The effect of surgical trauma on circulating free DNA levels in cancer patients—implications for studies of circulating tumor DNA

Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) post‐treatment is an emerging marker of residual disease. ctDNA constitutes only a minor fraction of the cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in cancer patients, complicating ctDNA detection. This is exacerbated by trauma‐induced cfDNA. To guide optimal blood...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular oncology 2020-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1670-1679
Hauptverfasser: Henriksen, Tenna V., Reinert, Thomas, Christensen, Emil, Sethi, Himanshu, Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin, Gögenur, Mikail, Gögenur, Ismail, Zimmermann, Bernhard G., Dyrskjøt, Lars, Andersen, Claus L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1679
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1670
container_title Molecular oncology
container_volume 14
creator Henriksen, Tenna V.
Reinert, Thomas
Christensen, Emil
Sethi, Himanshu
Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin
Gögenur, Mikail
Gögenur, Ismail
Zimmermann, Bernhard G.
Dyrskjøt, Lars
Andersen, Claus L.
description Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) post‐treatment is an emerging marker of residual disease. ctDNA constitutes only a minor fraction of the cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in cancer patients, complicating ctDNA detection. This is exacerbated by trauma‐induced cfDNA. To guide optimal blood sample timing, we investigated the duration and magnitude of surgical trauma‐induced cfDNA in patients with colorectal or bladder cancer. DNA levels were quantified in paired plasma samples collected before and up to 6 weeks after surgery from 436 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. To assess whether trauma‐induced cfDNA fragments are longer than ordinary cfDNA fragments, the concentration of short ( 1 kb) fragments was determined for 91 patients. Previously reported ctDNA data from 91 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with bladder cancer were used to assess how trauma‐induced DNA affects ctDNA detection. The total cfDNA level increased postoperatively—both in patients with colorectal cancer (mean threefold) and bladder cancer (mean eightfold). The DNA levels were significantly increased up to 4 weeks after surgery in both patient cohorts (P = 0.0005 and P ≤ 0.0001). The concentration of short, but not long, cfDNA fragments increased postoperatively. Of 25 patients with radiological relapse, eight were ctDNA‐positive and 17 were ctDNA‐negative in the period with trauma‐induced DNA. Analysis of longitudinal samples revealed that five of the negative patients became positive shortly after the release of trauma‐induced cfDNA had ceased. In conclusion, surgery was associated with elevated cfDNA levels, persisting up to 4 weeks, which may have masked ctDNA in relapse patients. Trauma‐induced cfDNA was of similar size to ordinary cfDNA. To mitigate the impact of trauma‐induced cfDNA on ctDNA detection, it is recommended that a second blood sample collected after week 4 is analyzed for patients initially ctDNA negative. We studied the change in circulating DNA levels resulting from cancer surgery. Surgical trauma caused an increase in the level of circulating DNA, which persisted up to 4 weeks after surgery. Detection of circulating tumor DNA after surgery was hampered by increased circulating DNA levels.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1878-0261.12729
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32471011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1a0853f72d514abf8dadcf4dce6648a3</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2408205006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-645e012791e25d4a8f2b7ee8f151e31d199c89c4f96882e40474b9c4f7d030bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEoqVw5oYscUFC244dJ7YvSNXyr9JCL-VsOc5461U2XuykqDckXoEn5ElwdpdVywVycTzzm08z468onlM4pQDsjEohZ8BqekqZYOpBcXyIPMz_leAzIRU9Kp6ktAKoalWrx8VRybigQOlx8ePqGgk6h3YgwZE0xqW3piNDNOPakNAT66MdOzP4fklcRCRvP5-TDm-wS8TntOktRrLJAPZD-vX9p19vuqwx-NAn4kIkaRhbj2nSvys2jOuczGpPi0fOdAmf7c-T4sv7d1fzj7PF5YeL-fliZmsANat5hZDHVBRZ1XIjHWsEonS0oljSliplpbLcqVpKhhy44M10Fy2U0LTlSXGx022DWelN9GsTb3UwXm8DIS61iYO3HWpqQFalE6ytKDeNk61preOtxbrm0pRZ681OazM2a8zxPm-suyd6P9P7a70MN1pwACFUFni1F4jh64hp0GufLHad6TGMSTMOkkEFUGf05V_oKoyxz6vKVAnAVVlXmTrbUTaGlCK6QzMU9GQWPVlDT9bQW7Pkihd3Zzjwf9yRgdc74Bs2wSWbX9jiAYPsp7xkntvM30TL_6fnftg6ZB7Gfsil9b7Ud3j7r8b1p8sF243wG6w-7CE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430049365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of surgical trauma on circulating free DNA levels in cancer patients—implications for studies of circulating tumor DNA</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Henriksen, Tenna V. ; Reinert, Thomas ; Christensen, Emil ; Sethi, Himanshu ; Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin ; Gögenur, Mikail ; Gögenur, Ismail ; Zimmermann, Bernhard G. ; Dyrskjøt, Lars ; Andersen, Claus L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henriksen, Tenna