Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections
The most dreaded complication of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is device infection. We sought to assess whether inadequate cleaning and sterilization of the reusable Furlow inserter may represent one of the last etiologies of infection in PP patients. We performed a prospective analysis of cul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of impotence research 2021-04, Vol.33 (3), p.291-295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 291 |
container_title | International journal of impotence research |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Yafi, Faysal A. Furr, James El-Khatib, Farouk M. van Renterghem, Koenraad Venturino, Luca Andrianne, Robert Osmonov, Daniar Ralph, David Otero, Javier Romero Sempels, Maxime Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios Lentz, Aaron Wilson, Steven K. |
description | The most dreaded complication of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is device infection. We sought to assess whether inadequate cleaning and sterilization of the reusable Furlow inserter may represent one of the last etiologies of infection in PP patients. We performed a prospective analysis of cultures of the Furlow inserter used for PP surgeries from seven centers between May 1st and June 30th, 2019. Once the Furlow was received for surgery, the surgical team inspected the device for assembly status (disassembled or not) and the presence of visible stains, pieces of tissue or discoloration on either the interior of the barrel or the plunger. Swab aerobic and anaerobic bacterial and fungal cultures were then obtained from the internal component, after removal from the external component if assembled, and after introduction and immediate removal from the external component if disassembled. A total of 83 Furlow devices were cultured. Median age of surgical instrument was 4 years (2–10 years). Methods of sterilization included autoclave, wet autoclave, steam, and Sterad. Median time from sterilization was 3 days (1–22). On initial presentation, 79 devices were disassembled (95.1%) and 4 devices were still assembled (4.9%). Three external components were discolored (3.6%), while internal components demonstrated two stains (2.4%) indicative of improper cleaning which were thought to be residual blood products. Overall, 2/83 (2.4%) devices revealed positive swab cultures for
Staphylococcus epidermidis
. Swab cultures were negative for fungi and anaerobic bacteria. This patient cohort will continue to be followed to see if device infection occurs but it is unlikely to be meaningful since contaminated Furlows were discarded. Improper cleaning and/or sterilization of the Furlow Insertion Instrument may represent a source of infection for patients undergoing PP implantation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41443-020-0256-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32203428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A658989815</galeid><sourcerecordid>A658989815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-958ed6d87475f6a183c1437505e49c162eb5b854b1fda8055070dd9fba8db41e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoModrv6A7yRgCDejOZ7Eu9KsVUo6IVeh8zMye6U7GRMMsr-ezNu1SpICIGT57zn40XoGSWvKeH6TRZUCN4QRuqVqmEP0IaKVjVSaPMQbYiRsjGGkzN0nvMtIcQQqh6jM84Y4YLpDVo-pZhn6Mv4DbCbXDjmMePocb-EsiTI2Kd4wGUP-GpJIX7H45QhlTFOuMQY3mKH55jz2AXAUMMh7o7Yx4RnmMYam6t-zV5Vx8mvheKUn6BH3oUMT-_eLfpy9e7z5fvm5uP1h8uLm6YXnJbGSA2DGnQrWumVo5r3VPBWEgnC9FQx6GSnpeioH5wmUpKWDIPxndNDJyjwLXp10q1dfF0gF3sYcw8huAniki3jmimpFFMVffEPehuXVBdSKUmFVkbre9TOBbB1oFiS61dRe6GkNvVQWamX96g9uFD2OYbl5-x_g_QE9nVLOYG3cxoPLh0tJXa12J4sttViu1pcO96i53eNLt0Bht8ZvzytADsBuX5NO0h_Jvm_6g9vObDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514869886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yafi, Faysal A. ; Furr, James ; El-Khatib, Farouk M. ; van Renterghem, Koenraad ; Venturino, Luca ; Andrianne, Robert ; Osmonov, Daniar ; Ralph, David ; Otero, Javier Romero ; Sempels, Maxime ; Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios ; Lentz, Aaron ; Wilson, Steven K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yafi, Faysal A. ; Furr, James ; El-Khatib, Farouk M. ; van Renterghem, Koenraad ; Venturino, Luca ; Andrianne, Robert ; Osmonov, Daniar ; Ralph, David ; Otero, Javier Romero ; Sempels, Maxime ; Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios ; Lentz, Aaron ; Wilson, Steven K.</creatorcontrib><description>The most dreaded complication of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is device infection. We sought to assess whether inadequate cleaning and sterilization of the reusable Furlow inserter may represent one of the last etiologies of infection in PP patients. We performed a prospective analysis of cultures of the Furlow inserter used for PP surgeries from seven centers between May 1st and June 30th, 2019. Once the Furlow was received for surgery, the surgical team inspected the device for assembly status (disassembled or not) and the presence of visible stains, pieces of tissue or discoloration on either the interior of the barrel or the plunger. Swab aerobic and anaerobic bacterial and fungal cultures were then obtained from the internal component, after removal from the external component if assembled, and after introduction and immediate removal from the external component if disassembled. A total of 83 Furlow devices were cultured. Median age of surgical instrument was 4 years (2–10 years). Methods of sterilization included autoclave, wet autoclave, steam, and Sterad. Median time from sterilization was 3 days (1–22). On initial presentation, 79 devices were disassembled (95.1%) and 4 devices were still assembled (4.9%). Three external components were discolored (3.6%), while internal components demonstrated two stains (2.4%) indicative of improper cleaning which were thought to be residual blood products. Overall, 2/83 (2.4%) devices revealed positive swab cultures for
Staphylococcus epidermidis
