Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial

[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one universi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Odontology 2020-04, Vol.108 (2), p.321-330
Hauptverfasser: Taha, Khaled, Conley, R. Scott, Arany, Praveen, Warunek, Stephen, Al-Jewair, Thikriat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 330
container_issue 2
container_start_page 321
container_title Odontology
container_volume 108
creator Taha, Khaled
Conley, R. Scott
Arany, Praveen
Warunek, Stephen
Al-Jewair, Thikriat
description [Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31912371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334700624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEolXpC7BAltiwaGDGTvzDDlWlIFViA2vLcSbFKLEvdm5VeAveGF9SWokFG3uk-c4Ze07TPEd4jQDqTUHgUraApgXoNLTwqDlGibpF3veP7-tOHTWnpYQBOo4ICvunzZFAg1woPG5-XUwT-bWwNLGF_FcXg3czuwlDdmtIsTYiW9xtmGeXfzBf-5FYpjU7f-gzF0e2o-wp3FCtXIjsLXNsF-a0nrES4vVMrae4Uj5judJpCT9pbH2Ka07zXEV-DtvUNQc3P2ueTG4udHp3nzRf3l98Pv_QXn26_Hj-7qr1nRRriwoNF6bruVPdoI2Wkxw0CjlyMxrXg_AD-ZGMFB4mM7peD8pMndZOewUkTppXm-8up-97KqtdQvFU_xkp7YvlQnQKQPKuoi__Qb-lfY71dZVSkktjECvFN8rnVEqmye5yWOrWLII9ZGa3zGzNzP7JzEIVvbiz3g8LjfeSvwlVQGxAqa14Tflh9n9tLzdV9TysNsW6Y3qQ-mtMY03AcuCVR9DANwPBsR4ChMSDmfgNCdW4-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376269911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Taha, Khaled ; Conley, R. Scott ; Arany, Praveen ; Warunek, Stephen ; Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creator><creatorcontrib>Taha, Khaled ; Conley, R. Scott ; Arany, Praveen ; Warunek, Stephen ; Al-Jewair, Thikriat ; School of Dental Medicine ; VA ; USA ; State University of New York at Buffalo ; Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering ; Engineering and Applied Sciences ; Washington ; University at Buffalo ; Private Practice ; Department of Orthodontics ; PA ; Virginia Beach</creatorcontrib><description>[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-1247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1255</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31912371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: The Society of the Nippon Dental University</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Bicuspid ; Canine teeth ; Clinical trials ; Cuspid ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Maxilla ; Medicine ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Orthodontics ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Perceptions ; Statistical analysis ; Tooth Movement Techniques ; Vibration ; Vibrations</subject><ispartof>Odontology, 2020-04, Vol.108 (2), p.321-330</ispartof><rights>The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2020</rights><rights>2020© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6857-747X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31912371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taha, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, R. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arany, Praveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warunek, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Dental Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>State University of New York at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engineering and Applied Sciences</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Private Practice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthodontics</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virginia Beach</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</title><title>Odontology</title><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><description>[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>Canine teeth</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cuspid</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Tooth Movement Techniques</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Vibrations</subject><issn>1618-1247</issn><issn>1618-1255</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEolXpC7BAltiwaGDGTvzDDlWlIFViA2vLcSbFKLEvdm5VeAveGF9SWokFG3uk-c4Ze07TPEd4jQDqTUHgUraApgXoNLTwqDlGibpF3veP7-tOHTWnpYQBOo4ICvunzZFAg1woPG5-XUwT-bWwNLGF_FcXg3czuwlDdmtIsTYiW9xtmGeXfzBf-5FYpjU7f-gzF0e2o-wp3FCtXIjsLXNsF-a0nrES4vVMrae4Uj5judJpCT9pbH2Ka07zXEV-DtvUNQc3P2ueTG4udHp3nzRf3l98Pv_QXn26_Hj-7qr1nRRriwoNF6bruVPdoI2Wkxw0CjlyMxrXg_AD-ZGMFB4mM7peD8pMndZOewUkTppXm-8up-97KqtdQvFU_xkp7YvlQnQKQPKuoi__Qb-lfY71dZVSkktjECvFN8rnVEqmye5yWOrWLII9ZGa3zGzNzP7JzEIVvbiz3g8LjfeSvwlVQGxAqa14Tflh9n9tLzdV9TysNsW6Y3qQ-mtMY03AcuCVR9DANwPBsR4ChMSDmfgNCdW4-w</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Taha, Khaled</creator><creator>Conley, R. Scott</creator><creator>Arany, Praveen</creator><creator>Warunek, Stephen</creator><creator>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creator><general>The Society of the Nippon Dental University</general><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-747X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</title><author>Taha, Khaled ; Conley, R. Scott ; Arany, Praveen ; Warunek, Stephen ; Al-Jewair, Thikriat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-1719239452a74b8986f6b8136d29d9a503cbecde963c0f9da58b79f488a8c70e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>Canine teeth</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cuspid</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Tooth Movement Techniques</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Vibrations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taha, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conley, R. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arany, Praveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warunek, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>School of Dental Medicine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>State University of New York at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engineering and Applied Sciences</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University at Buffalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Private Practice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Orthodontics</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virginia Beach</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taha, Khaled</au><au>Conley, R. Scott</au><au>Arany, Praveen</au><au>Warunek, Stephen</au><au>Al-Jewair, Thikriat</au><aucorp>School of Dental Medicine</aucorp><aucorp>VA</aucorp><aucorp>USA</aucorp><aucorp>State University of New York at Buffalo</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Engineering</aucorp><aucorp>Engineering and Applied Sciences</aucorp><aucorp>Washington</aucorp><aucorp>University at Buffalo</aucorp><aucorp>Private Practice</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Orthodontics</aucorp><aucorp>PA</aucorp><aucorp>Virginia Beach</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Odontology</jtitle><stitle>Odontology</stitle><addtitle>Odontology</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>321-330</pages><issn>1618-1247</issn><eissn>1618-1255</eissn><abstract>[Abstract] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mechanical vibratory stimulation on maxillary canine retraction and pain perception in adolescents undergoing full-fixed orthodontic treatment with extraction. A pilot randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted in one university orthodontic clinic. Twenty-one healthy adolescents who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment with maxillary first-premolar extraction were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to the experimental group (N = 10) that used a mechanical vibration device (AcceleDent Aura, OrthoAccel Technologies, Inc.) or the control group (N = 11) that did not receive a vibration device. The evaluation timepoints were T0 = day of initial canine retraction; T1 = 4 weeks post-initiation; T2 = 8 weeks post-initiation; and T3 = 12 weeks post-initiation. Three-dimensional palatal landmark superimpositions were made to assess amount of tooth movement (mm) at each visit, monthly rate of tooth movement (mm), and perceived pain levels (VAS scores). The total amount of tooth movement was observed in the control versus experimental groups, respectively, as 1.12 +- 0.22 mm versus 1.39 +- 0.36 mm at 4 weeks (p = 0.058), 2.59 +- 0.37 mm versus 2.49 +- 0.76 mm at 8 weeks (p = 0.702), and 3.54 +- 0.23 mm versus 3.37 +- 1.37 mm at 12 weeks (p = 0.716). The rate of tooth movement was 1.21 +- 0.32 mm/month in the control and 1.12 +- 0.20 mm/month in the experimental groups, which was not statistically significant at any of the timepoints and neither was the level of pain. This study found no statistically significant differences in canine retraction and pain perception between the experimental and control groups. We propose that further optimization of accelerated tooth movement with mechanical vibration devices is necessary.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>The Society of the Nippon Dental University</pub><pmid>31912371</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-747X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1618-1247
ispartof Odontology, 2020-04, Vol.108 (2), p.321-330
issn 1618-1247
1618-1255
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_31912371
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adolescents
Bicuspid
Canine teeth
Clinical trials
Cuspid
Dentistry
Humans
Maxilla
Medicine
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Original Article
Orthodontics
Pain
Pain perception
Perceptions
Statistical analysis
Tooth Movement Techniques
Vibration
Vibrations
title Effects of mechanical vibrations on maxillary canine retraction and perceived pain : a pilot, single-center, randomized-controlled clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20mechanical%20vibrations%20on%20maxillary%20canine%20retraction%20and%20perceived%20pain%20:%20a%20pilot,%20single-center,%20randomized-controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Odontology&rft.au=Taha,%20Khaled&rft.aucorp=School%20of%20Dental%20Medicine&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=321-330&rft.issn=1618-1247&rft.eissn=1618-1255&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10266-019-00480-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334700624%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376269911&rft_id=info:pmid/31912371&rfr_iscdi=true