Association of preceding psychosis risk states and non‐psychotic mental disorders with incidence of clinical psychosis in the general population: a prospective study in the NEMESIS‐2 cohort

The validity and clinical utility of the concept of “clinical high risk” (CHR) for psychosis have so far been investigated only in risk‐enriched samples in clinical settings. In this population‐based prospective study, we aimed – for the first time – to assess the incidence rate of clinical psychosi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World psychiatry 2020-06, Vol.19 (2), p.199-205
Hauptverfasser: Guloksuz, Sinan, Pries, Lotta‐Katrin, Have, Margreet, Graaf, Ron, Dorsselaer, Saskia, Klingenberg, Boris, Bak, Maarten, Lin, Bochao D., Eijk, Kristel R., Delespaul, Philippe, Amelsvoort, Therese, Luykx, Jurjen J., Rutten, Bart P.F., Os, Jim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title World psychiatry
container_volume 19
creator Guloksuz, Sinan
Pries, Lotta‐Katrin
Have, Margreet
Graaf, Ron
Dorsselaer, Saskia
Klingenberg, Boris
Bak, Maarten
Lin, Bochao D.
Eijk, Kristel R.
Delespaul, Philippe
Amelsvoort, Therese
Luykx, Jurjen J.
Rutten, Bart P.F.
Os, Jim
description The validity and clinical utility of the concept of “clinical high risk” (CHR) for psychosis have so far been investigated only in risk‐enriched samples in clinical settings. In this population‐based prospective study, we aimed – for the first time – to assess the incidence rate of clinical psychosis and es­timate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of that incidence for preceding psychosis risk states and DSM‐IV diagnoses of non‐psychotic mental disorders (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol use disorders, and drug use disorders). All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and education. The incidence rate of clinical psychosis was 63.0 per 100,000 person‐years. The mutually‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards model indicated that preceding diagnoses of mood disorders (hazard ratio, HR=10.67, 95% CI: 3.12‐36.49), psychosis high‐risk state (HR=7.86, 95% CI: 2.76‐22.42) and drug use disorders (HR=5.33, 95% CI: 1.61‐17.64) were associated with an increased risk for clinical psychosis incidence. Of the clinical psychosis incidence in the population, 85.5% (95% CI: 64.6‐94.1) was attributable to prior psychopathology, with mood disorders (PAF=66.2, 95% CI: 33.4‐82.9), psychosis high‐risk state (PAF=36.9, 95% CI: 11.3‐55.1), and drug use disorders (PAF=18.7, 95% CI: –0.9 to 34.6) as the most important factors. Although the psychosis high‐risk state displayed a high relative risk for clinical psychosis outcome even after adjusting for other psychopathology, the PAF was comparatively low, given the low prevalence of psychosis high‐risk states in the population. These findings provide empirical evidence for the “prevention paradox” of targeted CHR early intervention. A comprehensive prevention strategy with a focus on broader psychopathology may be more effective than the current psychosis‐focused approach for achieving population‐based improvements in prevention of psychotic disorders.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wps.20755
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32394548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2401805477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-c83034e10ac66e89845f2e1a43c175dd9e3cf719546136b76cbbf27c9114544f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2xgkdaO7ThhgVRVA1QqF2lALC2PczLjkrGD7XQ0Ox6BV-JVeBI8TVsuEisvzqfv_D76EXpMyRElpDzeDvGoJFKIO2hWEkELIbi4i2ZUlqyoKyoP0IMYLwjhoqnlfXTAStZwwesZ-nESozdWJ-sd9h0eAhhorVvhIe7M2kcbcbDxC45JJ4hYuxY7735--z7NkzV4Ay7pHrc2-tBCiHhr0xpbZ2wLzsBea3rrrMnQb6t1OK0Br8BB2A_8MPZXMV5gnWP4OIBJ9hLy5rHd3eDv5m_ni7NF3l9i49c-pIfoXqf7CI-u30P06dX84-mb4vz967PTk_PCcM5EYWpGGAdKtKkqqJuai64EqjkzVIq2bYCZTtJG8Iqyaikrs1x2pTQNpflSvGOH6OXkHcblBlqTP51zqyHYjQ475bVVf0-cXauVv1SypIIIngXPrgXBfx0hJrWx0UDfawd-jKrkhNYZlDKjT_9BL_wYXP7eniI1kxWrMvV8oky-VgzQ3YahRO2LoXIx1FUxMvvkz_S35E0TMnA8AVvbw-7_JvX5w2JS_gLC_skp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400837636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of preceding psychosis risk states and non‐psychotic mental disorders with incidence of clinical psychosis in the general population: a prospective study in the NEMESIS‐2 cohort</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Guloksuz, Sinan ; Pries, Lotta‐Katrin ; Have, Margreet ; Graaf, Ron ; Dorsselaer, Saskia ; Klingenberg, Boris ; Bak, Maarten ; Lin, Bochao D. ; Eijk, Kristel R. ; Delespaul, Philippe ; Amelsvoort, Therese ; Luykx, Jurjen J. ; Rutten, Bart P.F. ; Os, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Guloksuz, Sinan ; Pries, Lotta‐Katrin ; Have, Margreet ; Graaf, Ron ; Dorsselaer, Saskia ; Klingenberg, Boris ; Bak, Maarten ; Lin, Bochao D. ; Eijk, Kristel R. ; Delespaul, Philippe ; Amelsvoort, Therese ; Luykx, Jurjen J. ; Rutten, Bart P.F. ; Os, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>The validity and clinical utility of the concept of “clinical high risk” (CHR) for psychosis have so far been investigated only in risk‐enriched samples in clinical settings. In this population‐based prospective study, we aimed – for the first time – to assess the incidence rate of clinical psychosis and es­timate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of that incidence for preceding psychosis risk states and DSM‐IV diagnoses of non‐psychotic mental disorders (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol use disorders, and drug use disorders). All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and education. The incidence rate of clinical psychosis was 63.0 per 100,000 person‐years. The mutually‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards model indicated that preceding diagnoses of mood disorders (hazard ratio, HR=10.67, 95% CI: 3.12‐36.49), psychosis high‐risk state (HR=7.86, 95% CI: 2.76‐22.42) and drug use disorders (HR=5.33, 95% CI: 1.61‐17.64) were associated with an increased risk for clinical psychosis incidence. Of the clinical psychosis incidence in the population, 85.5% (95% CI: 64.6‐94.1) was attributable to prior psychopathology, with mood disorders (PAF=66.2, 95% CI: 33.4‐82.9), psychosis high‐risk state (PAF=36.9, 95% CI: 11.3‐55.1), and drug use disorders (PAF=18.7, 95% CI: –0.9 to 34.6) as the most important factors. Although the psychosis high‐risk state displayed a high relative risk for clinical psychosis outcome even after adjusting for other psychopathology, the PAF was comparatively low, given the low prevalence of psychosis high‐risk states in the population. These findings provide empirical evidence for the “prevention paradox” of targeted CHR early intervention. A comprehensive prevention strategy with a focus on broader psychopathology may be more effective than the current psychosis‐focused approach for achieving population‐based improvements in prevention of psychotic disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1723-8617</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-5545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wps.20755</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32394548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>at risk mental states ; clinical high risk ; Cohort analysis ; Drug use ; drug use disorders ; early intervention ; Emotional disorders ; Mental disorders ; Mood disorders ; Population ; prevention ; Psychopathology ; Psychosis ; Research Reports ; ultra‐high risk</subject><ispartof>World psychiatry, 2020-06, Vol.19 (2), p.199-205</ispartof><rights>2020 World Psychiatric Association</rights><rights>2020 World Psychiatric Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-c83034e10ac66e89845f2e1a43c175dd9e3cf719546136b76cbbf27c9114544f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-c83034e10ac66e89845f2e1a43c175dd9e3cf719546136b76cbbf27c9114544f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215054/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7215054/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1427,27901,27902,46384,46808,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32394548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guloksuz, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pries, Lotta‐Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Have, Margreet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorsselaer, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingenberg, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bochao D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijk, Kristel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delespaul, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amelsvoort, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luykx, Jurjen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutten, Bart P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Os, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>Association of preceding psychosis risk states and non‐psychotic mental disorders with incidence of clinical psychosis in the general population: a prospective study in the NEMESIS‐2 cohort</title><title>World psychiatry</title><addtitle>World Psychiatry</addtitle><description>The validity and clinical utility of the concept of “clinical high risk” (CHR) for psychosis have so far been investigated