Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost

Retrospective cohort. To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine deformity 2017-07, Vol.5 (4), p.272
Hauptverfasser: Gum, Jeffrey L, Carreon, Leah Yacat, Kelly, Michael P, Hostin, Richard, Robinson, Chessie, Burton, Douglas C, Polly, David W, Shaffrey, Christopher I, LaFage, Virginie, Schwab, Frank J, Ames, Christopher P, Kim, Han Jo, Smith, Justin S, Bess, R Shay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 272
container_title Spine deformity
container_volume 5
creator Gum, Jeffrey L
Carreon, Leah Yacat
Kelly, Michael P
Hostin, Richard
Robinson, Chessie
Burton, Douglas C
Polly, David W
Shaffrey, Christopher I
LaFage, Virginie
Schwab, Frank J
Ames, Christopher P
Kim, Han Jo
Smith, Justin S
Bess, R Shay
description Retrospective cohort. To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had complete preoperative and surgical data were identified. Patients were stratified into (1) cell saver available during surgery, but no intraoperative autologous infusion (No Infusion group), or (2) cell saver available and received autologous infusion (Infusion group). There were 427 patients in the Infusion group and 153 in the No infusion group. Patients in both groups had similar demographics. Mean autologous infusion volume was 698 mL. The Infusion group had a higher percentage of EBL relative to the estimated blood volume (42.2%) than the No Infusion group (19.6%, p < .000). Allogeneic transfusion was more common in the Infusion group (255/427, 60%) than the No Infusion group (67/153, 44%, p = .001). The number of allogeneic blood units transfused was also higher in the Infusion group (2.4) than the No Infusion group (1.7, p = .009). Total blood costs ranged from $396 to $2,146 in the No Infusion group and from $1,262 to $5,088 in the Infusion group. If the cost of cell saver blood was transformed into costs of allogeneic blood, total blood costs for the Infusion group would range from $840 to $5,418. Thus, cell saver use yielded a mean cost savings ranging from $330 to $422 (allogeneic blood averted). Linear regression showed that after an EBL of 614 mL, cell saver becomes cost-efficient. Compared to transfusing allogeneic blood, cell saver autologous infusion did not reduce the proportion or the volume of allogeneic transfusion for patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. The use of cell saver becomes cost-efficient above an EBL of 614 mL, producing a cost savings of $330 to $422. Level III.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.01.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31997291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31997291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_319972913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjUELgjAYhkcQKeUf6BD7A659M3N2Cys6Z3dZbYYyc2wu8N_Xoc69lwceHngRWgIlQGG7bknrjCSMQkYoEErTCQoZAxZDkvIARc619DPON8DTGQoSyPOM5RCiXaG0xqV4KYvr3uK99HrApWmeQuOD-qiuGUZcevtQdsQXJf1dOVz0bligaS20U9GXc7Q6Ha_FOTb-1ilZGdt0wo7V7yz5G7wBO1w6hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gum, Jeffrey L ; Carreon, Leah Yacat ; Kelly, Michael P ; Hostin, Richard ; Robinson, Chessie ; Burton, Douglas C ; Polly, David W ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; LaFage, Virginie ; Schwab, Frank J ; Ames, Christopher P ; Kim, Han Jo ; Smith, Justin S ; Bess, R Shay</creator><creatorcontrib>Gum, Jeffrey L ; Carreon, Leah Yacat ; Kelly, Michael P ; Hostin, Richard ; Robinson, Chessie ; Burton, Douglas C ; Polly, David W ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; LaFage, Virginie ; Schwab, Frank J ; Ames, Christopher P ; Kim, Han Jo ; Smith, Justin S ; Bess, R Shay ; International Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Retrospective cohort. To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had complete preoperative and surgical data were identified. Patients were stratified into (1) cell saver available during surgery, but no intraoperative autologous infusion (No Infusion group), or (2) cell saver available and received autologous infusion (Infusion group). There were 427 patients in the Infusion group and 153 in the No infusion group. Patients in both groups had similar demographics. Mean autologous infusion volume was 698 mL. The Infusion group had a higher percentage of EBL relative to the estimated blood volume (42.2%) than the No Infusion group (19.6%, p &lt; .000). Allogeneic transfusion was more common in the Infusion group (255/427, 60%) than the No Infusion group (67/153, 44%, p = .001). The number of allogeneic blood units transfused was also higher in the Infusion group (2.4) than the No Infusion group (1.7, p = .009). Total blood costs ranged from $396 to $2,146 in the No Infusion group and from $1,262 to $5,088 in the Infusion group. If the cost of cell saver blood was transformed into costs of allogeneic blood, total blood costs for the Infusion group would range from $840 to $5,418. Thus, cell saver use yielded a mean cost savings ranging from $330 to $422 (allogeneic blood averted). Linear regression showed that after an EBL of 614 mL, cell saver becomes cost-efficient. Compared to transfusing allogeneic blood, cell saver autologous infusion did not reduce the proportion or the volume of allogeneic transfusion for patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. The use of cell saver becomes cost-efficient above an EBL of 614 mL, producing a cost savings of $330 to $422. Level III.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2212-1358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2017.01.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31997291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Spine deformity, 2017-07, Vol.5 (4), p.272</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31997291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gum, Jeffrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carreon, Leah Yacat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Chessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Douglas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polly, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFage, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Frank J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Han Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Justin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bess, R Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost</title><title>Spine deformity</title><addtitle>Spine Deform</addtitle><description>Retrospective cohort. To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had complete preoperative and surgical data were identified. Patients were stratified into (1) cell saver available during surgery, but no intraoperative autologous infusion (No Infusion group), or (2) cell saver available and received autologous infusion (Infusion group). There