. Swab cultures were negative for fungi and anaerobic bacteria. This patient cohort will continue to be followed to see if device infection occurs but it is unlikely to be meaningful since contaminated Furlows were discarded. Improper cleaning and/or sterilization of the Furlow Insertion Instrument may represent a source of infection for patients undergoing PP implantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-9930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0256-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32203428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/308 ; 692/499 ; Bacterial infections ; Child, Preschool ; Complications ; Complications and side effects ; Contamination ; Etiology ; Humans ; Infections ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Penile Diseases ; Penile Implantation ; Penile prostheses ; Penile Prosthesis ; Penis ; Prospective Studies ; Prostheses ; Reproductive Medicine ; Risk factors ; rology ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Transplants & implants ; Urological surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International journal of impotence research, 2021-04, Vol.33 (3), p.291-295</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-958ed6d87475f6a183c1437505e49c162eb5b854b1fda8055070dd9fba8db41e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-958ed6d87475f6a183c1437505e49c162eb5b854b1fda8055070dd9fba8db41e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8324-2547 ; 0000-0002-0666-5105 ; 0000-0002-4726-1182</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41443-020-0256-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41443-020-0256-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32203428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yafi, Faysal A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furr, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Khatib, Farouk M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Renterghem, Koenraad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturino, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrianne, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osmonov, Daniar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, Javier Romero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempels, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lentz, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Steven K.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections</title><title>International journal of impotence research</title><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><description>The most dreaded complication of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is device infection. We sought to assess whether inadequate cleaning and sterilization of the reusable Furlow inserter may represent one of the last etiologies of infection in PP patients. We performed a prospective analysis of cultures of the Furlow inserter used for PP surgeries from seven centers between May 1st and June 30th, 2019. Once the Furlow was received for surgery, the surgical team inspected the device for assembly status (disassembled or not) and the presence of visible stains, pieces of tissue or discoloration on either the interior of the barrel or the plunger. Swab aerobic and anaerobic bacterial and fungal cultures were then obtained from the internal component, after removal from the external component if assembled, and after introduction and immediate removal from the external component if disassembled. A total of 83 Furlow devices were cultured. Median age of surgical instrument was 4 years (2–10 years). Methods of sterilization included autoclave, wet autoclave, steam, and Sterad. Median time from sterilization was 3 days (1–22). On initial presentation, 79 devices were disassembled (95.1%) and 4 devices were still assembled (4.9%). Three external components were discolored (3.6%), while internal components demonstrated two stains (2.4%) indicative of improper cleaning which were thought to be residual blood products. Overall, 2/83 (2.4%) devices revealed positive swab cultures for
Staphylococcus epidermidis
. Swab cultures were negative for fungi and anaerobic bacteria. This patient cohort will continue to be followed to see if device infection occurs but it is unlikely to be meaningful since contaminated Furlows were discarded. Improper cleaning and/or sterilization of the Furlow Insertion Instrument may represent a source of infection for patients undergoing PP implantation.</description><subject>692/308</subject><subject>692/499</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Penile Diseases</subject><subject>Penile Implantation</subject><subject>Penile prostheses</subject><subject>Penile Prosthesis</subject><subject>Penis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>rology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0955-9930</issn><issn>1476-5489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoModrv6A7yRgCDejOZ7Eu9KsVUo6IVeh8zMye6U7GRMMsr-ezNu1SpICIGT57zn40XoGSWvKeH6TRZUCN4QRuqVqmEP0IaKVjVSaPMQbYiRsjGGkzN0nvMtIcQQqh6jM84Y4YLpDVo-pZhn6Mv4DbCbXDjmMePocb-EsiTI2Kd4wGUP-GpJIX7H45QhlTFOuMQY3mKH55jz2AXAUMMh7o7Yx4RnmMYam6t-zV5Vx8mvheKUn6BH3oUMT-_eLfpy9e7z5fvm5uP1h8uLm6YXnJbGSA2DGnQrWumVo5r3VPBWEgnC9FQx6GSnpeioH5wmUpKWDIPxndNDJyjwLXp10q1dfF0gF3sYcw8huAniki3jmimpFFMVffEPehuXVBdSKUmFVkbre9TOBbB1oFiS61dRe6GkNvVQWamX96g9uFD2OYbl5-x_g_QE9nVLOYG3cxoPLh0tJXa12J4sttViu1pcO96i53eNLt0Bht8ZvzytADsBuX5NO0h_Jvm_6g9vObDY</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Yafi, Faysal A.</creator><creator>Furr, James</creator><creator>El-Khatib, Farouk M.</creator><creator>van Renterghem, Koenraad</creator><creator>Venturino, Luca</creator><creator>Andrianne, Robert</creator><creator>Osmonov, Daniar</creator><creator>Ralph, David</creator><creator>Otero, Javier Romero</creator><creator>Sempels, Maxime</creator><creator>Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios</creator><creator>Lentz, Aaron</creator><creator>Wilson, Steven K.