Improved homology modeling of the human & rat EP 4 prostanoid receptors

The EP prostanoid receptor is one of four GPCRs that mediate the diverse actions of prostaglandin E (PGE ). Novel selective EP receptor agonists would assist to further elucidate receptor sub-type function and promote development of therapeutics for bone healing, heart failure, and other receptor as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC molecular and cell biology 2019-08, Vol.20 (1), p.37
Hauptverfasser: Holt, Melissa C, Ho, Chi S, Morano, M Inés, Barrett, Stephen D, Stein, Adam J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title BMC molecular and cell biology
container_volume 20
creator Holt, Melissa C
Ho, Chi S
Morano, M Inés
Barrett, Stephen D
Stein, Adam J
description The EP prostanoid receptor is one of four GPCRs that mediate the diverse actions of prostaglandin E (PGE ). Novel selective EP receptor agonists would assist to further elucidate receptor sub-type function and promote development of therapeutics for bone healing, heart failure, and other receptor associated conditions. The rat EP (rEP ) receptor has been used as a surrogate for the human EP (hEP ) receptor in multiple SAR studies. To better understand the validity of this traditional approach, homology models were generated by threading for both receptors using the RaptorX server. These models were fit to an implicit membrane using the PPM server and OPM database with refinement of intra and extracellular loops by Prime (Schrödinger). To understand the interaction between the receptors and known agonists, induced-fit docking experiments were performed using Glide and Prime (Schrödinger), with both endogenous agonists and receptor sub-type selective, small-molecule agonists. The docking scores and observed interactions were compared with radioligand displacement experiments and receptor (rat & human) activation assays monitoring cAMP. Rank-ordering of in silico compound docking scores aligned well with in vitro activity assay EC and radioligand binding K . We observed variations between rat and human EP binding pockets that have implications in future small-molecule receptor-modulator design and SAR, specifically a S103G mutation within the rEP4 receptor. Additionally, these models helped identify key interactions between the EP receptor and ligands including PGE and several known sub-type selective agonists while serving as a marked improvement over the previously reported models. This work has generated a set of novel homology models of the rEP and hEP receptors. The homology models provide an improvement upon the previously reported model, largely due to improved solvation. The hEP docking scores correlates best with the cAMP activation data, where both data sets rank order Rivenprost>CAY10684 > PGE  ≈ PGE  > 11-deoxy-PGE  ≈ 11-dexoy-PGE  > 8-aza-11-deoxy-PGE . This rank-ordering matches closely with the rEP receptor as well. Species-specific differences were noted for the weak agonists Sulprostone and Misoprostol, which appear to dock more readily within human receptor versus rat receptor.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_31455205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31455205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmed_primary_314552053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjbsKwjAUQIMgtmh_Qe7kJiRpU9pZ6mNzcC_RpA9pekOSCv17HXR2Oss5nAWJeZ6zfVEIGpHE-yellLO0LBlfkShlmRCcipicLsY6fGkFHRocsJ3BoNJDP7aADYROQzcZOcIOnAxQXSGDT-CDHLFX4PRD24DOb8iykYPXyZdrsj1Wt8N5b6e70aq2rjfSzfXvnP4V3p1bOOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved homology modeling of the human &amp; rat EP 4 prostanoid receptors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Access via BioMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Holt, Melissa C ; Ho, Chi S ; Morano, M Inés ; Barrett, Stephen D ; Stein, Adam J</creator><creatorcontrib>Holt, Melissa C ; Ho, Chi S ; Morano, M Inés ; Barrett, Stephen D ; Stein, Adam J</creatorcontrib><description>The EP prostanoid receptor is one of four GPCRs that mediate the diverse actions of prostaglandin E (PGE ). Novel selective EP receptor agonists would assist to further elucidate receptor sub-type function and promote development of therapeutics for bone healing, heart failure, and other receptor associated conditions. The rat EP (rEP ) receptor has been used as a surrogate for the human EP (hEP ) receptor in multiple SAR studies. To better understand the validity of this traditional approach, homology models were generated by threading for both receptors using the RaptorX server. These models were fit to an implicit membrane using the PPM server and OPM database with refinement of intra and extracellular loops by Prime (Schrödinger). To understand the interaction between the receptors and known agonists, induced-fit docking experiments were performed using Glide and Prime (Schrödinger), with both endogenous agonists and receptor sub-type selective, small-molecule agonists. The docking scores and observed interactions were compared with radioligand displacement experiments and receptor (rat &amp; human) activation assays monitoring cAMP. Rank-ordering of in silico compound docking scores aligned well with in vitro activity assay EC and radioligand binding K . We observed variations between rat and human EP binding pockets that have implications in future small-molecule receptor-modulator design and SAR, specifically a S103G