A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Women's health issues 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.83-92
Hauptverfasser: Haider, Sadia, Stoffel, Cynthia, Rankin, Kristin, Uesugi, Keriann, Handler, Arden, Caskey, Rachel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 2
container_start_page 83
container_title Women's health issues
container_volume 30
creator Haider, Sadia
Stoffel, Cynthia
Rankin, Kristin
Uesugi, Keriann
Handler, Arden
Caskey, Rachel
description Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial. Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed. Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07). Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31964564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1049386719305110</els_id><sourcerecordid>2343497857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUuL1TAYhosozkV_gBvJUnBac2uT6upQvAwMOsi4Dmn6lZND29QkPQf99ab0OEtxlXfxvC98T7LsFcEFwaR6dyhOe1tQTOqC0AJj8iS7JFLInDNKnqaMeZ0zWYmL7CqEA8a4pCV-nl0wUle8rPhlNu_QV3eEAe3m2Ttt9ig6dO9CnLWPy4gaN0WvDczRugnde3e0YU2NG1s7QYdONu7R7dTrKaJGe3iPdui7njo32t_Q3WwDbhgS-uCtHl5kz3o9BHh5fq-zH58-PjRf8rtvn2-b3V1uWF3FnJKuq1tueKtBy0ozTYFQISQTfWU62RvJqGgxbhnrBekFZpqUHAxPlKk4u87ebLvprJ8LhKhGGwwMg57ALUFRxhmvhSxFQsmGGu9C8NCr2dtR-1-KYLWKVgeVRKtVtCJUJdGp8_o8v7QjdI-Nv2YTIDfgBK3rg7EwGXjE1q8gdSlqmhJmjY16Fdy4ZYqp-vb_q4n-sNGQbB4teHVudNaDiapz9h93_AHnma9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343497857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Haider, Sadia ; Stoffel, Cynthia ; Rankin, Kristin ; Uesugi, Keriann ; Handler, Arden ; Caskey, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Haider, Sadia ; Stoffel, Cynthia ; Rankin, Kristin ; Uesugi, Keriann ; Handler, Arden ; Caskey, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial. Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed. Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07). Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-3867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4321</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31964564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Birth Intervals ; Child, Preschool ; Contraception - methods ; Contraception Behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Care ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Unplanned ; Public, Environmental &amp; Occupational Health ; Science &amp; Technology ; Social Sciences ; Sterilization, Reproductive ; Time Factors ; Women's Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Women's health issues, 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.83-92</ispartof><rights>2019 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>14</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000519579200003</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,28256,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31964564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haider, Sadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoffel, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uesugi, Keriann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handler, Arden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caskey, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><title>Women's health issues</title><addtitle>WOMEN HEALTH ISS</addtitle><addtitle>Womens Health Issues</addtitle><description>Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial. Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed. Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07). Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth Intervals</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Contraception - methods</subject><subject>Contraception Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant Care</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Unplanned</subject><subject>Public, Environmental &amp; Occupational Health</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sterilization, Reproductive</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Women's Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1049-3867</issn><issn>1878-4321</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUuL1TAYhosozkV_gBvJUnBac2uT6upQvAwMOsi4Dmn6lZND29QkPQf99ab0OEtxlXfxvC98T7LsFcEFwaR6dyhOe1tQTOqC0AJj8iS7JFLInDNKnqaMeZ0zWYmL7CqEA8a4pCV-nl0wUle8rPhlNu_QV3eEAe3m2Ttt9ig6dO9CnLWPy4gaN0WvDczRugnde3e0YU2NG1s7QYdONu7R7dTrKaJGe3iPdui7njo32t_Q3WwDbhgS-uCtHl5kz3o9BHh5fq-zH58-PjRf8rtvn2-b3V1uWF3FnJKuq1tueKtBy0ozTYFQISQTfWU62RvJqGgxbhnrBekFZpqUHAxPlKk4u87ebLvprJ8LhKhGGwwMg57ALUFRxhmvhSxFQsmGGu9C8NCr2dtR-1-KYLWKVgeVRKtVtCJUJdGp8_o8v7QjdI-Nv2YTIDfgBK3rg7EwGXjE1q8gdSlqmhJmjY16Fdy4ZYqp-vb_q4n-sNGQbB4teHVudNaDiapz9h93_AHnma9A</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Haider, Sadia</creator><creator>Stoffel, Cynthia</creator><creator>Rankin, Kristin</creator><creator>Uesugi, Keriann</creator><creator>Handler, Arden</creator><creator>Caskey, Rachel</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</title><author>Haider, Sadia ; Stoffel, Cynthia ; Rankin, Kristin ; Uesugi, Keriann ; Handler, Arden ; Caskey, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-21dd9b4c4baea86a3a2e1277837f6cd8fc8327b00b33f71f703a154ec4127c643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth Intervals</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Contraception - methods</topic><topic>Contraception Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant Care</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Unplanned</topic><topic>Public, Environmental &amp; Occupational Health</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sterilization, Reproductive</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Women's Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haider, Sadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoffel, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, Kristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uesugi, Keriann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handler, Arden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caskey, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Women's health issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haider, Sadia</au><au>Stoffel, Cynthia</au><au>Rankin, Kristin</au><au>Uesugi, Keriann</au><au>Handler, Arden</au><au>Caskey, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Women's health issues</jtitle><stitle>WOMEN HEALTH ISS</stitle><addtitle>Womens Health Issues</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>83-92</pages><issn>1049-3867</issn><eissn>1878-4321</eissn><abstract>Unintended pregnancy among women with short interpregnancy intervals remains common. Women's attendance at the 4- to 6-week postpartum visit, when contraception provision often occurs, is low, whereas their attendance at well-baby visits is high. We aimed to evaluate if offering co-located contraceptive services to mothers at well-baby visits increases use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at 5 months postpartum compared with usual care in a randomized, controlled trial. Women with infants aged 4.5 months or younger who were not using a LARC method and had not undergone sterilization were eligible. Generalized linear models were used to estimate risk ratios. Likability and satisfaction of the contraception visit were assessed. Between January 2015 and January 2017, 446 women were randomized. LARC use at 5 months was 19.1% and 20.9% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, and was not significantly different after controlling for weeks postpartum (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.59–1.23). Uptake of the co-located visit was low (17.7%), but the concept was liked; insufficient time to stay for the visit was the biggest barrier to uptake. Women who accepted the visit were more likely to use a LARC method at 5 months compared with women in the control group (risk ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–3.07). Women perceived co-located care favorably and LARC use was higher among those who completed a visit; however, uptake was low for reasons including inability to stay after the infant visit. Intervention effects were possibly diluted. Future research should test a version of this intervention designed to overcome barriers that participants reported.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31964564</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-3867
ispartof Women's health issues, 2020-03, Vol.30 (2), p.83-92
issn 1049-3867
1878-4321
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_31964564
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Adult
Birth Intervals
Child, Preschool
Contraception - methods
Contraception Behavior
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant Care
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception - statistics & numerical data
Postpartum Period
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Unplanned
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Science & Technology
Social Sciences
Sterilization, Reproductive
Time Factors
Women's Studies
Young Adult
title A Novel Approach to Postpartum Contraception Provision Combined with Infant Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T02%3A27%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Novel%20Approach%20to%20Postpartum%20Contraception%20Provision%20Combined%20with%20Infant%20Care:%20A%20Randomized,%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Women's%20health%20issues&rft.au=Haider,%20Sadia&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=83-92&rft.issn=1049-3867&rft.eissn=1878-4321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.whi.2019.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2343497857%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343497857&rft_id=info:pmid/31964564&rft_els_id=S1049386719305110&rfr_iscdi=true