Interview expectancies: awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees
Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and informati...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatry, psychology, and law psychology, and law, 2019-02, Vol.26 (1), p.150–166-166 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 166 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 150–166 |
| container_title | Psychiatry, psychology, and law |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M. Horselenberg, Robert Hubert, Josephine Vrij, Aldert van Koppen, Peter |
| description | Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and information-gathering questions. It was hypothesized that those exposed to the negative information (the expectancy) would demonstrate behaviour consistent with an increased cognitive load, and evidence was found to support this prediction. Due to the investigative nature of the information-gathering questions, it was also expected that the targets exposed to the expectancy would exhibit more of these behaviours in the investigative portion of the interview. Some behaviour was found to support this prediction (i.e. shorter responses and increased speech disturbances); however, indicators of performance altering load were not observed during this phase of the interview. These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31984070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agis.20190606011741</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2346297787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-2917d8c73f682e9000b771d926f61ed5848931d6f598dc79d032d17e54c642883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEou3CTwBF4sIli8dO_MEBFVWFVqrUC1y4WF5nsutVNg52skv_PQ7ZVgUkhGzJI_uZ1555nWWvgCyBSPIOGAUpQC0pAbmEUlYVpU-yU1CsLIBL8TTFiSkm6CQ7i3FLCCiQ5Hl2wkDJkghymn277gYMe4eHHH_0aAfTWYfxfW4OJmCHMea-yXs_YDc40-YrZyLG3HVNO2JnU7jCjdk7P4a0meZRDTG-yJ41po348rgusq-fLr9cXBU3t5-vLz7eFJYzNhRUgailFazhkqIihKyEgFpR3nDAupKlVAxq3lRK1laomjBag8CqtLykUrJF9mHW7cfVDmubXhpMq_vgdibcaW-c_v2kcxu99nvNBaeQ-rXI3h4Fgv8-Yhz0zkWLbWs69GPUlJWcKiGkSOibP9BtqrxL5WlKGVFCpZ4nqpopG3yMAZuHxwDRk3v63j09uaeP7qW8148reci6tysBtzMQdm7Q1rdtcsz5Lm7NEHVEE-xGJ2_8r3Mf1rr2brqUMeDarF2cLlSEpwEgSkiKV48UJ6If_ksoYX9Jnc9Sc545-NDWejB3rQ9NmP5VTJX8swE_ASUp3kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2230979132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interview expectancies: awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M. ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Hubert, Josephine ; Vrij, Aldert ; van Koppen, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M. ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Hubert, Josephine ; Vrij, Aldert ; van Koppen, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and information-gathering questions. It was hypothesized that those exposed to the negative information (the expectancy) would demonstrate behaviour consistent with an increased cognitive load, and evidence was found to support this prediction. Due to the investigative nature of the information-gathering questions, it was also expected that the targets exposed to the expectancy would exhibit more of these behaviours in the investigative portion of the interview. Some behaviour was found to support this prediction (i.e. shorter responses and increased speech disturbances); however, indicators of performance altering load were not observed during this phase of the interview. These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1321-8719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-1687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31984070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Routledge</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Bias ; Cognitive load ; Cognitive-behavioral factors ; expectancy effects ; Honesty ; Information gathering ; interviewee behaviour ; Interviews ; investigative interviews ; Membership ; Negative information ; Police questioning ; Speech ; stereotype activation ; truth-tellers</subject><ispartof>Psychiatry, psychology, and law, 2019-02, Vol.26 (1), p.150–166-166</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-2917d8c73f682e9000b771d926f61ed5848931d6f598dc79d032d17e54c642883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-2917d8c73f682e9000b771d926f61ed5848931d6f598dc79d032d17e54c642883</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2598-5654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6762119/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6762119/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,30976,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31984070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horselenberg, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrij, Aldert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Koppen, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Interview expectancies: awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees</title><title>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</title><addtitle>Psychiatr Psychol Law</addtitle><description>Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and information-gathering questions. It was hypothesized that those exposed to the negative information (the expectancy) would demonstrate behaviour consistent with an increased cognitive load, and evidence was found to support this prediction. Due to the investigative nature of the information-gathering questions, it was also expected that the targets exposed to the expectancy would exhibit more of these behaviours in the investigative portion of the interview. Some behaviour was found to support this prediction (i.e. shorter responses and increased speech disturbances); however, indicators of performance altering load were not observed during this phase of the