mutation within the rEP4 receptor. Additionally, these models helped identify key interactions between the EP receptor and ligands including PGE and several known sub-type selective agonists while serving as a marked improvement over the previously reported models. This work has generated a set of novel homology models of the rEP and hEP receptors. The homology models provide an improvement upon the previously reported model, largely due to improved solvation. The hEP docking scores correlates best with the cAMP activation data, where both data sets rank order Rivenprost&gt;CAY10684 &gt; PGE  ≈ PGE  &gt; 11-deoxy-PGE  ≈ 11-dexoy-PGE  &gt; 8-aza-11-deoxy-PGE . This rank-ordering matches closely with the rEP receptor as well. Species-specific differences were noted for the weak agonists Sulprostone and Misoprostol, which appear to dock more readily within human receptor versus rat receptor.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2661-8850</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31455205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Amino Acid Sequence ; Animals ; Decapodiformes ; Dinoprostone - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Dinoprostone - chemistry ; Humans ; Ligands ; Models, Molecular ; Molecular Docking Simulation ; Rats ; Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - agonists ; Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - chemistry ; Rhodopsin - chemistry ; Structural Homology, Protein</subject><ispartof>BMC molecular and cell biology, 2019-08, Vol.20 (1), p.37</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-9948-0870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31455205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holt, Melissa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morano, M Inés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Adam J</creatorcontrib><title>Improved homology modeling of the human &amp; rat EP 4 prostanoid receptors</title><title>BMC molecular and cell biology</title><addtitle>BMC Mol Cell Biol</addtitle><description>The EP prostanoid receptor is one of four GPCRs that mediate the diverse actions of prostaglandin E (PGE ). Novel selective EP receptor agonists would assist to further elucidate receptor sub-type function and promote development of therapeutics for bone healing, heart failure, and other receptor associated conditions. The rat EP (rEP ) receptor has been used as a surrogate for the human EP (hEP ) receptor in multiple SAR studies. To better understand the validity of this traditional approach, homology models were generated by threading for both receptors using the RaptorX server. These models were fit to an implicit membrane using the PPM server and OPM database with refinement of intra and extracellular loops by Prime (Schrödinger). To understand the interaction between the receptors and known agonists, induced-fit docking experiments were performed using Glide and Prime (Schrödinger), with both endogenous agonists and receptor sub-type selective, small-molecule agonists. The docking scores and observed interactions were compared with radioligand displacement experiments and receptor (rat &amp; human) activation assays monitoring cAMP. Rank-ordering of in silico compound docking scores aligned well with in vitro activity assay EC and radioligand binding K . We observed variations between rat and human EP binding pockets that have implications in future small-molecule receptor-modulator design and SAR, specifically a S103G mutation within the rEP4 receptor. Additionally, these models helped identify key interactions between the EP receptor and ligands including PGE and several known sub-type selective agonists while serving as a marked improvement over the previously reported models. This work has generated a set of novel homology models of the rEP and hEP receptors. The homology models provide an improvement upon the previously reported model, largely due to improved solvation. The hEP docking scores correlates best with the cAMP activation data, where both data sets rank order Rivenprost&gt;CAY10684 &gt; PGE  ≈ PGE  &gt; 11-deoxy-PGE  ≈ 11-dexoy-PGE  &gt; 8-aza-11-deoxy-PGE . This rank-ordering matches closely with the rEP receptor as well. Species-specific differences were noted for the weak agonists Sulprostone and Misoprostol, which appear to dock more readily within human receptor versus rat receptor.</description><subject>Amino Acid Sequence</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Decapodiformes</subject><subject>Dinoprostone - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Dinoprostone - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Models, Molecular</subject><subject>Molecular Docking Simulation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - agonists</subject><subject>Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - chemistry</subject><subject>Rhodopsin - chemistry</subject><subject>Structural Homology, Protein</subject><issn>2661-8850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjbsKwjAUQIMgtmh_Qe7kJiRpU9pZ6mNzcC_RpA9pekOSCv17HXR2Oss5nAWJeZ6zfVEIGpHE-yellLO0LBlfkShlmRCcipicLsY6fGkFHRocsJ3BoNJDP7aADYROQzcZOcIOnAxQXSGDT-CDHLFX4PRD24DOb8iykYPXyZdrsj1Wt8N5b6e70aq2rjfSzfXvnP4V3p1bOOY</recordid><startdate>20190827</startdate><enddate>20190827</enddate><creator>Holt, Melissa C</creator><creator>Ho, Chi S</creator><creator>Morano, M Inés</creator><creator>Barrett, Stephen