only in risk‐enriched samples in clinical settings. In this population‐based prospective study, we aimed – for the first time – to assess the incidence rate of clinical psychosis and es­timate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of that incidence for preceding psychosis risk states and DSM‐IV diagnoses of non‐psychotic mental disorders (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol use disorders, and drug use disorders). All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and education. The incidence rate of clinical psychosis was 63.0 per 100,000 person‐years. The mutually‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards model indicated that preceding diagnoses of mood disorders (hazard ratio, HR=10.67, 95% CI: 3.12‐36.49), psychosis high‐risk state (HR=7.86, 95% CI: 2.76‐22.42) and drug use disorders (HR=5.33, 95% CI: 1.61‐17.64) were associated with an increased risk for clinical psychosis incidence. Of the clinical psychosis incidence in the population, 85.5% (95% CI: 64.6‐94.1) was attributable to prior psychopathology, with mood disorders (PAF=66.2, 95% CI: 33.4‐82.9), psychosis high‐risk state (PAF=36.9, 95% CI: 11.3‐55.1), and drug use disorders (PAF=18.7, 95% CI: –0.9 to 34.6) as the most important factors. Although the psychosis high‐risk state displayed a high relative risk for clinical psychosis outcome even after adjusting for other psychopathology, the PAF was comparatively low, given the low prevalence of psychosis high‐risk states in the population. These findings provide empirical evidence for the “prevention paradox” of targeted CHR early intervention. A comprehensive prevention strategy with a focus on broader psychopathology may be more effective than the current psychosis‐focused approach for achieving population‐based improvements in prevention of psychotic disorders.</description><subject>at risk mental states</subject><subject>clinical high risk</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>drug use disorders</subject><subject>early intervention</subject><subject>Emotional disorders</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>ultra‐high risk</subject><issn>1723-8617</issn><issn>2051-5545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgS2xgkdaO7ThhgVRVA1QqF2lALC2PczLjkrGD7XQ0Ox6BV-JVeBI8TVsuEisvzqfv_D76EXpMyRElpDzeDvGoJFKIO2hWEkELIbi4i2ZUlqyoKyoP0IMYLwjhoqnlfXTAStZwwesZ-nESozdWJ-sd9h0eAhhorVvhIe7M2kcbcbDxC45JJ4hYuxY7735--z7NkzV4Ay7pHrc2-tBCiHhr0xpbZ2wLzsBea3rrrMnQb6t1OK0Br8BB2A_8MPZXMV5gnWP4OIBJ9hLy5rHd3eDv5m_ni7NF3l9i49c-pIfoXqf7CI-u30P06dX84-mb4vz967PTk_PCcM5EYWpGGAdKtKkqqJuai64EqjkzVIq2bYCZTtJG8Iqyaikrs1x2pTQNpflSvGOH6OXkHcblBlqTP51zqyHYjQ475bVVf0-cXauVv1SypIIIngXPrgXBfx0hJrWx0UDfawd-jKrkhNYZlDKjT_9BL_wYXP7eniI1kxWrMvV8oky-VgzQ3YahRO2LoXIx1FUxMvvkz_S35E0TMnA8AVvbw-7_JvX5w2JS_gLC_skp</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Guloksuz, Sinan</creator><creator>Pries, Lotta‐Katrin</creator><creator>Have, Margreet</creator><creator>Graaf, Ron</creator><creator>Dorsselaer, Saskia</creator><creator>Klingenberg, Boris</creator><creator>Bak, Maarten</creator><creator>Lin, Bochao D.</creator><creator>Eijk, Kristel R.</creator><creator>Delespaul, Philippe</creator><creator>Amelsvoort, Therese</creator><creator>Luykx, Jurjen J.</creator><creator>Rutten, Bart P.F.</creator><creator>Os, Jim</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Association of preceding psychosis risk states and non‐psychotic mental disorders with incidence of clinical psychosis in the general population: a prospective study in the NEMESIS‐2 cohort</title><author>Guloksuz, Sinan ; Pries, Lotta‐Katrin ; Have, Margreet ; Graaf, Ron ; Dorsselaer, Saskia ; Klingenberg, Boris ; Bak, Maarten ; Lin, Bochao D. ; Eijk, Kristel R. ; Delespaul, Philippe ; Amelsvoort, Therese ; Luykx, Jurjen J. ; Rutten, Bart P.F. ; Os, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4435-c83034e10ac66e89845f2e1a43c175dd9e3cf719546136b76cbbf27c9114544f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>at risk mental states</topic><topic>clinical high risk</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>drug use disorders</topic><topic>early intervention</topic><topic>Emotional disorders</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>ultra‐high risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guloksuz, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pries, Lotta‐Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Have, Margreet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graaf, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorsselaer, Saskia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingenberg, Boris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bak, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Bochao D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijk, Kristel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delespaul, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amelsvoort, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luykx, Jurjen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutten, Bart P.