Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Background. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation at the lumbar spinal level evokes rhythmic muscle activation of lower-limb antagonists, attributed to the central pattern generator. However, the efficacy of noninvasive spinal stimulation for the activation of lower-limb muscles is not yet clear. T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.3-12, Article 1545968319893298 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Megía García, Alvaro Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Taylor, Julian Avendaño-Coy, Juan Gómez-Soriano, Julio |
description | Background. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation at the lumbar spinal level evokes rhythmic muscle activation of lower-limb antagonists, attributed to the central pattern generator. However, the efficacy of noninvasive spinal stimulation for the activation of lower-limb muscles is not yet clear. This review aimed to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) on motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Methods. A search for tSCS studies was made of the following databases: PubMed; Cochrane Registry; and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). In addition, an inverse manual search of the references cited by the identified articles was carried out. The keywords transcutaneous, non-invasive, electrical stimulation, spinal cord stimulation [Mesh term], and spinal cord injury were used. Results. A total of 352 articles were initially screened, of which 13 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. The total participant sample comprised 55 persons with spinal cord injury. All studies with tSCS provided evidence of induced muscle activation in the lower and upper limbs, and applied stimulation at the level of the T11-T12 and C4-C7 interspinous space, respectively. All studies reported an increase in motor response measured by recording surface electromyography, voluntary movement, muscle strength, or function. Conclusions. Although this review highlights tSCS as a feasible therapeutic neuromodulatory strategy to enhance voluntary movement, muscle strength, and function in patients with chronic spinal cord injury, the clinical impact and efficacy of electrode location and current intensity need to be characterized in statistically powered and controlled clinical trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1545968319893298 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31858871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1545968319893298</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2329738832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2ce40b1c3e4c82374a670a2d12c2f49cfa77cef1f1ebed0869884fb99bc349553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtr3DAURkVoyKvZZ1W8LAQneo6l7oJpHpAQ6CRrI8vXqQZbmkpyw_z7avAk0EChK12453xInxA6I_iCkKq6JIILtZCMKKkYVXIPHREhaLmQnH_azlyU2_0hOo5xhTFlUuEDdMiIFFJW5AitnoJ20UxJO_BTLJZr6_RQ1D50xTLZcRp0st4V2nXFg08-FD_gp27tYNO8sO4v586tprD5VlwVy01MMGbIZOW3hdfPaL_XQ4TT3XmCnq-_P9W35f3jzV19dV8azkUqqQGOW2IYcCMpq7heVFjTjlBDe65Mr6vKQE96Ai10WC6UlLxvlWoN40oIdoK-zrnr4H9NEFMz2mhgGOYnNjQ3VTEpGc0onlETfIwB-mYd7KjDpiG42TbcfGw4K1926VM7QvcuvFWagfMZeIXW99FYcAbeMYyxwDyHkjzhLS3_n653pdd-cimr5axG_QLNyk8h_0L8983_AJEDpMo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329738832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Megía García, Alvaro ; Serrano-Muñoz, Diego ; Taylor, Julian ; Avendaño-Coy, Juan ; Gómez-Soriano, Julio</creator><creatorcontrib>Megía García, Alvaro ; Serrano-Muñoz, Diego ; Taylor, Julian ; Avendaño-Coy, Juan ; Gómez-Soriano, Julio</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation at the lumbar spinal level evokes rhythmic muscle activation of lower-limb antagonists, attributed to the central pattern generator. However, the efficacy of noninvasive spinal stimulation for the activation of lower-limb muscles is not yet clear. This review aimed to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) on motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Methods. A search for tSCS studies was made of the following databases: PubMed; Cochrane Registry; and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). In addition, an inverse manual search of the references cited by the identified articles was carried out. The keywords transcutaneous, non-invasive, electrical stimulation, spinal cord stimulation [Mesh term], and spinal cord injury were used. Results. A total of 352 articles were initially screened, of which 13 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. The total participant sample comprised 55 persons with spinal cord injury. All studies with tSCS provided evidence of induced muscle activation in the lower and upper limbs, and applied stimulation at the level of the T11-T12 and C4-C7 interspinous space, respectively. All studies reported an increase in motor response measured by recording surface electromyography, voluntary movement, muscle strength, or function. Conclusions. Although this review highlights tSCS as a feasible therapeutic neuromodulatory strategy to enhance voluntary movement, muscle strength, and function in patients with chronic spinal cord injury, the clinical impact and efficacy of electrode location and current intensity need to be characterized in statistically powered and controlled clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-9683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1545968319893298</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31858871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical Neurology ; Humans ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology ; Neurosciences & Neurology ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Rehabilitation ; Science & Technology ; Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation ; Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods ; Spinal Cord Stimulation - standards</subject><ispartof>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.3-12, Article 1545968319893298</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>84</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000504545100001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2ce40b1c3e4c82374a670a2d12c2f49cfa77cef1f1ebed0869884fb99bc349553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2ce40b1c3e4c82374a670a2d12c2f49cfa77cef1f1ebed0869884fb99bc349553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8760-3490 ; 0000-0002-7521-5087 ; 0000-0003-2553-2348</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1545968319893298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1545968319893298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,315,781,785,793,21824,27927,27929,27930,28253,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858871$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Megía García, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Muñoz, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avendaño-Coy, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Soriano, Julio</creatorcontrib><title>Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review</title><title>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair</title><addtitle>NEUROREHAB NEURAL RE</addtitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><description>Background. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation at the lumbar spinal level evokes rhythmic muscle activation of lower-limb antagonists, attributed to the central pattern generator. However, the efficacy of noninvasive spinal stimulation for the activation of lower-limb muscles is not yet clear. This review aimed to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) on motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Methods. A search for tSCS studies was made of the following databases: PubMed; Cochrane Registry; and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). In addition, an inverse manual search of the references cited by the identified articles was carried out. The keywords transcutaneous, non-invasive, electrical stimulation, spinal cord stimulation [Mesh term], and spinal cord injury were used. Results. A total of 352 articles were initially screened, of which 13 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. The total participant sample comprised 55 persons with spinal cord injury. All studies with tSCS provided evidence of induced muscle activation in the lower and upper limbs, and applied stimulation at the level of the T11-T12 and C4-C7 interspinous space, respectively. All studies reported an increase in motor response measured by recording surface electromyography, voluntary movement, muscle strength, or function. Conclusions. Although this review highlights tSCS as a feasible therapeutic neuromodulatory strategy to enhance voluntary movement, muscle strength, and function in patients with chronic spinal cord injury, the clinical impact and efficacy of electrode location and current intensity need to be characterized in statistically powered and controlled clinical trials.</description><subject>Clinical Neurology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Neurosciences & Neurology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Stimulation - standards</subject><issn>1545-9683</issn><issn>1552-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtr3DAURkVoyKvZZ1W8LAQneo6l7oJpHpAQ6CRrI8vXqQZbmkpyw_z7avAk0EChK12453xInxA6I_iCkKq6JIILtZCMKKkYVXIPHREhaLmQnH_azlyU2_0hOo5xhTFlUuEDdMiIFFJW5AitnoJ20UxJO_BTLJZr6_RQ1D50xTLZcRp0st4V2nXFg08-FD_gp27tYNO8sO4v586tprD5VlwVy01MMGbIZOW3hdfPaL_XQ4TT3XmCnq-_P9W35f3jzV19dV8azkUqqQGOW2IYcCMpq7heVFjTjlBDe65Mr6vKQE96Ai10WC6UlLxvlWoN40oIdoK-zrnr4H9NEFMz2mhgGOYnNjQ3VTEpGc0onlETfIwB-mYd7KjDpiG42TbcfGw4K1926VM7QvcuvFWagfMZeIXW99FYcAbeMYyxwDyHkjzhLS3_n653pdd-cimr5axG_QLNyk8h_0L8983_AJEDpMo</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Megía García, Alvaro</creator><creator>Serrano-Muñoz, Diego</creator><creator>Taylor, Julian</creator><creator>Avendaño-Coy, Juan</creator><creator>Gómez-Soriano, Julio</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-3490</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7521-5087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-2348</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review</title><author>Megía García, Alvaro ; Serrano-Muñoz, Diego ; Taylor, Julian ; Avendaño-Coy, Juan ; Gómez-Soriano, Julio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-2ce40b1c3e4c82374a670a2d12c2f49cfa77cef1f1ebed0869884fb99bc349553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical Neurology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Neurosciences & Neurology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Stimulation - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Megía García, Alvaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serrano-Muñoz, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avendaño-Coy, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Soriano, Julio</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Megía García, Alvaro</au><au>Serrano-Muñoz, Diego</au><au>Taylor, Julian</au><au>Avendaño-Coy, Juan</au><au>Gómez-Soriano, Julio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair</jtitle><stitle>NEUROREHAB NEURAL RE</stitle><addtitle>Neurorehabil Neural Repair</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>3-12</pages><artnum>1545968319893298</artnum><issn>1545-9683</issn><eissn>1552-6844</eissn><abstract>Background. Epidural spinal electrical stimulation at the lumbar spinal level evokes rhythmic muscle activation of lower-limb antagonists, attributed to the central pattern generator. However, the efficacy of noninvasive spinal stimulation for the activation of lower-limb muscles is not yet clear. This review aimed to analyze the feasibility and efficacy of noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) on motor function in individuals with spinal cord injury. Methods. A search for tSCS studies was made of the following databases: PubMed; Cochrane Registry; and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). In addition, an inverse manual search of the references cited by the identified articles was carried out. The keywords transcutaneous, non-invasive, electrical stimulation, spinal cord stimulation [Mesh term], and spinal cord injury were used. Results. A total of 352 articles were initially screened, of which 13 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. The total participant sample comprised 55 persons with spinal cord injury. All studies with tSCS provided evidence of induced muscle activation in the lower and upper limbs, and applied stimulation at the level of the T11-T12 and C4-C7 interspinous space, respectively. All studies reported an increase in motor response measured by recording surface electromyography, voluntary movement, muscle strength, or function. Conclusions. Although this review highlights tSCS as a feasible therapeutic neuromodulatory strategy to enhance voluntary movement, muscle strength, and function in patients with chronic spinal cord injury, the clinical impact and efficacy of electrode location and current intensity need to be characterized in statistically powered and controlled clinical trials.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31858871</pmid><doi>10.1177/1545968319893298</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-3490</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7521-5087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2553-2348</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1545-9683 |
ispartof | Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.3-12, Article 1545968319893298 |
issn | 1545-9683 1552-6844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmed_primary_31858871 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Clinical Neurology Humans Life Sciences & Biomedicine Motor Activity - physiology Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology Neurosciences & Neurology Outcome Assessment, Health Care Recovery of Function - physiology Rehabilitation Science & Technology Spinal Cord Injuries - rehabilitation Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods Spinal Cord Stimulation - standards |
title | Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Motor Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T11%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcutaneous%20Spinal%20Cord%20Stimulation%20and%20Motor%20Rehabilitation%20in%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Neurorehabilitation%20and%20Neural%20Repair&rft.au=Meg%C3%ADa%20Garc%C3%ADa,%20Alvaro&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=3-12&rft.artnum=1545968319893298&rft.issn=1545-9683&rft.eissn=1552-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1545968319893298&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2329738832%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329738832&rft_id=info:pmid/31858871&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1545968319893298&rfr_iscdi=true |