Adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Criteria for Inguinal and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer Patients—A Survey Assessment in German-speaking Countries on Behalf of the European Prospective Penile Cancer Study Group

Urologists’ adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations to perform inguinal (ILND) and pelvic (PLND) lymph node dissection in penile cancer (PC) patients is not known. To assess a German-speaking European cohort of urologists based...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology focus 2021-07, Vol.7 (4), p.843-849
Hauptverfasser: Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo, Zengerling, Friedemann, Haccius, Marlene, Lebentrau, Steffen, Schmid, Hans-Peter, Bier, Maximilian, Lenart, Sebastian, Distler, Florian A., Resch, Irene, Oelschlager, Markus, May, Matthias, Bolenz, Christian, Gratzke, Christian, Miernik, Arkadiusz, Wakileh, Gamal Anton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Urologists’ adherence to European Association of Urology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline recommendations to perform inguinal (ILND) and pelvic (PLND) lymph node dissection in penile cancer (PC) patients is not known. To assess a German-speaking European cohort of urologists based on their criteria to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients. A 14-item survey addressing general issues of PC treatment was developed and sent to 45 clinical centers in Germany (n = 34), Austria (n = 8), Switzerland (n = 2), and Italy (n = 1). Two of the 14 questions assessed the criteria to perform ILND and ipsilateral PLND. Correct responses for ILND and PLND criteria were assessed. Based on a multivariate logistic-regression-model, criteria independently predicting guideline adherence were identified. In total, 557 urologists participated in the survey, of whom 43.5%, 19.3%, and 37.2% were residents in training, certified, and in leading positions, respectively. ILND and PLND criteria were correctly identified by 35.2% and 23.9%, respectively. Of the participants, 23.3% used external sources for survey completion. The use of auxiliary tools (odds ratio [OR] 1.57; p[bootstrapped] = 0.028) and participants outside of Germany (OR 0.56; p[bootstrapped] = 0.006) were predictors of ILND guideline adherence. The number of PC patients treated yearly (p = 0.012; OR 1.06) and the use of auxiliary tools (p < 0.001; OR 5.88) were predictors of PLND adherence. Department size, healthcare status, professional status, and responsibility for PC surgery did not predict endpoints. Limitations include sample size and results in comparison with retrospective studies. Our results demonstrate overall suboptimal knowledge of the correct indications to perform ILND and PLND in PC patients among the surveyed urologists. We propose that governments and healthcare providers should be encouraged to centralize PC management. The management of inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes is crucial for the survival of penile cancer patients. Disease rarity mandates referral to clinical practice guidelines for appropriate treatment selection. Inguinal and pelvic lymph node dissections are fundamental in the management of nonmetastatic penile cancer. Owing to the rarity of the disease, treatment is not uniform and often depends on surgeons’ experience. Adherence to international guideline recommendations is strongly advised.
ISSN:2405-4569
2405-4569
DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2020.02.005