Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial
[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one universi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Odontology 2020-04, Vol.108 (2), p.321-330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 321 |
container_title | Odontology |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Taha, Khaled Conley, R. Scott Arany, Praveen Warunek, Stephen Al-Jewair, Thikriat |
description | [Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31912371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334700624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEolXpC7BAltiwaGDGTvzDDlWlIFViA2vLcSbFKLEvdm5VeAveGF9SWokFG3uk-c4Ze07TPEd4jQDqTUHgUraApgXoNLTwqDlGibpF3veP7-tOHTWnpYQBOo4ICvunzZFAg1woPG5-XUwT-bWwNLGF_FcXg3czuwlDdmtIsTYiW9xtmGeXfzBf-5FYpjU7f-gzF0e2o-wp3FCtXIjsLXNsF-a0nrES4vVMrae4Uj5judJpCT9pbH2Ka07zXEV-DtvUNQc3P2ueTG4udHp3nzRf3l98Pv_QXn26_Hj-7qr1nRRriwoNF6bruVPdoI2Wkxw0CjlyMxrXg_AD-ZGMFB4mM7peD8pMndZOewUkTppXm-8up-97KqtdQvFU_xkp7YvlQnQKQPKuoi__Qb-lfY71dZVSkktjECvFN8rnVEqmye5yWOrWLII9ZGa3zGzNzP7JzEIVvbiz3g8LjfeSvwlVQGxAqa14Tflh9n9tLzdV9TysNsW6Y3qQ-mtMY03AcuCVR9DANwPBsR4ChMSDmfgNCdW4-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376269911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Taha, Khaled ; Conley, R. Scott ; Arany, Praveen ; Warunek, Stephen ; Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creator><creatorcontrib>Taha, Khaled ; Conley, R. Scott ; Arany, Praveen ; Warunek, Stephen ; Al-Jewair, Thikriat ; School of Dental Medicine ; VA ; USA ; State University of New York at Buffalo ; Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering ; Engineering and Applied Sciences ; Washington ; University at Buffalo ; Private Practice ; Department of Orthodontics ; PA ; Virginia Beach</creatorcontrib><description>[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-1247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1255</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31912371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: The Society of the Nippon Dental University</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Bicuspid ; Canine teeth ; Clinical trials ; Cuspid ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Maxilla ; Medicine ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Orthodontics ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Perceptions ; Statistical analysis ; Tooth Movement Techniques ; Vibration ; Vibrations</subject><ispartof>Odontology, 2020-04, Vol.108 (2), p.321-330</ispartof><rights>The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2020</rights><rights>2020© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6857-747X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31912371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taha, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, R. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arany, Praveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warunek, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Dental Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>State University of New York at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engineering and Applied Sciences</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Private Practice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthodontics</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virginia Beach</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</title><title>Odontology</title><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><description>[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>Canine teeth</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cuspid</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Vibrations</subject><issn>1618-1247</issn><issn>1618-1255</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEolXpC7BAltiwaGDGTvzDDlWlIFViA2vLcSbFKLEvdm5VeAveGF9SWokFG3uk-c4Ze07TPEd4jQDqTUHgUraApgXoNLTwqDlGibpF3veP7-tOHTWnpYQBOo4ICvunzZFAg1woPG5-XUwT-bWwNLGF_FcXg3czuwlDdmtIsTYiW9xtmGeXfzBf-5FYpjU7f-gzF0e2o-wp3FCtXIjsLXNsF-a0nrES4vVMrae4Uj5judJpCT9pbH2Ka07zXEV-DtvUNQc3P2ueTG4udHp3nzRf3l98Pv_QXn26_Hj-7qr1nRRriwoNF6bruVPdoI2Wkxw0CjlyMxrXg_AD-ZGMFB4mM7peD8pMndZOewUkTppXm-8up-97KqtdQvFU_xkp7YvlQnQKQPKuoi__Qb-lfY71dZVSkktjECvFN8rnVEqmye5yWOrWLII9ZGa3zGzNzP7JzEIVvbiz3g8LjfeSvwlVQGxAqa14Tflh9n9tLzdV9TysNsW6Y3qQ-mtMY03AcuCVR9DANwPBsR4ChMSDmfgNCdW4-w</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Taha, Khaled</creator><creator>Conley, R. Scott</creator><creator>Arany, Praveen</creator><creator>Warunek, Stephen</creator><creator>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creator><general>The Society of the Nippon Dental University</general><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-747X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</title><author>Taha, Khaled ; Conley, R. Scott ; Arany, Praveen ; Warunek, Stephen ; Al-Jewair, Thikriat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>Canine teeth</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cuspid</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tooth Movement Techniques</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Vibrations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taha, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, R. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arany, Praveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warunek, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Dental Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>State University of New York at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engineering and Applied Sciences</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Private Practice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthodontics</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virginia Beach</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taha, Khaled</au><au>Conley, R. Scott</au><au>Arany, Praveen</au><au>Warunek, Stephen</au><au>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</au><aucorp>School of Dental Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>VA</aucorp><aucorp>USA</aucorp><aucorp>State University of New York at Buffalo</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering</aucorp><aucorp>Engineering and Applied Sciences</aucorp><aucorp>Washington</aucorp><aucorp>University at Buffalo</aucorp><aucorp>Private Practice</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Orthodontics</aucorp><aucorp>PA</aucorp><aucorp>Virginia Beach</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle><stitle>Odontology</stitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>321-330</pages><issn>1618-1247</issn><eissn>1618-1255</eissn><abstract>[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>The Society of the Nippon Dental University</pub><pmid>31912371</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-747X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-1247 |
ispartof | Odontology, 2020-04, Vol.108 (2), p.321-330 |
issn | 1618-1247 1618-1255 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31912371 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adolescents Bicuspid Canine teeth Clinical trials Cuspid Dentistry Humans Maxilla Medicine Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original Article Orthodontics Pain Pain perception Perceptions Statistical analysis Tooth Movement Techniques Vibration Vibrations |
title | Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20mechanical%20vibrations%20on%20maxillary%20canine%20retraction%20and%20perceived%20pain%20:%20a%20pilot,%20single-center,%20randomized-controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Odontology&rft.au=Taha,%20Khaled&rft.aucorp=School%20of%20Dental%20Medicine&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=321-330&rft.issn=1618-1247&rft.eissn=1618-1255&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334700624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376269911&rft_id=info:pmid/31912371&rfr_iscdi=true |