Applicability of two bone age assessment methods to children from Saudi Arabia
To assess the applicability of the Greulich & Pyle (G&P) and Tanner & Whitehouse (TW3) methods to children from Saudi Arabia using both subjective (manual) rating and BoneXpert software. Bone age (BA) was assessed using the G&P and TW3 methods, firstly by independent manual rating of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical radiology 2020-02, Vol.75 (2), p.156.e1-156.e9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To assess the applicability of the Greulich & Pyle (G&P) and Tanner & Whitehouse (TW3) methods to children from Saudi Arabia using both subjective (manual) rating and BoneXpert software.
Bone age (BA) was assessed using the G&P and TW3 methods, firstly by independent manual rating of two observers, followed by a single observer using the BoneXpert software program. In total, 420 hand trauma radiographs for Saudi Arabians (220 males, 329 left, age range 1–18 years) performed in the period January 2012 to September 2016 were assessed. Paired sample t test was used to compare the difference between mean BA and mean chronological age (CA) and to compare the difference between manual and BoneXpert ratings. Statistical analysis was undertaken using SPSS v.25.
A statistically significant difference was found between BA and CA in males when using the G&P (mean difference –0.36±1 years, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-9260 1365-229X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.029 |