Morphometric evaluation of the alveolar bone around central incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment of high‐angle skeletal class III malocclusion
Objectives To evaluate morphometric characteristics of alveolar bone around the incisors of high‐angle skeletal class III patients receiving surgical orthodontic treatment. Setting and Sample Population Thirty high‐angle skeletal class III patients (mean age, 20.94 ± 3.25 years) underwent cone‐beam...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Orthodontics & craniofacial research 2021-02, Vol.24 (1), p.87-95 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 95 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 87 |
| container_title | Orthodontics & craniofacial research |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Ma, Huimin Li, Weiran Xu, Li Hou, Jianxia Wang, Xiaoxia Ding, Shuai Lv, Hangmiao Li, Xiaotong |
| description | Objectives
To evaluate morphometric characteristics of alveolar bone around the incisors of high‐angle skeletal class III patients receiving surgical orthodontic treatment.
Setting and Sample Population
Thirty high‐angle skeletal class III patients (mean age, 20.94 ± 3.25 years) underwent cone‐beam computed tomography before treatment (T0), after pre‐surgical orthodontic treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2).
Materials and Methods
The vertical bone level (VBL), alveolar bone thickness (ABT), alveolar bone area (ABA) and position of upper and lower central incisors (UCIs and LCIs) were evaluated. The ABT included five levels (4, 6, 8 mm from the cemento‐enamel junction, midroot and root apex level). One‐way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple‐comparison test and matched t test was performed to compare variables.
Results
Before treatment, the average labial ABT was approximately 1 mm in UCIs and 0.38 ~ 0.79 mm in LCIs, and the VBL of the LCIs was over 2 mm. After treatment, the VBL increased by 2.19 ± 1.96 mm (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ocr.12408 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32615016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478233350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-ad82ab285d47903e64af30e05754bd615b6a8231e1f66ade2ddb0fa67ca732ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtuFDEUhi0EIhcoeAFkiQaKTXyZ8UxKtOKyUlAkBPXojH1mx8FjL74kSscjUPN4eRIcNqRAwo1t-Tufj_0T8oKzE17HadDxhIuG9Y_IIVeMr5Rs5OOHtWwPyFFKl4wJJoR6Sg6kULxlXB2SX59C3M1hwRytpngFrkC2wdMw0TwjBXeFwUGkY_B1F0Pxhmr0OYKj1mubQkzUlGj9lqYSt1bXgxDzHEzwuTpzRMhLrbhTznY73_74CX7rkKZv6DBXXDtIiW42G7qAC1q7kmoLz8iTCVzC5_fzMfn6_t2X9cfV-cWHzfrt-UrLVvYrML2AUfStabozJlE1MEmGrO3aZjT1naOCXkiOfFIKDApjRjaB6jR0slbKY_J6793F8L1gysNik0bnwGMoaRCNYFwqyc4q-uof9DKU6Gt3lerqLfWvWaXe7CkdQ0oRp2EX7QLxZuBsuAtsqIENfwKr7Mt7YxkXNA_k34QqcLoHrq3Dm_-bhov1573yN_rzo6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478233350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morphometric evaluation of the alveolar bone around central incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment of high‐angle skeletal class III malocclusion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ma, Huimin ; Li, Weiran ; Xu, Li ; Hou, Jianxia ; Wang, Xiaoxia ; Ding, Shuai ; Lv, Hangmiao ; Li, Xiaotong</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Huimin ; Li, Weiran ; Xu, Li ; Hou, Jianxia ; Wang, Xiaoxia ; Ding, Shuai ; Lv, Hangmiao ; Li, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate morphometric characteristics of alveolar bone around the incisors of high‐angle skeletal class III patients receiving surgical orthodontic treatment.
Setting and Sample Population
Thirty high‐angle skeletal class III patients (mean age, 20.94 ± 3.25 years) underwent cone‐beam computed tomography before treatment (T0), after pre‐surgical orthodontic treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2).
Materials and Methods
The vertical bone level (VBL), alveolar bone thickness (ABT), alveolar bone area (ABA) and position of upper and lower central incisors (UCIs and LCIs) were evaluated. The ABT included five levels (4, 6, 8 mm from the cemento‐enamel junction, midroot and root apex level). One‐way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple‐comparison test and matched t test was performed to compare variables.
