A Novel External Quality Assessment of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Based on Chimera Image Assembly
This study aimed to establish a new external quality assessment (EQA) of chromosomal karyotype analysis. Chimeric assembly A1 was established by collecting chimeric chromosome images prepared artificially from chromosomally abnormal amniocytes remaining after prenatal diagnosis. Chimeric assembly B1...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of clinical and laboratory science 2020-09, Vol.50 (5), p.674 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 674 |
container_title | Annals of clinical and laboratory science |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Weng, Bing-Huan Shen, Xiao-Yun Xu, Ya-Li Ying, Jun Xu, Wei Zou, Duo-Bing He, Li-Mei Jin, Keqin Li, Lan-Juan |
description | This study aimed to establish a new external quality assessment (EQA) of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
Chimeric assembly A1 was established by collecting chimeric chromosome images prepared artificially from chromosomally abnormal amniocytes remaining after prenatal diagnosis. Chimeric assembly B1 and nonchimeric assembly C1 were constructed through the collection of chimeric and nonchimeric chromosome images from prenatal diagnosis, respectively. Then, chromosome images were selected randomly from assemblies A1, B1, or C1 to send to 20 technicians via email to verify the validity of a new EQA of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
According to the EQA of 20 technicians, 47,XX,+mar from assembly A was easily misdiagnosed as 47,XX,+19 or 47,XXY, and 45,XX,t(13;22) (q10;q10) was misdiagnosed as 45,XX,13S
,-22. The total misdiagnosis rate was 3.8%. For assembly B, 46,X,+mar and 46,X,idic(Y) were easily misdiagnosed as 46,XY and 46,X,+mar, respectively. In addition, some testers missed 47,XXX in 47,XXX[2]/46,XX[48], as well as 47,XX,+18 in 46,XX [47]/47,XX,+18[3], and 45,X and 47,XXX in 46,XX[47]/45,X[2]/47,XXX[1]. The total misdiagnosis rate was 4.2%. All karyo-types from assembly C were correctly diagnosed, although incorrect descriptions used for 4% of cases.
The quality of chromosome karyotype analysis can be comprehensively evaluated by a new EQA based on assembly A1 or B1. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_33067215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33067215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p178t-7ea4b56abecbaf917dc71ed725e2d1b249d2fd4743e567d696d2eb90d01b132a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j9tKw0AURQdBbK3-gswPBOaaSR5jqVpaFEGfy5nOiUYymZCTivl7g5en_bL2Yu8ztpTWiqwQhViwS6IPIVRpjLhgC61F7pS0S4YVf0yf2PLN14hDBy1_PkHbjBOviJAoYjfyVPP1-5BiohRnYgfDlMapR17NhYka4rdAGHjqZq6JOADfRnjDH0f07XTFzmtoCa__csVe7zYv64ds_3S_XVf7rJeuGDOHYLzNwePRQ11KF45OYnDKogrSK1MGVQfjjEabu5CXeVDoSxGE9FIr0Ct28-vtTz5iOPRDE-exh_-_-hshGlIq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Novel External Quality Assessment of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Based on Chimera Image Assembly</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Weng, Bing-Huan ; Shen, Xiao-Yun ; Xu, Ya-Li ; Ying, Jun ; Xu, Wei ; Zou, Duo-Bing ; He, Li-Mei ; Jin, Keqin ; Li, Lan-Juan</creator><creatorcontrib>Weng, Bing-Huan ; Shen, Xiao-Yun ; Xu, Ya-Li ; Ying, Jun ; Xu, Wei ; Zou, Duo-Bing ; He, Li-Mei ; Jin, Keqin ; Li, Lan-Juan</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to establish a new external quality assessment (EQA) of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
Chimeric assembly A1 was established by collecting chimeric chromosome images prepared artificially from chromosomally abnormal amniocytes remaining after prenatal diagnosis. Chimeric assembly B1 and nonchimeric assembly C1 were constructed through the collection of chimeric and nonchimeric chromosome images from prenatal diagnosis, respectively. Then, chromosome images were selected randomly from assemblies A1, B1, or C1 to send to 20 technicians via email to verify the validity of a new EQA of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
According to the EQA of 20 technicians, 47,XX,+mar from assembly A was easily misdiagnosed as 47,XX,+19 or 47,XXY, and 45,XX,t(13;22) (q10;q10) was misdiagnosed as 45,XX,13S
,-22. The total misdiagnosis rate was 3.8%. For assembly B, 46,X,+mar and 46,X,idic(Y) were easily misdiagnosed as 46,XY and 46,X,+mar, respectively. In addition, some testers missed 47,XXX in 47,XXX[2]/46,XX[48], as well as 47,XX,+18 in 46,XX [47]/47,XX,+18[3], and 45,X and 47,XXX in 46,XX[47]/45,X[2]/47,XXX[1]. The total misdiagnosis rate was 4.2%. All karyo-types from assembly C were correctly diagnosed, although incorrect descriptions used for 4% of cases.
