Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults: A Review of Validated Questionnaires From a Nutritionist’s Point of View

Physical activity (PA) is a component of total energy expenditure. PA and PA energy expenditure (PAEE) can be estimated by objective techniques (OTs). However, the use of questionnaires is frequent in clinical settings and epidemiological studies. We conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, and Google...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation & the health professions 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.235-254, Article 0163278720928500
Hauptverfasser: Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia, Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel, Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E., De Leon, Lidia G., Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 254
container_issue 4
container_start_page 235
container_title Evaluation & the health professions
container_volume 43
creator Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia
Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel
Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E.
De Leon, Lidia G.
Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia
description Physical activity (PA) is a component of total energy expenditure. PA and PA energy expenditure (PAEE) can be estimated by objective techniques (OTs). However, the use of questionnaires is frequent in clinical settings and epidemiological studies. We conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to perform a review of studies reporting the reliability and validity of PA questionnaires validated against OTs—doubly labeled water (DLW) or accelerometers—in free-living adults. We selected original articles published between 2009 and 2019 that reported validation studies of PA questionnaires. We identified 53 studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Four PA questionnaires were validated against DLW and the remaining against accelerometers. Three questionnaires were compared with both DLW and accelerometer results. The correlation between questionnaire-estimated PAEE and DLW results ranged from r = .22 to r = .46, while that between questionnaire-estimated total PA (TPA) and accelerometer results ranged from r = .11 to r = .54 The intraclass correlation coefficients were between .56 and .84. Despite having good reliability, most of the questionnaires included in this review have shown limited validity for estimating TPA in adults. OTs should be considered as a first option, when possible. Further research is warranted on techniques to obtain more accurate PA and PAEE estimates.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0163278720928500
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32567363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0163278720928500</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2415837400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-561d975f6223cc7812fb31743be914ac92c835f54454f65644de6b864c1789933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9r1jAYxYM43Ov03isJeCNIZ_4n9a68uCmMbYrutqRpqhltM_ukG--dX2Nfz09iSueEgeBVQp7fOTnJQegFJYeUav2WUMWZNpqRkhlJyCO0oVKygpfUPEabZVws8330FOCSEMqk1E_QPmdSaa74Bs0VgAcY_Jhw7PD59x0EZ3tcuRSuQ9rhMOKqnfsE73CFP_vr4G8W8ML2obXJt_jT7CGFOI42TB7w0RQHbPHpnKawHAdIv37eAj6PYb3iIjs8Q3ud7cE_v1sP0Nej91-2H4qTs-OP2-qkcILTVEhF21LLTjHGndOGsq7hVAve-JIK60rmDJedFEKKTkklROtVY5RwVJuy5PwAvV59r6b4Y8lZDwGc73s7-jhDzQSVhmtBSEZfPUAv4zyNOV2mhDbEaEEzRVbKTRFg8l19NYXBTruaknqppH5YSZa8vDOem8G394I_HWTArMCNb2IHLvjR-XuMECIF40bxvCN0G5JdvnUb5zFl6Zv_l2a6WGmw3_zf5_0z-W_JpbMX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447808741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults: A Review of Validated Questionnaires From a Nutritionist’s Point of View</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia ; Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel ; Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E. ; De Leon, Lidia G. ; Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia</creator><creatorcontrib>Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia ; Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel ; Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E. ; De Leon, Lidia G. ; Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia</creatorcontrib><description>Physical activity (PA) is a component of total energy expenditure. PA and PA energy expenditure (PAEE) can be estimated by objective techniques (OTs). However, the use of questionnaires is frequent in clinical settings and epidemiological studies. We conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to perform a review of studies reporting the reliability and validity of PA questionnaires validated against OTs—doubly labeled water (DLW) or accelerometers—in free-living adults. We selected original articles published between 2009 and 2019 that reported validation studies of PA questionnaires. We identified 53 studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Four PA questionnaires were validated against DLW and the remaining against accelerometers. Three questionnaires were compared with both DLW and accelerometer results. The correlation between questionnaire-estimated PAEE and DLW results ranged from r = .22 to r = .46, while that between questionnaire-estimated total PA (TPA) and accelerometer results ranged from r = .11 to r = .54 The intraclass correlation coefficients were between .56 and .84. Despite having good reliability, most of the questionnaires included in this review have shown limited validity for estimating TPA in adults. OTs should be considered as a first option, when possible. Further research is warranted on techniques to obtain more accurate PA and PAEE estimates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0163278720928500</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32567363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Correlation ; Exercise ; Health administration ; Health Care Sciences &amp; Services ; Health Policy &amp; Services ; Health technology assessment ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Physical activity ; Questionnaires ; Reliability ; Science &amp; Technology ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Evaluation &amp; the health professions, 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.235-254, Article 0163278720928500</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>3</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000542386300001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-561d975f6223cc7812fb31743be914ac92c835f54454f65644de6b864c1789933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-561d975f6223cc7812fb31743be914ac92c835f54454f65644de6b864c1789933</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5541-5308</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0163278720928500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163278720928500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21823,27928,27929,31003,43625,43626</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32567363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Leon, Lidia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults: