FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION
Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glau...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Survey of ophthalmology 2020-04 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Survey of ophthalmology |
container_volume | |
creator | Hu, Rongrong Racette, Lyne Chen, Kelly S Johnson, Chris A |
description | Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32348798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32348798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_323487983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYFA0NNAzNDA008_SKy4tKssvyCjJSMzRMzIwMtAzMNEzMDBhYuA0tDC31DU2NjDhYOAqLs4yAIoaW5qzM3AYGxmbAOUsOBlc3UL9nEM8_f0cfRQcg4Ndg4N9Xf1CFPzdFNx9HEOd_X0dFQKC_N2DgBJARVYKQNX-Ya5Bnn7uyOI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptBzs01xNlDt6A0KTc1Jb6gKDM3sagyHmavMUEFAKWrO28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hu, Rongrong ; Racette, Lyne ; Chen, Kelly S ; Johnson, Chris A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rongrong ; Racette, Lyne ; Chen, Kelly S ; Johnson, Chris A</creatorcontrib><description>Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32348798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Survey of ophthalmology, 2020-04</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rongrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racette, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kelly S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Chris A</creatorcontrib><title>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</title><title>Survey of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Surv Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.</description><issn>1879-3304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYFA0NNAzNDA008_SKy4tKssvyCjJSMzRMzIwMtAzMNEzMDBhYuA0tDC31DU2NjDhYOAqLs4yAIoaW5qzM3AYGxmbAOUsOBlc3UL9nEM8_f0cfRQcg4Ndg4N9Xf1CFPzdFNx9HEOd_X0dFQKC_N2DgBJARVYKQNX-Ya5Bnn7uyOI8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptBzs01xNlDt6A0KTc1Jb6gKDM3sagyHmavMUEFAKWrO28</recordid><startdate>20200426</startdate><enddate>20200426</enddate><creator>Hu, Rongrong</creator><creator>Racette, Lyne</creator><creator>Chen, Kelly S</creator><creator>Johnson, Chris A</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200426</creationdate><title>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</title><author>Hu, Rongrong ; Racette, Lyne ; Chen, Kelly S ; Johnson, Chris A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_323487983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rongrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Racette, Lyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Kelly S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Chris A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Survey of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Rongrong</au><au>Racette, Lyne</au><au>Chen, Kelly S</au><au>Johnson, Chris A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION</atitle><jtitle>Survey of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Surv Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2020-04-26</date><risdate>2020</risdate><eissn>1879-3304</eissn><abstract>Clinicians who manage glaucoma patients carefully monitor the visual field to determine if treatments are effective or interventions are needed. Visual field tests may reflect disease progression or variability among examinations. We describe the approaches and perimetric tests used to evaluate glaucomatous visual field progression and factors that are important for identifying progression. These include stimulus size, which area of the visual field to assess (central versus peripheral), and the testing frequency, which is important to detect change early while minimizing patient testing burden. We also review the different statistical methods developed to identify change. These include trend- and event-based analyses, parametric and non-parametric tests, population-based versus individualized approaches, as well as pointwise and global analyses. We hope this information will prove useful and important to enhance the management of glaucoma patients. Overall, analysis procedures based on series of at least 5 to 6 examinations that require confirmation and persistence of changes, that are guided by the pattern and shape of the glaucomatous visual field deficits, and that are consistent with structural defects provide the best clinical performance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32348798</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1879-3304 |
ispartof | Survey of ophthalmology, 2020-04 |
issn | 1879-3304 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_32348798 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
title | FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF GLAUCOMA PROGRESSION: UNCOVERING PROGRESSION |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T01%3A14%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FUNCTIONAL%20ASSESSMENT%20OF%20GLAUCOMA%20PROGRESSION:%20UNCOVERING%20PROGRESSION&rft.jtitle=Survey%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Hu,%20Rongrong&rft.date=2020-04-26&rft.eissn=1879-3304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.04.004&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E32348798%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32348798&rfr_iscdi=true |