The quality of chromosome karyotype analysis can be comprehensively evaluated by a new EQA based on assembly A1 or B1.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1550-8080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33067215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>China ; Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Karyotype ; Karyotyping - methods ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Quality Control</subject><ispartof>Annals of clinical and laboratory science, 2020-09, Vol.50 (5), p.674</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Association of Clinical Scientists, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33067215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weng, Bing-Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xiao-Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ya-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Duo-Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Li-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Keqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lan-Juan</creatorcontrib><title>A Novel External Quality Assessment of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Based on Chimera Image Assembly</title><title>Annals of clinical and laboratory science</title><addtitle>Ann Clin Lab Sci</addtitle><description>This study aimed to establish a new external quality assessment (EQA) of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
Chimeric assembly A1 was established by collecting chimeric chromosome images prepared artificially from chromosomally abnormal amniocytes remaining after prenatal diagnosis. Chimeric assembly B1 and nonchimeric assembly C1 were constructed through the collection of chimeric and nonchimeric chromosome images from prenatal diagnosis, respectively. Then, chromosome images were selected randomly from assemblies A1, B1, or C1 to send to 20 technicians via email to verify the validity of a new EQA of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
According to the EQA of 20 technicians, 47,XX,+mar from assembly A was easily misdiagnosed as 47,XX,+19 or 47,XXY, and 45,XX,t(13;22) (q10;q10) was misdiagnosed as 45,XX,13S
,-22. The total misdiagnosis rate was 3.8%. For assembly B, 46,X,+mar and 46,X,idic(Y) were easily misdiagnosed as 46,XY and 46,X,+mar, respectively. In addition, some testers missed 47,XXX in 47,XXX[2]/46,XX[48], as well as 47,XX,+18 in 46,XX [47]/47,XX,+18[3], and 45,X and 47,XXX in 46,XX[47]/45,X[2]/47,XXX[1]. The total misdiagnosis rate was 4.2%. All karyo-types from assembly C were correctly diagnosed, although incorrect descriptions used for 4% of cases.