V. ; Reinert, Thomas ; Christensen, Emil ; Sethi, Himanshu ; Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin ; Gögenur, Mikail ; Gögenur, Ismail ; Zimmermann, Bernhard G. ; Dyrskjøt, Lars ; Andersen, Claus L. ; IMPROVE Study Grp ; IMPROVE study group ; The IMPROVE Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) post‐treatment is an emerging marker of residual disease. ctDNA constitutes only a minor fraction of the cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in cancer patients, complicating ctDNA detection. This is exacerbated by trauma‐induced cfDNA. To guide optimal blood sample timing, we investigated the duration and magnitude of surgical trauma‐induced cfDNA in patients with colorectal or bladder cancer. DNA levels were quantified in paired plasma samples collected before and up to 6 weeks after surgery from 436 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. To assess whether trauma‐induced cfDNA fragments are longer than ordinary cfDNA fragments, the concentration of short (&lt; 1 kb) and long (&gt; 1 kb) fragments was determined for 91 patients. Previously reported ctDNA data from 91 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with bladder cancer were used to assess how trauma‐induced DNA affects ctDNA detection. The total cfDNA level increased postoperatively—both in patients with colorectal cancer (mean threefold) and bladder cancer (mean eightfold). The DNA levels were significantly increased up to 4 weeks after surgery in both patient cohorts (P = 0.0005 and P ≤ 0.0001). The concentration of short, but not long, cfDNA fragments increased postoperatively. Of 25 patients with radiological relapse, eight were ctDNA‐positive and 17 were ctDNA‐negative in the period with trauma‐induced DNA. Analysis of longitudinal samples revealed that five of the negative patients became positive shortly after the release of trauma‐induced cfDNA had ceased. In conclusion, surgery was associated with elevated cfDNA levels, persisting up to 4 weeks, which may have masked ctDNA in relapse patients. Trauma‐induced cfDNA was of similar size to ordinary cfDNA. To mitigate the impact of trauma‐induced cfDNA on ctDNA detection, it is recommended that a second blood sample collected after week 4 is analyzed for patients initially ctDNA negative. We studied the change in circulating DNA levels resulting from cancer surgery. Surgical trauma caused an increase in the level of circulating DNA, which persisted up to 4 weeks after surgery. Detection of circulating tumor DNA after surgery was hampered by increased circulating DNA levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1574-7891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12729</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32471011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Bladder cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer surgery ; cell‐free DNA ; Chemotherapy ; circulating tumor DNA ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Invasiveness ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Oncology ; Patients ; Plasma ; Science &amp; Technology ; Studies ; Surgery ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Molecular oncology, 2020-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1670-1679</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>100</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000540448200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-645e012791e25d4a8f2b7ee8f151e31d199c89c4f96882e40474b9c4f7d030bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-645e012791e25d4a8f2b7ee8f151e31d199c89c4f96882e40474b9c4f7d030bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7406-2103 ; 0000-0002-8541-1735 ; 0000-0002-5787-8901 ; 0000-0003-4835-4804 ; 0000-0001-7061-9851</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400779/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400779/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,1418,2103,2115,11567,27929,27930,28253,45579,45580,46057,46481,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henriksen, Tenna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinert, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gögenur, Mikail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gögenur, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Bernhard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyrskjøt, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Claus L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMPROVE Study Grp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMPROVE study group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The IMPROVE Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of surgical trauma on circulating free DNA levels in cancer patients—implications for studies of circulating tumor DNA</title><title>Molecular oncology</title><addtitle>MOL ONCOL</addtitle><addtitle>Mol Oncol</addtitle><description>Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) post‐treatment is an emerging marker of residual disease. ctDNA constitutes only a minor fraction of the cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in cancer patients, complicating