Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow‐up in a multicentre retrospective cohort

Background and Objectives To report on the outcomes and evolution of an oncoplastic mammaplasty referred to as geometric compensation mammaplasty. Methods Seventy‐three patients with malignant tumours were operated on and followed up in five centres in two countries. Preoperative markings were perfo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2020-05, Vol.121 (6), p.967-974
Hauptverfasser: Resende Paulinelli, Régis, Oliveira, Vilmar Marques, Bagnoli, Fábio, Letzkus Berríos, Jaime, Cézar Chade, Milca, Bragatto Picoli, Larissa, Dias Santos, Thauana, Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula, Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando, Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 974
container_issue 6
container_start_page 967
container_title Journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 121
creator Resende Paulinelli, Régis
Oliveira, Vilmar Marques
Bagnoli, Fábio
Letzkus Berríos, Jaime
Cézar Chade, Milca
Bragatto Picoli, Larissa
Dias Santos, Thauana
Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula
Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando
Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo
description Background and Objectives To report on the outcomes and evolution of an oncoplastic mammaplasty referred to as geometric compensation mammaplasty. Methods Seventy‐three patients with malignant tumours were operated on and followed up in five centres in two countries. Preoperative markings were performed using a Wise pattern. The resection of affected skin was geometrically compensated using another area of preserved skin. Results Mean pathological tumour size was 30.42 ± 21.98 mm. Twenty tumours (30.77%) were locally advanced and 15 (20.55%) were multicentric. Twenty‐two patients (34.38%) were submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cosmetic results were considered good or excellent in 59 cases (80.82%). Margins were positive in two cases (2.74%). Complications were partial wound dehiscence (n = 11; 15.07%), fat necrosis (n = 9; 12.33%), skin necrosis (n = 5; 6.85%), seromas (n = 5; 6.85%), enlarged scars (n = 7; 9.59%) and infection (n = 2; 2.74%). There were three cases of local recurrence (4.29%), two of bone metastasis (2.86%) and three of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (4.35%). No deaths were recorded within a mean follow‐up of 35.33 ± 28.21 months. Conclusions The technique allowed breast conservation in situations requiring a large resection of skin in difficult positions, with a high rate of free margins, correction of ptosis, satisfactory symmetry and few complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jso.25860
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_32020633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351485958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-796bec1477f9273e9e4f83f2b07d6dee9a9c2959de9f8bfb8f3b6535ab0279603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhS0EYpqBBRdAltiAIDOVOE7s2aHW8KeRegGsI8cp024ldoidafWOG8AZOQnuH2aBhMTKZdX3ql7pEfI0h4scoLjcBH9RcFHBPbLIQVaZBCnuk0XqFVlZSzgjj0LYAICUVfmQnLECCqgYW5AfK6f92KsQraaDGgZ1-Ozo1sY1_Yp-wDillvbDiC6oaL27ote3vp_3JfWGxjXSiHrt7LcZX1M_xwRjoMp11Pi-99tf33_OI7WOKjrMfdqELk5IpzTahxF1tLeYNqz9FB-TB0b1AZ-c3nPy5e315-X77Gb17sPyzU2mGWeQ1bJqUedlXRtZ1AwllkYwU7RQd1WHKJXUheSyQ2lEa1phWFtxxlULRdICOycvjnPHySfbITaDDRr7Xjn0c2gKxvNScMlFQp__hW78PLnkLlFCVJyX1Z56eaR0uilMaJpxsoOadk0OzT6lJqXUHFJK7LPTxLkdsLsj_8SSAHEEtth6E7RFp_EOSznyHAQDmSrIlzYeYln62cUkffX_0kRfnmjb4-7flpuPn1ZH778BrcPAuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388655468</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow‐up in a multicentre retrospective cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Resende Paulinelli, Régis ; Oliveira, Vilmar Marques ; Bagnoli, Fábio ; Letzkus Berríos, Jaime ; Cézar Chade, Milca ; Bragatto Picoli, Larissa ; Dias Santos, Thauana ; Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula ; Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando ; Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo</creator><creatorcontrib>Resende Paulinelli, Régis ; Oliveira, Vilmar Marques ; Bagnoli, Fábio ; Letzkus Berríos, Jaime ; Cézar Chade, Milca ; Bragatto Picoli, Larissa ; Dias Santos, Thauana ; Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula ; Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando ; Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives To report on the outcomes and evolution of an oncoplastic mammaplasty referred to as geometric compensation mammaplasty. Methods Seventy‐three patients with malignant tumours were operated on and followed up in five centres in two countries. Preoperative markings were performed using a Wise pattern. The resection of affected skin was geometrically compensated using another area of preserved skin. Results Mean pathological tumour size was 30.42 ± 21.98 mm. Twenty tumours (30.77%) were locally advanced and 15 (20.55%) were multicentric. Twenty‐two patients (34.38%) were submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cosmetic results were considered good or excellent in 59 cases (80.82%). Margins were positive in two cases (2.74%). Complications were partial wound dehiscence (n = 11; 15.07%), fat necrosis (n = 9; 12.33%), skin necrosis (n = 5; 6.85%), seromas (n = 5; 6.85%), enlarged scars (n = 7; 9.59%) and infection (n = 2; 2.74%). There were three cases of local recurrence (4.29%), two of bone metastasis (2.86%) and three of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (4.35%). No deaths were recorded within a mean follow‐up of 35.33 ± 28.21 