The quality of chromosome karyotype analysis can be comprehensively evaluated by a new EQA based on assembly A1 or B1.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Karyotype</subject><subject>Karyotyping - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><issn>1550-8080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j9tKw0AURQdBbK3-gswPBOaaSR5jqVpaFEGfy5nOiUYymZCTivl7g5en_bL2Yu8ztpTWiqwQhViwS6IPIVRpjLhgC61F7pS0S4YVf0yf2PLN14hDBy1_PkHbjBOviJAoYjfyVPP1-5BiohRnYgfDlMapR17NhYka4rdAGHjqZq6JOADfRnjDH0f07XTFzmtoCa__csVe7zYv64ds_3S_XVf7rJeuGDOHYLzNwePRQ11KF45OYnDKogrSK1MGVQfjjEabu5CXeVDoSxGE9FIr0Ct28-vtTz5iOPRDE-exh_-_-hshGlIq</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Weng, Bing-Huan</creator><creator>Shen, Xiao-Yun</creator><creator>Xu, Ya-Li</creator><creator>Ying, Jun</creator><creator>Xu, Wei</creator><creator>Zou, Duo-Bing</creator><creator>He, Li-Mei</creator><creator>Jin, Keqin</creator><creator>Li, Lan-Juan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>A Novel External Quality Assessment of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Based on Chimera Image Assembly</title><author>Weng, Bing-Huan ; Shen, Xiao-Yun ; Xu, Ya-Li ; Ying, Jun ; Xu, Wei ; Zou, Duo-Bing ; He, Li-Mei ; Jin, Keqin ; Li, Lan-Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p178t-7ea4b56abecbaf917dc71ed725e2d1b249d2fd4743e567d696d2eb90d01b132a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Karyotype</topic><topic>Karyotyping - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weng, Bing-Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Xiao-Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ya-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ying, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Duo-Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Li-Mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Keqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lan-Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Annals of clinical and laboratory science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weng, Bing-Huan</au><au>Shen, Xiao-Yun</au><au>Xu, Ya-Li</au><au>Ying, Jun</au><au>Xu, Wei</au><au>Zou, Duo-Bing</au><au>He, Li-Mei</au><au>Jin, Keqin</au><au>Li, Lan-Juan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Novel External Quality Assessment of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Based on Chimera Image Assembly</atitle><jtitle>Annals of clinical and laboratory science</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Clin Lab Sci</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>674</spage><pages>674-</pages><eissn>1550-8080</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to establish a new external quality assessment (EQA) of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
Chimeric assembly A1 was established by collecting chimeric chromosome images prepared artificially from chromosomally abnormal amniocytes remaining after prenatal diagnosis. Chimeric assembly B1 and nonchimeric assembly C1 were constructed through the collection of chimeric and nonchimeric chromosome images from prenatal diagnosis, respectively. Then, chromosome images were selected randomly from assemblies A1, B1, or C1 to send to 20 technicians via email to verify the validity of a new EQA of chromosomal karyotype analysis.
According to the EQA of 20 technicians, 47,XX,+mar from assembly A was easily misdiagnosed as 47,XX,+19 or 47,XXY, and 45,XX,t(13;22) (q10;q10) was misdiagnosed as 45,XX,13S
,-22. The total misdiagnosis rate was 3.8%. For assembly B, 46,X,+mar and 46,X,idic(Y) were easily misdiagnosed as 46,XY and 46,X,+mar, respectively. In addition, some testers missed 47,XXX in 47,XXX[2]/46,XX[48], as well as 47,XX,+18 in 46,XX [47]/47,XX,+18[3], and 45,X and 47,XXX in 46,XX[47]/45,X[2]/47,XXX[1]. The total misdiagnosis rate was 4.2%. All karyo-types from assembly C were correctly diagnosed, although incorrect descriptions used for 4% of cases.
The quality of chromosome karyotype analysis can be comprehensively evaluated by a new EQA based on assembly A1 or B1.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>33067215</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1550-8080 |
ispartof | Annals of clinical and laboratory science, 2020-09, Vol.50 (5), p.674 |
issn | 1550-8080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_33067215 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | China Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Karyotype Karyotyping - methods Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis - methods Quality Control |
title | A Novel External Quality Assessment of Chromosomal Karyotype Analysis Based on Chimera Image Assembly |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T18%3A35%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Novel%20External%20Quality%20Assessment%20of%20Chromosomal%20Karyotype%20Analysis%20Based%20on%20Chimera%20Image%20Assembly&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20clinical%20and%20laboratory%20science&rft.au=Weng,%20Bing-Huan&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=674&rft.pages=674-&rft.eissn=1550-8080&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E33067215%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33067215&rfr_iscdi=true |