ctDNA detection. This is exacerbated by trauma‐induced cfDNA. To guide optimal blood sample timing, we investigated the duration and magnitude of surgical trauma‐induced cfDNA in patients with colorectal or bladder cancer. DNA levels were quantified in paired plasma samples collected before and up to 6 weeks after surgery from 436 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. To assess whether trauma‐induced cfDNA fragments are longer than ordinary cfDNA fragments, the concentration of short (&lt; 1 kb) and long (&gt; 1 kb) fragments was determined for 91 patients. Previously reported ctDNA data from 91 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with bladder cancer were used to assess how trauma‐induced DNA affects ctDNA detection. The total cfDNA level increased postoperatively—both in patients with colorectal cancer (mean threefold) and bladder cancer (mean eightfold). The DNA levels were significantly increased up to 4 weeks after surgery in both patient cohorts (P = 0.0005 and P ≤ 0.0001). The concentration of short, but not long, cfDNA fragments increased postoperatively. Of 25 patients with radiological relapse, eight were ctDNA‐positive and 17 were ctDNA‐negative in the period with trauma‐induced DNA. Analysis of longitudinal samples revealed that five of the negative patients became positive shortly after the release of trauma‐induced cfDNA had ceased. In conclusion, surgery was associated with elevated cfDNA levels, persisting up to 4 weeks, which may have masked ctDNA in relapse patients. Trauma‐induced cfDNA was of similar size to ordinary cfDNA. To mitigate the impact of trauma‐induced cfDNA on ctDNA detection, it is recommended that a second blood sample collected after week 4 is analyzed for patients initially ctDNA negative. We studied the change in circulating DNA levels resulting from cancer surgery. Surgical trauma caused an increase in the level of circulating DNA, which persisted up to 4 weeks after surgery. Detection of circulating tumor DNA after surgery was hampered by increased circulating DNA levels.</description><subject>Bladder cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>cell‐free DNA</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>circulating tumor DNA</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>1574-7891</issn><issn>1878-0261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEoqVw5oYscUFC244dJ7YvSNXyr9JCL-VsOc5461U2XuykqDckXoEn5ElwdpdVywVycTzzm08z468onlM4pQDsjEohZ8BqekqZYOpBcXyIPMz_leAzIRU9Kp6ktAKoalWrx8VRybigQOlx8ePqGgk6h3YgwZE0xqW3piNDNOPakNAT66MdOzP4fklcRCRvP5-TDm-wS8TntOktRrLJAPZD-vX9p19vuqwx-NAn4kIkaRhbj2nSvys2jOuczGpPi0fOdAmf7c-T4sv7d1fzj7PF5YeL-fliZmsANat5hZDHVBRZ1XIjHWsEonS0oljSliplpbLcqVpKhhy44M10Fy2U0LTlSXGx022DWelN9GsTb3UwXm8DIS61iYO3HWpqQFalE6ytKDeNk61preOtxbrm0pRZ681OazM2a8zxPm-suyd6P9P7a70MN1pwACFUFni1F4jh64hp0GufLHad6TGMSTMOkkEFUGf05V_oKoyxz6vKVAnAVVlXmTrbUTaGlCK6QzMU9GQWPVlDT9bQW7Pkihd3Zzjwf9yRgdc74Bs2wSWbX9jiAYPsp7xkntvM30TL_6fnftg6ZB7Gfsil9b7Ud3j7r8b1p8sF243wG6w-7CE</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Henriksen, Tenna V.</creator><creator>Reinert, Thomas</creator><creator>Christensen, Emil</creator><creator>Sethi, Himanshu</creator><creator>Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin</creator><creator>Gögenur, Mikail</creator><creator>Gögenur, Ismail</creator><creator>Zimmermann, Bernhard G.</creator><creator>Dyrskjøt, Lars</creator><creator>Andersen, Claus L.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7406-2103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8541-1735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5787-8901</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4835-4804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-9851</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>The effect of surgical trauma on circulating free DNA levels in cancer patients—implications for studies of circulating tumor DNA</title><author>Henriksen, Tenna V. ; Reinert, Thomas ; Christensen, Emil ; Sethi, Himanshu ; Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin ; Gögenur, Mikail ; Gögenur, Ismail ; Zimmermann, Bernhard G. ; Dyrskjøt, Lars ; Andersen, Claus L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6009-645e012791e25d4a8f2b7ee8f151e31d199c89c4f96882e40474b9c4f7d030bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bladder cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>cell‐free DNA</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>circulating tumor DNA</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henriksen, Tenna V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinert, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethi, Himanshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gögenur, Mikail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gögenur, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Bernhard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyrskjøt, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Claus L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMPROVE Study Grp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IMPROVE study group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The IMPROVE Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Molecular oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henriksen, Tenna V.