube%20array%20photoanode&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Ram%C3%ADrez,%20Patricia&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=267&rft.spage=128925&rft.pages=128925-&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E33213874%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33213874&rfr_iscdi=true