A Review of Validated Questionnaires From a Nutritionist’s Point of View</title><title>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</title><addtitle>EVAL HEALTH PROF</addtitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><description>Physical activity (PA) is a component of total energy expenditure. PA and PA energy expenditure (PAEE) can be estimated by objective techniques (OTs). However, the use of questionnaires is frequent in clinical settings and epidemiological studies. We conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to perform a review of studies reporting the reliability and validity of PA questionnaires validated against OTs—doubly labeled water (DLW) or accelerometers—in free-living adults. We selected original articles published between 2009 and 2019 that reported validation studies of PA questionnaires. We identified 53 studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Four PA questionnaires were validated against DLW and the remaining against accelerometers. Three questionnaires were compared with both DLW and accelerometer results. The correlation between questionnaire-estimated PAEE and DLW results ranged from r = .22 to r = .46, while that between questionnaire-estimated total PA (TPA) and accelerometer results ranged from r = .11 to r = .54 The intraclass correlation coefficients were between .56 and .84. Despite having good reliability, most of the questionnaires included in this review have shown limited validity for estimating TPA in adults. OTs should be considered as a first option, when possible. Further research is warranted on techniques to obtain more accurate PA and PAEE estimates.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health Care Sciences &amp; Services</subject><subject>Health Policy &amp; Services</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0163-2787</issn><issn>1552-3918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9r1jAYxYM43Ov03isJeCNIZ_4n9a68uCmMbYrutqRpqhltM_ukG--dX2Nfz09iSueEgeBVQp7fOTnJQegFJYeUav2WUMWZNpqRkhlJyCO0oVKygpfUPEabZVws8330FOCSEMqk1E_QPmdSaa74Bs0VgAcY_Jhw7PD59x0EZ3tcuRSuQ9rhMOKqnfsE73CFP_vr4G8W8ML2obXJt_jT7CGFOI42TB7w0RQHbPHpnKawHAdIv37eAj6PYb3iIjs8Q3ud7cE_v1sP0Nej91-2H4qTs-OP2-qkcILTVEhF21LLTjHGndOGsq7hVAve-JIK60rmDJedFEKKTkklROtVY5RwVJuy5PwAvV59r6b4Y8lZDwGc73s7-jhDzQSVhmtBSEZfPUAv4zyNOV2mhDbEaEEzRVbKTRFg8l19NYXBTruaknqppH5YSZa8vDOem8G394I_HWTArMCNb2IHLvjR-XuMECIF40bxvCN0G5JdvnUb5zFl6Zv_l2a6WGmw3_zf5_0z-W_JpbMX</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia</creator><creator>Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel</creator><creator>Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E.</creator><creator>De Leon, Lidia G.</creator><creator>Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-5308</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults: A Review of Validated Questionnaires From a Nutritionist’s Point of View</title><author>Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia ; Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel ; Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E. ; De Leon, Lidia G. ; Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-561d975f6223cc7812fb31743be914ac92c835f54454f65644de6b864c1789933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health Care Sciences &amp; Services</topic><topic>Health Policy &amp; Services</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Leon, Lidia G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bacelis-Rivero, Angela Patricia</au><au>Vazquez-Rodriguez, Anabel</au><au>Carrasco-Legleu, Claudia E.</au><au>De Leon, Lidia G.</au><au>Reza-Lopez, Sandra Alicia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults: A Review of Validated Questionnaires From a Nutritionist’s Point of View</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</jtitle><stitle>EVAL HEALTH PROF</stitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>235-254</pages><artnum>0163278720928500</artnum><issn>0163-2787</issn><eissn>1552-3918</eissn><abstract>Physical activity (PA) is a component of total energy expenditure. PA and PA energy expenditure (PAEE) can be estimated by objective techniques (OTs). However, the use of questionnaires is frequent in clinical settings and epidemiological studies. We conducted a search on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to perform a review of studies reporting the reliability and validity of PA questionnaires validated against OTs—doubly labeled water (DLW) or accelerometers—in free-living adults. We selected original articles published between 2009 and 2019 that reported validation studies of PA questionnaires. We identified 53 studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Four PA questionnaires were validated against DLW and the remaining against accelerometers. Three questionnaires were compared with both DLW and accelerometer results. The correlation between questionnaire-estimated PAEE and DLW results ranged from r = .22 to r = .46, while that between questionnaire-estimated total PA (TPA) and accelerometer results ranged from r = .11 to r = .54 The intraclass correlation coefficients were between .56 and .84. Despite having good reliability, most of the questionnaires included in this review have shown limited validity for estimating TPA in adults. OTs should be considered as a first option, when possible. Further research is warranted on techniques to obtain more accurate PA and PAEE estimates.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32567363</pmid><doi>10.1177/0163278720928500</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-5308</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-2787
ispartof Evaluation & the health professions, 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.235-254, Article 0163278720928500
issn 0163-2787
1552-3918
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_32567363
source Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adults
Correlation
Exercise
Health administration
Health Care Sciences & Services
Health Policy & Services
Health technology assessment
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physical activity
Questionnaires
Reliability
Science & Technology
Validation studies
Validity
title Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults: A Review of Validated Questionnaires From a Nutritionist’s Point of View
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A20%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Physical%20Activity%20in%20Adults:%20A%20Review%20of%20Validated%20Questionnaires%20From%20a%20Nutritionist%E2%80%99s%20Point%20of%20View&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20&%20the%20health%20professions&rft.au=Bacelis-Rivero,%20Angela%20Patricia&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=235-254&rft.artnum=0163278720928500&rft.issn=0163-2787&rft.eissn=1552-3918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0163278720928500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2415837400%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447808741&rft_id=info:pmid/32567363&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0163278720928500&rfr_iscdi=true