Perspectives on Telephone and Video Communication in the Intensive Care Unit during COVID-19
Rationale: During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, many intensive care units (ICUs) have shifted communication with patients' families toward chiefly telehealth methods (phone and video) to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Family and clinician perspectives about phone and video communi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.838-847 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 847 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 838 |
container_title | ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Kennedy, Niki R. Steinberg, Alexis Arnold, Robert M. Doshi, Ankur A. White, Douglas B. DeLair, Will Nigra, Karen Elmer, Jonathan |
description | Rationale: During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, many intensive care units (ICUs) have shifted communication with patients' families toward chiefly telehealth methods (phone and video) to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Family and clinician perspectives about phone and video communication in the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic are not yet well understood. Increased knowledge about clinicians' and families' experiences with telehealth may help to improve the quality of remote interactions with families during periods of hospital visitor restrictions during COVID-19.
Objectives: To explore experiences, perspectives, and attitudes of family members and ICU clinicians about phone and video interactions during COVID-19 hospital visitor restrictions.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative interviewing study with an intentional sample of 21 family members and 14 treating clinicians of cardiothoracic and neurologic ICU patients at an academic medical center in April 2020. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with each participant. We used content analysis to develop a codebook and analyze interview transcripts. We specifically explored themes of effectiveness, benefits and limitations, communication strategies, and discordant perspectives between families and clinicians related to remote discussions.
Results: Respondents viewed phone and video communication as somewhat effective but inferior to in-person communication. Both clinicians and families believed phone calls were useful for information sharing and brief updates, whereas video calls were preferable for aligning clinician and family perspectives. Clinicians and families expressed discordant views on multiple topics-for example, clinicians worried they were unsuccessful in conveying empathy remotely, whereas families believed empathy was conveyed successfully via phone and video. Communication strategies suggested by families and clinicians for remote interactions include identifying a family point person to receive updates, frequently checking family understanding, positioning the camera on video calls to help family see the patient and their clinical setting, and offering time for the family and patient to interact without clinicians participating.
Conclusions: Telehealth communication between families and clinicians of ICU patients appears to be a somewhat effective alternative when in-person communication is not possible. Use of communication strategies specific to phone and vi |
doi_str_mv | 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-729OC |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33181033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2523166234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d041c3de6313e68c2faeba3ccccab0cbc08278158dd4e6e36f1d74f315fff6103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9r3DAQxUVpaLZpv0IQ9FIoTvXHlrWXwuIk7UJgC93kVBCyPM4q2NJWklPy7aPNpkubU-ciwfzeY2YeQqeUnNGK8s8L5_QQF-sfZ4wwQkRRs_mqeYVmjLOqEILR12hGq1IUnDF2jN7GeEcIq-q5eIOOOaeSEs5n6Od3CHELJtl7iNg7vIYBthvvAGvX4RvbgceNH8fJWaOTzYR1OG0AL10CF7MMNzoAvnY24W4K1t3iZnWzPC_o_B066vOU8P75PUHXlxfr5ltxtfq6bBZXhSlLloqOlNTwDgSnHIQ0rNfQam5y6ZaY1hDJakkr2XUlCOCip11d9pxWfd-LvMcJ-rL33U7tCJ0Bl4Ie1DbYUYcH5bVV_3ac3ahbf68kkSLfKBt8fDYI_tcEManRRgPDoB34KSpWClILyasd-uEFeuensAtDsYpxmk_Py0yJPWWCjzFAfxiGErULUB0CVPsA1VOAWXj69yoH2Z_EMiD3wG9ofR-NBWfggJHsVIpc8_yjorHpKbPGTy5l6af_l_JH71y6kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2523166234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perspectives on Telephone and Video Communication in the Intensive Care Unit during COVID-19</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kennedy, Niki R. ; Steinberg, Alexis ; Arnold, Robert M. ; Doshi, Ankur A. ; White, Douglas B. ; DeLair, Will ; Nigra, Karen ; Elmer, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Niki R. ; Steinberg, Alexis ; Arnold, Robert M. ; Doshi, Ankur A. ; White, Douglas B. ; DeLair, Will ; Nigra, Karen ; Elmer, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale: During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, many intensive care units (ICUs) have shifted communication with patients' families toward chiefly telehealth methods (phone and video) to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Family and clinician perspectives about phone and video communication in the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic are not yet well understood. Increased knowledge about clinicians' and families' experiences with telehealth may help to improve the quality of remote interactions with families during periods of hospital visitor restrictions during COVID-19.
Objectives: To explore experiences, perspectives, and attitudes of family members and ICU clinicians about phone and video interactions during COVID-19 hospital visitor restrictions.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative interviewing study with an intentional sample of 21 family members and 14 treating clinicians of cardiothoracic and neurologic ICU patients at an academic medical center in April 2020. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with each participant. We used content analysis to develop a codebook and analyze interview transcripts. We specifically explored themes of effectiveness, benefits and limitations, communication strategies, and discordant perspectives between families and clinicians related to remote discussions.
