Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses
Until recently, no study had compared the quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation treated with osseointegration to socket prosthesis users. Comparison of quality of life in two types of prostheses users: a cohort of patients with osseointegration and patients equipped with a socket p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Prosthetics and orthotics international 2021-02, Vol.45 (1), p.309364620948649-25 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 25 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 309364620948649 |
| container_title | Prosthetics and orthotics international |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Pospiech, Philip Thomas Wendlandt, Robert Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich Ziegert, Sibylle Schulz, Arndt Peter |
| description | Until recently, no study had compared the quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation treated with osseointegration to socket prosthesis users.
Comparison of quality of life in two types of prostheses users: a cohort of patients with osseointegration and patients equipped with a socket prosthesis who were group-matched for age, body mass index and mobility grade.
A cross-sectional study that compared.
The quality of life of 39 participants (22 in the osseointegration group and 17 in the socket prosthesis group) was measured using the Questionnaire for Persons with Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) and European Questionnaire 5-dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) surveys.
Compared with the socket prosthesis group, the osseointegration group had a significantly higher 'Global' score (
= 0.022) and a significantly lower 'Problem' score (
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0309364620948649 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32842870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2511239021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-cd4c9375c54bdd0fe80bb76a67cf9ee91bb9ebe2afbd8e87a145235b4255b8fc0</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozvjYu5Is3VSTNGkadzL4AkEEXZckvXGqbVOTlGH-vS0-EFdncc537uUgdELJOaVSXpCcqLzgBSOKlwVXO2hJJS8yKkS-i5aznc3-Ah3E-EZILpUi-2iRs5KzUpIl2jyNum3SFnuH28bBrAOE6PuIN01a4xR0Hx10PugW624Yk06N7y_xyneDDs2UnJno7TskPAQf0xoiRKz7GvsYwTd9gtegE9R_7CO053Qb4fhbD9HLzfXz6i57eLy9X109ZJZRnjJbc6tyKazgpq6Jg5IYIwtdSOsUgKLGKDDAtDN1CaXUlAuWC8OZEKZ0lhyis6_e6fTHCDFVXRMttK3uwY-xYoJSlivC6BQlX1E7fRkDuGoITafDtqKkmueu_s89Iaff7aPpoP4FfvYln5k1fmE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511239021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses</title><creator>Pospiech, Philip Thomas ; Wendlandt, Robert ; Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich ; Ziegert, Sibylle ; Schulz, Arndt Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Pospiech, Philip Thomas ; Wendlandt, Robert ; Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich ; Ziegert, Sibylle ; Schulz, Arndt Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Until recently, no study had compared the quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation treated with osseointegration to socket prosthesis users.
Comparison of quality of life in two types of prostheses users: a cohort of patients with osseointegration and patients equipped with a socket prosthesis who were group-matched for age, body mass index and mobility grade.
A cross-sectional study that compared.
The quality of life of 39 participants (22 in the osseointegration group and 17 in the socket prosthesis group) was measured using the Questionnaire for Persons with Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) and European Questionnaire 5-dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) surveys.
Compared with the socket prosthesis group, the osseointegration group had a significantly higher 'Global' score (
= 0.022) and a significantly lower 'Problem' score (
< 0.001) of the Q-TFA. The 'Mobility' (
= 0.051) and 'Use' scores (
= 0.146) of the Q-TFA, the EQ-5D-3L index (
= 0.723), and EQ-5D visual analog scale (
= 0.497) showed no significant differences between groups.
Patients with osseointegration experienced less prosthesis-associated problems than socket prosthesis users and had a higher prosthesis-associated quality of life when assessed with the Q-TFA. General quality of life, as assessed with the EQ-5D-3L, was not different between groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-3646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-1553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0309364620948649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32842870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France</publisher><ispartof>Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2021-02, Vol.45 (1), p.309364620948649-25</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-cd4c9375c54bdd0fe80bb76a67cf9ee91bb9ebe2afbd8e87a145235b4255b8fc0</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-cd4c9375c54bdd0fe80bb76a67cf9ee91bb9ebe2afbd8e87a145235b4255b8fc0</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8642-301X ; 0000-0002-4927-549X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>778</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32842870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pospiech, Philip Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegert, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Arndt Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses</title><title>Prosthetics and orthotics international</title><addtitle>Prosthet Orthot Int</addtitle><description>Until recently, no study had compared the quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation treated with osseointegration to socket prosthesis users.
Comparison of quality of life in two types of prostheses users: a cohort of patients with osseointegration and patients equipped with a socket prosthesis who were group-matched for age, body mass index and mobility grade.
A cross-sectional study that compared.
The quality of life of 39 participants (22 in the osseointegration group and 17 in the socket prosthesis group) was measured using the Questionnaire for Persons with Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) and European Questionnaire 5-dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) surveys.