D</creator><creator>Stein, Adam J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-0870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190827</creationdate><title>Improved homology modeling of the human &amp; rat EP 4 prostanoid receptors</title><author>Holt, Melissa C ; Ho, Chi S ; Morano, M Inés ; Barrett, Stephen D ; Stein, Adam J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmed_primary_314552053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Amino Acid Sequence</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Decapodiformes</topic><topic>Dinoprostone - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Dinoprostone - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Models, Molecular</topic><topic>Molecular Docking Simulation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - agonists</topic><topic>Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - chemistry</topic><topic>Rhodopsin - chemistry</topic><topic>Structural Homology, Protein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holt, Melissa C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morano, M Inés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Adam J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><jtitle>BMC molecular and cell biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holt, Melissa C</au><au>Ho, Chi S</au><au>Morano, M Inés</au><au>Barrett, Stephen D</au><au>Stein, Adam J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved homology modeling of the human &amp; rat EP 4 prostanoid receptors</atitle><jtitle>BMC molecular and cell biology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Mol Cell Biol</addtitle><date>2019-08-27</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><pages>37-</pages><eissn>2661-8850</eissn><abstract>The EP prostanoid receptor is one of four GPCRs that mediate the diverse actions of prostaglandin E (PGE ). Novel selective EP receptor agonists would assist to further elucidate receptor sub-type function and promote development of therapeutics for bone healing, heart failure, and other receptor associated conditions. The rat EP (rEP ) receptor has been used as a surrogate for the human EP (hEP ) receptor in multiple SAR studies. To better understand the validity of this traditional approach, homology models were generated by threading for both receptors using the RaptorX server. These models were fit to an implicit membrane using the PPM server and OPM database with refinement of intra and extracellular loops by Prime (Schrödinger). To understand the interaction between the receptors and known agonists, induced-fit docking experiments were performed using Glide and Prime (Schrödinger), with both endogenous agonists and receptor sub-type selective, small-molecule agonists. The docking scores and observed interactions were compared with radioligand displacement experiments and receptor (rat &amp; human) activation assays monitoring cAMP. Rank-ordering of in silico compound docking scores aligned well with in vitro activity assay EC and radioligand binding K . We observed variations between rat and human EP binding pockets that have implications in future small-molecule receptor-modulator design and SAR, specifically a S103G mutation within the rEP4 receptor. Additionally, these models helped identify key interactions between the EP receptor and ligands including PGE and several known sub-type selective agonists while serving as a marked improvement over the previously reported models. This work has generated a set of novel homology models of the rEP and hEP receptors. The homology models provide an improvement upon the previously reported model, largely due to improved solvation. The hEP docking scores correlates best with the cAMP activation data, where both data sets rank order Rivenprost&gt;CAY10684 &gt; PGE  ≈ PGE  &gt; 11-deoxy-PGE  ≈ 11-dexoy-PGE  &gt; 8-aza-11-deoxy-PGE . This rank-ordering matches closely with the rEP receptor as well. Species-specific differences were noted for the weak agonists Sulprostone and Misoprostol, which appear to dock more readily within human receptor versus rat receptor.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>31455205</pmid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-0870</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2661-8850
ispartof BMC molecular and cell biology, 2019-08, Vol.20 (1), p.37
issn 2661-8850
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmed_primary_31455205
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Access via BioMed Central; PubMed Central
subjects Amino Acid Sequence
Animals
Decapodiformes
Dinoprostone - analogs & derivatives
Dinoprostone - chemistry
Humans
Ligands
Models, Molecular
Molecular Docking Simulation
Rats
Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - agonists
Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype - chemistry
Rhodopsin - chemistry
Structural Homology, Protein
title Improved homology modeling of the human & rat EP 4 prostanoid receptors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20homology%20modeling%20of%20the%20human%20&%20rat%20EP%204%20prostanoid%20receptors&rft.jtitle=BMC%20molecular%20and%20cell%20biology&rft.au=Holt,%20Melissa%20C&rft.date=2019-08-27&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.pages=37-&rft.eissn=2661-8850&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E31455205%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31455205&rfr_iscdi=true