FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION

Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glau...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Survey of ophthalmology 2020-04
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Rongrong, Racette, Lyne, Chen, Kelly S, Johnson, Chris A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Survey of ophthalmology
container_volume
creator Hu, Rongrong
Racette, Lyne
Chen, Kelly S
Johnson, Chris A
description Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32348798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32348798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_323487983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYFA0NNAzNDA008_SKy4tKssvyCjJSMzRMzIwMtAzMNEzMDBhYuA0tDC31DU2NjDhYOAqLs4yAIoaW5qzM3AYGxmbAOUsOBlc3UL9nEM8_f0cfRQcg4Ndg4N9Xf1CFPzdFNx9HEOd_X0dFQKC_N2DgBJARVYKQNX-Ya5Bnn7uyOI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptBzs01xNlDt6A0KTc1Jb6gKDM3sagyHmavMUEFAKWrO28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hu, Rongrong ; Racette, Lyne ; Chen, Kelly S ; Johnson, Chris A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rongrong ; Racette, Lyne ; Chen, Kelly S ; Johnson, Chris A</creatorcontrib><description>Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32348798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Survey of ophthalmology, 2020-04</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rongrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racette, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kelly S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Chris A</creatorcontrib><title>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</title><title>Survey of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Surv Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.</description><issn>1879-3304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYFA0NNAzNDA008_SKy4tKssvyCjJSMzRMzIwMtAzMNEzMDBhYuA0tDC31DU2NjDhYOAqLs4yAIoaW5qzM3AYGxmbAOUsOBlc3UL9nEM8_f0cfRQcg4Ndg4N9Xf1CFPzdFNx9HEOd_X0dFQKC_N2DgBJARVYKQNX-Ya5Bnn7uyOI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptBzs01xNlDt6A0KTc1Jb6gKDM3sagyHmavMUEFAKWrO28</recordid><startdate>20200426</startdate><enddate>20200426</enddate><creator>Hu, Rongrong</creator><creator>Racette, Lyne</creator><creator>Chen, Kelly S</creator><creator>Johnson, Chris A</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200426</creationdate><title>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</title><author>Hu, Rongrong ; Racette, Lyne ; Chen, Kelly S ; Johnson, Chris A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_323487983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rongrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racette, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kelly S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Chris A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Survey of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Rongrong</au><au>Racette, Lyne</au><au>Chen, Kelly S</au><au>Johnson, Chris A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</atitle><jtitle>Survey of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Surv Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2020-04-26</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>1879-3304</eissn><abstract>Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32348798</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1879-3304
ispartof Survey of ophthalmology, 2020-04
issn 1879-3304
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_32348798
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T01%3A14%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FUNCTIONAL%20ASSESSMENT%20OF%20GLAUCOMA%20PROGRESSION:%20UNCOVERING%20PROGRESSION&rft.jtitle=Survey%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Hu,%20Rongrong&rft.date=2020-04-26&rft.eissn=1879-3304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E32348798%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32348798&rfr_iscdi=true