Results: Respondents viewed phone and video communication as somewhat effective but inferior to in-person communication. Both clinicians and families believed phone calls were useful for information sharing and brief updates, whereas video calls were preferable for aligning clinician and family perspectives. Clinicians and families expressed discordant views on multiple topics-for example, clinicians worried they were unsuccessful in conveying empathy remotely, whereas families believed empathy was conveyed successfully via phone and video. Communication strategies suggested by families and clinicians for remote interactions include identifying a family point person to receive updates, frequently checking family understanding, positioning the camera on video calls to help family see the patient and their clinical setting, and offering time for the family and patient to interact without clinicians participating.
Conclusions: Telehealth communication between families and clinicians of ICU patients appears to be a somewhat effective alternative when in-person communication is not possible. Use of communication strategies specific to phone and video can improve clinician and family experiences with telehealth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-3222</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2329-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-6621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-729OC</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33181033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Amer Thoracic Soc</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Communication ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - psychology ; COVID-19 - therapy ; Emotional Intelligence ; Family - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Infection Control - organization & administration ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units - ethics ; Intensive Care Units - organization & administration ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Research ; Pennsylvania ; Physical Distancing ; Professional-Family Relations - ethics ; Qualitative Research ; Respiratory System ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Science & Technology ; Telecommunications - ethics ; Telecommunications - standards ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.838-847</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Thoracic Society May 2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 by the American Thoracic Society 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>84</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000646666900016</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d041c3de6313e68c2faeba3ccccab0cbc08278158dd4e6e36f1d74f315fff6103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d041c3de6313e68c2faeba3ccccab0cbc08278158dd4e6e36f1d74f315fff6103</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0314-6331</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930,39263</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33181033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Niki R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doshi, Ankur A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLair, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigra, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Perspectives on Telephone and Video Communication in the Intensive Care Unit during COVID-19</title><title>ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY</title><addtitle>ANN AM THORAC SOC</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><description>Rationale: During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, many intensive care units (ICUs) have shifted communication with patients' families toward chiefly telehealth methods (phone and video) to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Family and clinician perspectives about phone and video communication in the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic are not yet well understood. Increased knowledge about clinicians' and families' experiences with telehealth may help to improve the quality of remote interactions with families during periods of hospital visitor restrictions during COVID-19.
Objectives: To explore experiences, perspectives, and attitudes of family members and ICU clinicians about phone and video interactions during COVID-19 hospital visitor restrictions.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative interviewing study with an intentional sample of 21 family members and 14 treating clinicians of cardiothoracic and neurologic ICU patients at an academic medical center in April 2020. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with each participant. We used content analysis to develop a codebook and analyze interview transcripts. We specifically explored themes of effectiveness, benefits and limitations, communication strategies, and discordant perspectives between families and clinicians related to remote discussions.
Results: Respondents viewed phone and video communication as somewhat effective but inferior to in-person communication. Both clinicians and families believed phone calls were useful for information sharing and brief updates, whereas video calls were preferable for aligning clinician and family perspectives. Clinicians and families expressed discordant views on multiple topics-for example, clinicians worried they were unsuccessful in conveying empathy remotely, whereas families believed empathy was conveyed successfully via phone and video. Communication strategies suggested by families and clinicians for remote interactions include identifying a family point person to receive updates, frequently checking family understanding, positioning the camera on video calls to help family see the patient and their clinical setting, and offering time for the family and patient to interact without clinicians participating.
Conclusions: Telehealth communication between families and clinicians of ICU patients appears to be a somewhat effective alternative when in-person communication is not possible. Use of communication strategies specific to phone and video can improve clinician and family experiences with telehealth.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - psychology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - therapy</subject><subject>Emotional Intelligence</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - organization & administration</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - ethics</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - organization & administration</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Physical Distancing</subject><subject>Professional-Family Relations - ethics</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Respiratory System</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Telecommunications - ethics</subject><subject>Telecommunications - standards</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>1546-3222</issn><issn>2329-6933</issn><issn>2325-6621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9r3DAQxUVpaLZpv0IQ9FIoTvXHlrWXwuIk7UJgC93kVBCyPM4q2NJWklPy7aPNpkubU-ciwfzeY2YeQqeUnNGK8s8L5_QQF-sfZ4wwQkRRs_mqeYVmjLOqEILR12hGq1IUnDF2jN7GeEcIq-q5eIOOOaeSEs5n6Od3CHELJtl7iNg7vIYBthvvAGvX4RvbgceNH8fJWaOTzYR1OG0AL10CF7MMNzoAvnY24W4K1t3iZnWzPC_o_B066vOU8P75PUHXlxfr5ltxtfq6bBZXhSlLloqOlNTwDgSnHIQ0rNfQam5y6ZaY1hDJakkr2XUlCOCip11d9pxWfd-LvMcJ-rL33U7tCJ0Bl4Ie1DbYUYcH5bVV_3ac3ahbf68kkSLfKBt8fDYI_tcEManRRgPDoB34KSpWClILyasd-uEFeuensAtDsYpxmk_Py0yJPWWCjzFAfxiGErULUB0CVPsA1VOAWXj69yoH2Z_EMiD3wG9ofR-NBWfggJHsVIpc8_yjorHpKbPGTy5l6af_l_JH71y6kQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Kennedy, Niki R.