Results
Before treatment, the average labial ABT was approximately 1 mm in UCIs and 0.38 ~ 0.79 mm in LCIs, and the VBL of the LCIs was over 2 mm. After treatment, the VBL increased by 2.19 ± 1.96 mm (P < .001) on the lingual side of UCIs and 2.78 ± 2.29 mm and 3.09 ± 2.52 mm on the labial and lingual sides of LCIs, respectively (all P < .001). ABT at every level decreased significantly, decreasing by 1.66 ± 1.93 mm at the 8 mm level of UCIs and 1.06 ± 1.01 mm at the apex of LCIs (P < .001). The lingual ABA of UCIs and LCIs decreased by over 50% (P < .001).
Conclusions
In high‐angle skeletal class III patients, the condition of alveolar bone around UCIs and LCIs was extremely poor before treatment. Further alveolar bone resorption occurred during surgical orthodontic treatment. More attention should be paid to the movement of anterior teeth in cases of severe alveolar bone loss.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1601-6335</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1601-6343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32615016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Alveolar bone ; alveolar bone around central incisors ; Bone loss ; Bone resorption ; Cephalometry ; Computed tomography ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dental enamel ; Dental occlusion ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Incisor - diagnostic imaging ; Incisors ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III - diagnostic imaging ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - surgery ; Maxilla ; Orthodontics ; skeletal class III malocclusion ; surgical orthodontic treatment ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2021-02, Vol.24 (1), p.87-95</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-ad82ab285d47903e64af30e05754bd615b6a8231e1f66ade2ddb0fa67ca732ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-ad82ab285d47903e64af30e05754bd615b6a8231e1f66ade2ddb0fa67ca732ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1817-0625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Focr.12408$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Focr.12408$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32615016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Huimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Weiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Jianxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hangmiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><title>Morphometric evaluation of the alveolar bone around central incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment of high‐angle skeletal class III malocclusion</title><title>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</title><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate morphometric characteristics of alveolar bone around the incisors of high‐angle skeletal class III patients receiving surgical orthodontic treatment.
Setting and Sample Population
Thirty high‐angle skeletal class III patients (mean age, 20.94 ± 3.25 years) underwent cone‐beam computed tomography before treatment (T0), after pre‐surgical orthodontic treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2).
Materials and Methods
The vertical bone level (VBL), alveolar bone thickness (ABT), alveolar bone area (ABA) and position of upper and lower central incisors (UCIs and LCIs) were evaluated. The ABT included five levels (4, 6, 8 mm from the cemento‐enamel junction, midroot and root apex level). One‐way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple‐comparison test and matched t test was performed to compare variables.
Results
Before treatment, the average labial ABT was approximately 1 mm in UCIs and 0.38 ~ 0.79 mm in LCIs, and the VBL of the LCIs was over 2 mm. After treatment, the VBL increased by 2.19 ± 1.96 mm (P < .001) on the lingual side of UCIs and 2.78 ± 2.29 mm and 3.09 ± 2.52 mm on the labial and lingual sides of LCIs, respectively (all P < .001). ABT at every level decreased significantly, decreasing by 1.66 ± 1.93 mm at the 8 mm level of UCIs and 1.06 ± 1.01 mm at the apex of LCIs (P < .001). The lingual ABA of UCIs and LCIs decreased by over 50% (P < .001).
Conclusions
In high‐angle skeletal class III patients, the condition of alveolar bone around UCIs and LCIs was extremely poor before treatment. Further alveolar bone resorption occurred during surgical orthodontic treatment. More attention should be paid to the movement of anterior teeth in cases of severe alveolar bone loss.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alveolar bone</subject><subject>alveolar bone around central incisors</subject><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>Bone resorption</subject><subject>Cephalometry</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dental occlusion</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>skeletal class III malocclusion</subject><subject>surgical orthodontic treatment</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1601-6335</issn><issn>1601-6343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtuFDEUhi0EIhcoeAFkiQaKTXyZ8UxKtOKyUlAkBPXojH1mx8FjL74kSscjUPN4eRIcNqRAwo1t-Tufj_0T8oKzE17HadDxhIuG9Y_IIVeMr5Rs5OOHtWwPyFFKl4wJJoR6Sg6kULxlXB2SX59C3M1hwRytpngFrkC2wdMw0TwjBXeFwUGkY_B1F0Pxhmr0OYKj1mubQkzUlGj9lqYSt1bXgxDzHEzwuTpzRMhLrbhTznY73_74CX7rkKZv6DBXXDtIiW42G7qAC1q7kmoLz8iTCVzC5_fzMfn6_t2X9cfV-cWHzfrt-UrLVvYrML2AUfStabozJlE1MEmGrO3aZjT1naOCXkiOfFIKDApjRjaB6jR0slbKY_J6793F8L1gysNik0bnwGMoaRCNYFwqyc4q-uof9DKU6Gt3lerqLfWvWaXe7CkdQ0oRp2EX7QLxZuBsuAtsqIENfwKr7Mt7YxkXNA_k34QqcLoHrq3Dm_-bhov1573yN_rzo6I</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Ma, Huimin</creator><creator>Li, Weiran</creator><creator>Xu, Li</creator><creator>Hou, Jianxia</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaoxia</creator><creator>Ding, Shuai</creator><creator>Lv, Hangmiao</creator><creator>Li, Xiaotong</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-0625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Morphometric