A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located cont...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Women's health issues 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.83-92 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 92 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Women's health issues |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Haider, Sadia Stoffel, Cynthia Rankin, Kristin Uesugi, Keriann Handler, Arden Caskey, Rachel |
description | Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial.
Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed.
Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07).
Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31964564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1049386719305110</els_id><sourcerecordid>2343497857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuL1TAYhosozkV_gBvJUnBac2uT6upQvAwMOsi4Dmn6lZND29QkPQf99ab0OEtxlXfxvC98T7LsFcEFwaR6dyhOe1tQTOqC0AJj8iS7JFLInDNKnqaMeZ0zWYmL7CqEA8a4pCV-nl0wUle8rPhlNu_QV3eEAe3m2Ttt9ig6dO9CnLWPy4gaN0WvDczRugnde3e0YU2NG1s7QYdONu7R7dTrKaJGe3iPdui7njo32t_Q3WwDbhgS-uCtHl5kz3o9BHh5fq-zH58-PjRf8rtvn2-b3V1uWF3FnJKuq1tueKtBy0ozTYFQISQTfWU62RvJqGgxbhnrBekFZpqUHAxPlKk4u87ebLvprJ8LhKhGGwwMg57ALUFRxhmvhSxFQsmGGu9C8NCr2dtR-1-KYLWKVgeVRKtVtCJUJdGp8_o8v7QjdI-Nv2YTIDfgBK3rg7EwGXjE1q8gdSlqmhJmjY16Fdy4ZYqp-vb_q4n-sNGQbB4teHVudNaDiapz9h93_AHnma9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343497857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Haider, Sadia ; Stoffel, Cynthia ; Rankin, Kristin ; Uesugi, Keriann ; Handler, Arden ; Caskey, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Haider, Sadia ; Stoffel, Cynthia ; Rankin, Kristin ; Uesugi, Keriann ; Handler, Arden ; Caskey, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial.
Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed.
Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07).
Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-3867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4321</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31964564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Birth Intervals ; Child, Preschool ; Contraception - methods ; Contraception Behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Care ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics & numerical data ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Unplanned ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Science & Technology ; Social Sciences ; Sterilization, Reproductive ; Time Factors ; Women's Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Women's health issues, 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.83-92</ispartof><rights>2019 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>14</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000519579200003</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,28256,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31964564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haider, Sadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoffel, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uesugi, Keriann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handler, Arden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caskey, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><title>Women's health issues</title><addtitle>WOMEN HEALTH ISS</addtitle><addtitle>Womens Health Issues</addtitle><description>Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial.
Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed.
Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07).
Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth Intervals</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Care</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Unplanned</subject><subject>Public, Environmental & Occupational Health</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sterilization, Reproductive</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Women's Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1049-3867</issn><issn>1878-4321</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuL1TAYhosozkV_gBvJUnBac2uT6upQvAwMOsi4Dmn6lZND29QkPQf99ab0OEtxlXfxvC98T7LsFcEFwaR6dyhOe1tQTOqC0AJj8iS7JFLInDNKnqaMeZ0zWYmL7CqEA8a4pCV-nl0wUle8rPhlNu_QV3eEAe3m2Ttt9ig6dO9CnLWPy4gaN0WvDczRugnde3e0YU2NG1s7QYdONu7R7dTrKaJGe3iPdui7njo32t_Q3WwDbhgS-uCtHl5kz3o9BHh5fq-zH58-PjRf8rtvn2-b3V1uWF3FnJKuq1tueKtBy0ozTYFQISQTfWU62RvJqGgxbhnrBekFZpqUHAxPlKk4u87ebLvprJ8LhKhGGwwMg57ALUFRxhmvhSxFQsmGGu9C8NCr2dtR-1-KYLWKVgeVRKtVtCJUJdGp8_o8v7QjdI-Nv2YTIDfgBK3rg7EwGXjE1q8gdSlqmhJmjY16Fdy4ZYqp-vb_q4n-sNGQbB4teHVudNaDiapz9h93_AHnma9A</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Haider, Sadia</creator><creator>Stoffel, Cynthia</creator><creator>Rankin, Kristin</creator><creator>Uesugi, Keriann</creator><creator>Handler, Arden</creator><creator>Caskey, Rachel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><author>Haider, Sadia ; Stoffel, Cynthia ; Rankin, Kristin ; Uesugi, Keriann ; Handler, Arden ; Caskey, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth Intervals</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Care</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Unplanned</topic><topic>Public, Environmental & Occupational Health</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sterilization, Reproductive</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Women's Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haider, Sadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoffel, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uesugi, Keriann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handler, Arden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caskey, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Women's health issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haider, Sadia</au><au>Stoffel, Cynthia</au><au>Rankin, Kristin</au><au>Uesugi, Keriann</au><au>Handler, Arden</au><au>Caskey, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Women's health issues</jtitle><stitle>WOMEN HEALTH ISS</stitle><addtitle>Womens Health Issues</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>83-92</pages><issn>1049-3867</issn><eissn>1878-4321</eissn><abstract>Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial.
Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed.
Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07).
Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31964564</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-3867 |
ispartof | Women's health issues, 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.83-92 |
issn | 1049-3867 1878-4321 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31964564 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
subjects | Adult Birth Intervals Child, Preschool Contraception - methods Contraception Behavior Female Humans Infant Infant Care Life Sciences & Biomedicine Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics & numerical data Postpartum Period Pregnancy Pregnancy, Unplanned Public, Environmental & Occupational Health Science & Technology Social Sciences Sterilization, Reproductive Time Factors Women's Studies Young Adult |
title | A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T02%3A27%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Novel%20Approach%20to%20Postpartum%20Contraception%20Provision%20Combined%20with%20Infant%20Care:%20A%20Randomized,%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Women's%20health%20issues&rft.au=Haider,%20Sadia&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=83-92&rft.issn=1049-3867&rft.eissn=1878-4321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2343497857%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343497857&rft_id=info:pmid/31964564&rft_els_id=S1049386719305110&rfr_iscdi=true |