</creator><creator>Steinberg, Alexis</creator><creator>Arnold, Robert M.</creator><creator>Doshi, Ankur A.</creator><creator>White, Douglas B.</creator><creator>DeLair, Will</creator><creator>Nigra, Karen</creator><creator>Elmer, Jonathan</creator><general>Amer Thoracic Soc</general><general>American Thoracic Society</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-6331</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Perspectives on Telephone and Video Communication in the Intensive Care Unit during COVID-19</title><author>Kennedy, Niki R. ; Steinberg, Alexis ; Arnold, Robert M. ; Doshi, Ankur A. ; White, Douglas B. ; DeLair, Will ; Nigra, Karen ; Elmer, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-d041c3de6313e68c2faeba3ccccab0cbc08278158dd4e6e36f1d74f315fff6103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - psychology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - therapy</topic><topic>Emotional Intelligence</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - organization & administration</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - ethics</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - organization & administration</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Physical Distancing</topic><topic>Professional-Family Relations - ethics</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Respiratory System</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Telecommunications - ethics</topic><topic>Telecommunications - standards</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Niki R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doshi, Ankur A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLair, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nigra, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmer, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kennedy, Niki R.</au><au>Steinberg, Alexis</au><au>Arnold, Robert M.</au><au>Doshi, Ankur A.</au><au>White, Douglas B.</au><au>DeLair, Will</au><au>Nigra, Karen</au><au>Elmer, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perspectives on Telephone and Video Communication in the Intensive Care Unit during COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY</jtitle><stitle>ANN AM THORAC SOC</stitle><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>838</spage><epage>847</epage><pages>838-847</pages><issn>1546-3222</issn><issn>2329-6933</issn><eissn>2325-6621</eissn><abstract>Rationale: During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, many intensive care units (ICUs) have shifted communication with patients' families toward chiefly telehealth methods (phone and video) to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Family and clinician perspectives about phone and video communication in the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic are not yet well understood. Increased knowledge about clinicians' and families' experiences with telehealth may help to improve the quality of remote interactions with families during periods of hospital visitor restrictions during COVID-19.
Objectives: To explore experiences, perspectives, and attitudes of family members and ICU clinicians about phone and video interactions during COVID-19 hospital visitor restrictions.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative interviewing study with an intentional sample of 21 family members and 14 treating clinicians of cardiothoracic and neurologic ICU patients at an academic medical center in April 2020. Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with each participant. We used content analysis to develop a codebook and analyze interview transcripts. We specifically explored themes of effectiveness, benefits and limitations, communication strategies, and discordant perspectives between families and clinicians related to remote discussions.
Results: Respondents viewed phone and video communication as somewhat effective but inferior to in-person communication. Both clinicians and families believed phone calls were useful for information sharing and brief updates, whereas video calls were preferable for aligning clinician and family perspectives. Clinicians and families expressed discordant views on multiple topics-for example, clinicians worried they were unsuccessful in conveying empathy remotely, whereas families believed empathy was conveyed successfully via phone and video. Communication strategies suggested by families and clinicians for remote interactions include identifying a family point person to receive updates, frequently checking family understanding, positioning the camera on video calls to help family see the patient and their clinical setting, and offering time for the family and patient to interact without clinicians participating.
Conclusions: Telehealth communication between families and clinicians of ICU patients appears to be a somewhat effective alternative when in-person communication is not possible. Use of communication strategies specific to phone and video can improve clinician and family experiences with telehealth.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Amer Thoracic Soc</pub><pmid>33181033</pmid><doi>10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-729OC</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0314-6331</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-3222 |
ispartof | ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2021-05, Vol.18 (5), p.838-847 |
issn | 1546-3222 2329-6933 2325-6621 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_33181033 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Communication COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - psychology COVID-19 - therapy Emotional Intelligence Family - psychology Female Humans Infection Control - organization & administration Intensive care Intensive Care Units - ethics Intensive Care Units - organization & administration Life Sciences & Biomedicine Male Middle Aged Original Research Pennsylvania Physical Distancing Professional-Family Relations - ethics Qualitative Research Respiratory System SARS-CoV-2 Science & Technology Telecommunications - ethics Telecommunications - standards Telemedicine |
title | Perspectives on Telephone and Video Communication in the Intensive Care Unit during COVID-19 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T01%3A19%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perspectives%20on%20Telephone%20and%20Video%20Communication%20in%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20during%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=ANNALS%20OF%20THE%20AMERICAN%20THORACIC%20SOCIETY&rft.au=Kennedy,%20Niki%20R.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=838&rft.epage=847&rft.pages=838-847&rft.issn=1546-3222&rft.eissn=2325-6621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-729OC&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2523166234%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2523166234&rft_id=info:pmid/33181033&rfr_iscdi=true |