interview. These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cognitive load</subject><subject>Cognitive-behavioral factors</subject><subject>expectancy effects</subject><subject>Honesty</subject><subject>Information gathering</subject><subject>interviewee behaviour</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>investigative interviews</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>Negative information</subject><subject>Police questioning</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>stereotype activation</subject><subject>truth-tellers</subject><issn>1321-8719</issn><issn>1934-1687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEou3CTwBF4sIli8dO_MEBFVWFVqrUC1y4WF5nsutVNg52skv_PQ7ZVgUkhGzJI_uZ1555nWWvgCyBSPIOGAUpQC0pAbmEUlYVpU-yU1CsLIBL8TTFiSkm6CQ7i3FLCCiQ5Hl2wkDJkghymn277gYMe4eHHH_0aAfTWYfxfW4OJmCHMea-yXs_YDc40-YrZyLG3HVNO2JnU7jCjdk7P4a0meZRDTG-yJ41po348rgusq-fLr9cXBU3t5-vLz7eFJYzNhRUgailFazhkqIihKyEgFpR3nDAupKlVAxq3lRK1laomjBag8CqtLykUrJF9mHW7cfVDmubXhpMq_vgdibcaW-c_v2kcxu99nvNBaeQ-rXI3h4Fgv8-Yhz0zkWLbWs69GPUlJWcKiGkSOibP9BtqrxL5WlKGVFCpZ4nqpopG3yMAZuHxwDRk3v63j09uaeP7qW8148reci6tysBtzMQdm7Q1rdtcsz5Lm7NEHVEE-xGJ2_8r3Mf1rr2brqUMeDarF2cLlSEpwEgSkiKV48UJ6If_ksoYX9Jnc9Sc545-NDWejB3rQ9NmP5VTJX8swE_ASUp3kQ</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Horselenberg, Robert</creator><creator>Hubert, Josephine</creator><creator>Vrij, Aldert</creator><creator>van Koppen, Peter</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Australian Academic Press Group Pty Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-5654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Interview expectancies: awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees</title><author>Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M. ; Horselenberg, Robert ; Hubert, Josephine ; Vrij, Aldert ; van Koppen, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c633t-2917d8c73f682e9000b771d926f61ed5848931d6f598dc79d032d17e54c642883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cognitive load</topic><topic>Cognitive-behavioral factors</topic><topic>expectancy effects</topic><topic>Honesty</topic><topic>Information gathering</topic><topic>interviewee behaviour</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>investigative interviews</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>Negative information</topic><topic>Police questioning</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>stereotype activation</topic><topic>truth-tellers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horselenberg, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubert, Josephine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrij, Aldert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Koppen, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams-Quackenbush, Nicole M.</au><au>Horselenberg, Robert</au><au>Hubert, Josephine</au><au>Vrij, Aldert</au><au>van Koppen, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interview expectancies: awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</jtitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Psychol Law</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>150–166</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>150–166-166</pages><issn>1321-8719</issn><eissn>1934-1687</eissn><abstract>Expectancy effects are known to influence behaviour so that what is expected appears to be true. In this study, expectancy was induced using (fabricated) information about honesty and specific group membership. Targets were tested in a non-accusatory interview environment using neutral and information-gathering questions. It was hypothesized that those exposed to the negative information (the expectancy) would demonstrate behaviour consistent with an increased cognitive load, and evidence was found to support this prediction. Due to the investigative nature of the information-gathering questions, it was also expected that the targets exposed to the expectancy would exhibit more of these behaviours in the investigative portion of the interview. Some behaviour was found to support this prediction (i.e. shorter responses and increased speech disturbances); however, indicators of performance altering load were not observed during this phase of the interview. These findings support the hypothesis that expectancy effects can noticeably alter interviewee behaviour.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>31984070</pmid><doi>10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522</doi><tpages>150–166</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-5654</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1321-8719 |
| ispartof | Psychiatry, psychology, and law, 2019-02, Vol.26 (1), p.150–166-166 |
| issn | 1321-8719 1934-1687 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31984070 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Behavior Bias Cognitive load Cognitive-behavioral factors expectancy effects Honesty Information gathering interviewee behaviour Interviews investigative interviews Membership Negative information Police questioning Speech stereotype activation truth-tellers |
| title | Interview expectancies: awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interview%20expectancies:%20awareness%20of%20potential%20biases%20influences%20behaviour%20in%20interviewees&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry,%20psychology,%20and%20law&rft.au=Adams-Quackenbush,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=150%E2%80%93166&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=150%E2%80%93166-166&rft.issn=1321-8719&rft.eissn=1934-1687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2346297787%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2230979132&rft_id=info:pmid/31984070&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agis.20190606011741&rfr_iscdi=true |