</au><au>Reinert, Thomas</au><au>Christensen, Emil</au><au>Sethi, Himanshu</au><au>Birkenkamp‐Demtröder, Karin</au><au>Gögenur, Mikail</au><au>Gögenur, Ismail</au><au>Zimmermann, Bernhard G.</au><au>Dyrskjøt, Lars</au><au>Andersen, Claus L.</au><aucorp>IMPROVE Study Grp</aucorp><aucorp>IMPROVE study group</aucorp><aucorp>The IMPROVE Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of surgical trauma on circulating free DNA levels in cancer patients—implications for studies of circulating tumor DNA</atitle><jtitle>Molecular oncology</jtitle><stitle>MOL ONCOL</stitle><addtitle>Mol Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1670</spage><epage>1679</epage><pages>1670-1679</pages><issn>1574-7891</issn><eissn>1878-0261</eissn><abstract>Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) post‐treatment is an emerging marker of residual disease. ctDNA constitutes only a minor fraction of the cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) circulating in cancer patients, complicating ctDNA detection. This is exacerbated by trauma‐induced cfDNA. To guide optimal blood sample timing, we investigated the duration and magnitude of surgical trauma‐induced cfDNA in patients with colorectal or bladder cancer. DNA levels were quantified in paired plasma samples collected before and up to 6 weeks after surgery from 436 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer. To assess whether trauma‐induced cfDNA fragments are longer than ordinary cfDNA fragments, the concentration of short (&lt; 1 kb) and long (&gt; 1 kb) fragments was determined for 91 patients. Previously reported ctDNA data from 91 patients with colorectal cancer and 47 patients with bladder cancer were used to assess how trauma‐induced DNA affects ctDNA detection. The total cfDNA level increased postoperatively—both in patients with colorectal cancer (mean threefold) and bladder cancer (mean eightfold). The DNA levels were significantly increased up to 4 weeks after surgery in both patient cohorts (P = 0.0005 and P ≤ 0.0001). The concentration of short, but not long, cfDNA fragments increased postoperatively. Of 25 patients with radiological relapse, eight were ctDNA‐positive and 17 were ctDNA‐negative in the period with trauma‐induced DNA. Analysis of longitudinal samples revealed that five of the negative patients became positive shortly after the release of trauma‐induced cfDNA had ceased. In conclusion, surgery was associated with elevated cfDNA levels, persisting up to 4 weeks, which may have masked ctDNA in relapse patients. Trauma‐induced cfDNA was of similar size to ordinary cfDNA. To mitigate the impact of trauma‐induced cfDNA on ctDNA detection, it is recommended that a second blood sample collected after week 4 is analyzed for patients initially ctDNA negative. We studied the change in circulating DNA levels resulting from cancer surgery. Surgical trauma caused an increase in the level of circulating DNA, which persisted up to 4 weeks after surgery. Detection of circulating tumor DNA after surgery was hampered by increased circulating DNA levels.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>32471011</pmid><doi>10.1002/1878-0261.12729</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7406-2103</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8541-1735</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5787-8901</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4835-4804</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-9851</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1574-7891
ispartof Molecular oncology, 2020-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1670-1679
issn 1574-7891
1878-0261
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_32471011
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Bladder cancer
Cancer
Cancer surgery
cell‐free DNA
Chemotherapy
circulating tumor DNA
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Invasiveness
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
Patients
Plasma
Science & Technology
Studies
Surgery
Trauma
title The effect of surgical trauma on circulating free DNA levels in cancer patients—implications for studies of circulating tumor DNA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T10%3A07%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20surgical%20trauma%20on%20circulating%20free%20DNA%20levels%20in%20cancer%20patients%E2%80%94implications%20for%20studies%20of%20circulating%20tumor%20DNA&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20oncology&rft.au=Henriksen,%20Tenna%20V.&rft.aucorp=IMPROVE%20Study%20Grp&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1670&rft.epage=1679&rft.pages=1670-1679&rft.issn=1574-7891&rft.eissn=1878-0261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1878-0261.12729&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2408205006%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430049365&rft_id=info:pmid/32471011&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1a0853f72d514abf8dadcf4dce6648a3&rfr_iscdi=true