Compared with the socket prosthesis group, the osseointegration group had a significantly higher 'Global' score (
= 0.022) and a significantly lower 'Problem' score (
< 0.001) of the Q-TFA. The 'Mobility' (
= 0.051) and 'Use' scores (
= 0.146) of the Q-TFA, the EQ-5D-3L index (
= 0.723), and EQ-5D visual analog scale (
= 0.497) showed no significant differences between groups.
Patients with osseointegration experienced less prosthesis-associated problems than socket prosthesis users and had a higher prosthesis-associated quality of life when assessed with the Q-TFA. General quality of life, as assessed with the EQ-5D-3L, was not different between groups.</description><issn>0309-3646</issn><issn>1746-1553</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMozvjYu5Is3VSTNGkadzL4AkEEXZckvXGqbVOTlGH-vS0-EFdncc537uUgdELJOaVSXpCcqLzgBSOKlwVXO2hJJS8yKkS-i5aznc3-Ah3E-EZILpUi-2iRs5KzUpIl2jyNum3SFnuH28bBrAOE6PuIN01a4xR0Hx10PugW624Yk06N7y_xyneDDs2UnJno7TskPAQf0xoiRKz7GvsYwTd9gtegE9R_7CO053Qb4fhbD9HLzfXz6i57eLy9X109ZJZRnjJbc6tyKazgpq6Jg5IYIwtdSOsUgKLGKDDAtDN1CaXUlAuWC8OZEKZ0lhyis6_e6fTHCDFVXRMttK3uwY-xYoJSlivC6BQlX1E7fRkDuGoITafDtqKkmueu_s89Iaff7aPpoP4FfvYln5k1fmE</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Pospiech, Philip Thomas</creator><creator>Wendlandt, Robert</creator><creator>Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich</creator><creator>Ziegert, Sibylle</creator><creator>Schulz, Arndt Peter</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8642-301X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-549X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses</title><author>Pospiech, Philip Thomas ; Wendlandt, Robert ; Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich ; Ziegert, Sibylle ; Schulz, Arndt Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-cd4c9375c54bdd0fe80bb76a67cf9ee91bb9ebe2afbd8e87a145235b4255b8fc0</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pospiech, Philip Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendlandt, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegert, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Arndt Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prosthetics and orthotics international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pospiech, Philip Thomas</au><au>Wendlandt, Robert</au><au>Aschoff, Horst-Heinrich</au><au>Ziegert, Sibylle</au><au>Schulz, Arndt Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses</atitle><jtitle>Prosthetics and orthotics international</jtitle><addtitle>Prosthet Orthot Int</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>309364620948649</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>309364620948649-25</pages><issn>0309-3646</issn><eissn>1746-1553</eissn><abstract>Until recently, no study had compared the quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation treated with osseointegration to socket prosthesis users.
Comparison of quality of life in two types of prostheses users: a cohort of patients with osseointegration and patients equipped with a socket prosthesis who were group-matched for age, body mass index and mobility grade.
A cross-sectional study that compared.
The quality of life of 39 participants (22 in the osseointegration group and 17 in the socket prosthesis group) was measured using the Questionnaire for Persons with Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) and European Questionnaire 5-dimension 3-level (EQ-5D-3L) surveys.
Compared with the socket prosthesis group, the osseointegration group had a significantly higher 'Global' score (
= 0.022) and a significantly lower 'Problem' score (
< 0.001) of the Q-TFA. The 'Mobility' (
= 0.051) and 'Use' scores (
= 0.146) of the Q-TFA, the EQ-5D-3L index (
= 0.723), and EQ-5D visual analog scale (
= 0.497) showed no significant differences between groups.
Patients with osseointegration experienced less prosthesis-associated problems than socket prosthesis users and had a higher prosthesis-associated quality of life when assessed with the Q-TFA. General quality of life, as assessed with the EQ-5D-3L, was not different between groups.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>32842870</pmid><doi>10.1177/0309364620948649</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8642-301X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4927-549X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | no_fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0309-3646 |
| ispartof | Prosthetics and orthotics international, 2021-02, Vol.45 (1), p.309364620948649-25 |
| issn | 0309-3646 1746-1553 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_32842870 |
| source | |
| title | Quality of life of persons with transfemoral amputation: Comparison of socket prostheses and osseointegrated prostheses |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20life%20of%20persons%20with%20transfemoral%20amputation:%20Comparison%20of%20socket%20prostheses%20and%20osseointegrated%20prostheses&rft.jtitle=Prosthetics%20and%20orthotics%20international&rft.au=Pospiech,%20Philip%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=309364620948649&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=309364620948649-25&rft.issn=0309-3646&rft.eissn=1746-1553&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0309364620948649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2511239021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511239021&rft_id=info:pmid/32842870&rfr_iscdi=true |