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-2547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0666-5105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-1182</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections</title><author>Yafi, Faysal A. ; Furr, James ; El-Khatib, Farouk M. ; van Renterghem, Koenraad ; Venturino, Luca ; Andrianne, Robert ; Osmonov, Daniar ; Ralph, David ; Otero, Javier Romero ; Sempels, Maxime ; Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios ; Lentz, Aaron ; Wilson, Steven K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-958ed6d87475f6a183c1437505e49c162eb5b854b1fda8055070dd9fba8db41e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>692/308</topic><topic>692/499</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Penile Diseases</topic><topic>Penile Implantation</topic><topic>Penile prostheses</topic><topic>Penile Prosthesis</topic><topic>Penis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>rology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yafi, Faysal A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furr, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Khatib, Farouk M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Renterghem, Koenraad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venturino, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrianne, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osmonov, Daniar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otero, Javier Romero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sempels, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lentz, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Steven K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of impotence research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yafi, Faysal A.</au><au>Furr, James</au><au>El-Khatib, Farouk M.</au><au>van Renterghem, Koenraad</au><au>Venturino, Luca</au><au>Andrianne, Robert</au><au>Osmonov, Daniar</au><au>Ralph, David</au><au>Otero, Javier Romero</au><au>Sempels, Maxime</au><au>Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios</au><au>Lentz, Aaron</au><au>Wilson, Steven K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections</atitle><jtitle>International journal of impotence research</jtitle><stitle>Int J Impot Res</stitle><addtitle>Int J Impot Res</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>291-295</pages><issn>0955-9930</issn><eissn>1476-5489</eissn><abstract>The most dreaded complication of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is device infection. We sought to assess whether inadequate cleaning and sterilization of the reusable Furlow inserter may represent one of the last etiologies of infection in PP patients. We performed a prospective analysis of cultures of the Furlow inserter used for PP surgeries from seven centers between May 1st and June 30th, 2019. Once the Furlow was received for surgery, the surgical team inspected the device for assembly status (disassembled or not) and the presence of visible stains, pieces of tissue or discoloration on either the interior of the barrel or the plunger. Swab aerobic and anaerobic bacterial and fungal cultures were then obtained from the internal component, after removal from the external component if assembled, and after introduction and immediate removal from the external component if disassembled. A total of 83 Furlow devices were cultured. Median age of surgical instrument was 4 years (2–10 years). Methods of sterilization included autoclave, wet autoclave, steam, and Sterad. Median time from sterilization was 3 days (1–22). On initial presentation, 79 devices were disassembled (95.1%) and 4 devices were still assembled (4.9%). Three external components were discolored (3.6%), while internal components demonstrated two stains (2.4%) indicative of improper cleaning which were thought to be residual blood products. Overall, 2/83 (2.4%) devices revealed positive swab cultures for
Staphylococcus epidermidis
. Swab cultures were negative for fungi and anaerobic bacteria. This patient cohort will continue to be followed to see if device infection occurs but it is unlikely to be meaningful since contaminated Furlows were discarded. Improper cleaning and/or sterilization of the Furlow Insertion Instrument may represent a source of infection for patients undergoing PP implantation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32203428</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41443-020-0256-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8324-2547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0666-5105</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-1182</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-9930 |
ispartof | International journal of impotence research, 2021-04, Vol.33 (3), p.291-295 |
issn | 0955-9930 1476-5489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_32203428 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | 692/308 692/499 Bacterial infections Child, Preschool Complications Complications and side effects Contamination Etiology Humans Infections Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Penile Diseases Penile Implantation Penile prostheses Penile Prosthesis Penis Prospective Studies Prostheses Reproductive Medicine Risk factors rology Surgery Surgical outcomes Transplants & implants Urological surgery Urology |
title | Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20analysis%20of%20cultures%20from%20the%20Furlow%20insertion%20tool:%20a%20possible%20etiology%20for%20penile%20prosthesis%20infections&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20impotence%20research&rft.au=Yafi,%20Faysal%20A.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=291-295&rft.issn=0955-9930&rft.eissn=1476-5489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41443-020-0256-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA658989815%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514869886&rft_id=info:pmid/32203428&rft_galeid=A658989815&rfr_iscdi=true |