months. Conclusions The technique allowed breast conservation in situations requiring a large resection of skin in difficult positions, with a high rate of free margins, correction of ptosis, satisfactory symmetry and few complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jso.25860</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32020633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; conservative surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Mammaplasty - methods ; mammoplasty ; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods ; mastopexy ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; oncoplastic surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Science &amp; Technology ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-05, Vol.121 (6), p.967-974</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>11</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000510830900001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-796bec1477f9273e9e4f83f2b07d6dee9a9c2959de9f8bfb8f3b6535ab0279603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-796bec1477f9273e9e4f83f2b07d6dee9a9c2959de9f8bfb8f3b6535ab0279603</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4145-8598 ; 0000-0001-6326-1660 ; 0000-0002-5606-8376 ; 0000-0002-6894-3780 ; 0000-0002-7604-2528 ; 0000-0001-7541-9373 ; 0000-0001-6263-3805 ; 0000-0002-9478-5616 ; 0000-0003-3602-3450 ; 0000-0001-9899-9278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjso.25860$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjso.25860$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,28253,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Resende Paulinelli, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Vilmar Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagnoli, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letzkus Berríos, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cézar Chade, Milca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragatto Picoli, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Santos, Thauana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo</creatorcontrib><title>Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow‐up in a multicentre retrospective cohort</title><title>Journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>J SURG ONCOL</addtitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives To report on the outcomes and evolution of an oncoplastic mammaplasty referred to as geometric compensation mammaplasty. Methods Seventy‐three patients with malignant tumours were operated on and followed up in five centres in two countries. Preoperative markings were performed using a Wise pattern. The resection of affected skin was geometrically compensated using another area of preserved skin. Results Mean pathological tumour size was 30.42 ± 21.98 mm. Twenty tumours (30.77%) were locally advanced and 15 (20.55%) were multicentric. Twenty‐two patients (34.38%) were submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cosmetic results were considered good or excellent in 59 cases (80.82%). Margins were positive in two cases (2.74%). Complications were partial wound dehiscence (n = 11; 15.07%), fat necrosis (n = 9; 12.33%), skin necrosis (n = 5; 6.85%), seromas (n = 5; 6.85%), enlarged scars (n = 7; 9.59%) and infection (n = 2; 2.74%). There were three cases of local recurrence (4.29%), two of bone metastasis (2.86%) and three of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (4.35%). No deaths were recorded within a mean follow‐up of 35.33 ± 28.21 months. Conclusions The technique allowed breast conservation in situations requiring a large resection of skin in difficult positions, with a high rate of free margins, correction of ptosis, satisfactory symmetry and few complications.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>conservative surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>mammoplasty</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</subject><subject>mastopexy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>oncoplastic surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0022-4790</issn><issn>1096-9098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2O1DAQhS0EYpqBBRdAltiAIDOVOE7s2aHW8KeRegGsI8cp024ldoidafWOG8AZOQnuH2aBhMTKZdX3ql7pEfI0h4scoLjcBH9RcFHBPbLIQVaZBCnuk0XqFVlZSzgjj0LYAICUVfmQnLECCqgYW5AfK6f92KsQraaDGgZ1-Ozo1sY1_Yp-wDillvbDiC6oaL27ote3vp_3JfWGxjXSiHrt7LcZX1M_xwRjoMp11Pi-99tf33_OI7WOKjrMfdqELk5IpzTahxF1tLeYNqz9FB-TB0b1AZ-c3nPy5e315-X77Gb17sPyzU2mGWeQ1bJqUedlXRtZ1AwllkYwU7RQd1WHKJXUheSyQ2lEa1phWFtxxlULRdICOycvjnPHySfbITaDDRr7Xjn0c2gKxvNScMlFQp__hW78PLnkLlFCVJyX1Z56eaR0uilMaJpxsoOadk0OzT6lJqXUHFJK7LPTxLkdsLsj_8SSAHEEtth6E7RFp_EOSznyHAQDmSrIlzYeYln62cUkffX_0kRfnmjb4-7flpuPn1ZH778BrcPAuQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Resende Paulinelli, Régis</creator><creator>Oliveira, Vilmar Marques</creator><creator>Bagnoli, Fábio</creator><creator>Letzkus Berríos, Jaime</creator><creator>Cézar Chade, Milca</creator><creator>Bragatto Picoli, Larissa</creator><creator>Dias Santos, Thauana</creator><creator>Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula</creator><creator>Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando</creator><creator>Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-8598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6326-1660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-8376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-3780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7604-2528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7541-9373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-3805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9478-5616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-3450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9899-9278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow‐up