were 427 patients in the Infusion group and 153 in the No infusion group. Patients in both groups had similar demographics. Mean autologous infusion volume was 698 mL. The Infusion group had a higher percentage of EBL relative to the estimated blood volume (42.2%) than the No Infusion group (19.6%, p &lt; .000). Allogeneic transfusion was more common in the Infusion group (255/427, 60%) than the No Infusion group (67/153, 44%, p = .001). The number of allogeneic blood units transfused was also higher in the Infusion group (2.4) than the No Infusion group (1.7, p = .009). Total blood costs ranged from $396 to $2,146 in the No Infusion group and from $1,262 to $5,088 in the Infusion group. If the cost of cell saver blood was transformed into costs of allogeneic blood, total blood costs for the Infusion group would range from $840 to $5,418. Thus, cell saver use yielded a mean cost savings ranging from $330 to $422 (allogeneic blood averted). Linear regression showed that after an EBL of 614 mL, cell saver becomes cost-efficient. Compared to transfusing allogeneic blood, cell saver autologous infusion did not reduce the proportion or the volume of allogeneic transfusion for patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. The use of cell saver becomes cost-efficient above an EBL of 614 mL, producing a cost savings of $330 to $422. Level III.</description><issn>2212-1358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjUELgjAYhkcQKeUf6BD7A659M3N2Cys6Z3dZbYYyc2wu8N_Xoc69lwceHngRWgIlQGG7bknrjCSMQkYoEErTCQoZAxZDkvIARc619DPON8DTGQoSyPOM5RCiXaG0xqV4KYvr3uK99HrApWmeQuOD-qiuGUZcevtQdsQXJf1dOVz0bligaS20U9GXc7Q6Ha_FOTb-1ilZGdt0wo7V7yz5G7wBO1w6hg</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Gum, Jeffrey L</creator><creator>Carreon, Leah Yacat</creator><creator>Kelly, Michael P</creator><creator>Hostin, Richard</creator><creator>Robinson, Chessie</creator><creator>Burton, Douglas C</creator><creator>Polly, David W</creator><creator>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creator><creator>LaFage, Virginie</creator><creator>Schwab, Frank J</creator><creator>Ames, Christopher P</creator><creator>Kim, Han Jo</creator><creator>Smith, Justin S</creator><creator>Bess, R Shay</creator><scope>NPM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost</title><author>Gum, Jeffrey L ; Carreon, Leah Yacat ; Kelly, Michael P ; Hostin, Richard ; Robinson, Chessie ; Burton, Douglas C ; Polly, David W ; Shaffrey, Christopher I ; LaFage, Virginie ; Schwab, Frank J ; Ames, Christopher P ; Kim, Han Jo ; Smith, Justin S ; Bess, R Shay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_319972913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gum, Jeffrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carreon, Leah Yacat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostin, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Chessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Douglas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polly, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffrey, Christopher I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFage, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Frank J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames, Christopher P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Han Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Justin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bess, R Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International Spine Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>Spine deformity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gum, Jeffrey L</au><au>Carreon, Leah Yacat</au><au>Kelly, Michael P</au><au>Hostin, Richard</au><au>Robinson, Chessie</au><au>Burton, Douglas C</au><au>Polly, David W</au><au>Shaffrey, Christopher I</au><au>LaFage, Virginie</au><au>Schwab, Frank J</au><au>Ames, Christopher P</au><au>Kim, Han Jo</au><au>Smith, Justin S</au><au>Bess, R Shay</au><aucorp>International Spine Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost</atitle><jtitle>Spine deformity</jtitle><addtitle>Spine Deform</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>272</spage><pages>272-</pages><eissn>2212-1358</eissn><abstract>Retrospective cohort. To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had complete preoperative and surgical data were identified. Patients were stratified into (1) cell saver available during surgery, but no intraoperative autologous infusion (No Infusion group), or (2) cell saver available and received autologous infusion (Infusion group). There were 427 patients in the Infusion group and 153 in the No infusion group. Patients in both groups had similar demographics. Mean autologous infusion volume was 698 mL. The Infusion group had a higher percentage of EBL relative to the estimated blood volume (42.2%) than the No Infusion group (19.6%, p &lt; .000). Allogeneic transfusion was more common in the Infusion group (255/427, 60%) than the No Infusion group (67/153, 44%, p = .001). The number of allogeneic blood units transfused was also higher in the Infusion group (2.4) than the No Infusion group (1.7, p = .009). Total blood costs ranged from $396 to $2,146 in the No Infusion group and from $1,262 to $5,088 in the Infusion group. If the cost of cell saver blood was transformed into costs of allogeneic blood, total blood costs for the Infusion group would range from $840 to $5,418. Thus, cell saver use yielded a mean cost savings ranging from $330 to $422 (allogeneic blood averted). Linear regression showed that after an EBL of 614 mL, cell saver becomes cost-efficient. Compared to transfusing allogeneic blood, cell saver autologous infusion did not reduce the proportion or the volume of allogeneic transfusion for patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. The use of cell saver becomes cost-efficient above an EBL of 614 mL, producing a cost savings of $330 to $422. Level III.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>31997291</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jspd.2017.01.005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2212-1358
ispartof Spine deformity, 2017-07, Vol.5 (4), p.272
issn 2212-1358
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_31997291
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
title Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A58%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cell%20Saver%20for%20Adult%20Spinal%20Deformity%20Surgery%20Reduces%20Cost&rft.jtitle=Spine%20deformity&rft.au=Gum,%20Jeffrey%20L&rft.aucorp=International%20Spine%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=272&rft.pages=272-&rft.eissn=2212-1358&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.01.005&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E31997291%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31997291&rfr_iscdi=true