Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode
The photocatalytic activity of TiO anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO phase, while rutile was slightly pres...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2021-03, Vol.267, p.128925 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 128925 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 267 |
creator | García-Ramírez, Patricia Ramírez-Morales, Erik Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos Sirés, Ignasi Silva-Martínez, Susana |
description | The photocatalytic activity of TiO
anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO
nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO
phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO
nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
, whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E
(PP) was much higher than that attained at E
(SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33213874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33213874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_332138743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01OwzAUhC0k1BbKFdDjAAm2Q2myRiBYdVPYVo7zUrty_CL_VMpBuC9BwJrVSKOZTzOM3QleCi4e70-lNjhQHA0GLCWXsy_rRm4u2ErU26YQsqmX7CrGE-dzYdMs2LKqpKjq7cOKfb753mX0GoF6CDkZ9DYP0NFo_RHIw_tHAcp3cLbRtg4LZ48mwWgoETrUKZBWSbkpWQ2aHAUI856zctAHmkETQiSXkyUfIcdvqoK93YEErzyl3CKoENT0w5ytDtfsslcu4s2vXrPbl-f902sx5nbA7jAGO6gwHf5-VP8GvgADY1-u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>García-Ramírez, Patricia ; Ramírez-Morales, Erik ; Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos ; Sirés, Ignasi ; Silva-Martínez, Susana</creator><creatorcontrib>García-Ramírez, Patricia ; Ramírez-Morales, Erik ; Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos ; Sirés, Ignasi ; Silva-Martínez, Susana</creatorcontrib><description>The photocatalytic activity of TiO
anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO
nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO
phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO
nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
, whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E
(PP) was much higher than that attained at E
(SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33213874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Catalysis ; Doping in Sports ; Light ; Nanotubes ; Ruthenium ; Titanium ; Ultraviolet Rays</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2021-03, Vol.267, p.128925</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>García-Ramírez, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirés, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Martínez, Susana</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>The photocatalytic activity of TiO
anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO
nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO
phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO
nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
, whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E
(PP) was much higher than that attained at E
(SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum.</description><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Doping in Sports</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Nanotubes</subject><subject>Ruthenium</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFj01OwzAUhC0k1BbKFdDjAAm2Q2myRiBYdVPYVo7zUrty_CL_VMpBuC9BwJrVSKOZTzOM3QleCi4e70-lNjhQHA0GLCWXsy_rRm4u2ErU26YQsqmX7CrGE-dzYdMs2LKqpKjq7cOKfb753mX0GoF6CDkZ9DYP0NFo_RHIw_tHAcp3cLbRtg4LZ48mwWgoETrUKZBWSbkpWQ2aHAUI856zctAHmkETQiSXkyUfIcdvqoK93YEErzyl3CKoENT0w5ytDtfsslcu4s2vXrPbl-f902sx5nbA7jAGO6gwHf5-VP8GvgADY1-u</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>García-Ramírez, Patricia</creator><creator>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</creator><creator>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Sirés, Ignasi</creator><creator>Silva-Martínez, Susana</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</title><author>García-Ramírez, Patricia ; Ramírez-Morales, Erik ; Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos ; Sirés, Ignasi ; Silva-Martínez, Susana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_332138743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Doping in Sports</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Nanotubes</topic><topic>Ruthenium</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>García-Ramírez, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirés, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Martínez, Susana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>García-Ramírez, Patricia</au><au>Ramírez-Morales, Erik</au><au>Solis Cortazar, Juan Carlos</au><au>Sirés, Ignasi</au><au>Silva-Martínez, Susana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>267</volume><spage>128925</spage><pages>128925-</pages><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><abstract>The photocatalytic activity of TiO
anodes was enhanced by synthesizing Ru-doped Ti|TiO
nanotube arrays. Such photoanodes were fabricated via Ti anodization followed by Ru impregnation and annealing. The X-ray diffractograms revealed that anatase was the main TiO
phase, while rutile was slightly present in all samples. Scanning electron microscopy evidenced a uniform morphology in all samples, with nanotube diameter ranging from 60 to 120 nm. The bias potential for the photoelectrochemical (PEC) treatment was selected from the electrochemical characterization of each electrode, made via linear sweep voltammetry. All the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube array photoanodes showed a peak photocurrent (PP) and a saturation photocurrent (SP) upon their illumination with UV or visible light. In contrast, the undoped TiO
nanotubes only showed the SP, which was higher than that reached with the Ru-doped photoanodes using UV light. An exception was the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
, whose SP was comparable under visible light. Using that anode, the activity enhancement during the PEC treatment of a Terasil Blue dye solution at E
(PP) was much higher than that attained at E
(SP). The percentage of color removal at 120 min with the Ru(0.15 wt%)-doped TiO
was 98% and 55% in PEC with UV and visible light, respectively, being much greater than 82% and 28% achieved in photocatalysis. The moderate visible-light photoactivity of the Ru-doped TiO
nanotube arrays suggests their convenience to work under solar PEC conditions, aiming at using a large portion of the solar spectrum.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33213874</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1879-1298 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2021-03, Vol.267, p.128925 |
issn | 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_33213874 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier) |
subjects | Catalysis Doping in Sports Light Nanotubes Ruthenium Titanium Ultraviolet Rays |
title | Influence of ruthenium doping on UV- and visible-light photoelectrocatalytic color removal from dye solutions using a TiO 2 nanotube array photoanode |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20ruthenium%20doping%20on%20UV-%20and%20visible-light%20photoelectrocatalytic%20color%20removal%20from%20dye%20solutions%20using%20a%20TiO%202%20nanotube%20array%20photoanode&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Garc%C3%ADa-Ram%C3%ADrez,%20Patricia&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=267&rft.spage=128925&rft.pages=128925-&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128925&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E33213874%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33213874&rfr_iscdi=true |