in a multicentre retrospective cohort</title><author>Resende Paulinelli, Régis ; Oliveira, Vilmar Marques ; Bagnoli, Fábio ; Letzkus Berríos, Jaime ; Cézar Chade, Milca ; Bragatto Picoli, Larissa ; Dias Santos, Thauana ; Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula ; Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando ; Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-796bec1477f9273e9e4f83f2b07d6dee9a9c2959de9f8bfb8f3b6535ab0279603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>conservative surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>mammoplasty</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - methods</topic><topic>mastopexy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>oncoplastic surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Resende Paulinelli, Régis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Vilmar Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagnoli, Fábio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letzkus Berríos, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cézar Chade, Milca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bragatto Picoli, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Santos, Thauana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Resende Paulinelli, Régis</au><au>Oliveira, Vilmar Marques</au><au>Bagnoli, Fábio</au><au>Letzkus Berríos, Jaime</au><au>Cézar Chade, Milca</au><au>Bragatto Picoli, Larissa</au><au>Dias Santos, Thauana</au><au>Bastos de Carvalho, Ana Paula</au><au>Jubé Ribeiro, Luiz Fernando</au><au>Freitas‐Junior, Ruffo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow‐up in a multicentre retrospective cohort</atitle><jtitle>Journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>J SURG ONCOL</stitle><addtitle>J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>967</spage><epage>974</epage><pages>967-974</pages><issn>0022-4790</issn><eissn>1096-9098</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives To report on the outcomes and evolution of an oncoplastic mammaplasty referred to as geometric compensation mammaplasty. Methods Seventy‐three patients with malignant tumours were operated on and followed up in five centres in two countries. Preoperative markings were performed using a Wise pattern. The resection of affected skin was geometrically compensated using another area of preserved skin. Results Mean pathological tumour size was 30.42 ± 21.98 mm. Twenty tumours (30.77%) were locally advanced and 15 (20.55%) were multicentric. Twenty‐two patients (34.38%) were submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cosmetic results were considered good or excellent in 59 cases (80.82%). Margins were positive in two cases (2.74%). Complications were partial wound dehiscence (n = 11; 15.07%), fat necrosis (n = 9; 12.33%), skin necrosis (n = 5; 6.85%), seromas (n = 5; 6.85%), enlarged scars (n = 7; 9.59%) and infection (n = 2; 2.74%). There were three cases of local recurrence (4.29%), two of bone metastasis (2.86%) and three of metachronous contralateral breast cancer (4.35%). No deaths were recorded within a mean follow‐up of 35.33 ± 28.21 months. Conclusions The technique allowed breast conservation in situations requiring a large resection of skin in difficult positions, with a high rate of free margins, correction of ptosis, satisfactory symmetry and few complications.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>32020633</pmid><doi>10.1002/jso.25860</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-8598</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6326-1660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5606-8376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-3780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7604-2528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7541-9373</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-3805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9478-5616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-3450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9899-9278</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4790
ispartof Journal of surgical oncology, 2020-05, Vol.121 (6), p.967-974
issn 0022-4790
1096-9098
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_32020633
source MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cohort Studies
conservative surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Mammaplasty - methods
mammoplasty
Mastectomy, Segmental - methods
mastopexy
Middle Aged
Oncology
oncoplastic surgery
Retrospective Studies
Science & Technology
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
title Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow‐up in a multicentre retrospective cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T05%3A28%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oncoplastic%20mammaplasty%20with%20geometric%20compensation:%20Evolution%20of%20the%20technique,%20outcomes%20and%20follow%E2%80%90up%20in%20a%20multicentre%20retrospective%20cohort&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Resende%20Paulinelli,%20R%C3%A9gis&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=967&rft.epage=974&rft.pages=967-974&rft.issn=0022-4790&rft.eissn=1096-9098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jso.25860&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2351485958%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388655468&rft_id=info:pmid/32020633&rfr_iscdi=true