evaluation of the alveolar bone around central incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment of high‐angle skeletal class III malocclusion</title><author>Ma, Huimin ; Li, Weiran ; Xu, Li ; Hou, Jianxia ; Wang, Xiaoxia ; Ding, Shuai ; Lv, Hangmiao ; Li, Xiaotong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-ad82ab285d47903e64af30e05754bd615b6a8231e1f66ade2ddb0fa67ca732ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alveolar bone</topic><topic>alveolar bone around central incisors</topic><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>Bone resorption</topic><topic>Cephalometry</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dental occlusion</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>skeletal class III malocclusion</topic><topic>surgical orthodontic treatment</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Huimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Weiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Jianxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Hangmiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaotong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Huimin</au><au>Li, Weiran</au><au>Xu, Li</au><au>Hou, Jianxia</au><au>Wang, Xiaoxia</au><au>Ding, Shuai</au><au>Lv, Hangmiao</au><au>Li, Xiaotong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morphometric evaluation of the alveolar bone around central incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment of high‐angle skeletal class III malocclusion</atitle><jtitle>Orthodontics & craniofacial research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthod Craniofac Res</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>87-95</pages><issn>1601-6335</issn><eissn>1601-6343</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate morphometric characteristics of alveolar bone around the incisors of high‐angle skeletal class III patients receiving surgical orthodontic treatment.
Setting and Sample Population
Thirty high‐angle skeletal class III patients (mean age, 20.94 ± 3.25 years) underwent cone‐beam computed tomography before treatment (T0), after pre‐surgical orthodontic treatment (T1) and after treatment (T2).
Materials and Methods
The vertical bone level (VBL), alveolar bone thickness (ABT), alveolar bone area (ABA) and position of upper and lower central incisors (UCIs and LCIs) were evaluated. The ABT included five levels (4, 6, 8 mm from the cemento‐enamel junction, midroot and root apex level). One‐way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple‐comparison test and matched t test was performed to compare variables.
Results
Before treatment, the average labial ABT was approximately 1 mm in UCIs and 0.38 ~ 0.79 mm in LCIs, and the VBL of the LCIs was over 2 mm. After treatment, the VBL increased by 2.19 ± 1.96 mm (P < .001) on the lingual side of UCIs and 2.78 ± 2.29 mm and 3.09 ± 2.52 mm on the labial and lingual sides of LCIs, respectively (all P < .001). ABT at every level decreased significantly, decreasing by 1.66 ± 1.93 mm at the 8 mm level of UCIs and 1.06 ± 1.01 mm at the apex of LCIs (P < .001). The lingual ABA of UCIs and LCIs decreased by over 50% (P < .001).
Conclusions
In high‐angle skeletal class III patients, the condition of alveolar bone around UCIs and LCIs was extremely poor before treatment. Further alveolar bone resorption occurred during surgical orthodontic treatment. More attention should be paid to the movement of anterior teeth in cases of severe alveolar bone loss.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32615016</pmid><doi>10.1111/ocr.12408</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-0625</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1601-6335 |
| ispartof | Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2021-02, Vol.24 (1), p.87-95 |
| issn | 1601-6335 1601-6343 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_32615016 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Alveolar bone alveolar bone around central incisors Bone loss Bone resorption Cephalometry Computed tomography Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dental enamel Dental occlusion Dentistry Humans Incisor - diagnostic imaging Incisors Malocclusion, Angle Class III - diagnostic imaging Malocclusion, Angle Class III - surgery Mandible - diagnostic imaging Mandible - surgery Maxilla Orthodontics skeletal class III malocclusion surgical orthodontic treatment Young Adult |
| title | Morphometric evaluation of the alveolar bone around central incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment of high‐angle skeletal class III malocclusion |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A20%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morphometric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20alveolar%20bone%20around%20central%20incisors%20during%20surgical%20orthodontic%20treatment%20of%20high%E2%80%90angle%20skeletal%20class%20III%20malocclusion&rft.jtitle=Orthodontics%20&%20craniofacial%20research&rft.au=Ma,%20Huimin&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=87-95&rft.issn=1601-6335&rft.eissn=1601-6343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ocr.12408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478233350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478233350&rft_id=info:pmid/32615016&rfr_iscdi=true |