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Os, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guloksuz, Sinan</au><au>Pries, Lotta‐Katrin</au><au>Have, Margreet</au><au>Graaf, Ron</au><au>Dorsselaer, Saskia</au><au>Klingenberg, Boris</au><au>Bak, Maarten</au><au>Lin, Bochao D.</au><au>Eijk, Kristel R.</au><au>Delespaul, Philippe</au><au>Amelsvoort, Therese</au><au>Luykx, Jurjen J.</au><au>Rutten, Bart P.F.</au><au>Os, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of preceding psychosis risk states and non‐psychotic mental disorders with incidence of clinical psychosis in the general population: a prospective study in the NEMESIS‐2 cohort</atitle><jtitle>World psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>World Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>199-205</pages><issn>1723-8617</issn><eissn>2051-5545</eissn><abstract>The validity and clinical utility of the concept of “clinical high risk” (CHR) for psychosis have so far been investigated only in risk‐enriched samples in clinical settings. In this population‐based prospective study, we aimed – for the first time – to assess the incidence rate of clinical psychosis and es­timate the population attributable fraction (PAF) of that incidence for preceding psychosis risk states and DSM‐IV diagnoses of non‐psychotic mental disorders (mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol use disorders, and drug use disorders). All analyses were adjusted for age, gender and education. The incidence rate of clinical psychosis was 63.0 per 100,000 person‐years. The mutually‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards model indicated that preceding diagnoses of mood disorders (hazard ratio, HR=10.67, 95% CI: 3.12‐36.49), psychosis high‐risk state (HR=7.86, 95% CI: 2.76‐22.42) and drug use disorders (HR=5.33, 95% CI: 1.61‐17.64) were associated with an increased risk for clinical psychosis incidence. Of the clinical psychosis incidence in the population, 85.5% (95% CI: 64.6‐94.1) was attributable to prior psychopathology, with mood disorders (PAF=66.2, 95% CI: 33.4‐82.9), psychosis high‐risk state (PAF=36.9, 95% CI: 11.3‐55.1), and drug use disorders (PAF=18.7, 95% CI: –0.9 to 34.6) as the most important factors. Although the psychosis high‐risk state displayed a high relative risk for clinical psychosis outcome even after adjusting for other psychopathology, the PAF was comparatively low, given the low prevalence of psychosis high‐risk states in the population. These findings provide empirical evidence for the “prevention paradox” of targeted CHR early intervention. A comprehensive prevention strategy with a focus on broader psychopathology may be more effective than the current psychosis‐focused approach for achieving population‐based improvements in prevention of psychotic disorders.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32394548</pmid><doi>10.1002/wps.20755</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1723-8617
ispartof World psychiatry, 2020-06, Vol.19 (2), p.199-205
issn 1723-8617
2051-5545
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_32394548
source Wiley Online Library Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects at risk mental states
clinical high risk
Cohort analysis
Drug use
drug use disorders
early intervention
Emotional disorders
Mental disorders
Mood disorders
Population
prevention
Psychopathology
Psychosis
Research Reports
ultra‐high risk
title Association of preceding psychosis risk states and non‐psychotic mental disorders with incidence of clinical psychosis in the general population: a prospective study in the NEMESIS‐2 cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20preceding%20psychosis%20risk%20states%20and%20non%E2%80%90psychotic%20mental%20disorders%20with%20incidence%20of%20clinical%20psychosis%20in%20the%20general%20population:%20a%20prospective%20study%20in%20the%20NEMESIS%E2%80%902%20cohort&rft.jtitle=World%20psychiatry&rft.au=Guloksuz,%20Sinan&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=199-205&rft.issn=1723-8617&rft.eissn=2051-5545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wps.20755&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2401805477%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400837636&rft_id=info:pmid/32394548&rfr_iscdi=true